Louisiana Did the Right Thing by Blocking Climate Lawfare

From ClimateREALISM

By Linnea Lueken

A recent article in the Times-Picayune and Nola.com, “Louisiana just made it illegal to sue oil companies over climate change. So have other states,” describes a recent bill passed in the Louisiana legislature and signed into law by Gov. Jeff Landry (R) which bars groups from suing oil and gas companies over alleged downstream impacts of climate change. This is a very positive development, as it is not reasonable to try to connect storms or things like heat-related illness to any particular oil producer.

The bill, called the Louisiana Energy Protection Act, is intended to protect Louisiana oil and gas companies, and all other potential defendants, from frivolous lawsuits over climate change. The Times-Picayune article describes the potential lawsuits as intending to “hold oil and gas companies accountable for the impacts of sea level rise, extreme weather events, wildfires and flooding, arguing that the companies should pay for measures needed to adapt, such as seawalls and building elevations.”

Rep. Brett Geymann (R – Lake Charles), who wrote and sponsored the bill, expressed skepticism about human activity like burning oil and gas causing climate change, which the Times-Picayune article chastises, reciting the idea that there is “overwhelming consensus among scientists that greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels heat the planet.”

The “overwhelming consensus” line is overplayed and worthless when it comes to the facts, because that claim is extremely suspect, as breakdowns of the “97 percent consensus” study show that scientists have a range of belief about how much humans contribute to global warming, and besides, scientific truth does not lean on consensus.

Geymann is quoted as saying “[t]o say my aunt died from a heat stroke and I’m going to sue every oil company and every pipeline company in Louisiana because of it — that is not a legitimate claim.” He is right to be skeptical that these lawsuits are anything but frivolous.

For one, oil and gas are necessary for the lifestyle that Louisiana residents live. The heat and humidity of the state is handled with copious energy demanding air conditioning almost year-round. Stable, abundant, affordable electricity to handle that load comes mostly from natural gas in Louisiana, nearly 70 percent, with most of the rest made up by nuclear, then coal. Louisiana residents are not going to give up air conditioning, or roads, or driving cars, or concrete, or medical technologies, pharmaceuticals, and electronics that rely on the byproducts of petroleum refining. Nor should they be forced to. Attempting to run companies out of business with lawfare for making these essential products is much worse than the alleged impact of a degree or two of warming over more than a hundred years.

Another problem with these lawsuits is that they are attempting to attribute a particular negative outcome, like sea level rise, to a single company or industry, and assign damages based on that company’s contributions. But a single oil company in Louisiana is going to be contributing an immeasurably small amount of emissions—upstream and downstream—to the global count. And it is not the oil company itself that is producing the emissions, it is the public, the users of its products including city and state governments, businesses, and households that use oil and gas and produce emissions.

Also, something like sea level rise has many contributing factors, including the effects of local thermal expansion of water which may have nothing at all to do with global warming, and land subsidence, which is often completely disconnected from climate change or weather at all.

Major civil engineering projects to keep New Orleans from slipping under the waves have been ongoing since the city was first established, long before modern warming trends.

Oil companies, particularly pipeline companies, can be responsible for contributing to erosion and making channels in coastal tidelands which can make land erosion worse; this bill does not ban groups from suing over those very direct and real impacts.

Thus far, most climate lawfare has been more about harassing oil and gas producers and costing them money than actually solving any problems, and certainly cannot stop sea level rise or hurricanes, both of which have occurred throughout history. As numerous papers at Climate at a Glance demonstrate, trends for those and other weather-related events have not gotten worse and fewer people are dying now from temperatures or extreme weather events than at any time in history.

It is the state’s job to handle major civil engineering projects like building levees, so long as they want to maintain below-sea level cities. Louisiana’s legislature and Gov. Landry did a good thing by blocking unscientific and frivolous potential lawfare from climate-obsessed environmental groups.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.8 18 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
31 Comments
2hotel9
June 22, 2026 10:06 am

Finally, some good news out of Louisiana.

Scissor
Reply to  2hotel9
June 22, 2026 11:37 am

Landry is actively going after waste, fraud and abuse. It’s about time.

ResourceGuy
June 22, 2026 10:11 am

Great, now wake up legislators in other states.

Russell Cook
Reply to  ResourceGuy
June 22, 2026 12:19 pm

Plus, wake up the law firms defending the energy companies already named in the assortment of “ExxonKnew” lawsuits across the country – the accusations within them about ‘industry disinformation campaigns’ are based on worthless ‘evidence’ which makes the cases ripe for outright dismissals.

SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Case on Colorado Dispute over Climate Change; (it should throw that case and all the others out)

Reply to  ResourceGuy
June 22, 2026 8:59 pm

Sadly, here in the UK Mad Ed is in a coma

mleskovarsocalrrcom
June 22, 2026 10:36 am

It’s about time.

June 22, 2026 10:36 am

The petroleum companies should countersue the activists for causing climate change by using their products. No one forced them to use petroleum-based products. They did it—and continue to do it—with reckless disregard for the climate apocalypse they shriek about. Hypocrites.

oeman50
Reply to  stinkerp
June 23, 2026 4:27 am

It’s like suing a food store for making you fat, despite the fact that you need the food to survive!

June 22, 2026 10:55 am

Absurd that such a law is even needed .

One comment : at a Heartland Conf , Tom Wysmuller pointed out to me that thermal expansion means nothing in shallow water near shore . Water’s expansion coefficient is just 0.000207 per degree at 20c . It takes hundreds of meters to make that significant .

MarkW
Reply to  Bob Armstrong
June 22, 2026 5:06 pm

Do you believe that thermal expansion only impacts the water column directly above the molecules that are expanding?

It doesn’t matter where the water is expanding, the sea surface rises more or less uniformally.

Mike Larkin
Reply to  MarkW
June 23, 2026 3:15 am

Ah, no it doesn’t. That’s why some places show a very small rise in sea levels and some places, often not far away, show none at all.

MarkW
Reply to  Mike Larkin
June 23, 2026 9:43 am

If you can find me a column of water, standing there unsupported, then I will believe your claim that expansion only impacts the surface directly above.

Most of the time when you find one place with more apparent sea level rise, it’s because the ground itself is moving.

MarkW
Reply to  Mike Larkin
June 23, 2026 9:45 am

Most tsunamis are caused when an earthquake forces a portion of the sea floor to rise.
This action does not cause a column of water to rise out of the oceans and just stand there and neither does thermal expansion.

June 22, 2026 11:15 am

The specific reason behind this new Louisiana law is unusual, and was not articulated in the post. Plaquemines Parish had sued Chevron in state court for ‘climate change’ wetlands degradation under an obscure and vague state wetlands statute. The state jury awarded the Parish $744 million. In April 2026 SCOTUS ruled unanimously that the suit should have been brought in federal court, and voided the state jury award. This new law simply prevents such an embarrassment from arising there again.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
June 22, 2026 1:19 pm

A bit more detail. The Chevron oil production at issue was ordered by the federal government during WW2! The court simply held the circumstances met the conditions of 28USC1442, the ‘federal officer removal’ statute. The reason for the new LA law is that there are presently 40 other nearly identical state La lawsuits pending; this stops that nonsense in the other 40.

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  Rud Istvan
June 22, 2026 4:57 pm

Yep! The New World manner is not superior to the Old World origin of its colonial antecedents.
The US needs a proper revolution to finish the job started two hundred years ago.

June 22, 2026 11:21 am

“Louisiana just made it illegal to sue oil companies over climate change.”

Journalistic utterings about climate change tend to be statements of political beliefs, which are protected under the U.S. Constitution, even political beliefs which are silly.

ResourceGuy
June 22, 2026 12:13 pm

How about a tandem law stripping nonprofit status of litigants involved in such suits.

ResourceGuy
June 22, 2026 12:15 pm

I was already envious of Louisiana for its Senator Kennedy.

oeman50
Reply to  ResourceGuy
June 23, 2026 4:29 am

That guy is a trip. He puts forth his ideas with humor and wit.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
Reply to  ResourceGuy
June 23, 2026 10:26 am

A very astute “good old boy” who is a national treasure.

ferdberple
June 22, 2026 2:05 pm

Louisiana – land of drive thru frozen daiquiris.

oeman50
Reply to  ferdberple
June 23, 2026 4:30 am

Somebody has to do it!

Phillip Chalmers
June 22, 2026 4:53 pm

To me, the entire USA system needs a revolution – the last one has left a mess.
No nation can ever hope to reach some sort of stability if it is possible to conduct lawfare legitimately. It is an abomination. It puts humanity into the hands of money, not money in the hands of humanity.
At the present, the US does not have the rule of law, it is ruled by lawyers

MarkW
Reply to  Phillip Chalmers
June 22, 2026 5:17 pm

The US needs a loser pays rule.
NGOs can use their in house lawyers and pump out low cost lawsuits by the barrel load.
Lawsuits that cost their targets millions, even when they win. Which they almost always do.

drednicolson
Reply to  MarkW
June 22, 2026 7:59 pm

And a 1 year time limit from the date of filing. Defendant wins automatically if time runs out.

MarkW
Reply to  drednicolson
June 22, 2026 8:30 pm

What if it’s the defendant who’s doing the delaying?

Bob
June 22, 2026 5:10 pm

Very nice Linnea.

OldRetiredGuy
June 23, 2026 12:12 am

If they are serious about approving things they would adopt “loser pays for lawsuits.

KVS Marshall - Manicbeancounter
June 23, 2026 4:02 am

It is about time that states are blocking lawsuits against oil and gas companies. They are not just frivolous. They are ideologically driven. The activists behind these claims have not understood the very basic science behind human-caused global warming. That is CO2 is well-mixed in the atmosphere. That means that if emissions from the burning of fossil fuels are causing changes in the climate, then it is irrelevant where in the world the fossil fuels are extracted or are burnt.
If the activists had actually read and understood an IPCC statement on emissions pathways, they would realise that these were global pathways. Not separate emissions pathways for every US State, or each individual country. For instance, see 2021 IPCC AR6 WG3 SPM Table SPM.2.
If you are going to sue fossil fuel interests for the climate damages in the State of Louisiana, who are the “most guilty” parties?
The Carbon Majors database is a useful source. They claim that “70% of Global Fossil Fuel & Cement CO2 Emissions” come from “100 Investor-owned Companies, 72 State-owned Companies, 6 Nation States”.But that is not the whole truth. 72 different nation states do not control the 72 State-owned companies. The biggest “culprits” numerically are China, Russia, the former USSR, and Saudi Arabia.
Any court within any US State should declare that the control of CO2 is beyond its jurisdiction. The same goes for the EPA, which can only control CO2 emissions within US territory, with the US now accounting for less than one-seventh of global emissions. That means over 85% of CO2 emissions come from outside of the USA. For Louisiana, Google AI states

In 2024, Louisiana emitted an estimated 183.6 MtCO2 (million metric tons of carbon dioxide) from energy-related sources.

Yet, the UNEP Emissions Gap Report 2025 estimates that in 2024 global GHG gas emissions reached a record 57.7 GtCO2e, 2.3% higher than the previous year, which was also a record. That is 57,700 MtCO2e.
So activists are now prevented from trying to sue energy companies in Louisiana for the harms of human-caused climate change within Louisiana, when over 99.6% of the alleged harms are coming from elsewhere. Why has nobody pointed this out?
Yet control of CO2 emissions must be on a global scale. This can only be done by international treaties. If I understand the separation of powers under the US Constitution correctly, under Article II, Section 2, the power to make and negotiate treaties lies with the President. It needs a two-thirds supermajority of the Senate to ratify such treaties.
It will take some lawyers to argue the case. But suing fossil fuel companies within a state for the damages of climate change within that state is, at the very least, discriminatory and therefore unjust. It will also make no significant impact on the claimed problem.

oeman50
Reply to  KVS Marshall - Manicbeancounter
June 23, 2026 4:32 am

Bu..but you have to start somewhere. (/sarc)