By Vijay Jayaraj
When temperatures elevate in Europe, political rhetoric rises even faster. Within days of the June 2026 heat wave, familiar voices rushed to assign blame. John Kerry, speaking to the BBC, labeled the current U.S. administration “dangerous and reckless” on climate. U.N. climate chief Simon Stiell declared that “Europe’s savage heat wave has the fingerprints of the climate crisis all over it; it’s the latest price to pay for fossil fuel pollution baking our planet.”
This hyperbole has no scientific basis. The urgency of assertions that carbon dioxide is overheating the atmosphere is never matched in reports about cold snaps that are at least as dangerous. The imbalance reflects an apocalyptic narrative that prioritizes fear and ideology over nuance and evidence.
So, what triggered the heat wave? The cause appears to have been a natural meteorological phenomenon known as an omega block. The jet stream formed an enormous high-pressure ridge sandwiched between two low-pressure systems. The pressure differential, whose contour lines resemble the Greek letter omega, conveys hot Saharan air into western Europe through a natural atmospheric process.
Blaming a regional weather pattern on gasoline-powered cars deliberately misleads the public to justify increased state control over daily life. The selective framing becomes even more troubling upon examination of mortality data for heat and cold.
A study published in The Lancet examined temperature-related deaths across 43 countries between 2000 and 2019. The results are stark: An average of 4.59 million deaths annually were linked to cold, compared to 489,000 from heat — a ratio of nearly 9 to 1. Cold is the far greater killer.
Fearmongering seldom gives attention to details that matter but don’t contribute to the favored agenda. For example, long-term temperature records in the U.S. destroy the story of a “boiling” planet. An analysis of 711 weather stations across the country with over a century of continuous daily observations reveals that the frequency of record-high maximum temperatures has gone down, not up.
Yet public discourse is ignorant of this reality. Mainstream media panics over summer heat and snoozes through winter cold. Why are governments not issuing urgent warnings about inadequate heating? Why do international bodies not hold press conferences on winter mortality?
In fact, the true danger comes not from trace gases in the atmosphere but from draconian energy policies forced upon the working class by out-of-touch politicians. The aggressive push for net zero carbon emissions has triggered a self-inflicted economic disaster across the Western world.
Look at the United Kingdom to see the future under green mandates. Even partial pursuit of “net zero” has precipitated a steep decline in per capita electricity use in the U.K. since 2000 — a drop that places Britain alongside some of the world’s poorest nations in trends of energy consumption. British manufacturers have warned that high energy prices are driving production overseas and threatening entire sectors. Hospitality firms report that energy bills are up by as much as 65%
If heat is dangerous, access to cooling should be expanded rather than constrained. Air conditioning is one of the most effective tools of human adaptation. However, in parts of Europe high electricity costs and regulatory pressure are making cooling less available.
The cruelty of this agenda extends far beyond the borders of Western nations. When global institutions demand eradication of fossil fuel use to prevent an imaginary climate crisis, they are condemning billions of people in developing countries to permanent poverty. There, access to affordable and abundant fossil fuels can be the difference between life and death.
Europe’s recent heat wave should prompt a reassessment, not a repetition of worn out talking points. It should prompt questions about preparedness, infrastructure, and energy access. Instead, weather has been used to reinforce a narrative that overlooks the most pressing challenges facing ordinary people and making them less adaptable to adverse conditions.
It is time to wake up from this fear-induced coma. The public manipulation has placed a massive premium on the cost of electricity, heating, and cooling.
Originally published at Real Clear Markets, July 2, 2026.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Fairfax, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India. He served as a research associate with the Changing Oceans Research Unit at University of British Columbia, Canada.
The whole thing boils down to, “Look! Grasshoppers!”
We have been programmed to a 13 second attention span.
Scan and scroll dominates reading.
