Resourceful Earth Day: Fred Smith on Julian Simon

From MasterResource

By Robert Bradley Jr.

Editor’s Note: Today has been celebrated since 1970 as Earth Day. With the Progressive Left all but abandoning its significance, the opportunity is to rebrand April 22nd as Resourceful Earth Day. Human ingenuity, despite Statism, has proven optimist/realist Julian Simon correct, as noted by CEI founder and longtime head Fred Smith in this 1999 tribute.

“The problems of famine, overpopulation, poverty, and disease are resolvable. In fact, they have been resolved in the United States and other places where human ingenuity is free to solve them.”

April 22, once associated with the optimism of revolutionary Marxism (as the birthday of Lenin) and then with the pessimism of modern Malthusianism (environmentalism’s Earth Day since 1970), merits redemption. A new label, Resourceful Earth Day, is appropriate as we enter the 21st century, a title selected to honor mankind’s increasing ability to solve environmental as well as economic problems.

This title, of course, is inspired by the late Julian Simon, author of “The Resourceful Earth,” who combated with passion and power those who viewed man as the cancer of this planet and his future as bleak and austere.

Resourceful Earth Day also signals a hope more appropriate to spring, marking a return to a positive view of man’s role on this planet. Indeed the old Marxists, convinced that they would dominate the future, optimistically favored economic and technological change. The forces of change, they believed, would move man toward heaven here on Earth.

That optimistic element has disappeared. The environmental establishment has grown increasingly gloomy, convinced that the Earth is suffering from the “Terrible Toos” — too many people, too much consumption, too great a reliance on technology which is understood too little. Earth Day has become a day of atonement for man’s criminal assault on our planet. That pessimism reflects, in part, their realization that history is no longer on their side; thus, change is no longer in their interest. Stasis must be the order of the day.

With attacks on things like biotechnology, automobiles, suburban opportunity and trade, they now seek only, as Aaron Wildavsky noted, “an egalitarian society based on rejection of economic growth in favor of a smaller population eating lower on the food chain, consuming a lot less, and sharing a much lower level of resources much more equally.” Had God not expelled man from the Garden of Eden, so the story goes, the “greens” certainly would have. And, indeed, their ideal land use is “wilderness,” defined as an area from which man is excluded.

Simon was a wonderful critic of all this foolishness. He investigated and refuted the gloomy projections that Western Civilization was a failure, that our civilization was non-sustainable and doomed to inevitable decline as the planet’s finite resources were depleted.

But the finite nature of the Earth’s material resources pose no great problem, he argued, because the Earth’s most precious resource is infinite and organic. It is its people, contributing to  the ever-growing stock of useful human knowledge. When people have been free to apply their intellect, they have always found ways to meet needs and answer crises, and always will.

Simon pointed out that, while people are born with stomachs, they are born with brains and hands as well. The latter allow them to create far more than they consume. People, after all, are not ciphers, which helps explain how the growth in the world’s food supply has outstripped the growth in the world’s population.

The problems of famine, overpopulation, poverty, and disease are resolvable. In fact, they have been resolved in the United States and other places where human ingenuity is free to solve them. The calamity criers of the green movement predicted great disasters afflicting the planet by the year 2000. The Carter administration’s Global 2000 Report forecast global calamity, and Paul Ehrlich claimed on the Johnny Carson Show, “If I were a gambler, I would bet even money that England will not exist in the year 2000.”

Unfortunately for the eco-catastrophists, as we approach their due date for disaster, the planet is in increasingly good shape. This point was recently conceded by America’s arch-druid. “Not only do we have the healthiest economy in a generation,” said Vice President Al Gore, “we also have the cleanest environment.”

On this Resourceful Earth Day, we may hope that Gore and his fellow foot soldiers in the environmental brigades will ponder these points and rethink the wisdom of the current policy of placing all one’s faith in federal political solutions. The greens’ constant calls for massive government controls, forced population limits, harsh curbs on economic activity, and a curtailing of technology threaten to produce exactly the results that such actions seek to avoid —a world of ecological and economic disaster. On this April 22, let us commit to both a freer and a cleaner world; they go together after all.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 11 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 22, 2026 6:40 pm

If Paul Ehrlich had been a painter, he would have painted nothing but still lifes… In french : “des natures mortes.”

