Northern Hemisphere tropical activity in 2025

by Paul Dorian

*Second year in a row with below-normal tropical activity across the Northern Hemisphere… western Pacific Ocean leads the way with its seventh straight down year…no hurricanes hit the US for the first time in a decade*

Overview

The 2025 hurricane season is winding down across the Northern Hemisphere, and it has been the second straight season with below-normal activity as measured by the metric known as the “Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE)”. The most important region when it comes to tropical activity in the Northern Hemisphere is the western half of the Pacific Ocean as it features the highest ACE value of any sector from a climatological point-of view and it was well below-normal for the 2025 tropical season. In the Atlantic Basin, tropical activity ended up slightly above the normal in terms of ACE thanks in large part to the end-of-season blockbuster hurricane named “Melissa” which reached category 5 status and lasted for a lengthy period. However, there were no landfalling hurricanes in the US for the first time since 2015, and the number of hurricanes, 5, was below the long-term average of 7.2.   

Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE)

The Accumulated Cyclone Energy or ACE metric was originally created by Dr. William Gray and associates at Colorado State University, and it was later tweaked by NOAA. This is perhaps the best metric to measure overall tropical activity (as opposed to, for example, the number of storms) – as it not only factors in the intensity of a tropical cyclone, but it considers its longevity.  A “major” (category 3 or higher) hurricane, for example, that lasts for a long time will have a much bigger impact on the Accumulated Cyclone Energy than a short-lived and weaker tropical system. 

Pacific Ocean

The Pacific Ocean is so large it is generally split into two sectors by meteorologists in the tracking of tropical activity using the international date line as the divider. The western part of the Pacific Ocean is the most important when it comes to global tropical activity as suggested by the climatological ACE which outweighs all other sectors of the northern hemisphere. The ACE levels for 2025 were slightly below-normal east of the date line and well below-normal in the all-important western Pacific.  In fact, this crucial part of the Pacific Ocean has experienced below-normal activity during each of the past 7 years with seasonal ACE levels in each of those years below the average for the 1991-2020 baseline period. Interestingly, the number of storms in the western Pacific Ocean this season was above normal, suggesting the ACE level per storm was below the averages (i.e., more storms than normal, but they were weaker and of shorter duration compared to normal).

Atlantic Basin

While the Pacific Ocean featured below-normal tropical activity this season when measured by ACE levels, the Atlantic Basin ended up slightly above the normal. A large part of this finish at slightly above normal ACE levels in the Atlantic Basin was due to the very last storm, Hurricane Melissa, which reached category 5 status and was rather long-lived. The tropical wave that became Melissa originated over West Africa and traveled across the central Atlantic to the Caribbean Sea where is strengthened into a named tropical storm on October 21st. In just a few days after that, Melissa rapidly intensified into a Category 5 hurricane before making landfall in Jamaica while at its peak intensity…the strongest Atlantic landfalling hurricane since Dorian in 2019 (both winds maximum sustained winds of 185 mph). Hurricane Melissa then crossed over eastern Cuba and the central Bahama Islands and approached Bermuda as a Category 2 hurricane by the end of the month.

In contrast to the western Pacific where ACE levels have been below-normal for the past 7 years, the Atlantic Basin has experienced above-normal conditions in 9 of the last 10 seasons (only below-normal year was 2022). Also, in contrast to the western Pacific where the number of storms was higher than normal but ACE per storm lower than normal, the number of storms (13) in the Atlantic Basin this year was below-normal suggesting that the average ACE per storm was above-normal. Interestingly, there were no landfalling hurricanes in the US this year which is the first time that has happened in ten years.

One of the factors leading to consistent levels of above-normal activity in the Atlantic Basin during recent years is the persistent warmer-than-normal sea surface temperature pattern across the main development region. One index that gives us a clue as to the water temperatures in the Atlantic Ocean is known as the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO). The AMO represents a long-term cycle of sea-surface temperature variations in the North Atlantic that influences weather patterns across North America and globally. It’s linked to changes in the frequency and intensity of Atlantic hurricanes, drought conditions in North America and Africa, and large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns.  During a warm phase, the AMO is associated with an increase in the intensity and frequency of Atlantic hurricane seasons. Since ~1995, the AMO has been in a warm phase and if past patterns hold, the warm phase will potentially continue for another 5 or 10 years.

One final note on the comparison of tropical activity in today’s era to periods in the past, there are likely to be significant underestimations in intensities of tropical systems prior to the satellite era (mid-1960’s) according to some hurricane experts (e.g., Dr. Philip Klotzbach (CSU), Christopher Landsea (NOAA).