No critical thinking needed. /s
Was it a case of fossil fuel productivity becoming a victim of its own success as poor old Manfred is at a loss with the suicidal empathy and everyone expecting manna from Heaven-
‘We cannot kill our industry due to climate change,’ Manfred Weber says
Leftys sell a good story about how being a victim of the system entitles you to lots of free stuff
“The pressure differential, whose contour lines resemble the Greek letter omega, conveys hot Saharan air into western Europe through a natural atmospheric process.”
Ok, but that Saharan air has gotten hotter.
The omega block transported hot Saharan air into Europe, but the Sahara itself has warmed substantially over recent decades. That means the air mass being advected is warmer to begin with.
The UAH LT grid cell covering the Sahara shows a warming trend since 1979:
(LSAT would be more directly relevant than LT trends when discussing the heating of Saharan source regions, since desert heating begins at the surface, and sensible heat flux + turbulent mixing warm the near surface atmosphere. But, on this blog, UAH LT is the only temperature dataset being seriously considered, so I play along.)
Circulation explains why the heat reached Europe, while global warming explains how intense the heat became.
So, you cannot minimize the impact of global warming in this situation. The reality is that we are facing a global warming crisis.
Source: https://www.nsstc.uah.edu/data/aosc/Global_Temperature_Report/archive/2025/GTR_202512.pdf
Well then you better stop using FF, a little sacrifice now will make a big difference in 75 years. Stop using air con and stop driving and flying you flaming hypocrite.
No.
Why are you people so authoritarian when it comes to fossil fuels? I’m not allowed to use them, but you are?
I thought you guys were all about freedom and individual rights.
It seems to me that YOU want to use FF but for others to stop? Please show us your solar panels and wind mills and you eco-friendly life style and your bamboo bicycle. Oh, you have none, I suspect.
Asking, not demanding, someone to live the lifestyle they want to force on others, is now the new face of authoritarianism.
It’s the hypocrisy that pisses me off.
It seems to me that YOU want to use FF but for others to stop? Please show us your solar panels and wind mills and you eco-friendly life style and your bamboo bicycle. Oh, you have none, I suspect.
When will demand we get into the box car indeed.
So you socialists are going to make us do that, huh?
Nope, I believe in freedom. As much freedom as possible.
And your point is?
The only people we ask to stop using FF are those who want to curtail its use. Not for themselves, but everyone else “who doesn’t really need to use them”. So European politicians are pushing to curtail air conditioners and petrol cars “for the little people” but they themselves continue to live the jet set lifestyle. Not just European politicians – let’s not forget John Kerry and Al Gore, who can’t even be bothered with commercial air travel but insist on traveling by private jet. Just to name two. I won’t even get into the entertainment industry.
Interesting, banning fossil fuels is not authoritarian, but believing that those who want to ban fossil fuels for everyone should show their commitment by living the life they want to FORCE on everyone eles, is.
Socialists really are good at redefining words.
Control the language, control the ideas.
Control includes shifting the definition on a constant basis to keep you off balance.
It appears that people like YOU suffer from an omega block of the head since facts can’t flow in, but baloney flows out very well.
You offer no viable facts here at all, just more of the usual denial of what is going on here as this has happened in the past and the suggested 1C increase in Africa since 1980 was enough to badly hurt Europe while Africans doesn’t seem to notice.
LOL.
Omega blocks have always occurred, but the air masses they transport are warmer than they used to be, increasing the temperatures experienced beneath the ridge.
Second of all, it’s not true that Africans haven’t noticed:
“Observed increases in hot extremes (including heatwaves) and decreases in cold extremes (including cold waves) are projected to continue throughout the 21st century with additional global warming (high confidence).”
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/factsheets/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Regional_Fact_Sheet_Africa.pdf
Climate model “projections” are meaningless because they are based on erroneous science.
Roy Clark: A Nobel Prize for Climate Model Errors | Tom Nelson Pod #271
Why not just consult Nostra-dumbass. !
How can they be wrong? They are producing the answers that the alarmists paid for.
