The closure of the Strait of Hormuz is a missile on course to blow the neo-Malthusian death cult of Net Zero to smithereens. The reduction of up to 25% in the global supply of hydrocarbons is a serious dress rehearsal for the full Net Zero calamity. Hard lessons are about to be learnt across the world, particularly in already de-industrialising countries in Europe, that reliable energy is just one crucial use of hydrocarbons. Fertiliser, medicines, plastics, construction materials – it might be quicker to list products that do not rely on hydrocarbons. Yet the UK has an Energy Minister in power who, if reports are to be believed, will refuse any gas to be drawn from a new North Sea field that could increase supply from British sources by around 6% in only a few months. ‘Mad’ and ‘Sinister’ are names often attached to Edward Miliband; now more people are calling it out for what they say it really looks like: Treason.
Treason is defined as a citizen betraying the state by aiding its enemies. It has become crystal clear that pursuing a path to true Net Zero will destroy a country’s industrial base (in the UK that process is well under way), reduce food supplies to starvation levels (hydrocarbon-based fertiliser has doubled crop yields around the world in the last few decades) and cause the deaths of thousands of people in only intermittently warmed houses. A country weakened in this fashion would be prey to stronger tribes whether it be the Caliphate or a frisky Boris the Bear. The best outcome might be to become a protectorate of a pitying power such as the USA.
The excuse that this unfolding tragedy is required because the climate is in crisis looks thinner by the day. As the full implications of Net Zero start to dawn, proof from the scientific process about atmospheric carbon dioxide is replacing imaginative ‘settled’ opinions from rigged computer models. The Greta madness – autism on stilts – is fading into history, although many would argue that the process is still not fast enough.
Is this all a headline-grabbing exaggeration of the effects of Net Zero? Maybe, one might hope so, but let us recall the horror show that unfolded in the British Parliament last year when around 200 MPs were prepared to vote for a private bill that would have reduced the use of all hydrocarbons, domestic and imported, to 10% within less than a decade. You surely didn’t need to be Brain of Britain to work out that this would have led to mass starvation, death, disease and societal collapse in the near future. Yet all the LibDems, all the Greens, 90 Labour MPs from the governing party and two crackpot Conservatives were in favour.
Perhaps some of these Honourable Members have IQs near plant-watering levels, perhaps some were uniformed, uneducated and uninterested, perhaps some, perish the thought, are ideologues determined to remake the British state according to their own warped political and social views. It is difficult to forget when dealing with some of these people that they believe a woman can have a penis. The Mastermind UK Justice Minister David Lammy not only thinks King Henry VII came after Henry VIII, but has noted that it is “not accurate” to state that only women can have a cervix. Whatever the reason for their manifest stupidity, it would seem a matter of great electoral urgency that these muppets be removed from controlling any lever of political power.
There is no excuse for not knowing about the vital role that hydrocarbons play in manufacturing artificial fertiliser. The Daily Sceptic, along with many others, has been reporting about the Net Zero effects on world food supplies for a number of years.
Last September, the journalist Ella Whelan interrupted the BBC Radio 4 Moral Maze waffle-fest by noting that billions of people will die under Net Zero 2050, since half the world’s food is created using fossil fuels. There was a short embarrassed pause as if someone had thunderously broken wind in the pulpit before another guest lamely chipped in with the suggestion that “billions of people are at risk from climate change”. In the mainstream wackadoodle media world of Net Zero and climate change, supposition has always trumped fact.
While Miliband tries to shut off the gas, Britain will be scrambling to import increasingly expensive artificial fertiliser from abroad. Prices in the last month have risen by up to 40% for nitrogen products with competition for diminishing supplies increasing around the world. Of course, high energy prices have already reduced the UK’s ability to make its own fertiliser, and the country now imports about 60% of its needs. As with a full Net Zero scenario, supplies in the next weeks and months will be taken by richer countries desperate to keep food in their shops at almost any price. With luck, halo-polishing elites may still be able to buy new season Jersey Royals and asparagus for a while in Waitrose; those in the developing world could face mass hunger, if not starvation.
In 2013, Sir David Attenborough made the appalling comment that it was “barmy” for the United Nations to send bags of flour to famine-stricken Ethiopia. Too little land, too many people, was his considered judgement. In 2009, he told the Guardian that: “I’ve never seen a problem that wouldn’t be easier to solve with fewer people.” Under a full Net Zero programme, Britain’s national treasure can thankfully spare us his neo-Malthusian thoughts. There will be no export of bags of any foodstuffs whatsoever to any country.
Or medicines. In a Net Zero future with befuddled climate headbangers still sitting on the gas taps, many common medicines will be in very short supply. Useful and at times life-saving drugs such as paracetamol, aspirin and antibiotics rely on hydrocarbons. Carbon-based chemistry is at the heart of the medical supply business, whether it be drugs or all the various cheap, strong plastics used in medical facilities. Like fertilisers, so with medicines – the maniacs calling for hydrocarbon exploitation to stop have little idea how a modern industrial society stays healthy and feeds itself.
It can only be hoped that the curtain is starting to close on Net Zero but heroic efforts to keep the farce going are still being made. None more so than in the Guardian where the retired UCL Professor of Climate Impacts Bill McGuire recently said it was important that the UK Government “holds its nerve and leaves North Sea oil and gas in the ground”. Exploiting North Sea oil and gas would “send entirely the wrong message to the rest of the world”, he claimed. McGuire’s article concentrates on energy and it is as if the thousands of other uses for hydrocarbons do not exist. The climate “breakdown” is said to be getting worse by the day, something he seems to deduce from a number of recent floods. Wales was said to have had its warmest February on record but, alas, the claim is nowhere to be found in the Met Office record. This shows that the month was the fifth warmest since 1918 when the temperature tied at 6.2°C. An identical average temperature was also declared in 1961.
Regular readers, of course, will recall that McGuire has speculated in the past on other interesting ways that global emissions could be cut. In May 2024, he tweeted the following.
Predictably, there was a bit of a fuss and McGuire subsequently withdrew his post – “not because I regretted it”, but because people took it the wrong way, he explained.
It seems that Professor McGuire is not in favour of a mass cull of the human race. On that we can all agree – stop Net Zero now before it is too late.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor. Follow him on X.