Meteorologist Paul Dorian
Arcfield
arcfieldweather.com

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube

5 14 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
strativarius
December 9, 2025 2:25 am

This year’s Hurricane season was given a fair bit of [the usual, overconfident] hype: NOAA predicts above-normal 2025 Atlantic hurricane season, Above-average Atlantic Ocean temperatures set the stage”. And they trumpeted that they are “using the most advanced weather models and cutting-edge hurricane tracking systems” 

And all to no avail. No Hurricane hit the US this year. Given Mr Trump’s hard-nosed and publicly stated position on the Climate Scam, that fact is rather amusing.

I can’t think of a single thing that has gone right for the alarmist camps for, well, I can’t think of one; can you?

Reply to  strativarius
December 9, 2025 3:22 am

I can’t remember when NOAA did not claim an upcoming hurricane season would be above-normal. That is their standard claim.

When was the last time NOAA declared a below-normal hurricane season? I can’t remember one.

Derg
Reply to  Tom Abbott
December 9, 2025 3:39 am

It’s like watching your local weather or Fox weather hype is where the money lies.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
December 9, 2025 5:07 am

“When was the last time NOAA declared a below-normal hurricane season?”

It would be irrational for NOAA to ever forecast a below-normal hurricane season, only to be dragged in front of some House committee when it turns out to have been more active than that. Human nature.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tom Abbott
December 9, 2025 5:26 am

NOAA can’t. They must claim higher numbers or face significant lawsuits for not warning the public. It is better to be wrong predicting higher than actuals than the converse.

December 9, 2025 3:16 am

Look at the temperature trendline in the AMO chart above, in this article.

That is the Global Atmospheric Temperature Trendline, also.

Every original, written, historical regional temperature chart has the same temperature trendline as the AMO chart where there are temperature high points in the 1880’s, the 1930’s, and the high points of today. And all three high points are approximately the same temperature.

There is no “hotter and hotter and hotter” Hockey Stick Global Temperature trendline in the AMO or the regional temperature charts from around the world. There is no evidence for the Hockey Stick chart trendline. There is no data that supports a Hockey Stick chart trendline.

The actual data says the Hockey Stick chart trendline is a BIG LIE.

The real global temperature trendline is represented by the AMO chart and by the regional temperature charts from around the world and they all show it was just as warm in the recent, instrument-era past, as it is today. Therefore, CO2 increases over the years have had no visible effect on the Earth’s temperatures.

There is no evidence that CO2 is anything other than a benign gas, essential for life on Earth, and the AMO chart and the regional charts reinforce this.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tom Abbott
December 9, 2025 5:28 am

CO2 is not a toxic pollutant as declared by some political idiot. People exhale 2 pounds per day (20,000 to 40,000 ppm, perhaps higher). Hold your breath? Do you die? Get cancer? How is it toxic?

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
December 9, 2025 9:00 am

Humans exhale 8 billion kg of CO2 every day. To this should be added, the CO2 exhaled from the domestic animals ranging from cattle to canaries.

At the Mauna Loa Obs. in Hawaii, the concentration of CO2 ln dry are is ca. 425 ppmv. One cubic meter of this air has a mass of 1,290 g and contains a mere 0.83 g of CO2 at STP. The reason there is so little CO2 in the air is that most of it is absorbed by the oceans. We really do not have to worry about CO2.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
December 9, 2025 6:01 am

Just read an article where Norway(?) just found a reindeer slaughter pen that has appeared from under a glacier. Estimated 1500 years old. Wow! As warm back then as now?

Reply to  Jim Gorman
December 9, 2025 9:00 am

Yes, warmer back then…just no mercury thermometers for real proof. Gotta rely on treemometers and coral-mometers, neither of which are used by weathermen on the nightly news…for accuracy reasons.

IMG_1090
Reply to  Tom Abbott
December 9, 2025 6:22 am

Look at the temperature trendline in the AMO chart above, in this article.

That is the Global Atmospheric Temperature Trendline, also.

Those are detrended data, as the caption states.

Here are the non-detrended AMO data:

amo
real bob boder
Reply to  TheFinalNail
December 9, 2025 7:32 am

Guess you didn’t read the article.

Reply to  real bob boder
December 9, 2025 9:15 am

I wasn’t responding to the article. I was responding to the comment.

Reply to  TheFinalNail
December 11, 2025 2:08 am
strativarius
December 9, 2025 3:39 am

Off topic, but amusing in the extreme

Keir Starmer decided to just hand over the Chagos islands to Mauritius (big China ally…) on the basis of his warped take and interpretation of international law, and then to pay at least £35 billion to Mauritius to rent the Diego Garcia base.

And now…

Mauritius Slammed by UN as International Legal Community Turns on Starmer and Mauritian Attorney General
It’s hugely embarrassing for lifelong human rights activist lawyer Sir Keir Starmer KC that the international legal community is now turning on him over his Chagos giveaway.  G. Fawkes

He was never going to listen the people who foot the bill.

starzmom
Reply to  strativarius
December 9, 2025 5:55 am

I guess the US will have to pull out of Diego Garcia, as we don’t want to have the Chinese spying on our operations.

rbabcock
December 9, 2025 4:30 am

Thank you Paul for the short and concise summary. Living in hurricane alley makes you pay attention and over the years we all know each season can be completely different from the last.. which is good or bad. Most people don’t realize the high winds from these storms generally are confined to a relative small area, but if that area includes you hang on to your hat (literally).