Once again our favorite totalitarian troll wants to ignore the fact that we don’t know past temperature well enough to support the wild claims it is making.
Graph I posted earlier shows the 4 main cities in the South Africa area were all warmer in the 1940s..
Oh.. is down the topic a bit.. not above.
1979 was the coldest period since 1900 after the 1940s warmth that appears in basically all NH temperature data as being warmer than the first two decades of this century.
UAH shows that all the atmospheric warming came from El Nino events charged by increased absorption of the SUN’S energy. There is no warming between those El Nino events.
And the Little Ice Age was the coldest period in the last 20,000 years.
Your denial continues.
By the way, it didn’t go unnoticed here that your criticism doesn’t rescue Vijay Jayaraj.
He said:
“Blaming a regional weather pattern on gasoline-powered cars deliberately misleads the public to justify increased state control over daily life. “
Turns out he’s the one doing the misleading by conveniently ignoring the role of rapid global warming.
The UAH satellite chart shows the temperatures have cooled by about 0.5C since early 2024. Where did the rapid global warming go?
The drop is the natural decay of the 2023/24 El Nino event.
Just like the spike was caused by a natural energy release from the oceans.
“Rapid global warming”?
Saturday 100F
Monday 70 F
Tuesday 70 F
I would consider a 30 F swing over 48 hours to be rapid in some cases, but a 1.5 C rise over 170 years is not rapid.
CO2 has nothing to do with an Omega block heat dome. A perfect storm of pressure differentials is the cause. It is fraudulent pseudoscience to claim otherwise.
The UAH temperature actually drop last month, despite all the manic squawking from the alarmist stooges. !
Other places were much cooler than usual.
UK and Europe were just lucky enough to enough some warm WEATHER for a change.
It wasn’t just “warm weather.”
NBC News reported this remarkable comparison during the recent late June European heat wave:
“Further record-breaking temperatures are expected, including some that could surpass all previous records, regardless of the time of year,” the Météo-France weather service said, adding that the conditions were comparable to the 16-day heat wave in August 2003 that caused an estimated 80,000 excess deaths across Europe.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/world/europe/europe-heatwave-record-temperatures-france-uk-germany-eiffel-tower-rcna351525
The 2003 heat wave was so exceptional that it received its own case study in the 2007 IPCC report:
https://archive.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/xccsc1.html
“Average summer (June to August) temperatures were far above the long-term mean by up to five standard deviations (Figure C1.1), implying that this was an extremely unlikely event under current climatic conditions (Schär and Jendritzky, 2004).”
And now Europe is seeing those temperatures once considered exceptional for August…
…in June.
You quote media as if they are peer revied research papers.
Wow.
I never said it did.
It does play a major role in why temperatures are warmer, though.
No it doesn’t. That is just scientifically baseless conjecture.
There is no science and less data to support that opinion.
Is mindless regurgitation of climate cult mantra actually an “opinion” ?
Good question. He is in the best position to answer that.
“I never said it did.”
Liar-
“Circulation explains why the heat reached Europe, while global warming explains how intense the heat became.”
How intense it became was due to atmospheric pressure not the mild warming in the Sahara since 1979.
Then you need to explain where you think the air transported by the omega block is being advected from, if not the Sahara. You should point this out to Vijay Jayaraj as well.
“Then you need to explain where you think the air transported by the omega block is being advected from”
No, I need to explain to you that adiabatic warming from compressed air that can’t escape the heat dome is the source of the warming not where it is originally advected from.
No one is arguing that subsidence is irrelevant. Both subsidence and warm air advection into the ridge play important roles.
Also, warmer air increases the thickness of the atmospheric column, helping maintain the ridge. So the two processes are not even mutually exclusive.
Even places like South Africa show that the 1940’s was warmer.
https://www.csag.uct.ac.za/2019/09/25/twice-the-global-rate/
As usual.. absolutely nothing like the actual measurements. !
