Sierra Club Floods the Climate Zone (alarmism or bust!)

From MasterResource

MasterResource previously announced the launch of “Climate Truth Tellers” by the Sierra Club to flood social media with comments on climate and energy issues from the alarmist, statist, Climate Industrial Complex perspective. “Climate disinformation is rampant on social media,” the project stated, “but the volunteers of Sierra Club’s Climate Truth Tellers team are fighting back by uplifting positive, fact-based posts.” The “trolls” (like me) must be winning!

I challenged readers to sign up. We, too, can weigh-in on “How important is clean, renewable energy to you” and “How important is protecting our public lands from destructive drilling, mining, and fracking?“. I signed up. I am a Climate Truth Teller and wanted to get behind enemy lines and evaluate what the spoon feeding was about.

Jennifer McCharen sent the following to the CLIMATE-TRUTH-TELLERS list serve last week (May 29, 2026):

Hello Truth Tellers….
Today’s Posts

POST 1 (by Sierra Club) – Save the Arctic: Tag a fossil fuel company!
When you share this post and tag one of the major fossil fuel companies — by typing @ followed by the name they use on social media — you essentially tap their social media team on the shoulder and let them know you’re paying attention to the company’s nefarious influence on this crucial environmental issue. Remember: climate disinformation thrives in isolation and behind a veil of carefully crafted, focus-grouped talking points. Not on our watch!

  • Hey @ExxonMobil, in case you were wondering, you can’t profit from selling fossil fuels on an unlivable planet. No drilling in the Arctic!
  • @ConocoPhilips, we don’t want to see the Earth’s precious wild places be destroyed to line your pockets.
  • The future is renewable, @Chevron. Drilling for oil in the Arctic isn’t even a smart investment.

POST 2 (by Grist) – A planned “hyperscale” data center threatens wild land in rural Utah

INSTRUCTIONS for engaging with these two posts: Please visit each post on your preferred social media platforms and leave a comment in your own words (you’ll need to be following Sierra Club to comment on Instagram. Then, if you want to, we encourage you to share the post(s) with your friends and family!

Note: if you use a different social media platform that isn’t listed, feel free to share the post directly to your social account of choice! Simply copy the link to one of the other platforms (like Facebook), then post with your own thoughts using the prompts and talking points.

Today’s Tip

Mis- and Disinformation: What’s the Difference?

We’ve welcomed a lot of new Truth Tellers in recent weeks, so we thought it was a good idea to revisit one of the core concepts of the project: What is the difference between misinformation and disinformation, and why does it matter?

Misinformation is simply incorrect information, likely shared by mistake or believed due to a misunderstanding. Not every false statement you see online is an intentional lie.

On the other hand, disinformation is incorrect on purpose for a specific reason. A fossil fuel company purchasing a full-page advertisement to cast doubt on whether climate change is real? That’s a classic example of disinformation for the sake of profit.

There are many new and subtle types of disinformation to be found online. Another example is the myth that offshore wind turbines harm whales. There is no truth to this whatsoever, and in fact wind power is an important part of solving climate change (which actually does harm whales).

The difference between mis- and disinformation matters because you wouldn’t want to accuse someone making an innocent mistake of being part of a massive fossil fuel funded conspiracy! Instead, someone sharing misinformation is a great opportunity to practice skills for difficult conversations, such as leading with your values and letting them know you care. Check out our webinar recording for more!

Thanks again for joining this team. Your voice matters! If you have any questions, please email truth.tellers@sierraclub.org.

In solidarity,
Sierra Club Action Team

P.S. Remember to check out our Welcome Guide for more information on how this team works and to access previous workshops and recordings. We are always updating our list of Frequently Asked Questions here as well.

Better yet. Understand the weak opposing arguments and provide your own “climate truth.” Climate realists should sign up and express their concerns about climate exaggeration, the (industrial) Green New Deal, and Net Zero waste. Join here.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
3 9 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
17 Comments
Neil Pryke
June 10, 2026 10:13 pm

The Sierra Club…that figures…they wrote the book, didn’t they..?

leefor
June 10, 2026 10:14 pm

Hey Sierra Club, how about renewables taking good cropping land. 😉

George Thompson
Reply to  leefor
June 11, 2026 4:32 am

And poisoning that land and killing birds.

Reply to  George Thompson
June 11, 2026 8:05 am

and bats and insects

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  leefor
June 12, 2026 6:58 am

When they go after the forest habitat of the spotted owls, to clear it for a WTG farm, will you protest?

Bob B.
June 11, 2026 3:40 am

“…someone sharing misinformation is a great opportunity to practice skills for difficult conversations, such as leading with your values and letting them know you care.”

The truth matters not as long as you show that you care. The very definition of virtue signaling.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Bob B.
June 12, 2026 6:59 am

Lead with emotions, then facts will have zero impact.

June 11, 2026 3:49 am

I tried to join but the form only accepts USA Zip Codes and phone numbers.

George Thompson
Reply to  Oldseadog
June 11, 2026 4:34 am

Send cash ‘cuz good socilaists will always accept free money.

June 11, 2026 5:27 am

Who is financing this effort? Perhaps the Communist Chinese.

The Chicoms want to promote windmills and solar in the U.S., and want to discourage the building of Data Centers in the U.S. The Sierra Club is helping them out. Are they getting paid to do so?

Crispin in Val Quentin
Reply to  Tom Abbott
June 12, 2026 11:52 am

Don’t assume. If Americans are dumb enough to listen to the Sierra Club, the server farms will move north to Alberta. No problem! We have masses electricity and unsaleable gas due to the Sierra Club paying professional protesters to block any new pipelines to the coast. Carry on Sierra Club! Stop your foreign interference and concentrate on Utah!

“Soon all your base are belong to us! Ha ha! We pwn you!”

Richard Mott
June 11, 2026 5:32 am

I can remember all the way back to 1966, when the Sierra Club (correctly) backed the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant as environmentally preferable to building more dams for hydroelectric power. That decision caused a schism between what Steward Brand refers to as the “pragmatic” vs. the “romantic” wings of the environmental movement. Brand himself is very much a pragmatist and always has been, a “maker” in today’s terms. He has embraced nuclear for at least two decades (see his piece from a dozen years ago in MIT’s Technology Today magazine, among others). Just for fun, ask one of these “truth tellers” how they feel about nuclear power. The answer will tell you whether they actually understand the science they swear fealty to.

Reply to  Richard Mott
June 11, 2026 6:26 am

in fact wind power is an important part of solving climate change”

This is what they use as the example of something that isn’t disinformation. Fortunately, climate propaganda appears to follow the Beer-Lambert Law (paradoxically), and we’ve already flat-lined at saturation (hopefully). As Tom Abbott mentions above though, we still have to be vigilant about their conflating in new big targets (e.g. data centers).

Arthur Jackson
June 11, 2026 9:34 am

Good idea, the problem is I would need to get a libtarded social media account. X, no. Facebook, no. Instagram, never been there. Linked In, deleted when I retired.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Arthur Jackson
June 12, 2026 7:01 am

Ditto and I am preparing to delete my Linked-In account which I put up 11 years ago during a job search.

Bob
June 11, 2026 4:37 pm

This is an important post. Pay attention to the fact that they aren’t using a bunch of academic/scientific speak. They are using the average guy to spread their message in easy to understand language. The truth doesn’t seem to be an important standard to them, just their message. We need to do something similar only using truth and facts. Our most important audience is the tax payer and rate payer.

Crispin in Val Quentin
June 12, 2026 11:40 am

The server farm should not be built in Utah. That’s correct. It should be built in Alberta. Let the Canadians do it properly, not in the wasteful manner proposed for Utah.

A server farm and its accompanying power station are huge sources of heat and CO2, a great deal of which can be harvested at nominal cost to grow food year round, even in Alberta. For example, waste heat from a 1.5 GW power station and a server farm using half of it can grow fresh vegetables and fruit year round and make a $6 billion/yr profit, food currently imported by air and truck from Mexico and California, . Read the proposal at

https://www.newdawnengineering.com/website/library/Papers%2bArticles/Yellowhead%20Development%20Corridor/Yellowhead_Project_Analysis_FINAL.pdf

Every power station and every server farm in Canada should be supporting massive food production facilities. We can sell it to the northern States also presently trucking it in from Mexi and Cali. All the technologies needed are already in common use in Holland. Nothing to invent except the will to think more broadly about what a resource is and looks like.