UPDATE: The connection in Crownies to me is unmistakeable now, see update below.
Stranger than fiction shades of Ben Santer:
“Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted.” – Dr. Ben Santer in a Climategate email
I was aware of this TV show last week as a couple of alert readers brought it to my attention, but unfortunately I couldn’t comment on it for two reasons: 1) The draconian ABC (Australia) copyright policy prevents it from being viewed in the USA, so I couldn’t see the scene or get the dialog and 2) If I commented on it, people would say I was the only one who sees the comparison, and that it was self serving. Tim Blair of the Daily Telegraph solves both problems. He transcripts the dialog and writes:
Idealistic young lawyer: “He’s a lead author for the IPCC. He’s a climatologist who put together a global temperature reconstruction going back 12,000 years!”
Legal secretary: “So he’s a geek.”
Idealistic young lawyer: “He’s been on Four Corners.”
Legal secretary: “A huge geek.”
Idealistic young lawyer: “And on Oprah.”
Legal secretary: “Slightly cool. And the alleged assault?”
Idealistic young lawyer: “He punched a climate change sceptic, James Watt. Watt runs a blog, CO2 Fraud, a bunch of anti-science crap.”
Legal secretary: “Sounds like a fun day in court. You haven’t had a win yet, have you?”
Continue viewing to see the impressive physical differences between doddery old denier and punchy professor, who must be the only climatologist in history with a $250 haircut.
Former Greens candidate Clive Hamilton loved it:
At last, the ABC has broadcast a program that accurately reflects the debate over climate science.
Yep – cool guys versus jabbering idiots who deserve a beating!
The program in question is the episode of Crownies aired last Thursday night. In it, DPP solicitor Richard Stirling (played by Hamish Michael and one of Crownies’ real stars) reluctantly has to prosecute an eminent climate scientist who allegedly punched a climate denier in the face. The denier James Watt (played with disconcerting accuracy by Richard Healy) had been harassing Professor Tim Coghburn for years, turning up at every public event to demand answers to his inane questions lifted uncritically from some denialist website.
Hamilton didn’t watch very carefully. The Watt character – possibly a dig at Anthony Watts – runs his own site. And the climatologist is Steve Coburn, not Tim Coghburn. Clive can’t even get TV credits right.
When Watt, after disrupting a public lecture, followed Coghburn out of the venue haranguing, insulting and poking him in the chest, the scientist finally lost his rag and lashed out. Who hasn’t wanted to do that?
=========================================================
Read it all here at Tim Blair’s column
What is ironic is that when I gave public lectures in Australia, the only person who disrupted them was reef scientist turned activist Ove Hoegh-Guldberg.
Strangeness abounds. I’m not sure what to make of this. At least there is some comfort, according to my friends in Australia, the Crownies TV show appears to be tanking in the ratings. In a way though, the Watt character is an everyman, representing those who have doubts about the state of the science.
For anyone in Australia, here’s the episode, number thirteen.
Here’s the preview writeup.
=======================================================
UPDATE: I still can’t watch this show, but commenter “pwl” did, and adds some transcript. It seems unmistakeable now that I am the inspiration for the character:
From the show at about 15:20 into it.
“Was he aware that the modern temperature record was utterly corrupt? They put thermometers next to air conditioning units and on airport tarmacs.” – Fictional James Watts
“So you think a few thermometers at airports accounts for the late 20th century rise in recorded temperatures globally?” – Fake Idealistic young lawyer DPP solicitor Richard Stirling
“With El Nino thrown in, yes.” – Fictional James Watts
“And the rise in ocean temperatures, the receding glaciers, the earlier spring flowering, the earlier bird and animal migration, the collapse of arctic summer ice cover?” – Fake Idealistic young lawyer DPP solicitor Richard Stirling
“Was that in my police statement?” – Fictional James Watts
“Not really.” – Fake Idealistic young lawyer DPP solicitor Richard Stirling
“Oh, then why ask it?” – Fictional James Watts
“I’m demonstrating how upset professor may have been with your line of questioning. It goes to motive.” – Fake Idealistic young lawyer DPP solicitor Richard Stirling
“Hm.. right.” – Fictional James Watts
Oh, the professors book was being launched at the meeting where the fictional punch took place. The funny part is that the book is entitled “Boiling Frogs”.