Which one of your mates at CRU adjusted that ! 😉
bnice says it’s all a fraud.
When all comes to all play the fraud card.
That is literally his “with one bound he was free” play.
I’ll say it again….
All those cities you have in the graph above are coastal!
How many more times?
Coastal places are affected by sea breezes and/or have a prevailing wind from off the sea.
South aftica is a tad more than a narrow coastal strip. And even you may be able to appreciate that temps are higher inland?
FI:
Cape Town experiences two distinctly seasonal prevailing winds: the South-Easter (off the ocean) in the summer and the North-Wester in the winter.
Port Elizabeth;
Summer (December to February): Prevailing winds shift more towards the southeast. These maritime breezes bring cooler, moisture-laden air from the Indian Ocean, which helps temper the intense summer heat and fuels frequent local showers.
Nothing like real observation and measurements to show the fraudulent computer projections.
Early in 2018 National Geographic and mainstream sources were predicting Cape Town would soon be running out of water and the area and interior getting hotter. Well, we are now into the ninth Cape winter where the dams have either been overflowing or close. Presently they are at roughly 76% with two more winter months ahead. There has been no public apology for misleading the public after nearly nine years of a failed prediction.
The whole of South Africa has had a couple of years with very good rainfall across the whole country. Dams are close to full or overflowing. Of course this will help with greening and lowering temperatures. The only water shortages are because of leaking pipes, failure to properly maintain the purification and pumping system, and problems with electricity supply. These are man made not climate problems. Switching to unreliable fossil fuels will not fix this.
And South America.. 1940s warmer.
Again:
”South Central Andes” is not the whole of South America,
Data from GISS zealots again.
Matches the data changes they have made quite well doesn’t it.
You are aware that historical data is coming in all the time and thus the update will change the trend minutely.
So a vaiation of ~ +/- 0.15 is a fraud?
Bless you ittle conspiractorial mind.
Heck, they should be able to do better than that if they want to bias things!
But this is the real whopper!
They went the wrong way (sarc)
A major change for past sea temps upwards!!
[every time you violate your no more than five replies to a single individual in a post thread you make me want to make your rules more restrictive. These endless dueling graphs wars are incredibly tedious. I am seriously considering disabling image uploads for all users because our media library is filled with the same images over and over and over again and is already a strain on database handling. Have you considered actually writing one coherent response that might be more than 15 words and makes several points at once-ctm]
Example. These are all separate files now in our media library.
I wish someone could explain why nearly 50% of all state record high temperatures were recorded in the decade of the 1930s, and less than 10% have been set so far this century.
Here’s a map to go with that…
The reason is it was hotter, longer in the 1930’s, than it is today.
There is no unprecedented heat.
No it wasn’t.
The myth that never dies …..
Well, the Climate Change Guru, James Hansen, the guy in charge of recording the temperatures in the United States, said that 1934 was 0.5C hotter than 1998, and that makes 1934 hotter than 2016, and equal to the warmth of the 2024 Anamoly.
There is no unprecedented heat today. It’s a figment of your imagination.
And you should know better. You have seen the unmodified regional temperature records from all around the world that I have posted over the years, and none of them have a “hotter and hotter” temperature profile.
So you have chosen a bastardized temperature record, the Hockey Stick global chart as your go-to, and you ignore the actual data that refutes the Hockey Stick chart.
Showing bastardized regional charts as evidence is typical for climate alarmists like yourself. And you were a meteorologist! Ignoring the regional evidence right before your eyes. A case of “believing what you want to believe”.
I guess I’m going to have to breakdown and buy Windows 11. All my charts showing there is no unprecedented warming today are on my old Windows 8 hard drive that finally shot craps on me after running contiguously for approximately 12 years.
I have lots of charts showing there is no unprecedented heat today. Of course you have seen them all, yet you still deny reality. I’ll show them to you again.
“I have lots of charts showing there is no unprecedented heat today.”
