Breaking: The Trump Administration Protects U.S. National Security by Pausing Offshore Wind Leases

From the US Department of the Interior

12/22/2025

Last edited 12/22/2025

WASHINGTON – The Department of the Interior announced today that it is pausing—effective immediately—the leases for all large-scale offshore wind projects under construction in the United States due to national security risks identified by the Department of War in recently completed classified reports. This pause will give the Department, along with the Department of War and other relevant government agencies, time to work with leaseholders and state partners to assess the possibility of mitigating the national security risks posed by these projects.

“The prime duty of the United States government is to protect the American people,” said Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum. “Today’s action addresses emerging national security risks, including the rapid evolution of the relevant adversary technologies, and the vulnerabilities created by large-scale offshore wind projects with proximity near our east coast population centers. The Trump administration will always prioritize the security of the American people.”

The following leases are paused:

  1. Vineyard Wind 1 (OCS-A 0501)
  2. Revolution Wind (OCS-A 0486)
  3. CVOW – Commercial (OCS-A 0483)
  4. Sunrise Wind (OCS-A 0487)
  5. Empire Wind 1 (OCS-A 0512)

As for the national security risks inherent to large-scale offshore wind projects, unclassified reports from the U.S. Government have long found that the movement of massive turbine blades and the highly reflective towers create radar interference called “clutter.” The clutter caused by offshore wind projects obscures legitimate moving targets and generates false targets in the vicinity of the wind projects.

The Department of Energy in a 2024 report stated that a radar’s threshold for false alarm detection can be increased to reduce some clutter, but an increased detection threshold could cause the radar to “miss actual targets.”

Today’s action ensures that national security risks posed by offshore wind projects are appropriately addressed and that the United States government retains its ability to effectively defend the American people.

5 3 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
December 22, 2025 8:36 am

Artificial clutter? This might be as enduring as the “non ionizing radiation” kerfuffle used to demonize air defense radars.
As I recall, shifting to phased array radars in the 1970’s led to a dezinformatsiya program.

KevinM
Reply to  Tom Halla
December 22, 2025 10:12 am

Whew, thought I didn’t know a radar term. Nope it’s propaganda-related:
“Dezinformatsiya (дезинформация) is the Russian term for disinformation: the deliberate spread of false or misleading information to deceive, manipulate public opinion, or achieve political/economic goals, originating from Soviet intelligence operations (like the KGB) and now amplified by social media.”

MyUsernameReloaded
December 22, 2025 8:57 am

Lame excuse. Trump is still throwing a tantrum because of the wind farm in front of his golf course.

How about protecting american people from his crazy tariff policy?

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 22, 2025 10:03 am

And speaking of the windmills off Trump’s golf course in Scotland, they are also a national security risk.

Trump should say something about this the next time NATO meets. He should tell them they need to scrap their windmills for the security of all of us.

As for Trump’s “crazy tariffs”, he is crazy like a fox. All essential national security companies are moving some of their manufacturing to the United States, as a result of tariffs. If they want to avoid U.S. tariffs, then they build their products in the United States and don’t have to pay tariffs. And Trump gives them nice incentives like allowing them to expense all their equipment in the first year.

Trump is using tariff revenue to pay a $1,776 Christmas bonus to all serving members of the United States military.

Trump will be using tariff revenue ($12 billion) to support farmers who were stiffed by China, when China reneged on their deal to buy American soybeans.

Trump will pay each American taxpayer $1,000 in 2026 from tariff money.

Trump says the trade deficit has been cut in half.

Trump intends to use tariff money to pay down the U.S. national debt.

All crazy stuff, right?

MyUsernameReloaded
Reply to  Tom Abbott
December 22, 2025 10:19 am

Trump will pay each American taxpayer $1,000 in 2026 from tariff money.

How much did americans pay more because of tariffs? How many lost their job?

Trump will be using tariff revenue ($12 billion) to support farmers

Trump destroys internalional relations, fucks over farmers in the process and taxpayers have to bail them out.

Trump is using tariff revenue to pay a $1,776 Christmas bonus to all serving members of the United States military.

President Donald Trump’s “Warrior Dividend” bonus for service members, which he suggested would be funded by tariff revenue, is actually a one-time basic allowance for housing stipend already approved by Congress, according to a senior administration official.

Randle Dewees
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 22, 2025 10:08 am

troll

December 22, 2025 9:03 am

Fair’s fair. If the Left can crater useful infrastructure on behalf of a junk bait fish or the junk science behind CAGW, I have no problem invoking national security to put the kibosh on useless renewable energy.

Reply to  Frank from NoVA
December 22, 2025 10:08 am

Previous studies done by Europeans said the same thing about windmills: That windmills in the English Channel and elsewhere pose a security risk.

Trump and the U.S. are not saying anything new, it’s just that Trump is taking action while Europe does nothing.

ScienceABC123
December 22, 2025 9:56 am

The only way I could imagine offshore wind turbines as a “national defense” issue is if they had some sort of deleterious effect on sonar and/or submarine operations, but I have no evidence for either.

Dave Yaussy
December 22, 2025 10:00 am

Maybe this is a legitimate concern, maybe not. it would be unfortunate if we killed these projects, simply out of political expediency.

Getting rid of the subsidies and other preferential treatment is one (good) thing, but it will be unfortunate if we merely give supporters of offshore wind ability to argue that they would have succeeded if only they had been allowed to do so.

In the long-term, which requires a little patience, offshore wind will kill itself off. We don’t need to make a martyr of it by jumping the gun.

KevinM
December 22, 2025 10:10 am

Mexico and Canada seem friendly. Russia seems busy. Japan and Germany don’t seem to do that sort of thing anymore. Who’s planning to invade USA?

Verified by MonsterInsights