Joe Bastardi is lobbying for a modified ACE index which includes more about the destructiveness of a hurricane. A large CAT 3 would carry a higher score than a small one and the length of time a hurricane is at a certain level matters more or less, for example. Makes sense.

December 9, 2025 4:43 am

Perhaps a more correct way to look at it is that modern hurricane records are likely overstated because wind speeds have been inflated by satellite measurements taken higher off the ground than the ground based or aircraft based measurements of the past.

Coeur de Lion
December 9, 2025 5:38 am

Tell me why so few cyclones in the southern hemisphere? Is it due to Mickey Mann?

John Hultquist
Reply to  Coeur de Lion
December 9, 2025 9:14 am

Wikipedia has pages on:
1: South_Atlantic_tropical_cyclone
2: Hurricane_Catarina
Catarina was an extraordinarily rare cyclone that became the only hurricane-strength storm on record in the South Atlantic Ocean.

Further, any headline type phrase that ends with a question mark can be answered with a “No”.
See: Betteridge’s law of headlines

dh-mtl
December 9, 2025 7:33 am

Very good post.

The graph of Global ACE over the past 50 years tells us much about our climate system and the state of global climate change.

Firstly, what the graph represents:

  1. Variations of Global ACE are mirrored in variations in ENSO.
  2. Thus this graph can be taken as a proxy for global variations in the rate of evaporative cooling of the tropical oceans.
  3. Evaporative cooling from the tropical oceans represents about 25% of the earth’s global energy budget: i.e. 25% of the net solar energy incident upon the earth’s surface is transferred to the atmosphere by evaporative cooling from the tropical oceans.
  4. However, because of the extreme sensitivity of evaporative cooling to temperature, at ocean temperatures above 25 C (see Figure 5 of Willis Eschenbach’s post Rainergy, May 21, 2024), evaporative cooling represents almost all of the marginal increase in cooling from the earth’s surface that is required to off-set the marginal increase in warming, that is known as ‘Global Warming’, to maintain the earth’s energy balance.

So what this graph represents is the marginal rate of cooling of the earth’s surface that is required to offset the marginal rate of heating of the earth’s surface due to climate change.

Secondly, given that, as stated above, this graph can be seen as a real time depiction of climate change (i.e. it is the marginal variations cooling that are required off-set marginal variations in heating due to climate change.), what does this depiction of climate change tell us?

  1. Overall, energy input to the earth’s surface appears to have increased from the 1970s to the 1990s, appears to have peaked in the mid-1990s, and has been trending lower ever since.
  2. There are peaks of activity with a frequency of the order of 10 years, that roughly line up with the solar cycles.

My conclusions from the above are:

  1. Yes there was ‘global warming’ from the 1970s to the 1990s, but it appears to have peaked in the 1990s and is now receding.
  2. Given the influence of solar cycles, this global warming was likely caused by solar activity, perhaps the millennial peak in solar activity that happened in the latter half of the 20th century.
December 9, 2025 8:53 am

Predicting the number of hurricanes is simply free advertising for their department. They know it’s going to be entirely random, so predicting more/stronger/bigger every year makes them about 50% correct and understandably cautious in their public protection role at the same time.

December 9, 2025 12:34 pm

NOAA has available and uses two multimillion dollar-per-year-cost supercomputers to “help it” make accurate weather predictions, including those specific to hurricane activity and their respective ground tracks.

As I have previously commented on WUWT:

“This, despite the two multimillion dollar-per-year Weather and Climate Operational Supercomputing System (WCOSS) supercomputers used by NOAA, each operating at 14.5 petaflops. (source: https://www.noaa.gov/news-release/noaa-completes-upgrade-to-weather-and-climate-supercomputer-system ).

“The current government contract award to General Dynamics Information Technology for the WCOSS supercomputers and their designs, deployments, and management is stated to be $505 million over a potential 10-year period. (ref: https://www.gdit.com/about-gdit/press-releases/noaa-awards-general-dynamics-high-performance-computing-contract ).

“Of course, the quality of the output from supercomputers modeling “climate”, particularly tropical storms, is only as good as the “science” that goes into programming them and the “data” they are fed. In this case, it appears the NOAA supercomputer outputs are pretty much equivalent in uncertainty to just predicting the expected number of storms (in each category listed) using statistical analysis (the mean and 2-sigma statistics) of the last five years of tropical storm data.  

“That is, the predictions might as well have been done using an Excel program on a $500 laptop computer.”

Bob
December 9, 2025 1:33 pm

Very nice.