Net Zero ideology ‘putting NHS patients at risk’, warn top doctors

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

h/t Ian Magness

This really is shameful: 

From GB News:

NHS Net Zero rules could put patients’ lives at risk by threatening supplies of vital medicines, leading doctors have claimed.

From April 1 next year, drug companies seeking major new deals to supply NHS medicines will be forced to meet tougher Net Zero rules covering global supply chains – or risk being rejected for the contract.


Under the regulations, major suppliers will have to publicly report emissions from worldwide operations, commit to reaching Net Zero by 2050 and set out what they are doing to cut emissions.

Companies which fail to meet the minimum requirements will not qualify to go to the next stage of the buying process.

The Department of Health hit back at suggestions the policy could threaten medicine supplies, saying: “It is categorically untrue that patients will be put at risk by the transition to net zero.”

However, two of Britain’s leading cancer specialists warn the new requirements could drive up costs and shrink the pool of companies prepared to compete to supply drugs to the health service.

Professor Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St George’s, University of London, accused the health service of being “entirely beholden to Net Zero ideology”.

He told GB News: “There are plenty of other places suppliers can go and there is a worldwide shortage of many drugs. It is madness.”

He added: “Shouldn’t they look at how best to deal with patients – that should be the priority it is soul destroying. I wouldn’t be so sure this isn’t a deadly threat.”

Full story here.

https://www.gbnews.com/health/net-zero-nhs-doctors-patients

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Bruce Cobb
August 28, 2026 2:52 am

Those doctors must be Medicine Deniers.

Scissor
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
August 28, 2026 3:33 am

Literally true.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
August 28, 2026 7:00 am

In France, during one of the heatwaves we endured, someone died of heatstroke in a hospital. There you have it. In France, in the West, in the 21st century. I’m ashamed of my country.

It’s fitting that an oncology department is mentioned in this article. Humanity is not the cancer of the planet, but Malthusians are the cancer of humanity.

Reply to  Charles Armand
August 28, 2026 2:58 pm

I was in hospital in South Coast of England during heat wave , spent 7 days in after emergency laparotomy. It was so hot , large 60s hospital with no air con , we each had large fans aimed at our beds and all the windows barely opened . We looked forward to about 4.00 am when the temperature had dropped to early 20s . France got it worse than us with temperature reaching over 40C , in UK we got to 38C . I can understand how someone can die in hospital of heat, especially if you are frail .

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
August 28, 2026 4:04 pm

NO part of this issue is revealing that it is doctors in the NHS who are advocating Net Zero. It is bureaucrats and administrators and politicians who are trying to impose this idiocy and insanity.

strativarius
August 28, 2026 3:12 am

Professor Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St George’s, University of London, accused the health service of being “entirely beholden to Net Zero ideology”.

St. George’s happens to be the major teaching hospital in Tooting, South West London, complete with helipad etc. It’s more of a small town on a huge site. And it’s a place I avoid at all costs. The cock ups are legion, paperwork, test results not passed or forwarded to GPs etc, it reminds me of the immortal lines of Dr Leonard McCoy and Science Officer Spock:

McCoy: Jim. You’ve got to let me go in there. Don’t leave him in the hands of 20th-century medicine.

Spock: Admiral, may I suggest that Dr. McCoy is correct? We must help Chekov.

The entire establishment is “entirely beholden to Net Zero ideology”. We could be drilling – we aren’t, even now – and doing something about the ludicrously high net zero fuelled energy costs. They announce instead:

Ofgem has announced a 13% increase of the energy price cap for the period covering 1 July to 30 September 2026.
Energy Price Cap to RISE 4% from 1 October even after VAT cut

There’s another increase due in January 2027. So, who gets the blame for all this net zero zealotry and the spiralling costs of it?

The Guardian view on energy costs: vulnerable households need help with their bills

Fuelled by the consequences of Donald Trump’s disastrous war on Iran, household energy debt in Britain is continuing to soar

The government is right to stress, as the energy secretary, Miatta Fahnbulleh, did again this week, that completing the transition away from fossil fuels holds the key to bringing future costs down. The Guardian

Their answer? You know their answer: more taxes. More subsidies.

DipChip
Reply to  strativarius
August 28, 2026 3:59 am

Yes they keep holding on to the Key rather than using it and the key says, “drill baby drill”, all over it.

SxyxS
Reply to  strativarius
August 28, 2026 5:53 am

If even the Health Service has been totally co-opted
What is not?

August 28, 2026 5:07 am

Reminds me of WUWT’s parody: Greta’s Perfect Petroleum Free World where the punch line is:

 
 
 
 
 
 
  

Tune in tomorrow when Greta needs a root canal and learns how Novocain is synthesized.” 

Scissor
Reply to  Steve Case
August 28, 2026 6:30 am

Leter she learns that tampons contain plastic in their components, packaging, or even the absorbent material itself.

Reply to  Scissor
August 28, 2026 9:54 am

Hasn’t she claimed to be a man yet?

strativarius
August 28, 2026 5:14 am

O/T The Nepal disaster has already been blamed on… you guessed it, the climate crisis.

The devastating flash flood that has ripped through the border communities of Nepal and Tibet has heightened fears that the climate crisis is destabilising the geology of mountain and polar regions, threatening millions of people. Guardian

And just to reinforce the settled science point…

Scientists are still examining the precise mechanics of the Himalayan disaster, but many observe that glaciers and permafrost around the world are being weakened by global heating, caused by the burning of gas, oil and coal.

Scientists have high confidence that glacier retreat is caused by human-driven global heating. This has caused glacier collapses from the Alps to the Andes.

I have total confidence that they are full of neo-religious, proverbial bovine excrement.

SxyxS
Reply to  strativarius
August 28, 2026 6:06 am

Glaciers this size should no longer exist after all their melting away in record time for decades.

But we also have the same phenomenon of the skiing equipment industry that more than doubled since Viner declared the end of snow – despite being a sport almost exclusively done in countries with declining populations.

Same with ICE cars after peak oil was declared in 2000.

Strange things are going on on a planet with stuff that is no longer there.

Reply to  strativarius
August 28, 2026 6:12 am

Glaciers never collapsed until now.

I, too, heard it being blamed on CO2.

Some reports are that an earthquake caused the glacier to collapse, and other reports say the collapsing glacier caused the earthquake.

You can bet your boots that this will be blamed on human-caused climate change, as is every other extreme weather event. It’s Standard Operating Procedure for climate alarmists.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
August 28, 2026 1:35 pm

Frequently after a glacier has retreated they find tree stumps underneath, which is
clear, irrefutable evidence that it was warmer [typically 5-7000 yrs ago] than presently.
But that will never be mentioned since it would hurt “it’s a climate crisis!” meme.
As to the Nepal disaster:
Reports say it was a wall of water so one woud suspect the collapse of an ice dam.
A tragedy regardless of the cause.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  strativarius
August 28, 2026 7:25 am

Apparently, the rock that the glacier was sitting on collapsed. Was the collapse due to warming? Possibly. Geologists will need to study the exact cause. The Climate Caterwaulers, as usual, are quick to blame man though.

SxyxS
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
August 28, 2026 1:28 pm

If the rock collapsed the number 1 suspect should be a growing glacier.

It is way more likely the rock collapsed as result of too much weight (main reasons for calving) and that it reached a breaking point
than that it collapsed as result of a few years of warming (which leads to smaller,liter glaciers)

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
August 29, 2026 12:17 am

Yeah, but the extra weight of carbon in the air made the rock collapse.

It must be true, cos I read it on social media

Tom Johnson
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
August 29, 2026 4:57 am

There are also reports that an earthquake caused the rock collaple.