UPDATE: Thanks to a tip from Willis Eschenbach, there’s some developing news in that story from Dr. James Hansen. The Salon interviewee and book author, Rob Reiss that I quoted, now admits he somehow conflated 40 years with 20 years, and concedes that Dr. Hansen actually said 40 years for his prediction. However, as the newest analysis shows, it doesn’t make any difference, and we still aren’t seeing the magnitude of sea level rise predicted, now 23 years into it.
See the relevant excerpt below:
Michaels also has the facts wrong about a 1988 interview of me by Bob Reiss, in which Reiss asked me to speculate on changes that might happen in New York City in 40 years assuming CO2 doubled in amount. Michaels has it as 20 years, not 40 years, with no mention of doubled CO2. Reiss verified this fact to me, but he later sent the message:
“I went back to my book and re-read the interview I had with you. I am embarrassed to say that although the book text is correct, in remembering our original conversation, during a casual phone interview with a Salon magazine reporter in 2001 I was off in years. What I asked you originally at your office window was for a prediction of what Broadway would look like in 40 years, not 20. But when I spoke to the Salon reporter 10 years later probably because I’d been watching the predictions come true, I remembered it as a 20 year question.“
Source: this update on Dr. Hansen’s personal web page at Columbia University.
In my story, below, I quoted from Reiss here in the Salon interview.
So I’m happy to make the correction for Dr. Hansen in my original article, since Mr. Reiss reports on his original error in conflating 40 years with 20 years. But let’s look at how this changes the situation with forty years versus twenty.
Per Dr. Hansen’s prediction in 1988, now in 2011, 23 years later, we’re a bit over halfway there … so the sea level rise should be about halfway up the side of Manhattan Island by now.
How’s that going? Are the predictions coming true? Let’s find out. Let’s look at the tide gauge in New York and see what it says.
Here’s the PSMSL page http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/12.php
You can see the terrifying surge of acceleration in the sea level due to increasing GHGs in the 20th century. Willis downloaded and plotted the data to see what the slope looked like, and then plotted a linear average line.
Here it is overlaid with the Colorado satellite data. Note the rate of rise is unchanged:
And add to that, the recent peer reviewed paper from the Journal of Coastal Research that said: “worldwide-temperature increase has not produced acceleration of global sea level over the past 100 years”
As of this update in March 2011, we’re 23 years into his prediction of the West Side Highway being underwater. From what I can measure in Google Earth, Dr. Hansen would need at least a ten foot rise in forty years to make his prediction work. See this image below from Google Earth where I placed the pointe over the West Side Highway, near the famous landmark and museum, the USS Intrepid:

The lat/lon should you wish to check yourself is: 40.764572° -73.998498°
Here’s a ground level view (via a tourist photo) so you can see the vertical distance from the roadway to the sea level on that day and tide condition. Sure looks like at least 10 feet to me.

According to the actual data, after 23 years, we’ve seen about a 2.5 inch rise. There’ s still a very long way to go to ten feet to cover the West Side Highway there.
To reach the goal he predicted in 1988, Dr. Hansen needs to motivate the sea to do his bidding, he’s gonna have to kick it in gear and use a higher octane driver if he’s going to get there. – Anthony
The original story is below:
===========================================================
The news today from the Pew Institute tells us that many Americans are backing away from the predictions of catastrophic climate change. This may be because many predictions simply haven’t come true.
Most, if not all, WUWT readers know Dr. James Hansen of GISS. He’s credited with jump starting the debate in 1988 with his now famous “sweaty” testimony before Congress in June 1988. See more about the stagecraft of that event here.

Readers might be tempted to think that I’m going to point out the discrepancies between the three different model scenarios that Dr. Hansen presented to Congress in 1988, as shown below. But these model projections are very well known. I’m talking about something else entirely.