Boiling Frogs aka Richard Stirling, fictional lawyer.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Yeah TV shows are always supporting AGW in subtle and unsubtle ways. My recent experience was with the show “Terra Nova.” I decided to give it a chance and was quite off-put by inaccurate environmentalist BS.
Apparently in the near future we un-invented the catalytic converter and CO2 levels are so high they are debilitating to human health.
This is television.
Interesting that “James Watt” was chosen. Is this a reference to the scientist and inventor for whom the unit of power is named, or a reference to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior under Ronald Reagan. The former would be a compliment, but might undermine the attempt to picture skeptics as unscientific. The later would be considered more insulting by the environmentalists who so strongly disliked him. It is also possible that the AGW supporters do not know who either of these gentlemen are. In any case a man is defined by the quality of his enemies as much as his friends.
I didn’t care enough to actually watch the show.
But why did they have to jump back 65 million years?
Was it not possible to time jump back just a million years or so?
Was it not possible for them to time jump into the future?
Are they arguing that we’ve messed up the environment so much that it will never recover?
But who has 90 million viewers, without a penny in legally enforced financing?
Anthony, are you likely to do a UK tour as you did in Australia?
REPLY: If somebody invites me, and can help cover travel costs, sure – Anthony
The best way to hit the climate scientists who’ve got it wrong is with the knock out paper punch! Hit them with hardened science papers! That observational data lands a considerable blow.
Always remember two things:
“ If your experiment needs statistics, you ought to have done a better experiment. ” – Ernest Rutherford
“ No theory is carved in stone. Science is merciless when it comes to testing all theories over and over, at any time, in any place. Unlike religion or politics, science is ultimately decided by experiments, done repeatedly in every form. There are no sacred cows. In science, 100 authorities count for nothing. Experiment counts for everything. ” – Michio Kaku, a professor of theoretical physics at City College of New York
Now just where are the experiments that back up the alleged CO2 Climate CAGW Doomsday Rapturists claims? That’s what I’d like to know. Without experiments to replicate how can anyone possibly test their alleged claims?
James Watt was a bumbling interior secretary from 1981 to 1983. He was regarded as many as anti-environment, I just remember him being not very politically astute.
@grumpyoldmanuk
James Watt was a very great Scottish engineer, but he didn’t build any steam locomotives, his were all stationary engines.
You are thinking of the Stephensons, a couple of English engineers, and not to be confused with the Stevensons, who were a family of Scottish lighthouse engineers, and one of whom invented the Stevenson Screen with which were are so familiar, in its many and varied locations.
There, I hope that’s clear.
Flashback: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/07/18/clintons-solution-for-the-jobs-crisis-painters/
Update: http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/blog/aletho-news/stunning-pictures-al-gore-s-new-9-million-mansion-media-totally-ignored
Please see ariel photo of Al Gores’ roof
Don’t forget that James Watt was Ronald Reagan’s first Secretary of the Interior, and was widely reviled by environmentalists, at least here in the US. Not sure how widely he was known or remembered outside the States, including down under. Maybe a Freudian slip to conflate the two names.
I suppose if unaltered observational data does not support the extreme dangerous AGW paradigm an alternative approach would be to use a TV program to disseminate propaganda.
Some of the proposals related to the extreme AGW paradigm such as converting food to biofuels at three to five times the cost of fossil fuels and with a net increase or a less reduction in net CO2 emissions is ludicrous. The fact that large companies are cutting down virgin tropical forest to grow food to convert to biofuels is madness. The fact that the price of some basic foods has increased over 100% due to the biofuel initiative will result in malnutrition and if the program continues starvation in third world countries…. I have no appropriate word or pithy phrase to label the last consequence. If one yells fire in a crowded movie theater and organizes others to simultaneously yell fire in a movie theater, it is natural that people would over react and that there are real dangers to over reaction.
I has initially primarily concerned with the science. I believe now however I have responsibility to speak up.
I would highly recommend reading the following books each of which provides a different view point of the extreme AGW movement, of the consequences of the extreme AGW movement, and a summary of the world renown scientists who have specifically stated that observations and scientific analysis in their specialty does not support that extreme AGW will happen or that even if it did happen that the consequences will not occur.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7058406-the-real-global-warming-disaster
The Real Global Warming Disaster: Is the Obsession with “Climate Change” Turning Out to Be the Most Costly Scientific Blunder in History? By Christopher Booker.
http://www.amazon.com/Deniers-Renowned-Scientists-Political-Persecution/dp/0980076315
The Deniers: The World Renowned Scientists Who Stood Up Against Global Warming Hysteria, Political Persecution, and Fraud**And those who are too fearful to do so
http://www.amazon.com/Storms-My-Grandchildren-Catastrophe-Humanity/dp/1608192008
Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth About the Coming Climate Catastrophe and Our Last Chance to Save Humanity
OT. Another CME this afternoon
James Watts is…Cold Finger
OT. Direct Hit
Oh, I thought they were alluding to former Secretary of the Interior James G. Watt.
TheGoodLocust:
Interesting that about catalytic converters. According to Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalytic_converter
I’ve always said that the ideal exhaust from a car is harmless CO2 and water…
Anyway, this whole thing is a typical tactic of the left: the Morality Play. Some great examples abound, including All In The Family, and many others where the main characters exhibit undesireable behavior and are constantly punishing themselves for it.
Look at how Tina Fey almost single-handedly shaped the public’s opinion of Sarah Palin. It got to the point where the majority of people WITH an opinion don’t even realize their opinion was shaped by someone who wasn’t even the person they had the opinion about!
The original Star Trek was a thinly veiled platform for morality plays. And to think I grew up watching that stuff…
I’m still waiting for a pay-for-view cage match between “Fightin'” Ben Santer and “Hurricane” Joe Bastardi. Now that’s entertainment!
With the ever growing demand for program content U.S. makers of broadcast and cable TV programs have pillaged the world for programs and program premises to ripoff for the American market. I’m having a hard time trying to think of one they grabbed from Australia. It could have to do with the draconian copyright protection rules Anthony mentioned but I can’t help suspecting that they made rules incredibly strict to cover the fact that even if there were no rules at all there probably wouldn’t be many people lining up to steal much of it anyway.
Sorry I stopped reading at ‘self serving’ – what did I miss?
Lampooned on television. You have arrived Anthony!
Slain! By the JAWBONE of an ASS! Pity.
“I’m not sure what to make of this.” – Anthony Watts
Well it’s a form of fame. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, allegedly.
From the show at about 15:20 into it.
“Was he aware that the modern temperature record was utterly corrupt? They put thermometer next to air conditioning units and on airport tarmacs.” – Fictional James Watts
“So you think a few thermometers at airports accounts for the late 20th century rise in recorded temperatures globally?” – Fake Idealistic young lawyer DPP solicitor Richard Stirling
“With El Nino thrown in, yes.” – Fictional James Watts
“And the rise in ocean temperatures, the receding glaciers, the earlier spring flowering, the earlier bird and animal migration, the collapse of arctic summer ice cover?” – Fake Idealistic young lawyer DPP solicitor Richard Stirling
“Was that in my police statement?” – Fictional James Watts
“Not really.” – Fake Idealistic young lawyer DPP solicitor Richard Stirling
“Oh, then why ask it?” – Fictional James Watts
“I’m demonstrating how upset professor may have been with your line of questioning. It goes to motive.” – Fake Idealistic young lawyer DPP solicitor Richard Stirling
“Hm.. right.” – Fictional James Watts
Oh, the professors book was being launched at the meeting where the fictional punch too place. The funny part is that the book is entitled “Boiling Frogs”.
Boiling Frogs aka Richard Stirling, fictional lawyer.
Fictional Watts.
While the reference to “James Watt” may indeed be Reagan’s Interior Secretary, as others have pointed out, he was probably not widely known (even in the states). And that was 30 years ago. James Watt the inventor has a tenuous connection (industrialization), but the closeness to Anthony seems to be more the point the program was trying to make. At least to this colonial’s eyes.
Dr. Dave says:
October 4, 2011 at 11:53 am
I’m still waiting for a pay-for-view cage match between “Fightin’” Ben Santer and “Hurricane” Joe Bastardi. Now that’s entertainment!
Have you ever seen Joe with his shirt off? “Fightin’” Ben would end up as “Greasespot” Ben in short order.