Wind Catcher. By Diego Delso, CC BY-SA 4.0, Link

Green War on Air Conditioning is Heating Up

Essay by Eric Worrall

“We cannot air condition our way out of climate change” according to UNSW author Professor Mat Santamouris.

“We Cannot Air-Condition Our Way Out of Climate Change,” Cooling Study Finds

A new global review argues passive cooling technology must become central to climate adaptation.

Published: July 6, 2026 
Original story from the University of New South Wales, Sydney

As temperatures rise around the world, air conditioning is saving lives. But a growing reliance on it is also placing unprecedented pressure on electricity grids, increasing greenhouse gas emissions and making cities even hotter.

A global review led by UNSW Sydney’s Professor Mat Santamouris AM – an expert in innovative heat mitigation technologies and strategies for cities– argues that keeping buildings cool without relying solely on air conditioning will be critical for adapting to climate change.

Prof. Santamouris says passive cooling should no longer be viewed as a niche architectural feature, but as essential infrastructure for a warming world.

“Air conditioning saves lives and will remain essential during extreme heat,” he says. “But we cannot air-condition our way out of climate change. If every building depends entirely on mechanical cooling, we create enormous pressure on electricity systems while adding even more heat to our cities.”

Demand for cooling is soaring

The review highlights the rapid growth in cooling demand worldwide. Global electricity consumption for cooling has reached almost 10 per cent of total electricity use, with around 10 new air conditioners sold every second. By 2050, the number of residential air-conditioning units is projected to increase to almost 5.6 billion worldwide.

Read more: https://www.technologynetworks.com/tn/news/we-cannot-air-condition-our-way-out-of-climate-change-cooling-study-finds-414335

The abstract of the study;

  • Review Article
  • Published: 02 July 2026

Passive cooling for the built environment

Nature Reviews Clean Technology (2026) Cite this article

Abstract

Passive cooling technologies reduce heat and solar gains in buildings and public spaces while dissipating excess heat. This approach could reduce impacts of mechanical air conditioning, which has environmental impacts and consumes electricity, contributing to peak demand and grid stress. In this Review, we discuss advances in passive cooling technologies, focusing on smart solar control, ventilation, and radiative, evaporative and hybrid dissipation systems. These technologies are at different stages of development and deployment, ranging from technologically mature approaches such as ventilative cooling and solar control to emerging materials for passive and radiative cooling. Each technology has benefits and trade-offs. Ventilative, radiative and evaporative cooling have low energy use, but their effectiveness is dependent on climate, timing and air quality. Solar control improves thermal comfort, requires maintenance or has design constraints. Implementation of these technologies can reduce cooling-related energy consumption and provide thermal comfort in communities where access to affordable cooling is limited. However, increasing temperatures and humidity changes could challenge their effectiveness. Policies are needed to encourage uptake of passive cooling approaches in communities that currently rely on mechanical cooling and enable uptake for those that lack cooling access.

Read more: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44359-026-00177-y

I don’t know why Professor Santamouris is so dismissive of existing efforts to adapt buildings to conditions.

Buildings have been designed to enhance comfort ever since there are buildings. Ancient buildings in the Persian Gulf were designed with primitive but surprisingly effective passive air conditioners. My grandpa explained how a building he constructed in the 1940s, he put all the insulation in the living area, so the living area would be slow to warm in the summer heat, but the bedrooms would cool quickly after nightfall.

But if an air conditioner is cheaper than retrofitting some exotic passive environmental technology, why not use the air conditioner?

If power is in short supply, just build a few more coal plants. Or nuclear plants if you are feeling all precious about CO2 emissions. Only nations and states which place impediments in the path of energy providers have to worry about electricity shortages or high prices.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
July 6, 2026 10:10 am

Sure looked like Dr. Sanctimonious at first glance (-:

Scarecrow Repair
July 6, 2026 10:10 am

Wikipedia has this howler in their article on wind catcher buildings:

Generally, the cost of construction for a windcatcher-ventilated building is less than that of a similar building with conventional heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. The maintenance costs are also lower.

Doing nothing would be even cheaper.

Unlike powered air-conditioning and fans, windcatchers are silent[4] and continue to function when the electrical grid power fails (a particular concern in places where grid power is unreliable or expensive).

Gee, what would make grid power unreliable and more expensive?

A quick skim of the rest of the article found nothing about effectiveness. How much do these passive systems cool, and how effective are they when the humidity is 90+%? Most of their examples were for the Mideast. I probably should have scanned the edit history to see how often such mentions were backed out by the woke elite super-editors.

July 6, 2026 10:26 am

Perhaps if we promise to only use air conditioning on very sunny days when there will obviously be huge amounts of free solar energy?

July 6, 2026 10:28 am

China’s use of air conditioning uses more electricity than Britain’s and Germany’s total electricity use combined.

GeeJam
July 6, 2026 10:45 am

Electric powered cylinders of ‘roller-uppy’ winter loft insulation. Flick a switch, and bingo, all that trapped summer heat upstairs can escape and you get some sleep. Or just sleep in the car, petrol engine ticking over, air-con full blast. Luvverly.

July 6, 2026 10:50 am

Wind Turbines are catching the wind, too.

Walter Sobchak
July 6, 2026 10:59 am

Taste the lash, peasants.

July 6, 2026 11:04 am

Given that wind catchers, as pictured above, could also provide convenient locations from which muezzins could call the faithful to prayer, they would appear to be the perfect low-carbon solution for many European and US cities.

/s

MarkW
July 6, 2026 11:17 am

What works in the deserts of Iran, is not going to work in the tropics, or anywhere with more than a trivial amount of moisture in the air.

hdhoese
Reply to  MarkW
July 6, 2026 11:56 am

In some US deserts and a few other places they were called “evaporative coolers.” They worked great when the atmosphere was dry enough and you had enough water. Not on the coast however. 

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  MarkW
July 6, 2026 12:01 pm

My swamp cooler works great in 10% humidity. I can feel it falling off even at 30%.

MarkW
July 6, 2026 11:18 am

There is no need to engineer are way out of something that never existed in the first place.

July 6, 2026 11:38 am

So the next thing will be a green war on heating. We’ll all just have to wear more clothes in the winter since the (mandatory) heat pumps will struggle to work properly in the really cold places.

ResourceGuy
July 6, 2026 11:51 am

The first rule of politics in the US is don’t grab and try to pull up the third rail of voter interests. And ignorance of all the third rails is no excuse. But hey, there is this other more ancient strategy of not getting in the way of your enemies when they are talking up, marketing, and reaching for the third rail. It’s really a timing issue on when the sparks fly.