The EPA has gone mad cow disease

EPA classifies milk as oil, forcing costly rules on farmers

Hint: Milk does not come from the ground (Image: hornytoad.com)

Monica Scott The Grand Rapids Press

Update: State Senate calls for EPA to change rule classifying cow’s milk as oil

GRAND RAPIDS — Having watched the oil gushing in the Gulf of Mexico, dairy farmer Frank Konkel has a hard time seeing how spilled milk can be labeled the same kind of environmental hazard.

But the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is classifying milk as oil because it contains a percentage of animal fat, which is a non-petroleum oil.

The Hesperia farmer and others would be required to develop and implement spill prevention plans for milk storage tanks. The rules are set to take effect in November, though that date might be pushed back.

“That could get expensive quickly,” Konkel said. “We have a serious problem in the Gulf. Milk is a wholesome product that does not equate to spilling oil.”

But last week environmentalists disagreed at a Senate committee hearing on a resolution from Sen. Wayne Kuipers, R-Holland, calling for the EPA to rescind its ruling.

“The federal Clean Water Act requirements were meant to protect the environment from petroleum-based oils, not milk,” he said. “I think it is an example of federal government gone amuck.”

But Gayle Miller, legislative director of Sierra Club Michigan Chapter, said agricultural pollution probably is the nation’s most severe chronic problem when it comes to water pollution.

“Milk is wholesome in a child’s body. It is devastating in a waterway,” Miller said. “The fact that it’s biodegradable is irrelevant if people die as a result of cryptosporidium, beaches close for E. coli and fish are killed.”

Also, the International Dairy Foods Association said it has learned the EPA will exempt the industry from the rule. But state lawmakers say they won’t let up until that is official.

“This is an example of where we have overreach by the department that defies common sense,” said Matt Smego, legislative counsel for Michigan Farm Bureau.

Smego said its an unnecessary regulatory burden that creates additional costs. He said it could cost $2,500 for a certified engineer to safeguard milk, plus more to construct secondary containment structures.

“The federal government has gotten out touch what’s going on in rural America,” said Konkel. “This is our livelihood.””

More at http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2010/06/epa_classifies_milk_as_oil_for.html

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

180 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 26, 2010 7:03 am

Matt: June 25, 2010 at 1:52 pm
I’m glad we agree then! Carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide are both deadly to animals when present in sufficient quantities 😉
For that matter, so is oxygen.
Or anything else — hence the expression, “Too much of a good thing…”

Pat Moffitt
June 26, 2010 8:58 am

Elizabeth-
That’s what happens when you get old- you start mixing up your cyst formers!

Elizabeth
June 26, 2010 9:06 am

Galane: “When it gets down to parts per billion, forget it. Just drink it, not going to kill you… Water that’s been distilled and filtered to as close to absolute purity as possible is NOT good to drink.”
And, in fact, exposure to small levels of germs and organisms helps develop a healthy immune system. I do not think it is coincidence that most adults I know who grew up on farms, drinking dugout water and unpasteurized milk, hardly ever catch a cold. Sterilization of drinking water is not a bad thing, but the addition of chlorine certainly kills the good along with all the bad organisms.

Roy Hogue
June 27, 2010 10:30 am

I think we better cry over spilled milk — but not for the reason in the original saying.
The EPA has become an abomination.

James Bull
June 27, 2010 10:23 pm

Here in the UK during the Foot and Mouth disaster a few years ago a farmer came up against the walls of bureaucracy that now run our land. He was in an isolation zone so the road tanker couldn’t get to his farm and his storage tanks were getting full, he phoned for help and was told if he dumped the milk he would be prosecuted, if he tried to move the milk himself he would be prosecuted and the RSPCA said if he didn’t milk his cows they would prosecute him as well. (All the people were just doing their jobs and following the guide lines and none could help as much as they said they wanted to).

1 6 7 8