In Dr. Hansen’s case, he’s been living the life of a scientist in the media spotlight since, giving thousands of interviews. He’s also taken on the role of activist during that time, getting himself arrested this year for obstructing a public highway.
He likely doesn’t remember this one interview he gave to a book author approximately 20 years ago, but fortunately that author recounted the interview on Salon.com. What is most interesting about this particular Hansen interview is that he dispenses with the usual models and graphs, and makes predictions about what will happen in 20 years to New York City, right in his own neighborhood. Sea level figures prominently.
Here’s the interview.
In a 2001 interview with author Rob Reiss about his upcoming book “Stormy Weather” Salon.com contributor Suzy Hansen (no apparent relation to Jim Hansen) asks some questions about his long path of research for the book. One of the questions centered around an interview of Dr. James Hansen by Reiss around 1988-1989. Red emphasis mine.
Extreme weather means more terrifying hurricanes and tornadoes and fires than we usually see. But what can we expect such conditions to do to our daily life?
While doing research 12 or 13 years ago, I met Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress. I went over to the window with him and looked out on Broadway in New York City and said, “If what you’re saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?” He looked for a while and was quiet and didn’t say anything for a couple seconds. Then he said, “Well, there will be more traffic.” I, of course, didn’t think he heard the question right. Then he explained, “The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change.” Then he said, “There will be more police cars.” Why? “Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.”
And so far, over the last 10 years, we’ve had 10 of the hottest years on record.
Didn’t he also say that restaurants would have signs in their windows that read, “Water by request only.”
Under the greenhouse effect, extreme weather increases. Depending on where you are in terms of the hydrological cycle, you get more of whatever you’re prone to get. New York can get droughts, the droughts can get more severe and you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”
When did he say this will happen?
Within 20 or 30 years. And remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 1989.
Does he still believe these things?
Yes, he still believes everything. I talked to him a few months ago and he said he wouldn’t change anything that he said then.
I’ve saved the Salon.com web page as a PDF also, here, just in case it should be deleted. So not only did Dr. Hansen make the claims in the late 1980’s, he reaffirmed his predictions again in 2001.
The scenario of the interview with Dr. Hansen looking out his window and describing the changes he envisions 20 years into the future is very plausible. As we established yesterday, Dr. Hansen’s NASA GISS office at 2880 Broadway in NYC, has a view of the Hudson River.
Here’s a Google Earth street level view of 2880 Broadway:

Using Google Earth, I can actually fly right up to (what I think is) Dr. Hansen’s window and recreate the view. (Note to anyone who worries, this info about the location is public domain information, published on the NASA GISS office website)
First let’s establish the location in traditional downlooking map style view at put Dr. Hansen’s line of sight on the image:

Here is a close in view, from further east on 112th street, just behind the GISS building looking northwest to the Hudson river. Google’s 3D buildings feature is used to recreate the buildings:

Here’s what the view from Dr. Hansen’s window at GISS looks like:

And finally, here is the view from the Hudson, looking back to the GISS building:

In the recounting of the interview by Rob Reiss, Hansen makes several claims about trees, birds, police cars, and crime. I can’t comment on those as I have no data. What I can comment on is this prediction by Dr. Hansen:
“The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water.”
As you can clearly see in the Google Earth images, the West Side Highway remains dry and open. Sea level (at which the Hudson River at that point becomes) is not encroaching on the highway. Note the date on the Google Earth timeline toolbar in the upper left. The aerial imagery was taken approximately 20 years later, on May 12th, 2008.
So much for local climate change predictions by the leading global authority on climate change.
Even if we give Dr. Hansen the benefit of 30 years, I’ll point out that satellite measured rate of change of global sea level has slowed significantly in the last few years, and is not likely to rise enough to meet Dr. Hansen’s prediction even 30 years out. See this story.
In fact using the University of Colorado interactive sea level plotting tool, we can see virtually no trend in the last 20 years:

You can reproduce it here at sealevel.colorado.edu
I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