Then post them and I’ll debunk them (ONLY based on instrumental data) …. just so long as you don’t do the “it’s a fraud” thing.’
Because, of course there can be no substantive debate in that event.
Hockey stick
Proxies.
Exactly, not real.
Again the totally FAKE “global” fabrications based on data that DOES NOT EXIST. !
Show us where the oceans were measured in a scientific manner in1920……. still waiting.
Even the land data is sparse to say the least… see below
And what does exist doesn’t remotely match this totally bogus graph !
MEASURED USA temperatures… pre data “mal-adjustment”
If anything, US temps are even more corrupted than the are worse than the Met Office/CRU “never-was-data”….
… if that is even possible. !
12 years out of date.
Would you like to bring up to date?
NOAA adjustments to USHCN measured temperatures
Account for a very large proportion of the fake warming.
You wont read it – but hey ho …
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/papers/menne-etal2010.pdf
NOAA’s adjustments correct several recognized errors in the historical record:
” NOAA’s adjustments correct several recognized errors in the historical record:”
No. Lying BS. Gotta kiss climate alarmists asses.
The Emperor has NO new clothes.
Reality is biting them .
(And you ? )
“Adjustments™” are the cause of basically all warming in the USA data
mod…. does that get around the image problem?
As far as hosting goes, yes.
Yes, I’m not entirely sure why, honestly.
What makes it even more interesting is that extremely cold winters also occurred during the 1930s. The winter of 1935–36 ranked as the third coldest on record:
Source:
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/national-temperature-index/time-series/anom-tavg/3/2
So you’re not sure why the 1930s were hotter and colder, yet you are 100% certain that the current heat was caused by CO2.
See:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/07/06/europes-crisis-is-energy-poverty-not-a-heat-wave/#comment-4215456
If something is hotter and colder same time, it means that there is less water in the air.
Yes, 1936 had the second highest temperature in the 1930’s (1934 being the hottest), and that winter had record cold temperatures.
This can happen when a high pressure system hovers over the western half of the U.S. in summer, and the circulation can bring very cold air out of Canada into the eastern part of the country in winter. The western part of the U.S. did not experience these cold temperatures. It was still hot there.
It’s all about how the high pressure system configures itself.
It has nothing to do with CO2.
“It has everything to do with CO2.”
I don’t agree. While CO2 is an important contributor to warming in the U.S., it cannot account for every observed temperature pattern.
I didn’t say that quote. Just the opposite.
I don’t even think CO2 is an important contributor to warming. I think CO2’s effects are lost in the noise.
Were you just messing with my head with that quote and comment?
I did have to do a double-take.
Because of the “Dust Bowl :
“Natural Climate Variability: Decadal shifts in ocean temperatures, particularly in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, led to natural fluctuations that warmed the Earth’s surface. This shift also caused a dramatic warming of air and sea temperatures in the Arctic. [1, 2, 3]
Industrial Greenhouse Gases: While far lower than today, the accumulation of atmospheric \(CO_{2}\) and other greenhouse gases from early industrialization and the burning of fossil fuels began to force the climate system.
Land-Use Changes: Severe and unsustainable agricultural practices over the Great Plains led to the “Dust Bowl” droughts. Stripping away native prairie grass removed vital soil moisture, allowing much more solar radiation to be absorbed and reinforcing deep atmospheric heat. Research indicates this extreme regional heat triggered an atmospheric reaction that amplified high temperatures across much of the Northern Hemisphere.”
The cooling thereafter came as the above factors faded (CO2 forcing was still minor) and atmospheric aerosols increased during and after WW2 before decreasing again as clean air acts came into effect around the world with CO2 forcing eventually drowning most natural variation.”
I think it was said that 24 city heat records were recorded during this current heatwave in the United States.
That means there were thousands of cities that did not reach a record temperature.
CITY heat records.. says it all really, doesn’t it. !
