Proposed New El Niño Index to Measure El Niño strength

From the ECMWF and the robusted department of climate hubris, comes this announcement. -Anthony

A new El Niño index that brings a more climate-robust measure of the strength of El Niño signals has been released by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). With the World Meteorological Organisation’s recent update indicating an 80% likelihood of an El Niño event during June-August 2026 and a 90 percent probability of this continuing until at least November, it is more important than ever to have accurate data to rely on.

While the traditional Niño indices previously relied upon, compare current sea-surface temperatures with a fixed historical baseline, the new measure, known as the Relative Niño index, compares warming in the central Pacific with temperatures across the wider tropics. This can give a clearer picture of how unusual the conditions really are in today’s warming climate:

As the climate warms, interpreting anomalies becomes more challenging”, said Dr Tim Stockdale, Principal Scientist at ECMWF.

Rising background temperatures can make recent El Niño events appear stronger than they are, and La Niña events seem weaker. The new Relative El Niño indices compare the Niño 3.4 and other regions with the overall temperature of the tropics at the same time, offering a perspective that is less sensitive to long-term warming. This will provide an additional tool for describing the likely strength of an upcoming El Niño event. Even with this adjustment, the strength of the forecasts suggests that El Niño may be unusually strong later in the year”.

The new index is also more suited for monitoring and comparing events over time. It is less sensitive to picking up the background signal of global warming trends, meaning El Niño can be described more accurately and with greater separation from climate change.

It joins a range of El Niño indices and products; each designed for a slightly different scientific purpose. At the core are the Niño sea-surface temperature indices — Niño 3.4, Niño 3, Niño 4, and Niño 1+2, which track sea-surface temperature anomalies in different parts of the tropical Pacific. These are widely used to monitor where warming or cooling is concentrated and to assess the evolution of El Niño and La Niña events.

The Relative Niño index is provided on approximately the same scale as the traditional Niño index meaning forecasters and other users can adopt it without having to relearn thresholds or interpretation.

Florian Pappenberger, Director-General of ECMWF, said:

Providing the index in this new form, as recently recommended by WMO, should mean it can be adopted almost immediately. Producing it has been a huge collective endeavour from ECMWF and its partners. We are grateful to the WMO for the support they have shown throughout this process. It has been a long time in the making, but its availability now has become more crucial than ever with indicators pointing towards the potential for an El Niño event of at least moderate strength but possibly reaching strong intensity. We could be looking at an event as significant as any we have seen in the past 50 years”.

[UPDATE] Now that you know about the new whiz-bang Relative Oceanic Niño Index, I’m sure Anthony won’t mind if I show you just how big an improvement it is …

Be still, my beating heart … methinks someone at ECMWF has too much time on their hands.

w.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.8 12 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
45 Comments
strativarius
June 11, 2026 2:44 am

This one goes to 11

Bryan A
Reply to  strativarius
June 11, 2026 6:36 am

Had the same thought…
Anything to increase the Hype and create a greater sense of urgency and disparity.
Gotta make those kiddos feel hopeless!
Much like the recoloring of weather temperature graphics on the news that makes 70’s yellow instead of green and 80’s orange instead of yellow.

gezza1298
Reply to  Bryan A
June 11, 2026 8:15 am

Perhaps they could give them names like they have for every low pressure weather system to make them seem scarier, perhaps starting with Godzilla.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  gezza1298
June 11, 2026 9:42 am

Starting with Greta. 🙂

Bryan A
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
June 11, 2026 12:27 pm

How DARE you!
3 Hail Milkeys
5 ReGretas
And do the Weather Stations of the Hockey Stick
As penance

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Bryan A
June 11, 2026 1:12 pm

Can I merely do an Indian rain dance?

Bryan A
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
June 11, 2026 2:20 pm

Twice will suffice

jgorline
Reply to  Bryan A
June 12, 2026 3:25 pm

Mikey needs to pay up after lying in court. Mark Steyn has the last laugh.
Mikey’s nature trick is something that should never be done in science. He’s Mikey Fraudpants.