NOAA’s tide station-based Sea Level data for New York’s Battery Park (Southern tip of Manhattan)…
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=8518750
…shows a 2.77mm/yr trend, with no obvious acceleration in recent decades.
New readers might find the list of philosophical quotations from various bigwigs at http://www.green-agenda.com/ helpful in understanding the source of climate propaganda. Add a large dose of pure cynicism to understand the cap-and-tax garbage.
Maybe a stupid question but when i look to the graphic i see 3 sudden rises in the temperature. One in approximately 1975(0,25), one in approximately 1985(0,50) and one in approximately 1995(0,25). Is it possible that the NASA updated their systems in these years. Or mabe got a better system or a new satellite or more corver over the world at these years?
“Yarmy (01:28:19) :
‘…you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”’
Climate predictions don’t come more terrifying than that. Please won’t anybody think of the children.”
I am not sure if this was tounge-in-cheek, but more children and people have died at the hands of our leaders, dictators, tyrants and politicians than ever have from natuaral causes or any measureable ACC.
An example is in WW1, politicians decided arm Allied soldiers with a French made weapon, when there was a far superior weapon available at the same time. At least 100,000 soldiers died because of that decision.
If you want to be afraid for our children, be afraid of the policy decisions made by our politicians.
Jim Hansen, isn’t he a muppet?
Mojib Latif’s presentation in Geneva in early September.
Cooling is coming. (But then followed by runaway warming).
Michael hauber (23:32:04) :
“It would be interesting to know if any skeptics pointed out ”
Michael hauber,
the sceptics needn’t to point out anything.
In truth, the sceptics would have never even made a fuss of this “CC” non event, since it is in the natural scheme of things.
It’s the warmers who made it into such an overblown issue.
Jimbo versus the Volcano
Hansen got one prediction right… Scenario “A”accurately predicted the Mauna Loa CO2 curve.
“I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?”
I’m sure what he thinks today is, “Within 20 or 30 years…The West Side Highway will be under water.”
When Hansen calcifies his opinions, they’re calcified.
Sadly the MSM won’t do anything to expose their delusional tool. They’re in on the scam.
He was right about crime, look at all the f**** being committed in our names because the temperature has failed to rise fast enough.
Heh. Lubos. I see the death train.
rbateman (23:34:51) :
I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?
Perhaps something along the lines of “if I were to jump now, would I be missed? Darn. Need to see about getting my Prozac prescription level increased.”
“Ecotretas (23:50:20) :
“It would be great if a (sub)site would record all these predictions. Like Prince Charles, WWF, Hansens, etc, who all predict we’ll have something very bad things in x years, or so. ”
Here’s one I remember: In 1988 Ted Danson (from the TV show “Cheers”) predicted that we only had 10 years to live because the oceans were going to be dead in 10 years.
Such brilliant stupidity.
He lived right upstairs from Monk’s (i.e., Tom’s) Restaurant in Seinfeld?!!
… and wasn’t there another reference to that same restaurant here on WUWT within the past few days?
Quoting:
“We have a much respected science reporter and scientist Robin Williams…who predicted sea levels would rise by 100m by the end of the century due to climate change. ”
Commenting:
We have a Robin Williams in the U.S. He says silly things all the time, too.
Its good that Anthony points out the inaccurate bordering on absurd predictions of Jim Hanson. It shows that having a Ph.D. in a scientific discipline does not mean that you should be regarded as an infallible authority even in your area of specialization. It is a counterbalance to the warmist’s tactic of arrogating the mantle of science to intimidate and silence any opposition.
Yarmy (01:28:19) :
‘…you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”’
Be careful of water. Fish fornicate in it.
Just love the first picture. Look at the guy on the right… I’m sure he’s thinking is this for real: you’ve got to be kidding.
I wonder when Jim Hansen will move his office to the top of a taller building to get away from the encroaching tide?
@Robt Phelan. Great mental images from your post. Too bad you weren’t driving an F350 or a Dodge dualie, towing an RV bigger than most New York apartments. The bow wave might have crested at the corner of Broadway and 112th. Those are eco-friendly trucks, by the way. Diesels, you know.
@Simon. No. He’s a muppeteer. We are the muppets.
Leon Brozyna (23:32:07) :
An object lesson in embracing and holding onto a belief system in the face of evidence which contradicts that belief system. The greater the amount of evidence which contradicts the belief system, the more shrill are the voices raised to defend that belief system. Whatever else it may be, the AGW belief system has long since lost is claim to the mantle of science.
Which makes one wonder… If the proponents of religious frugality labelled “climate change” had ever considered the truth? You’d think that honest altruists need not trade in fabrication – if their aim is true (Elvis.) Why not come out and say, “We want you to donate 1-2% of GNP to developing countries.” These are people who didn’t listen when their father instructed them to tell the truth.
And knowing that abundance actually tempers lifestyles – witness population stablization in middle class – why attempt to retard technology yielding abundance?
The human race is about to learn it is not the only flawed intelligence in the universe. Sorry ET.
Had
“I wonder what Dr. Hansen thinks when he looks out that window today?”
James Hansen: “My dear Mr. Watts, an underlying model assumption when I made that prediction was increasing silt load caused by human disturbance of the natural environment due to increasing urbanization would cause significantly increased silt load leading to siltation and an elevated river bottom, which would raise the water level. However those damned environmental nutcases (EPA included) passed all those laws like construction barricades, zoning restrictions, and other soil conservation practices in the watershed and I didn’t get the erosion I needed. How was I to know other factors were involved. It’s so damn complicated to predict into the future. Why didn’t they outlaw dredging, stirring up the muck and such. But I get the last laugh, hehehe… I still got my UHI.
For Ecotretas
“It would be great if a (sub)site would record all these predictions. Like Prince Charles, WWF, Hansens, etc, who all predict we’ll have something very bad things in x years, or so. Does anybody know of such site, or should we start a new one?”
Already done by a Brit. See
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm