COP30’s Amazon Highway: Hypocrisy Paved with Virtue Signaling

The BBC has uncovered a jaw-dropping irony in Brazil’s preparations for the COP30 climate summit, set for November 2025 in Belém: a four-lane highway, Avenida Liberdade, is being bulldozed through tens of thousands of acres of protected Amazon rainforest. Touted as a traffic solution for the 50,000 world leaders and delegates expected to attend, this project drips with hypocrisy, exposing the gaping chasm between the climate summit’s green rhetoric and its deforestation reality. While global elites preach carbon cuts and sustainability, the Amazon—Earth’s mightiest carbon sink and biodiversity stronghold—is being felled to roll out the red carpet for their virtue-signaling parade.

The state government of Pará slaps a “sustainable” label on this 13-kilometer (8-mile) scar through the jungle, complete with promised wildlife crossings, bike lanes, and solar lighting. Infrastructure Secretary Adler Silveira calls it an “important mobility intervention” to modernize Belém and leave a “legacy” for COP30. But the reality on the ground tells a different story. Where lush rainforest once stood, logs now pile high as diggers pave over wetlands, slicing protected forest into fragmented patches. For locals like Claudio Verequete, who lives 200 meters from the carnage, it’s a personal betrayal. His açai berry harvest—his family’s livelihood—has been reduced to rubble. “Everything was destroyed,” he told the BBC. “We no longer have that income to support our family.” No compensation, no benefits—just a walled-off highway built for trucks and summit VIPs, not the people it displaces.

This isn’t just an environmental travesty; it’s a masterclass in greenwashing. The Brazilian president and environment minister have grandly declared COP30 “a COP in the Amazon, not a COP about the Amazon,” as if hosting it in the rainforest’s backyard absolves the sin of slashing it down. They’ll jet in thousands of delegates, build hotels, expand airports with an $81 million federal splurge, and redevelop ports for cruise ships—all while posing as saviors of the planet. Meanwhile, the road’s ecological toll is glaring: fragmented habitats, disrupted wildlife, and a shrinking wild where vets like Professor Silvia Sardinha struggle to release rehabilitated animals. “Land animals will no longer be able to cross to the other side,” she warned, underscoring the summit’s hollow promises.

The hypocrisy deepens when you consider Avenida Liberdade’s history. Shelved since 2012 due to environmental outcry, it was resurrected only when the prestige of COP30 dangled a chance to signal virtue on the world stage. Scientists decry the loss of biodiversity, locals lament their erased livelihoods, and yet the state presses on, cloaking destruction in buzzwords. Some market vendors, like Dalci Cardoso da Silva, buy the spin, hoping tourist dollars will trickle down. But others, like Verequete, see the grim future: a gateway to more deforestation, where gas stations and warehouses could soon replace what’s left of their homes—all while summit attendees sip cocktails and pat themselves on the back.

The COP30 spectacle reeks of performative environmentalism. Flying in global leaders to lament climate change while razing the Amazon for their convenience isn’t a solution—it’s a farce. As Sardinha put it, the high-level talks will hum along “among business people and government officials,” while those living the Amazon’s reality are silenced. This highway isn’t a legacy of progress; it’s a paved monument to the disconnect between climate grandstanding and the dirty work done in its name. If this is the road to a supposedly greener future, it’s one built on hypocrisy’s shaky foundation.

H/T strativarius and John C

5 14 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

51 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nick Stokes
March 12, 2025 6:16 pm

To put this in perspective, here is a map. The road is 13.5 km long and connects two parts of the city of Belem.

comment image.webp

Mr.
Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 12, 2025 6:22 pm

Thanks Nick.
How much forest would have to be removed to run a Zoom for a CoP gab-fest?
(I’m thinking 0.0)

Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 12, 2025 7:01 pm

Do you know a “Circle Jerk” is?

Reply to  Steve Case
March 12, 2025 8:10 pm

I wonder if Nick really does countenance the DESTRUCTION of of Amazon rainforest, just so climate glitterati can have a climate soirée. !

There is already a road from point A to point B….

… but let’s destroy some rainforest to make it more convenient for a pack of low-end climate grifters. !

Tom Halla
Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 12, 2025 8:17 pm

Of course, as Lula Da Silva is a leftist, he can do no wrong.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 12, 2025 11:01 pm

If the road system would not cope with traffic expected choose another city … not hard thought process.

Love that Nick wants to give us some perspective using lefty logic they are saving the planet and a few trees is a small price to pay 🙂

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Leon de Boer
March 12, 2025 11:33 pm

In fact they started building the road in 2012 – nothing to do with COP. That is, they cleared the path, but then ran short of money. With COP came federal funding to complete it.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 13, 2025 12:10 am

Yes. Shelved due to environmental outcry. Reinstated for ‘environmentalists’.

Love the defence, mate. Keep up the Nick-Picking!

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Zig Zag Wanderer
March 13, 2025 12:26 am

That’s the opinion of Ione Wells. But the path through the forest was cleared, so that wasn’t the issue. They needed the extra money.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 13, 2025 12:45 am

What is next they need extra money for the diesel generator for all the freeloaders to be able to use there electronic devices … is that okay?

The bottom line here is you are asking the rest of us to give up fossil fuel and you want this as the Optics 🙂

No-one will remember what happened at COP30 but everyone will remember that.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Leon de Boer
March 13, 2025 8:13 am

Please don’t abuse the word “optics”. There’s already a word for it, “visuals”. Optics are things you look through, not how something looks.

Denis
Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 13, 2025 9:47 am

The path could have been seeded and regrown for lot less money and an environmentally sounder outcome.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 13, 2025 5:48 pm

That’s the opinion of Ione Wells. But the path through the forest was cleared, so that wasn’t the issue. They needed the extra money.

Yes, it is their opinion, and your dismissal of it is your opinion.

Notably, online there is much ‘justification’ by the government, saying similar things to yourself. Interestingly, they also state that the environmental licence has just been given. This quite clearly indicates that it had not been given before, for many years, until this COP pushed through a need.

10/10 for effort, but 2/10 for effectiveness, Nick! Keep picking!

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 13, 2025 8:18 am

Assuming your comment is factual, cleared 13 years ago and shows no regrowth?

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 13, 2025 8:53 am

It could have been converted to turf- and mowed or grazed. Just guessing.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 14, 2025 6:12 am

So they had the money to maintain the cleared land. Ok.

oeman50
Reply to  Leon de Boer
March 13, 2025 6:02 am

I did not detect anything like that perspective from Nick’s response.

You can infer what you like from his history, but this post does not say that.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 13, 2025 12:21 am

So what was wrong with using Route 316 and “saving the rainforest”?

Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 13, 2025 1:41 am

Common guys, Nick can and has been heavily criticized on this platform, in my eyes deservedly, by myself as well, but he is posting a factual map here underpinning the article. So, are people blind here and just vote negatively because it is him? It seems so. Stupid.

Reply to  ballynally
March 13, 2025 1:45 am

And anyone can see it cuts right through the forest. But, a caveat here: it could be perceived Nick’ s comment “putting it in perspective” as saying ‘ it’s not too bad’.
Clarification please…

Derg
Reply to  ballynally
March 13, 2025 2:36 am

I am familiar with Nick’s thinking, so…

Listen unwashed masses, COP30 is the most important event for Mother Earth that sometimes sacrifices need to be made for the greater good. There can be no amount of money too great for the cause.

Oh and Elon and Trump are Hitler. And Trump works for Elon and Trump is Hitler.

Reply to  Derg
March 13, 2025 3:55 am

“COP30 is the most important event”

The Keeling “Curve”, is still curving. (ie. accelerating)

f424eb46-6874-4ffd-b173-2d42773f5291-1_all_924
Mr.
Reply to  David Pentland
March 13, 2025 7:00 am

Ya gonna need a bigger graph.

Reply to  David Pentland
March 13, 2025 8:56 am

Not much of an acceleration- especially the past few decades. it’s INCREASING but barely accelerating.

Denis
Reply to  ballynally
March 13, 2025 9:51 am

But Nick’s map seems to show that there are already road(s), or nearly so, between “A” and “B.” Would not a few helipads and helicopters been sexier and more environmentally sound?

Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 13, 2025 6:16 am

For once i have to agree with Nick. I’m absolutely against the COP meetings and all the environmental destruction hypocrisy but i think this is an overblown issue. If you look carefully at the Google image or photos associated with the article you will see large electric line towers. I think the road is being built on or mostly on electrical power line right-of-way that has already been cleared for power line access or maintenance. This is not to suggest that it is even needed in the first place…

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Phil R
March 13, 2025 8:22 am

Looking at the map zoomed in, those electrical towers are in the middle of the cutaway.
So, to put in a multilane expressway, the cutaway will have to be expanded. Can’t have delegates crashing into power line towers and causing a major blackout and potentially a fire.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 13, 2025 8:57 am

Actually, I kinda like the crashing and major blackout thingy.

