Another Obama sanctioned taxpayer funded boondoggle goes bellyup

Blythe Solar Power Project Groundbreaking
California Governor Jerry Brown and Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar among others use golden shovels to break ground in this White House Blog photo from June 17, 2011. (Photo by Tami Heilemann, Office of Communications) click image for story.

From WSJ:

The financial pipeline was cut short before engineers could begin operating the Blythe Solar Power Project, a 1,000-megawatt system with capacity to power 300,000 homes, according to the company.

The company filed for Chapter 11 protection Monday, the day after it was scheduled to make a $1 million rent payment to the U.S. Department of Interior for the acreage. Company officials said that the bankruptcy case would also protect the transmission-rights agreements it made with utilities.

“Without the [agreements], the Blythe Project would be unable to deliver electricity to market and would be rendered near, if not completely, valueless,” said Chief Operating Officer Edward Kleinschmidt in documents filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Del.

From Reuters,

April 2 (Reuters) – Solar Trust of America LLC, which holds the development rights for the world’s largest solar power project, on Monday filed for bankruptcy protection after its majority owner began insolvency proceedings in Germany.

The Oakland-based company has held rights for the 1,000-megawatt Blythe Solar Power Project in the Southern California desert, which last April won $2.1 billion of conditional loan guarantees from the U.S. Department of Energy. It is unclear how the bankruptcy will affect that project.

Solar Trust of America and several affiliates filed for protection from creditors with the U.S. bankruptcy court in Delaware. It estimated to have as much as $10 million of assets, and between $50 million and $100 million of liabilities.

Blythe is about 220 miles (354 km) southeast of Los Angeles.

“We have been working with Solar Trust of America for a couple of years in getting this project going,” David Lane, Blythe’s city manager, said in an interview. “Although the project is not in the city limits, we are the only city within 100 miles. My sense is that with the large investment in what was to have been the world’s largest solar power plant, someone somewhere will buy it and build it.”

Here’s the big PR sheet for USDOI: doi_blythe_solar_power_project

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
82 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gail Combs
April 3, 2012 5:44 pm

Peter says:
April 2, 2012 at 9:13 pm
If you start a bunch of projects, some projects will always fail. However, some projects will succeed…
____________________________________
Fine I am all for capitalism but sucking down tax payer dollars is not capitalism it is a scam. The rule of thumb is 80% of start-ups fail. Why should I have to risk my capital when I start a small business but these jokers do not.
Speaking of Earth Day and scams, Al Gore celebrated the first Earth Day by promoting Maurice Strong’s Molten Metals Technology Inc (another scam) The stock went up in value Strong sold out and made a bundle. The stock then nose dived and the remaining stockholders sued.
From what I can tell they never tested the idea in a pilot plant but instead build a full scale plant. That alone would tell any chemist it was a scam from the get go. You never ever go from lab bench to building a full size plant. Things can blow up if you do that. (Personal experience as an industrial chemist)
Now the case is even used as a class room study on what NOT to do.
http://special.equisearch.com/downloads/articles/EQMay08MudKnot.pdf

…MMT has already perfected its technology in the laboratory (bench-scale)….establish its three commercial start-ups….Many students may assume that resizing an operation to a commercial scale is a simple matter. It is not. [Understatement of the year] There are differences in both technical aspects and feed material….

The Campaign Financing Scandal:
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/11/04/us/panel-to-quiz-clinton-s-96-campaign-chief-on-stock-gift.html?sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
The Lawsuit by investors:
http://securities.stanford.edu/1008/AxlervMoltenMeta/001.html
A House Committee investigation was conducted but the PDF seems to have been removed
http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20040830154236-07181.pdf

Gail Combs
April 3, 2012 6:09 pm

Louis says:
April 2, 2012 at 11:41 pm
It seems these green jobs projects are not yet ready for prime time. By rushing these projects out too soon, they may have set green technology back for decades. Who will want to invest their money in future green projects with a track record like this?
_______________________________________________
Who the heck is going to be willing to trust scientists again period. Not the American public and not me and I am a chemist. At this point after reading a listing of grants I want to shut down ALL grants by the US government.

Gail Combs
April 3, 2012 6:22 pm

kadaka (KD Knoebel) says:
April 3, 2012 at 1:24 am
….Not outrageous for a good day with perfect conditions, but they’re expecting that every day of the year? And $7000/home for 6 hrs a day?
___________________________________________
If you are going to spend $7000/home this Geothermal heat pump (underground) heating and cooling system makes a heck of a lot more sense. It is the only “green” technology outside of nuclear that does.
Pump: http://www.energyguide.com/library/EnergyLibraryTopic.asp?bid=tva&prd=10&TID=25703&SubjectID=10168
Plans: http://mb-soft.com/solar/saving.html

Gail Combs
April 3, 2012 6:31 pm

P. Solar:
“The Spanish can manage to produce base-load solar why can’t the US get its act together?
__________________________________
Your data is a bit old pal.

….However, the Post’s report fails to understand the lesson and instead perpetuates the notion that subsidies don’t equal costs, which it confuses with price:

German policymakers indicated last week that they planned to cut once-generous subsidies as much as 29 percent by the end of the month, on top of a 15 percent cut in January, although some details were still being negotiated after protests from the solar industry. Britain and Italy have made similar moves, and in January, Spain abandoned its subsidies altogether, prompting outrage from the solar industry….
Now, sudden subsidy cuts here and elsewhere in Europe have thrown the industry into crisis just short of its ultimate goal: a price to generate solar energy that is no higher than fossil-fuel counterparts.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/solar-industry-faces-subsidy-cuts-in-europe/2012/03/10/gIQArkbXLS_story.html

That’s only true if one ignores the cost of the subsidies. After all, taxpayers have to pay twice for solar power: once when they use it, and another when they pay the taxes that fund the subsidies, which act only to hide the true cost of solar power in the artificially-lowered price… http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/20/the-fallacy-of-subsidized-parity-in-energy-pricing/

Justa Joe
April 3, 2012 6:54 pm

P. Solar wrote: “The Spanish can manage to produce base-load solar why can’t the US get its act together?”
———————–
Spain: Solar constituted 3 percent of 2010 electricity generation
Read more: http://www.pv-magazine.com/news/details/beitrag/spain–solar-constituted-3-percent-of-2010-electricity-generation_100002075/#ixzz1r23uZBUP
Even with solars meager contribution it has still been an economic disaster.

April 3, 2012 8:35 pm

“The best-laid schemes o’ mice an’ men. Gang aft agley,”

April 6, 2012 2:44 pm

Wag;
And the worst-laid ones almost always!