Frankemann
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
June 12, 2026 12:42 am

Now I am confused. Does One Greta equal 2 Godzillas, or is it the other way around? And where does Hiroshimas fit in the scale?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Frankemann
June 12, 2026 7:04 am

I cannot answer the first. The equation balance question.

I can assert with 90% confidence that Hiroshima is lower on the scale.
I better consult the IPCC summary for policy makers for verification.

jgorline
Reply to  Bryan A
June 12, 2026 6:45 am

Yes, the pseudoscientist prognosticators said the same thing about solar cycle 24. Ah man, it’s gonna be a big one, with egg on their faces after it didn’t materialize. Accountability?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  jgorline
June 12, 2026 7:05 am

Predictions and forecasts always are accompanied by the risk of being wrong.

Accountability?
When I make a mistake, I admit it, take corrective action when possible, and if needed make reparations.
Owning one’s mistakes is how I was raised.

Reply to  strativarius
June 11, 2026 11:19 pm

Their BS and desperation scale is at 12

Greg Goodman
Reply to  strativarius
June 12, 2026 4:48 am

Well if your read the article before going for the knee-jerk sarcasm , you would notice that the new index is about 0.5deg LESS than the traditional ENSO index.

What I do notice is that it underlines the ASSUMPTION that any long term change IS human caused “global warming” and that all the other indices are just about explaining the wiggles.

Currently, multivariate correlation studies are sucking out some of the warming and attributing it to ENSO. This lastest attempt at politically motivated “activist science” will allow ENSO to help remove the wiggles while leaving a stronger AGW attribution.

That is where the lie really lies.

Neil Pryke
June 11, 2026 3:06 am

If you set limits…anticipate them being exceeded, or broken…

Bob Weber
June 11, 2026 3:51 am

Where have you been ECMWF, the RONI has been around for five years! NOAA has included it in their monthly global ocean monitoring report all that time (see current version out yesterday).

comment image

Reply to  Bob Weber
June 11, 2026 6:51 am

It has the same goal as RONI but it is not the same, it uses a different SST dataset in its calculation for example.

strativarius
June 11, 2026 4:06 am

Story Tip – From the eco trenches…

Ed Miliband is at war with Number 10 over its attempts to slash DESNZ’s budget by at least 1% to help fund the elusive Defence Investment Plan (DIP). According to the Telegraph, Miliband has gone studs up over demands to squeeze around £600m from the department.
Will someone think of the heat pumps…

Currently, around £9 billion is set to be spent on carbon capture and storage alone. Miliband thinks this is a worthy investment, even as the DIP is around £4.5 billion short of the funding requested by the MoD. Is Ed aware that Britain’s Navy more or less doesn’t exist?
The ongoing cabinet wrangling over the DIP is increasingly regarded as an academic exercise within Labour circles anyway, given Starmer’s tenure in Number 10 is coming to an end.
Although under the new regime, Miliband will still sit at the top table…Guido

Mad Ed thinks saving the planet is far more important than defending the realm. Most of the Parliamentary Labour Party does. And to back mad Ed’s position up we have the jumble sale also known as the Met Office:

The Met Office has claimed that a new Welsh temperature record for springtime was set in Cardiff last month.

The place where it was recorded, Bute Park, is a Class 5 junk site and is arguably one of the most inappropriate places to measure temperatures.Daily Sceptic

Seeing is believing
comment image

strativarius
Reply to  strativarius
June 11, 2026 4:32 am
Bryan A
Reply to  strativarius
June 11, 2026 6:39 am

Probably because it’s hard to defend against inherent stupidity
Such is the Idiocracy

Reply to  strativarius
June 11, 2026 5:07 am

And that is how the Met Office measures temperatures ! 😉

June 11, 2026 5:36 am

The Southern Oscillation Index is still the #1 indicator, and that variation is separate from SSTs and any background temperature baseline. The SOI is what really seems to drive the whole ENSO cycle. Just go with that.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  johnesm
June 11, 2026 9:45 am

What? And give up tons of grant money? Outrageous! /s

June 11, 2026 5:37 am

Climate Alarmists have to find something to hype. This time it is El Niño. Much ado about nothing.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
June 11, 2026 6:31 am

Just a new way to lie to people.