KevinM
April 22, 2026 7:19 pm

 And, indeed, their ideal land use is “wilderness,” defined as an area … ” filled with solar panels?

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  KevinM
April 23, 2026 7:02 am

Their ultimate goal is ridding the Earth of 90% or more of humans. Which means no need for solar panels, wind turbines, nuclear plants, or any of it. At that point there won’t be a cohesive civilization any more to even make that stuff. That’s the point.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
April 23, 2026 10:03 am

Maybe they want to reduce the population by 90% but, for sure they want to control 100% of whatever population is left.

gyan1
April 22, 2026 7:43 pm

Malthusian delusion dominates modern environmentalism. No amount of empirical data can influence them because they are the good tribe who couldn’t possibly be wrong. They are so out of touch with reality that they should be considered mentally ill rather than be given any credibility.

Allen Pettee
April 22, 2026 7:47 pm

The only thing modernity has been unable to solve (partly because I believe it’s a cause of) is worldwide human fertility decline-to well below replacement.

Reply to  Allen Pettee
April 22, 2026 11:43 pm

It is interesting how that seems of little so concern. Even Africa is soon to go negative, possibly with the aid of … Perhaps there are some who desire human extinction?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Allen Pettee
April 23, 2026 8:45 am

It is not individual fertility.
It is birth and conception rates.
If one starts a family at 30, one loses 10+ years of reproduction potential.
If one studies several different social phenomena, one can see where certain “intimate” activities move away from potential conception.
Then there is the quality of contraceptives now available, the activists for abortion, the morning after pills and so forth.

Do not misconstrue. I am in favor of couples planning their families rather than letting nature do the job for them. The items listed are factors related to population declines, but are not the sole “control knob.”

Allen Pettee
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
April 23, 2026 11:10 am

I don’t want to engage in a nitpicking discussion, but I meant to use the term “human fertility” not in the strictly defined sense (“ability” of humans to reproduce), rather in the meaning of “desire” of humans to reproduce, which is what I believe modernity does-it encourages humans to reproduce less (below replacement of 2.1 births per couple). And yes it’s partly due to contraception and abortion and starting families late, but multifactorial-including plummeting marriage rates, increasing women’s education and work focus, and decreasing young men’s sexual activity. And with longevity starting to plateau, the world is likely currently at peak population (just over 8 billion), with concerns that it will be much older and contracting over the next century.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Allen Pettee
April 23, 2026 12:38 pm

You are not nitpicking. Your post contributes.

I agree with all points made.

observa
April 22, 2026 7:58 pm

It’s all under control just send more grants-
The climate change scientists racing to dim the sun

observa
April 22, 2026 8:07 pm

You’d think the movers and shakers would avoid the Thames with the dooming-
London mansion shatters global record with $518 million mega-sale
But there’s lots of the Green out there to be had-
Suneil Setiya: A Comprehensive Overview of the Life, Career, and Legacy of a Financial Visionary – digitaljournalusa.co.uk

Scissor
Reply to  observa
April 22, 2026 8:25 pm

This just in:

Ukrainian billionaire and the country’s richest man, Rinat Akhmetov, finalized the purchase of a luxury apartment in Monaco for approximately €471 million ($554 million), according to reports in April 2026.

Reply to  Scissor
April 22, 2026 8:34 pm
leefor
April 22, 2026 8:38 pm

“It is its people, contributing to the ever-growing stock of useful human knowledge” and then there are the bureaucrats.

Reply to  leefor
April 22, 2026 11:40 pm

And, politicians.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
April 23, 2026 8:46 am

And activists.

Edward Katz
April 23, 2026 2:15 pm

Among the “Terrible Toos” are too many poorly-informed and outright dishonest politicians, academics, bureaucrats, and green-product peddlers who are less concerned about the planet’s and mankind’s future but are looking for opportunities to financially prosper from advancing unproven theories about a mythical climate apocalypse.