No. You’re just in denial 🙂
[every time you try and go past your post thread individual limit it makes me want to get stricter~ctm]
So the trolls can post crap and I can’t respond. How leftist of you.!!!
Yeah, that’s the reason. It’s like you’re inside my head.
The atmosphere over the Sahara is hotter than in 1978 but there is no satellite data before then to judge the effect of the increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration over a longer period, say since 1950.
However the GISTEMP website has longer surface temperature records which admittedly have their issues and there are few location in the Sahara with longer records than the ~1970s.
One site is El Golea in the heart of the Sahara where the unadjusted record ~1890 – 2025 shows little net warming.
Also Algiers (Alger Dar El Beida) unadjusted record shows no net warming 1880 – 2025.
Make of that what you will.
Here’s El Golea:
Source: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/stdata_show_v4.cgi?id=AG000060590&ds=14&dt=1
Sorry, but data from before 1947 wasn’t available in the CSV.
Adjusted homogenized
datanumbers.Yep.
The temperature data Mannipulators bastardize a lot of regional charts.
Anything that has a “hotter and hotter and hotter” temperature profile is bogus.
No original, written regional temperature records have a Hockey Stick chart profile.
Here is Alger Dar El Beida:
Source: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/stdata_show_v4.cgi?id=AG000060390&ds=14&dt=1
There is a major discontinuity in this station’s record during the mid-20th century, so the graph begins in 1957.
Adjusted + homogenized
datanumbers.Yep, again.
As usual, the adjustments are automatically treated as fraud or manipulation here. Apparently, if they don’t produce the result some people want, they’re assumed to be deceptive. That seems more like an attempt to dismiss evidence than engage with it.
By the way, your original claim that both stations show no warming over their periods of record (even in the unadjusted data ) is false. In both cases, the most recent temperatures are higher than those recorded during the mid 20th century.
This century’s measured temperature and precipitation from 3 sites.
Oran, Algiers and Annaba
No trend anywhere.
All coastal:
Subject to cooling onshore winds.
FI:
“In Annaba, Algeria, the prevailing wind direction shifts seasonally, blowing predominantly from the west for 7.5 months (October to mid-May) and from the north (Off the Med) for the remaining 4.5 months (mid-May to October)
Proxy data also shows the Mediterranean was warmer by up to 2ºC for the last 2000+ years.
So no criticism of the proxies used there then? (rhetorical).
Yes, we know there was a LIA and a MWP – (caused by some sort of NV).
This has been the situation since 1620 ….
https://www.oceancare.org/en/stories_and_news/the-mediterraneans-heat/
“So no criticism of the proxies used there then? (rhetorical).”
+1
What do you expect? People here to be honest?
I’m not seeing anything remarkable happening to the Sahara in your chart. In fact, its warming less than quite a few other places.
The question is, why does anyone think the warming shown in the chart is due to emissions of CO2? And why does anyone think that this amount of warming represents a crisis?
And there is a much bigger and more important question than either: why does anyone think that the West reducing emissions, while everyone else grows them hell for leather, is going to have any effect on global temps?
All good questions!
You won’t be getting any answers from climate alarmists. They don’t have any answers.
Remember the disclaimer I included in my original post:
“(LSAT would be more directly relevant than LT trends when discussing the heating of Saharan source regions, since desert heating begins at the surface, and sensible heat flux + turbulent mixing warm the near surface atmosphere. But, on this blog, UAH LT is the only temperature dataset being seriously considered, so I play along.)”
If I were simply trying to show how much the Sahara has warmed, I would have used surface temperature observations, which show stronger warming than UAH lower-troposphere temperatures. I used UAH because it’s the dataset most people here accept.
“The question is, why does anyone think the warming shown in the chart is due to emissions of CO2? And why does anyone think that this amount of warming represents a crisis?”
Because the greenhouse explanation is the one that consistently explains the observations as a whole.
Two major pieces of evidence are the long term, unprecedented global warming and the simultaneous warming of the troposphere with cooling of the stratosphere (an expected fingerprint of increased greenhouse gases).
There’s also the fact that warming is occurring across virtually all regions of the globe and in all seasons, which is consistent with the greenhouse effect reducing outgoing IR rather than a localized or seasonal forcing.
Ocean heat content provides another key line of evidence. It shows that Earth has been accumulating energy over decades, indicating a persistent planetary energy imbalance that cannot be explained by internal climate variability alone.
And it is a crisis because of where the current trajectory leads.
Global mean surface temperature is going to rise by several more degrees this century, and the long term warming trend shows no indication of stopping as greenhouse gas concentrations continue to increase.
Land areas (including Europe and the Sahara) warm faster than the global average.
We’ve already seen devastating heat waves in Europe this century. If the globe continues warming, the upper limit of what future European heat waves can reach is going to increase as well.
The IPCC noted in 2007 that the 2003 European heat wave (an event considered extraordinary at the time)resembled what climate models projected could become a typical summer by the late 21st century under continued warming:
“As such, the 2003 heatwave resembles simulations by regional climate models of summer temperatures in the latter part of the 21st century under the A2 scenario (Beniston, 2004). Anthropogenic warming may therefore already have increased the risk of heatwaves such as the one experienced in 2003 (Stott et al., 2004).”
That heat wave claimed an estimated 70,000 lives across the continent.
If average late 21st century summer temperatures resemble that extraordinary heat wave, imagine what an extreme heat wave would look like in that climate.
The heat was caused by adiabatic processes.
We may be facing global warming but why will it be a crisis?
Don’t feed the troll. He must get some pleasure about posting stupid, unsupported stuff that has been debunked many times on these pages and then watching the fur fly.
If you can’t respond to the scientific evidence I’m presenting, just say so.
We all know the word “troll” is often used to dismiss someone who disagrees here.
That’s the pot calling the kettle black. My point is your “evidence” has been responded to many times on this site, so do a little of your own research before posting. Failure to do so is troll-like behavior, posting just to hear yourself talk.
My point was simply that the author of the post is ignoring the role that rapid global warming plays in Europe’s record temperatures.
As far as I can tell, no one in this thread has debunked that argument.
Instead, the responses have largely been:
“Omega blocks have happened before.” (Not what I’m contesting)
“CO2 didn’t cause the omega block.” (Again, not what I’m contesting)
“CO2 is not causing warming.” (Denial)
In fact, even if we assume for the sake of argument that CO2 has nothing to do with the warming, the author is still deliberately misleading.
The author argues that the recent European temperatures were entirely the result of a regional weather pattern.
But if the North African source region has warmed (for whatever reason) then the air transported into Europe by the omega block is warmer than it would have been previously.
So the temperatures cannot be explained solely by the regional circulation. The circulation explains where the air came from; the temperature of that air mass also matters.
Wow, an increase of 0.2°C/decade in the Sahara somehow translated into select thermometers in the UK registering 3°C higher than during similar events in the past. What’s the mechanism for that?
Emily,
First, the 0.2°C/decade figure is a trend rate, not the total change. Over several decades that accumulates. I also explicitly noted that lower troposphere (LT) trends are not the most appropriate metric for this specific question. Surface air temperature is more directly relevant to the heating of a desert source region. I referenced LT only because that is the dataset this blog appears to prioritize.
Second, I’m not suggesting Saharan warming is the only factor involved. I’m focusing on it because the blog itself uses Saharan air as part of its causal explanation:
“The cause appears to have been a natural meteorological phenomenon known as an omega block. The jet stream formed an enormous high-pressure ridge sandwiched between two low-pressure systems. The pressure differential, whose contour lines resemble the Greek letter omega, conveys hot Saharan air into western Europe through a natural atmospheric process.”
I am trying to accept that framing and provide additional context.
And in a reply to another commenter, I pointed out that a warmer air mass advected into the ridge region increases the thickness of the air column and can increase the geopotential height of the ridge. A stronger ridge favors persistence of the blocking pattern. This then promotes further soil drying, leading to reduced evaporative cooling.
Not to worry. They will turn to America for help after the situation becomes totally chaotic.
A heavily promoted prime time debate about climate change is needed to break the monolithic lies dominating media propaganda. Alarmists would get trounced like they have every time one has happened. The brainwashed will need to be shamed into submission for being easily manipulated idiots before any progress is possible for the deluded.
Yes! But also we need to have another BIG CLIMATE RALLY in major cities with all the faithful marching arm in arm preaching austerity (and marxism) for the masses while they live the high life, and NOT practicing what they preach. Then they leave behind piles of litter, get in their SUVs and drive home, one per car, and turn on the AC.
C02 C02 C02 C02
For all their hypocritical yapping and carry-on, all they are really doing is destroying the society they rely on for their very existence.
Nothing they do will make one iota of difference to future climates, only cause the contraction of their country’s industrial and energy supply systems.
China, India, Asia, Africa etc will continue on with their COAL and GAS fired power construction, ensuring an ever increasing supply of much needed atmospheric CO2.
Climate will continue to do what it has always done… change… NATURALLY.
Yep.
And these hypocrites would NEVER swap places with the “victims of global warming” they claim to be concerned about.
The Catastrophic Climate Cult is mental Munchausen’s syndrome by proxy! The media, the “educators,” and the politicians INTENTIONALLY drive the young, the weak, and the simple minded into apathy and depression, regaling them with outlandish end of world scenarios; all the while using their status as “savior” to gain more wealth and power!
This is fast becoming the most destructive cult in human history, making Mao’s Red Guard days pale in comparison! I demand reparations for all the money wasted on battling a few degrees of entirely beneficial, natural warming!
Europe’s problem is crappy government, take away the crappy government and the energy poverty goes away along with a lot of other things we don’t want.
Exactly.
Europe’s problems are self-generated by ignorant politicians. A self-inflicted wound.
Today I am being greeted with:
— Heartbreaking update on Phlip Schofield [and who is he?]
— Seniors eligible for something
— Value of homes in Diss [where on earth is that?]
— Someone called Kate doing something while being filmed
— Constipation cure
— Financial Trend retirees are curious about
— Megan Markle story or rumour
— Something about Megan Harry and Archie
— A clip of a giant anaconda
— A test of a cheap air conditioner
— What it means if you don’t ‘poop’ for 48 hours
— Needle free weight loss
— Instant erections at any age #1
— Instant erections at any age #2
— Needle free weight loss
And then now there are these endless popups about climate stuff ‘they’ don’t want you to see….
Sorry folks, I am not going to be treated like this. I have my reasons for not subscribing, which are of no importance to anyone else. But I will not put up with this nonsense and so will be stopping reading and commenting from here on.
Bye everyone.
I hate to hear that.
You are one of the better commenters. I hope you will reconsider.
Seconded!
There is artificial mountains created by wind parks in Europe, mostly on North Western shores and land.
Of course this is exactly direction from where wet Atlantic air comes to Europe. And all fresh water inland in Europe comes by air.
Those wind turbines are taking energy from air, that means mean temperature of air is decreasing and ability to hold water decreases.
Wind turbines are creating moisture shadow, increasing precipitation around wind farms and decreasing further downstream.
That means less moisture in Europe, more drought and less moisture means higher temperature swing.
Unintended consequences.
Messing with Mother Nature.
Hot lies matter.
Cold truths are suppressed.
I do not understand why certain individuals come here.
They are not interested in discussing the topic.
The know no will believe what they spew forth.
They push their point of view, often with little or no supporting data.
My conclusion?
They are flame warriors.
They come to score debating “points” to inflate their egos.
The live for the S&Gs posting insults gives them.
So, my friend, DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS.