A little known 20 40 year old climate change prediction by Dr. James Hansen – that failed will likely fail badly

UPDATE: Thanks to a tip from Willis Eschenbach, there’s some developing news in that story from Dr. James Hansen. The Salon interviewee and book author, Rob Reiss that I quoted, now admits he somehow conflated 40 years with 20 years, and concedes that Dr. Hansen actually said 40 years for his prediction. However, as the newest analysis shows, it doesn’t make any difference, and we still aren’t seeing the magnitude of sea level rise predicted, now 23 years into it.

See the relevant excerpt below:

Michaels also has the facts wrong about a 1988 interview of me by Bob Reiss, in which Reiss asked me to speculate on changes that might happen in New York City in 40 years assuming CO2 doubled in amount. Michaels has it as 20 years, not 40 years, with no mention of doubled CO2. Reiss verified this fact to me, but he later sent the message:

I went back to my book and re-read the interview I had with you. I am embarrassed to say that although the book text is correct, in remembering our original conversation, during a casual phone interview with a Salon magazine reporter in 2001 I was off in years. What I asked you originally at your office window was for a prediction of what Broadway would look like in 40 years, not 20. But when I spoke to the Salon reporter 10 years later probably because I’d been watching the predictions come true, I remembered it as a 20 year question.

Source: this update on Dr. Hansen’s personal web page at Columbia University.

In my story, below, I quoted from Reiss here in the Salon interview.

So I’m happy to make the correction for Dr. Hansen in my original article, since Mr. Reiss reports on his original error in conflating 40 years with 20 years. But let’s look at how this changes the situation with forty years versus twenty.

Per Dr. Hansen’s prediction in 1988, now in 2011, 23 years later, we’re a bit over halfway there … so the sea level rise should be about halfway up the side of Manhattan Island by now.

How’s that going? Are the predictions coming true? Let’s find out. Let’s look at the tide gauge in New York and see what it says.

Here’s the PSMSL page http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/12.php

You can see the terrifying surge of acceleration in the sea level due to increasing GHGs in the 20th century. Willis downloaded and plotted the data to see what the slope looked like, and then plotted a linear average line.

Here it is overlaid with the Colorado satellite data. Note the rate of rise is unchanged:

And add to that, the recent peer reviewed paper from the Journal of Coastal Research that said: “worldwide-temperature increase has not produced acceleration of global sea level over the past 100 years”

As of this update in March 2011, we’re 23 years into his prediction of the West Side Highway being underwater. From what I can measure in Google Earth, Dr. Hansen would need at least a ten foot rise in forty years to make his prediction work. See this image below from Google Earth where I placed the pointe over the West Side Highway, near the famous landmark and museum, the USS Intrepid:

According to Google Earth, the West Side Highway is 10 feet above sea level here - click to enlarge

The lat/lon should you wish to check yourself is: 40.764572° -73.998498°

Here’s a ground level view (via a tourist photo) so you can see the vertical distance from the roadway to the sea level on that day and tide condition. Sure looks like at least 10 feet to me.

Image from Panoramio

According to the actual data, after 23 years, we’ve seen about a 2.5 inch rise. There’ s still a very long way to go to ten feet to cover the West Side Highway there.

To reach the goal he predicted in 1988, Dr. Hansen needs to motivate the sea to do his bidding, he’s gonna have to kick it in gear and use a higher octane driver if he’s going to get there. – Anthony

The original story is below:

===========================================================

The news today from the Pew Institute tells us that many Americans are backing away from the predictions of catastrophic climate change. This may be because many predictions simply haven’t come true.

Most, if not all, WUWT readers know Dr. James Hansen of GISS. He’s credited with jump starting the debate in 1988 with his now famous “sweaty” testimony before Congress in June 1988. See more about the stagecraft of that event here.

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/hansen_1988_congress.jpg

Readers might be tempted to think that I’m going to point out the discrepancies between the three different model scenarios that Dr. Hansen presented to Congress in 1988, as shown below. But these model projections are very well known. I’m talking about something else entirely.

Hansen's 3 model scenarios compared to temperature records from RSS (satellite) and GISS (surface). Graphic: Steve McIntyre of Climate Audit

In Dr. Hansen’s case, he’s been living the life of a scientist in the media spotlight since, giving thousands of interviews. He’s also taken on the role of activist during that time, getting himself arrested this year for obstructing a public highway.

He likely doesn’t remember this one interview he gave to a book author approximately 20 years ago, but fortunately that author recounted the interview on Salon.com. What is most interesting about this particular Hansen interview is that he dispenses with the usual models and graphs, and makes predictions about what will happen in 20 years to New York City, right in his own neighborhood. Sea level figures prominently.

Here’s the interview.

In a 2001 interview with author Rob Reiss about his upcoming book “Stormy Weather” Salon.com contributor Suzy Hansen (no apparent relation to Jim Hansen) asks some questions about his long path of research for the book. One of the questions centered around an interview of Dr. James Hansen by Reiss around 1988-1989. Red emphasis mine.

Extreme weather means more terrifying hurricanes and tornadoes and fires than we usually see. But what can we expect such conditions to do to our daily life?

While doing research 12 or 13 years ago, I met Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress. I went over to the window with him and looked out on Broadway in New York City and said, “If what you’re saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?” He looked for a while and was quiet and didn’t say anything for a couple seconds. Then he said, “Well, there will be more traffic.” I, of course, didn’t think he heard the question right. Then he explained, “The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change.” Then he said, “There will be more police cars.” Why? “Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.”

And so far, over the last 10 years, we’ve had 10 of the hottest years on record.

Didn’t he also say that restaurants would have signs in their windows that read, “Water by request only.”

Under the greenhouse effect, extreme weather increases. Depending on where you are in terms of the hydrological cycle, you get more of whatever you’re prone to get. New York can get droughts, the droughts can get more severe and you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”

When did he say this will happen?

Within 20 or 30 years. And remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 1989.

Does he still believe these things?

Yes, he still believes everything. I talked to him a few months ago and he said he wouldn’t change anything that he said then.

I’ve saved the Salon.com web page as a PDF also, here, just in case it should be deleted. So not only did Dr. Hansen make the claims in the late 1980’s, he reaffirmed his predictions again in 2001.

The scenario of the interview with Dr. Hansen looking out his window and describing the changes he envisions 20 years into the future is very plausible. As we established yesterday, Dr. Hansen’s NASA GISS office at 2880 Broadway in NYC,  has a view of the Hudson River.

Here’s a Google Earth street level view of 2880 Broadway:

GISS is located right aboive "Monk's - Click for a larger image
The NASA GISS building at 2880 Broadway and 112th Street- The arrows indicate my guesses for offices of Dr. James Hansen and Dr, Gavin Schmidt - Click for a larger image

Using Google Earth, I can actually fly right up to (what I think is) Dr. Hansen’s window and recreate the view. (Note to anyone who worries, this info about the location is public domain information, published on the NASA GISS office website)

First let’s establish the location in traditional downlooking map style view at put Dr. Hansen’s line of sight on the image:

Click for a larger image
Click for a larger image

Here is a close in view, from further east on 112th street, just behind the GISS building looking northwest to the Hudson river. Google’s 3D buildings feature is used to recreate the buildings:

Click for a larger image
Click for a larger image

Here’s what the view from Dr. Hansen’s window at GISS looks like:

Click for a larger image
Click for a larger image

And finally, here is the view from the Hudson, looking back to the GISS building:

Click for a larger image
Click for a larger image

In the recounting of the interview by Rob Reiss, Hansen makes several claims about trees, birds, police cars, and crime. I can’t comment on those as I have no data. What I can comment on is this prediction by Dr. Hansen:

“The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water.”

As you can clearly see in the Google Earth images, the West Side Highway remains dry and open. Sea level (at which the Hudson River at that point becomes) is not encroaching on the highway. Note the date on the Google Earth timeline toolbar in the upper left. The aerial imagery was taken approximately 20 years later, on May 12th, 2008.

So much for local climate change predictions by the leading global authority on climate change.

Even if we give Dr. Hansen the benefit of 30 years, I’ll point out that satellite measured rate of change of global sea level has slowed significantly in the last few years, and is not likely to rise enough to meet Dr. Hansen’s prediction even 30 years out. See this story.

In fact using the University of Colorado interactive sea level plotting tool, we can see virtually no trend in the last 20 years:

Sea level plot - just off Manhattan Island - Graph: University of Colorado
Sea level plot - just off Manhattan Island - Graph: University of Colorado

You can reproduce it here at sealevel.colorado.edu

I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

161 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Frank K.
October 23, 2009 5:34 am

“You call this
http://www.realclimate.org/images/Hansen06_fig2.jpg
a “prediction that failed badly” proves only that you don’t understand what you are talking about.”
Why do the land+sea data stop in 2005? It’s nearly 2010 now…

Hansen’s 1988 climate code eventually morphed in Model E, so the legend lives on…

tallbloke
October 23, 2009 5:36 am

If I remember correctly, scenario C is for a big reduction in co2. Since this has turned out to be the most accurate of Jim’s scenarios, despite the ongoing rise of co2, it seems reasonable to conclude that it supports the view that :
1) Climate sensitivitry is overblown by his models
2) Co2 doesn’t make any difference to temperature

Craig W
October 23, 2009 5:37 am

I’ll make a prediction: In 20 to 30 years a bottle of scotch made today will be outstanding.
Out of curiosity, how old is that building? Has it been properly insulated? Have the windows been replaced? Where is Jim hiding the solar panels … has NASA invented a cloaking device?

Tom in Florida
October 23, 2009 5:51 am

“Didn’t he also say that restaurants would have signs in their windows that read, “Water by request only.” ”
Don’t know about New York these days but that is common in my part of Florida. Unfortunately for Dr Hansen the real reason for being careful with our water here is due to overdevelopment. Overdevelopment? In a place that is warmer than the global average temperature? Apparently people like warm.

hunter
October 23, 2009 5:53 am

It is long past time to roll up the apocalyptic clap trap of Hansen and his entourage and send them packing.

Clive
October 23, 2009 6:08 am

Thanks for this item. Good find. It is amazing how these people can continue and still be believed; continue to get a salary; and not have to answer for their absurd and immoral actions. What a crime.
Regarding inaccurate prophesies. In March/April 1990, David Lees wrote an item about our David Suzuki. (The Man Who Cries Wolf, will David Suzuki warn us about the environment once too often?, Harrowsmith pgs 34-44.) I have this article in PDF if anyone wants it. Norm?
Here is part of the Lees article:
In one of his last columns in the Globe, Suzuki quoted Ehrlich’s view of public apathy about the perils of economic growth … A few weeks later, when the Star began to publish the column, Ehrlich was featured in it regularly. “Ehrlich concludes that it would be a dangerous miscalculation to look to technology for the answer to [environmental problems]. Scientific analysis points toward the need for a quasi-religious transformation of contemporary culture.” … and three weeks after that [Suzuki wrote], “Stanford University ecologist Paul Ehrlich reminds us that … we face a ‘billion environmental Pearl Harbors all at once.’ ” On December 2, Suzuki wrote, “We no longer have the luxury of time … when people like Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University …tell us we only have a decade to turn things around.” And in his Christmas column on December 13, Suzuki wrote, “As eminent ecologist Paul Ehrlich says, ‘the solution to ecocatastrophe is quasi-religious.’” This was in 1990.
All of the predictions from twenty years ago have failed. (The IPCC claims of sea level rise in their first report were grossly wrong.) How do we get MSM to grasp this nonsense and start ripping apart the AGW fanaticism?
Screw it! I am going fishing. ☺
Clive

October 23, 2009 6:16 am

Did Al Gore sponsor him back in 1988-89?, how did he appear on the scene then?, who were his mentors?. It would be interesting to know the origins of this crazy issue.

October 23, 2009 6:19 am

I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?
He’s a zealot. He thinks, “why can’t the world see it as clearly as I? What do I need to do to make them understand? I know now that my predictions then were off, I mean, I took a cab down that damn highway the other night. But I got it nailed now, man, and I just need to convince them. They don’t know, but I do. Maybe in Houston, they’ll believe. Houston? Aw crap, fat chance of that. They’re all on big oil’s payroll down there. What moron scheduled this for Big Oil City? I need to fire my publicist; those Texans can be a tough crowd. It’s okay, it’s alway hot down there (I hope Gore’s not around or it’ll snow). Take a deep breath, no sense worrying…I wonder if the restaurant has any pudding….”

Yarmy
October 23, 2009 6:25 am

Geoff Sherrington (05:31:11) :
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm
Ha ha. That is magnificent and has made my day. You should let people assign a degree of daftness to them and make an anomaly graph. I predict an unprecedented increase in prior to Copenhagen.

Roger Knights
October 23, 2009 6:32 am

Patrick Davis (02:20:01) :
“An example is in WW1, politicians decided arm Allied soldiers with a French made weapon, when there was a far superior weapon available at the same time. At least 100,000 soldiers died because of that decision.”

I’m curious about that–could you provide more detail?

sabril
October 23, 2009 6:41 am

Technical note: North of 72nd street, what is known as the “West Side Highway” is actually the Henry Hudson Parkway.
Even if sea levels did rise as much as Hansen predicted, how hard would it be to protect the Parkway with levees; dykes; landfill; and trestles? Probably not too hard.
Anyway, are you sure that the Hudson river is at sea level at 112th street? It’s still a good ways to the Atlantic Ocean.

Mike86
October 23, 2009 6:48 am

>david alan:
At the end of “Atlas Shrugged” pretty much everything is shutting down and chaos is taking over. The smart guys are mostly retiring to their little community in the mountains to let the rest of mankind turn off the last lights. There’s also a really long speech by Gault that rehashes the book’s main premise. Basically, if you’re willing to roll up your sleeves, work hard, think, and you’re not looking for a handout (moocher) or shaking someone down (taker – read government in general), you’re OK.
The smart guys would be willing to help put things back together, but only on their terms. “Moral” causes (and have you noticed how many things today are being justified by “moral” causes?) are considered by these guys as just a way to guilt you into going along with the takers and support the moochers.
Other than the good guys not losing, the book doesn’t come to a clean resolution and a few threads are left hanging. If you haven’t read “Atlas Shrugged”, you should. Just to see where some of the references come from, if nothing else. There’s also an interview with Ayn Rand and Mike Wallace on YouTube (I think there’s three parts) that has some interesting perspectives.

H.R.
October 23, 2009 6:49 am

“I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?”
My guess… “Memo to self: have trousers hemmed up 50mm so cuffs won’t get wet.”

October 23, 2009 6:53 am

If he was believed by the organization that employs him why haven’t they moved from that building? Knowing what was coming would it have been prudent to move somewhere more sheltered from wind, far from rising water and no police tapes.
It proves that these people don’t really believe what they say.

Mark Fawcett
October 23, 2009 6:57 am

Rhys Jaggar (00:41:06) :
Today’s Independent in the UK has an absolutely RIDICULOUS map of ‘temperature rises by 2060′. They’re saying increases of 15C in the Arctic and 6-8C everywhere else.
As usual in a newspaper, it doesn’t say what the baseline is.
Link to this here: http://environment.independentminds.livejournal.com/183634.html
Interestingly, the balance of comments is somewhat in favour of “stop the bullsh*t, CO2 isn’t the problem” – nice. So now I’ve seen this effect on the Independent’s comments, the Times’ comments and even the Observer’s comments pages (well some of them). If this carries on then it’s (hopefully) a matter of time before the journalists start to realise they’re losing their public and start to do some _real_ investigative journalism…
Cheers
Mark.

