In the hallowed halls of Washington, where the wine flows freely and the government grants run wild, a curious gathering of cloistered bureaucrats posing as scientists recently assembled. They weren’t there to debate scientific breakthroughs or marvel at the wonders of the cosmos. No, they were there to wring their hands and tremble in fear because—horror of horrors—Donald Trump might become president again.
The American Geophysical Union (AGU) hosted its annual confab, and this year’s theme wasn’t climate change, rising seas, or polar bears. It was a full-blown therapy session for government-funded climate warriors, panicked at the thought of losing their cushy sinecures. You’d think they’d discovered an asteroid hurtling toward Earth, but no such luck. Their real fear? Budget cuts. Or worse: accountability.
Apocalypse Now, Fund Me Later
According to reports, the atmosphere at this science shindig was as cheery as a funeral for a goldfish. Words like censorship, funding cuts, and layoffs were tossed around as if Trump had already begun personally slashing their travel stipends. These professional alarmists didn’t even wait for the president-elect to take office before diving into a collective meltdown.
Andrew Dessler, a Texas A&M University climate scientist and president of AGU’s global environmental change section, said Trump officials could once again shutter websites, concealing years of research from the public at a time when the impacts of climate change are accelerating.
“People are really kind of exhausted,” he said. “It’s not so much that we people have evidence that it’s going to be bad. It’s just that if you look at what they say, that’s clearly what they want to do.”
https://www.eenews.net/articles/trumps-climate-threats-rattle-worlds-biggest-science-meeting/
After all, Trump had the audacity to question their sacred dogma—climate change—and joke that rising seas might create more coastal real estate. Blasphemy!
One AGU official went so far as to declare, “Everybody at AGU is nervous. The unknown is what makes people nervous.” Oh, the horror of not knowing whether taxpayers will continue funding their favorite global warming PowerPoints! This isn’t science; it’s a poorly scripted soap opera.
Project 2025: A Bureaucrat’s Nightmare
What has these bureaucratic activists so spooked? Enter Project 2025, a Heritage Foundation blueprint for making the federal government slightly less bloated. This dastardly document proposes eliminating wasteful spending, trimming agency staffs, and—gasp—requiring results from federal programs. Imagine the gall of expecting scientists to justify their work! If you didn’t know better, you’d think Trump planned to ban lab coats altogether.
The AGU attendees are convinced this plan will spell doom for agencies like NOAA and the EPA. They fear “climate translators” (yes, that’s a real thing) will be out of a job, as if Defense Department engineers can’t Google “climate data” without a chaperone.
Brandenberger of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory said her message to staff was to “stay calm and carry on.” But she noted that changes are likely. Certain words might be less jeopardized than others. The fate of more than 100 “climate translators” staffed by her office to help Defense Department engineers make sense of future-looking climate data is uncertain.
https://www.eenews.net/articles/trumps-climate-threats-rattle-worlds-biggest-science-meeting/
Meanwhile, the newly announced “Department of Government Efficiency,” helmed by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, has become the stuff of nightmares for these ivory tower types. Musk wants to send people to Mars, and somehow that’s a threat to NASA Earth Science programs. Priorities, people.
“Everyone’s demoralized,” the NASA scientist said, adding that Musk’s potential influence at the agency — particularly his dream of sending a crewed exploration team to Mars — might affect NASA’s Earth science programs or compete with climate programs for funding.
https://www.eenews.net/articles/trumps-climate-threats-rattle-worlds-biggest-science-meeting/
Censorship and Euphemisms
The pearl-clutching doesn’t stop there. Federal employees worry they might have to stop using terms like climate change and instead employ euphemisms like extreme weather. Funny how they weren’t concerned about censorship when climate skeptics, such as this very site are demoted and banned. But now that their bureaucratic fiefdoms are under threat, they’re ready to storm the barricades of free speech.
One NASA scientist, speaking anonymously (because bravery, apparently, is not their strong suit), lamented the potential end of work-from-home provisions. Forget saving the planet; these folks are fighting to preserve their right to attend Zoom meetings in pajamas.
The Real Tragedy? Accountability
Underpinning all this hysteria is one undeniable fact: these so-called scientists aren’t afraid of bad policy. They’re terrified of accountability. Trump’s first administration exposed their bloated budgets, redundant programs, and dubious research. It’s no wonder they’re panicking at the thought of a second term.
Take Will Happer, a physicist who tried to organize a formal review of climate science during Trump’s first term. The resistance he faced didn’t come from leftists—it came from Republican appointees more concerned with optics than truth. Heaven forbid anyone poke holes in their shaky models and politically motivated predictions.
Dark Humor and Lighter Wallets
To lighten the mood, some attendees resorted to dark humor. One NOAA official joked about making “the atmosphere great again,” riffing on Trump’s slogan. But behind the quips was a stark reality: these bureaucrats know their days of unchecked power may be numbered.
Legal experts at the conference gave tutorials on lobbying laws and how to survive mass layoffs. Imagine needing legal counsel to figure out how to keep your government gig. It’s a level of bureaucratic navel-gazing that only the Beltway could produce.
Keep Calm and Carry On (Or Don’t)
At the end of the day, the advice for these nervous Nellies was simple: stay calm and carry on. But that’s easier said than done when your entire career depends on public panic and political patronage. Their real worry isn’t that climate change will destroy the planet; it’s that a Trump administration might destroy their gravy train.
As the conference adjourned, attendees shuffled off to their government-funded offices, clutching their reusable coffee cups and hoping for a return to the Biden-era status quo. After all, why bother solving real problems when you can scare taxpayers into funding your next climate model?
H/T Roger Pielke Jr.

All of the scientists I work with are feeling “unburdened by what has been.”
And looking forward to what will be…
https://www.prageru.com/video/why-are-energy-prices-so-frickin-high-with-chris-wright
I can only like a comment once, but I’ve read this one three times now and I burst out laughing every time.
No Kiddin!!!😂😂😂
Especially those who grew up a middle-class kid. And were raised by a hardworking mother, who like so many people across our nation, had big dreams.
Kamaliar got 48.4% of the popular vote versus 49.9% for Trump, despite sounding like a dingbat,
Trump and republicans won all three facets of the election, easily !!
President 312 to 226
Senate 53 to 47
Congress 220 to 215
Get over it. !
2022
As a result of the elections, Republicans won 222 districts, gaining control of the chamber, while Democrats won 213 districts.
House 2024
2020 vs. 2015
That is worse than 2022, which was considered to be a disappointment for Republicans expecting a “red wave”.
I voted for every Republican on the ballot in 2024 and am disappointed in the House result. Just three RINO Republicans can join Democrats and ruin the Republican’s tiny majority … which will be even smaller for a few months in 2025.
Oh… what a good little boy you are !!
Michigan 2024 was not the only state that was close
…………………. TRUMP…..HARRIS
Popular vote 2,816,636 vs 2,736,533
Percentage 49.73% vs 48.31%
Trump and republicans won all three facets of the election, easily !!
President 312 to 226
Senate 53 to 47
Congress 220 to 215
Get over it. !
Well, the only numbers that matter
Harris/Walz – 226
Trump(47)/Vance(48) – 319
Trump/Vance was 312, not 319. 🙂
No one voted for Kamala, they voted against Trump. But many had the veils lifted from their eyes, so they couldn’t get enough votes to win.
Unfortunately Chris is still stuck with the CO2 warming myth. 🙁
I liked this sub heading
Though it should be more like
Apocalypse Later, Fund Me Now
More like Apocalypse Never, Fund Me Always
Mr. M: An excellent phrase, timely used, and the time is everyday!
Word salad up!
Nice post. Reality is setting in, triggering panic amongst bureaucrats and alarmists.
