Pachauri's TERI institute golf course – water hog in a city desperate for fresh water

Richard North of the EU Referendum reports on this bizarre twist with IPCC Chairman Rajenda Pachauri’s use of land that was designated for public use, now runs afoul of the grant terms under which the land was given. Plus a lot of water in a city that has water shortages. So much for sustainability.

Pachauri, famous for telling other how to live sustainable lives has a private chauffeur, spurns his electric cars provided for him, and once said in a newspaper interview:

‘Unfortunately, “social and environmental issues are often left without effective support when economic growth takes precedence,” he added.’

So, that’s why you charge memberships to your golf course and keep out the public from land given to you designated for public use?

It’s time for Pachauri to go. He’s dirty, deceitful, and dim witted. His personal life is hypocritical of what he preaches to the rest of the world via his IPCC position and is a public relations disaster.


[TERI+Green.jpg]

“Happiness in life is based on expectations,” writes Rajendra K Pachauri on his own blog. And if your expectations include ownership of a nine-hole golf course, then Dr Pachauri must be a very happy man indeed.

The ownership is reported today by the Indian newspaper the Mail Today which tells us that R K Pachauri’s “not-for-profit” TERI – imbued with a mission to “work towards global sustainable development, creating innovative solutions for a better tomorrow” – is the proud owner of a water-guzzling nine hole golf course in Gual Pahari on the outskirts of Gurgaon a satellite town to the southwest of New Delhi.

This much is not new. It was described in glowing terms by the Business Standard in February 2007, when we were told of a “beautiful golf course” that precedes the entrance of a “completely different world from the precincts of Gurgaon”.

It is part of the “amazingly landscaped 36-hectare TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute) campus at Gual Pahari.” And nestled inside this campus is an unassuming building called The Retreat, a training and recreation centre for TERI staff and executives.

Furthermore, TERI has made no secret of the facility, noting in its Annual report 2006/7 that the golf course had been created “with the intention of promoting golf amongst TERI personnel residing in Delhi and Gurgaon.” It was then that the six-hole golf course was being upgraded into a nine-hole green. A 200-yard driving range was “an added attraction” and there was a nine-hole putting course adjacent to the Retreat building.

But, it appears, TERI is harbouring a guilty “secret”. The five-acre golf course is part of the 69 acres of institutional land it acquired from Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) in 1985 (below – Google Earth), for the exclusive use of TERI staff. Commercial exploitation is prohibited.

click for interactive Google Maps

Yet the paper has found that the golf course has been opened up to selected members of the public who are being charged Rs 25,000 (£350) for membership.

According to Gurgaon’s district town planner Vijender Singh Rana, commercial activity through sports on institutional land is illegal. “HUDA gave this land to TERI for institutional or public and semi-public purpose.”

Rana said. “Though they have asked for change of land use (CLU) regularly from HUDA, permission cannot be given for any sporting activity. If TERI is selling golf course memberships, it is wrong.” Rana said the conditions for use of institutional land were clear. “If TERI uses it for its own purpose, there is no problem. But it cannot use it commercially and sell golf memberships,” he said.

Equally contentious is the water usage to keep the golf course green. As chair of the IPCC, Pachauri is voluble in demanding of governments around the world that they cut down on carbon emissions and save water, among other things, to sustain the environment. He is equally voluble about potential water shortages in his home country, arising from melting glaciers and all that.

TERI claims that water conservation measures on the campus include “an efficient central rainwater harvesting system in accordance with water conservation guidelines such as drip water irrigation, early morning and late evening half circle sprinkling to minimise water evaporation and loss.”

But with the golf course and environs requiring up to 300,000 gallons a day during the summer to keep the lush greenery in condition (pictured above), questions are being asked about the sustainability of the facility, which would have difficulty in meeting the volume required solely from harvested water.

more at the EU Referendum

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

188 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sera
February 20, 2010 9:53 pm

Xeroscaping the course would help- obviously these people don’t know anything about real enviromentalism.

John F. Hultquist
February 20, 2010 9:54 pm

Can someone tell Google to develop a reverse search – that is, I want to place the coordinates on a spot and have it identified.
For example, east of the TERI Retreat Center,
what are these four things?
28.425161 N, 77.155253 E
REPLY: They are buildings with central courtyards. Probably another institute or school of some sorts

Raving
February 20, 2010 9:56 pm

harvey (20:13:20) :
“He’s dirty, deceitful, and dim witted.”
Right, its all about the science….
————————
Yeah right, its all about the science of swindle, posture and pork barrel. That’s your 21st century ‘Science’ for you “harvey (20:13:20)”.
Carnival shill …
Buy this “IPCC Certified” product. It’s real because the “IPCC” and “Royal Society”certify it is genuine.
Spin the image of a credible, quality product. Shame on the buyer for being fooled by the tinsel foil, window dressing. Dare to be dubious and risk getting labeled as intellectualy defective, ‘creation scientist’ type.
Time for me to quit calling myself a scientist. I want none of the sick deceitfulness that science has become.

Patrick Davis
February 20, 2010 10:00 pm

“keith (21:53:39) :
It seems the only green Pachauri is familiar with is the one on his golf course..”
He’s familiar with the other type of green too (The greenback that is).

Memory Vault
February 20, 2010 10:07 pm

Icefree
While I agree with you that it’s a war, we are nowhere near winning. In fact, we are losing where it really counts.
The whole climategate/IPCC thing is a minor skirmish. If you want a glimpse of the “real” war, google “climate change lesson material”, and take a look at what the kids are being taught in the schools in your part of the world.
Drop in on http://www.teachingclimatechange.com for a look at the “recommended material” for junior high school students downunder here in OZ. Check out the “exercises” at the end of Module 5, for instance.
This is produced by the Australia Institute. Call at their website – http://www.tai.org.au and check out their board of directors, and see what/who we are up against.
If that doesn’t convince you, keep in mind this has all been going on for twenty years, and the teachers “teaching” this stuff as “science” are themselves products of the same propaganda/brainwashing.
We may be winning a few skirmishes and bagging a few scalps. But where it counts the high priests are still busy programming their next generation of mindless climate-bots with impunity.
Frankly, they don’t give a stuff what happens to Pachauri or the IPCC as long as they are being left alone to get on with the job.

Raving
February 20, 2010 10:10 pm

harvey (20:13:20) :
“He’s dirty, deceitful, and dim witted.”
Right, its all about the science….
—————–
About the science? No It is about turning science into a business that sells desirable, quality, ephemeral pipe dreams.
“Buy this bond because it certified, insured and backed by the Better Business Bureau”. It is about the deliberate crafting of an image that is easily marketable.
That’s the whole thing about this *new* science harvey. The science has become irrelevant.

crosspatch
February 20, 2010 10:12 pm

“the only green Pachauri is familiar with is the one on his golf course”
Or in his bank account.

James Allison
February 20, 2010 10:16 pm

Hi Harvey
Are you for real or are you just taking the piss? If you are not taking the piss then please spend some time reading previous posts on this subject. If you are taking the piss then just piss off.

Daniel H
February 20, 2010 10:24 pm

Let’s see, at 300,000 gallons per day (during summer) that translates to about one Olympic swimming pool’s worth of water every two days. That must be one hell of a catchment system!

Doug in Seattle
February 20, 2010 10:32 pm

mr.artday (20:53:32) :
Doug in Seattle; You left out hypocrite and (neologism alert) hyperhypocrite.

The thesaurus list I supplied is for “hypocrite”.

Editor
February 20, 2010 10:38 pm

The Basic Water Requirement is generally given as 25 litres per person per day. Since the golf course is using 300,000 gallons per day, that works out to enough water to supply 50,000 people …

J.Hansford
February 20, 2010 10:42 pm

It doesn’t suprise me that Pachauri has done this…. It’ s normal behaviour of tyrants and despots…. and there are always sycophants like Harvey who defend them…..

Editor
February 20, 2010 10:51 pm

harvey (20:13:20)

“He’s dirty, deceitful, and dim witted.”

Right, its all about the science….

I don’t understand this comment. Despite being described by the BBC as ““considered the top climate scientist in the world“, Pachauri is not a climate scientist of any kind. He has a joint Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering and Economics. I do not know of any work at all that he has done in climate science. He is a manager and a politician, pure and simple.
As a result, there’s nothing “about the science” that anyone could say regarding Pachauri … so your comment is nonsense. All we can comment on is his management and his politics, and those (as Anthony says) are both anti-scientific and deceitful.

J.Hansford
February 20, 2010 10:55 pm

Wow…. It isn’t hard to see where the parasitical bureaucracy resides and plays. Just look for the green bits… Here in Oz the farms would be green and the rest dry… ‘cept the ovals… gotta have green ovals for cricket.

Editor
February 20, 2010 10:57 pm

harvey (21:20:27) : edit
“Well this is not what I expected…
Its like replying to my statement that 3+2 is 5
by saying 4 +7 is 11.. So There
WHATS UP WITH THAT?
The value of attacking a person is in destroying his political or cultural position.
It has nothing to do with the facts.
So this implies that you really do not care about what is really going on, but rather to just score points.
I want to evaluate and understand what is going on, not to read these soap opera attacks.”
Harvey, cut the crap. We skeptics have been dealing with personal attacks on our character, to the point of being accused of being holocaust deniers, for years now. The facts are that your and other warmists personal attacks were utterly false, but these FACTS about Pauchauri’s behavior, corruption, fraud, misuse of public funds and assets, malfeasance, among other CRIMINAL activities, are not attacks, they are facts. It’s not like we are accusing him of having a dozen supermodel girlfriends or of sleeping with 12 year old boys…. Get real.

Daniel H
February 20, 2010 11:00 pm

@harvey
“The value of attacking a person is in destroying his political or cultural position. It has nothing to do with the facts.”
Pachauri’s hypocrisy is a FACT which needs to be exposed, discussed, and condemned. If a doctor is caught violating his Hippocratic Oath he is similarly condemned because it shows that he puts a low value on human life (the antithesis of what we would expect from a doctor). When the head of the IPCC uses fraudulent science to deceive the world while enriching himself and his cronies, that is a grotesque abuse of the public’s trust. In other words, that makes Pachauri a scumbag.
Attacking the character of a corrupt public official is standard practice in western democracies precisely because we expect public officials to be working for us, not against us. Since Pachauri is guilty of the latter, that makes this personal — Got it?

Sera
February 20, 2010 11:13 pm

A population can not exceed its annual rainfall. I think it was Willis who reminded me of that…

Raving
February 20, 2010 11:18 pm

harvey (21:20:27) :
The value of attacking a person is in destroying his political or cultural position.
It has nothing to do with the facts.
So this implies that you really do not care about what is really going on, but rather to just score points.
I want to evaluate and understand what is going on, not to read these soap opera attacks.
————————
Who cares about soap operas?
Why not go and argue with some ‘facts’ henry.
I mean, only a true Cnut would do such a thing.
Those ‘facts’ don’t listen. They cannot be convinced. That is their great saving grace.

aMINO aCIDS iN mETEORITES
February 20, 2010 11:20 pm

harvey
it’s important to show the character of the people involved in global warming. It shows how reliable they are.
“A tree is known by its fruits.”
For example, Al Gore had poor grades in science. His house used more electricity than 10 households (before he went ‘green’ after people found out about it) . James Hansen has accepted political award money and has endorsed a politician. He has also testified in court that vandalism is alright and he has been arrested at a coal protest.
All of these things reveal something about the people involved in global warming.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
“He’s dirty, deceitful, and dim witted.”
Right, its all about the science….
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
The fact that Pachauri didn’t reveal the truth about Himalayan Glaciers at Copenhagen says that for Pachauri it has nothing to do with science.
Would you contact Pachauri and tell him it’s all about science? Because apparently for him it is about other things.

aMINO aCIDS iN mETEORITES
February 20, 2010 11:22 pm

Pachauri’s TERI institute golf course – water hog in a city desperate for fresh water
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Let them drink Perrier.
Let them eat cake.

Mari Warcwm
February 20, 2010 11:22 pm

Harvey, if you really want to understand what is going on try nov55.com. This site explains how CO2 works and how it cannot cause disastrous warming, and why science has become corrupt – funding is only available for research to prove some point, not discover the facts; scientists lose their jobs if they rock the boat.
If you are being paid to spread anti sceptic propaganda and defend the status quo, it wouldn’t surprise me. This seems to be how science works now.

February 20, 2010 11:23 pm

SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS – George Orwell from “Animal Farm”

aMINO aCIDS iN mETEORITES
February 20, 2010 11:23 pm

harvey
The value of attacking a person is in destroying his political or cultural position. It has nothing to do with the facts.
come on harv, it’s satire.

Daniel H
February 20, 2010 11:32 pm


“It’s not like we are accusing him of having a dozen supermodel girlfriends or of sleeping with 12 year old boys…”
Pachauri wrote a softcore porn novel that features 76 year old Shirley MacLaine as one of the central characters. It’s hard enough to top that.

Editor
Reply to  Daniel H
February 20, 2010 11:37 pm

Daniel H
2010/02/20 at 11:32pm

“It’s not like we are accusing him of having a dozen supermodel girlfriends or of sleeping with 12 year old boys…”
“Pachauri wrote a softcore porn novel that features 76 year old Shirley MacLaine as one of the central characters. It’s hard enough to top that.”
Sure, but he was PROUD of THAT… its not like we exposed any deep dark hidden secret, like…OMG! Overwatered Golf Course!!!

Editor
Reply to  Daniel H
February 20, 2010 11:43 pm

Daniel H
2010/02/20 at 11:32pm

“It’s not like we are accusing him of having a dozen supermodel girlfriends or of sleeping with 12 year old boys…”
“Pachauri wrote a softcore porn novel that features 76 year old Shirley MacLaine as one of the central characters. It’s hard enough to top that.”
Meh, romance (I reserve “softcore porn” for publications that have pictures) novels… so easy a caveman can do it…
As for the golf club memberships, thats really just a matter of poor thinking… any idiot running a non-profit schtick knows those perks are merely benefits to “donors” of a certain level… selling actual memberships shows a real lack of imagination…

Steve Koch
February 20, 2010 11:34 pm

Pachauri is the gift that keeps giving. He’s hurting the AGW movement by putting a face on the venal, corrupt, incompetent side of AGW.