Michael Lenaghan
October 23, 2009 6:58 am

The author’s name is Bob Reiss (not Rob Reiss). And the title of his book is “The Coming Storm: Extreme Weather and Our Terrifying Future” (not “Stormy Weather”). (“Stormy Weather” was the title of the Salon article.)

MattN
October 23, 2009 7:03 am

“If I remember correctly, scenario C is for a big reduction in co2. ”
Scenario “C” was a ficticious scenario where CO2 was held constant at Y2K levels.

MattN
October 23, 2009 7:04 am

IIRC, Scenario “B” was determined by Hansen to be “most probable”. We aren’t even in the ballpark of Scenario “B”.

Richard M
October 23, 2009 7:12 am

I’ll make another prediction. We will soon be invaded by Hansen supporters.

dan Bailey
October 23, 2009 7:16 am

“I’ll point out that satellite measurement of global sea level has slowed significantly in the last few years”
Satellite measurement has slowed significantly? Did we lose some? Did the speed of light change? Does Einsteins theory no longer hold? .
just kidding. But really, please revise the sentence to be more accurate.

October 23, 2009 7:16 am

A delusional scientist might be a minor, sad story. The story becomes major when the US Congress invites the delusional scientist to testify that rational opponents “should be tried for high crimes against humanity.” The story becomes tragic if the US Congress passes legislation with profound economic consequences based on delusional science.

Myron Mesecke
October 23, 2009 7:19 am

Dr. James Hansen
Premier Climatologist
Author of: Storms of My Grandchildren
National Launch Event For The Book
Monday December 7 at 7:30 NEW DATE!
Location: Wortham Center, Houston,Tx
I instead invite people in Houston to travel the 160 miles to Temple, TX and enjoy the Christmas parade that evening. Starts at 6:30. Parade theme is Christmas in the Forties. No predictions on what the weather might be like unless Al Gore shows up!

matt v.
October 23, 2009 7:20 am

I wonder if Dr Hansen is thinking in the same mode as the Met Office to come up with such high warming forecasts only
In reviewing the latest Met Office climate projections of 4C by 2060, I was amazed by the almost straight line temperature anomaly projection with no flat or cooling periods shown anywhere. They claim that 10 year flat temperature increases or cooling periods are possible but are projected only as one in every 8 decades. This is rather a dramatic departure from the observed historical fluctuating curve of the 20 Th Century where cooler periods happened quite frequently and major cycles of 20-30 years of flat temperatures or cooling happen about every 20-30 years. In looking further into the Met Office forecasting programme UKCP09, I note
AMO effect seems to be excluded
NAO effect is not captured their models
MOC effect is assumed to weaken in response to warming from greenhouse gases by as much as 50% in some periods[ they even talk about a possible shutdown of MOC]
PDO is not mentioned
El Nino/La Nina effects seem to be included but how frequently and at what amplitude is not clear
It seems that in their computer simulations, the effect of greenhouse gases dominate and all natural variability effects are minor. No wonder they only project unprecedented warming for this winter, for the next decade and for the next 50years. It is like modeling the energy of your house but ignoring what happens outside [winter or summer].They now claim that the entire 20th century base warming curve[0.7 C trend rise] is due to man generated greenhouse gases and only the swings of high and low are due to natural or internal variability
Has anyone else looked into these models in terms of what they include or exclude?
http://ukclimateprojections.defra.gov.uk/content/view/2090/517/
http://ukclimateprojections.defra.gov.uk/content/view/2108/517/
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/info/warming/

Steve Keohane
October 23, 2009 7:20 am

tallbloke (05:36:41) Exactly, another diverging correlation, like some proxies these days. See Loehle’s post a few days ago. When you fake the temperature(heat), nothing correlates anymore. No wonder the same minds can’t create a model that works.

Gene Nemetz
October 23, 2009 7:24 am

REPLY: a new date that will “live in infamy” – A
Obscurity might be the right word.