June 11, 2026 6:55 am

At the start of the above article:
“A new El Niño index that brings a more climate-robust measure of the strength of El Niño signals has been released by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF).”

Just wondering if that “more climate-robust measure” (ROTFL!) for the strength of El Niños will do nothing more than to simply increase the “global warming” over, oh, the last 50 or so years since scientific metrics for such were first applied?

Yep, watch for the magician’s sleight-of-hand at work here.

Fran
Reply to  ToldYouSo
June 11, 2026 8:17 am

Daily Mail today says “super el nino already here, millions will die”. Must be the new index.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
June 11, 2026 8:20 am

Ha ha yeah. The new paradigm in climate science – increasing the robustness of the latest climate lie.

OK, I understand that these people have bills to pay, but can’t we pay them to just sit and look out of their windows all day, maybe even go for a walk at the taxpayer’s expense. Crazy glue their keyboards.

Richard M
June 11, 2026 9:13 am

The ONI is already adjusted. You can see the current adjustments to the ONI here:

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/ONI_change.shtml

The net effect of this baseline change is to make El Nino events look weaker and La Nina events look stronger. Without this adjustment many of the recent La Nina events would have been classified as neutral.

This change does make some sense for El Nino. The water which constitutes El Nino has been surface water which has warmed with the rest of the tropics. OTOH, a lot of water which constitutes La Nina is upwelling water from well below the surface water. This water hasn’t been warmed. While it would be mixing with warmed water, using the same baseline as El Nino is probably wrong.

Editor
June 11, 2026 9:22 am

I’ve added an update to the end of Anthony’s post …

w.

Richard M
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
June 11, 2026 10:53 am

Since the ONI is already based on a variable baseline, I wouldn’t expect much difference.

bdgwx
Reply to  Richard M
June 11, 2026 12:50 pm

RONI ≈ ONI earlier in the period.
RONI ≈ ONI – 0.5 today.

The issue with ONI is that the ENSO 3.4 region is not warming much if at all despite the tropical region and globe as whole continuing to warm. As a result La Nina effects are becoming amplified while El Nino effects are becoming attenuated. ONI doesn’t adequately capture this change in behavior because its baseline has been more static in recent decades.

MEI is another metric used to assess ENSO magnitudes that has been around for awhile.

Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
June 11, 2026 6:52 pm

Willis
Your graph appears to be of the NOAA RONI not the one referred to in the head post.

comment image?itok=GYga8fDH

Reply to  Phil.
June 11, 2026 9:07 pm

Thanks, Phil. Didn’t realize there are two “RONI” indices … but given how stupid the whole field of climate science is, it’s no surprise.

Further research reveals the ECMWF index is actually called “RNINO”, so my graph is of the actual RONI index.

I find this:

ECMWF defines a generic Relative Niño index 

RNINOanom

​= s⋅[(NINO−TROP)−mean(NINO−TROP)]

​with a scaling factor s chosen so that the variability amplitude matches the traditional Niño index

They compute relative versions for all four standard Niño regions (1+2, 3, 3.4, 4) for their seasonal forecasts

In their documentation they talk about “Relative Niño indices” and “Relative Niño index” but, at least in the official ECMWF blog, they do not brand it with the CPC acronym “RONI”; they just use the generic RNINO notation.

“TROP” is the SST of the broader tropical ocean, 20°N to 20°S. The mean is the climatological mean, 1991-2020.

Go figure.

w.

bdgwx
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
June 12, 2026 7:43 am

I get that some areas of climate science may seem stupid to some people, but why generalize it to the whole field? What specifically do you think is stupid about RONI, RNINO, or studying ENSO cycles in general?

Sparta Nova 4
June 11, 2026 9:42 am

And again, the use of anomalies.

F. Leghorn
June 11, 2026 12:45 pm

So it’s like the “Enhanced Fujita Index”. Anyone saying “the tornado was an F4” instead of “EF4” is now dumb.

bdgwx
Reply to  F. Leghorn
June 11, 2026 1:05 pm

Yes and no. It was supposed to be the case that the F4 ≈ EF4. We now know that it ended up being F4 ≲ EF4 because the guidelines for rating EF ended up being more stringently applied than F. [Lyza et al. 2025] For ENSO it was always known that RONI ≲ ONI. [L’Heureux et al. 2024]

Jim Ross
Reply to  bdgwx
June 13, 2026 3:57 am

“For ENSO it was always known that RONI ≲ ONI.”
 
To avoid some of the confusion over the references to the ECMWF version of a relative ONI which was the focus of the original post, I shall (with apologies) focus here solely on the recent switch by NOAA (1st February 2026) from using their traditional El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) classification basis of the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) to the Relative Oceanic Niño Index (RONI) where both are generated by NOAA using the same input sea surface temperature (SST) values in the Niño 3.4 region of the Pacific Ocean (ERSST.v5).
 
On that basis, the mathematical difference between the two indices shows that your comment on their numerical relationship is, at best, misleading. As shown below in the lower NOAA plot of the actual difference (ONI-RONI), RONI is mostly higher than ONI before 2000 (ONI-RONI is predominantly negative in every decade from 1950 to 2000, inclusive), roughly equal to ONI during the period 2000 to 2010 (and only during this decade), and is substantially and consistently lower than ONI only since 2010.

comment image

Note that the reference that you provide refers to a version of ONI that had been determined using a single fixed baseline (1991-2020) and not the version reported by NOAA since 2012, which reflects a “rolling” baseline. Using that version would make the ONI-RONI difference even more negative prior to 2000.

bdgwx
Reply to  Jim Ross
June 13, 2026 6:16 am

On that basis, the mathematical difference between the two indices shows that your comment on their numerical relationship is, at best, misleading.

I intentionally chose the ≲ symbol with the tilde specifically to avoid my statement being misleading. Note that ≲ is different than ≤.

Bryan A
June 11, 2026 1:15 pm

Gee Mr E., That new chart minus incremental temperature increase (red line) shows the 1983 El Niño event to be the strongest per the “Relative Index” indicator. I guess 1988, 2016 & 2024 were minor players and not the gargantuans they were hyped to be.

heme212
June 11, 2026 1:41 pm

it’s getting the fahrenheit treatment. just multiple by a fudge factor and add 32.

June 11, 2026 4:21 pm

“… indicators” … “pointing towards” … “potential for” … “at least moderate strength” … “possibly” ….. “reaching strong intensity”.

I wonder what odds the bookies in Las Vegas would offer based on such a ‘strong’ statement

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tombstone Gabby
June 12, 2026 7:11 am

People will bet on anything. Maybe you can make some coin with that concept.

alexbuch
June 14, 2026 12:17 am

China wind power capacity and El Nino

During El Niño, the trade winds (passat winds) that usually blow steadily from east to west across the tropical Pacific Ocean weaken, or can even reverse and blow west to east. This weakening triggers a chain reaction that shifts weather patterns globally.

By the end of 2025, China’s cumulative grid-connected wind power capacity reached roughly 640 GW (640 million kilowatts). Accounting for nearly 46% of the global total, China has firmly maintained the number one spot in worldwide wind energy capacity for 15 consecutive years. [1, 2, 3]
Key Capacity Milestones:
2025 Additions: China added a record 119 GW of new wind capacity in 2025 alone. [1]
Prospective Pipeline: According to the Global Energy Monitor, China has over 590 GW of wind capacity in prospective development (announced, pre-construction, and construction phases). [1]