Reply to  Phil R
March 13, 2025 8:57 am

You can’t have big wigs from the world having to drive through slums. /s

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 13, 2025 12:25 pm

ok, you win comment of the day. 🙂

Reply to  Phil R
March 13, 2025 9:45 am

i think this is an overblown issue

I’m pretty sure Claudio Verequete would disagree.

Reply to  Tony_G
March 13, 2025 12:33 pm

I’m not saying a agree, and maybe calling it an overblown issue was a bad word choice on my part, but I think there are a lot more important issues, like maybe working on cancelling COP-31, or whatever the next one is, so issues like this don’t come up in the first place.

If I can attach a photo correctly, one can see that the road construction is following not one but two power lines (not sure the resolution is any good).

AA1AJLld
Walter Sobchak
March 12, 2025 6:19 pm

Let’s hope there won’t be an American delegation at that fiasco.

Reply to  Walter Sobchak
March 13, 2025 8:58 am

Maybe some of Trump’s people will crash the party- bigly. 🙂

MarkW
March 12, 2025 7:01 pm

For some reason, every time I see the name COP30, I think of this:

C-3PO droid – C-3PO – Wikipedia

March 12, 2025 7:23 pm

It’s OK coz it’s a socialist initiative.

March 12, 2025 8:14 pm

What’s that saying again “When thieves fall out?”

J Boles
March 12, 2025 8:41 pm

Why a road? How about a helicopter shuttle, perfect for rich hypocrites virtue signaling.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  J Boles
March 12, 2025 11:03 pm

They could just build an airport so they can all land there private and charter jets. It’s on the coast I wonder if Greta will sail in for the freebies

Mr.
Reply to  Leon de Boer
March 13, 2025 7:03 am

How dare you!!

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Leon de Boer
March 13, 2025 8:16 am

Their.

atticman
Reply to  J Boles
March 13, 2025 3:21 pm

Why not a railway? Much more environmentally friendly. Oh! but it’s so much more expensive. But that hasn’t stopped the Climate Worriers foisting more-expensive power-generation on us, has it?

March 12, 2025 10:57 pm

Cutting down any trees for a highway to be built to allow more automobiles to run is an environmental sin.

Thank god there are environmental indulgences for climate conferences that make it OK.

Bruce Cobb
March 13, 2025 3:29 am

The cognitive dissonance required for the COP30 travesty will be epic.One wonders how the Climate Liars sleep at night.

Hartley
March 13, 2025 6:18 am

I wonder how much USAID contributed to that atrocity?

Hartley
March 13, 2025 6:29 am

Nick’s map is pretty low-res, so I spooled up Google Maps and took a look. The Google satellite view of Belem is supposedly 2025 imagery, and it does show that the path of this highway has been cleared of trees, though no actual roadway is visible, and the swath is quite green in color.
Clearly, it will further divide the wooded area into smaller pieces and cut off access to the river from many areas – but go take a look and see what you think?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Hartley
March 13, 2025 8:16 am

They could have connected 2 existing roads with 0.4 mile connector.

Sparta Nova 4
March 13, 2025 8:17 am

Come on people. Be reasonable. This will give the 50,000 attendees an up close and personal view of the rainforest – at 60+ mph.

Bob
March 13, 2025 2:09 pm

I have nothing good to say about the COP except that the United States shouldn’t spend one red cent on it.

Edward Katz
March 13, 2025 2:12 pm

This is typical of the stunts we’ve come to expect of the COP organizers over the years. They’ve accomplished next to nothing during the previous conferences, and if they were to be honest about the futility of their posturing, they would have abandoned these meetings long ago. Instead, thousands of representatives fly to places that don’t have good environmental credentials in the first place and tell what few people bother to listen to them that they (the listeners, but not the attendees) should stop using fossil fuels, eating red meat and flying to their destinations. Then attendees pretend to express concern that almost everyone ignores them. So if there are any upcoming comedy festivals, the next COP conference should be included since it could easily earn the top prize.

atticman
Reply to  Edward Katz
March 13, 2025 3:23 pm

Yep! Environmentally friendly they are not.