Out in the corporate world where if a business is not profitable, it goes bankrupt, the fastest way for a person’s job to disappear is if the boss paying the person’s salary discovers the person’s work has no value. But in government that’s properly run, if a person cannot justify the existence of their job which the taxpayers are funding, taxpayers should demand the elimination of that person’s job. Trump is a business man. We’ve elected him to use his business mentality to get the whole government back on track of doing what actually needs to be done.
It’s not Trump these ‘scientists’ fear, it’s their own inability to tell us all that what they do has any value to anybody.
“I’ve worked in the private sector. They expect results.”
Dr. Egon Spengler
“the fastest way for a person’s job to disappear is if the boss paying the person’s salary discovers the person’s work has no value.”
The Musk lesson at Twitter, concisely summarized.
Musk and Twitter
He grossly overpaid for company.
Twitter is not profitable:
Historically unprofitable
Twitter has only made a profit in two of the eight years since its IPO.
Tesla was unprofitable for 17 years before the first profitable year. Staying in business that long with no profits would make a great case study for a business school.
So Elon is helping FREEDOM, without any recompense, actually making a loss.
WOW. !!
Gotta luv that, hey !!
Fact check says: Disengenious.
Richard, you’re missing the lessons of the Dot,Com “hope over experience” era.
Literally “floating ideas” on stock exchanges worldwide created multi-millionaires for just cobbling up an “exciting” prospectus.
Which is all Elon has done, except he’s leveraged each float into newer “tulip mania” enterprises.
Good on him.
I don’t think you have a clue about business.
“Made only $114 million in revenue”? My search showed X had $505 M in the U.S. for 1st Q 2024. 2022 1st Q U.S. was $593 M.
88/593*100 = 15% drop.
With Truth Social, Instagram, TikTok, etc. that’s probably not bad.
The social media platform formerly known as Twitter is worth almost 80% less than two years ago when Elon Musk bought it, according to estimates from investment giant Fidelity. X no longer trades publicly after Musk shelled out $44 billion to take it private in October 2022.
Oct 2, 2024
“The New York Times recently reported that X made only $114 million in revenue in the U.S. during the second quarter of 2024, according to the documents they obtained. This is a massive drop compared to $661 million in the same quarter in 2022 before Musk took over. When we account for inflation, that’s a drop of a whopping 84%.”
As Twitter’s Revenue Collapses By 84%, Tesla Bulls Fear Elon Musk Will Liquidate More Tesla Stock, Bringing Its Value Down For Everyone
Just a minor point. Musk did not buy Twitter to create a profit center.
He was all in of Freedom of Speach.
Are you sure about your numbers
?
Tesla formed in 2003
Tesla first turned a profit in 2020, with a net positive of $721 million. The sale of climate credits was the primary reason for Tesla’s profitability in 2020
That adds up to 17 years.
Whatever. Musk fired 80% of Twitter employees, and improved company performance.
That’s about as stark an example as is possible.
Define “improved”? Advertisers left in droves as did users and the company is losing money faster than ever. But there are now more racists trolls on the platform so does that count as an improvement?
Evidence, mr. troll-person?
Or are you just regurgitating noise from the Fake News?
Evidence is at
https://www.isi.edu/news/55932/new-twitter-now-with-more-hate/
More HATE speech from the left because they can no longer get centrists and rational discussion banned.
We saw exactly which side was spreading all the hate, during the election…. and it wasn’t the Republicans.
USC.. a far-left university, sooking because they lost their “safe space”…
…. diddums. !!
More hate 😉
Number 2
Not sarcastically, YES.
The ‘racists’ you are getting your panties all knotted up about are race realists, and a lot are also Noticers.
Like the reality of 13/53, and ‘Did you ever observe that there’s this one group of people no one can notice, much less criticize, without being attacked?’
but sadly, x-twitter is folding to pressure from (((them))).
but at least here the anti-semites are free to post in coded language. And get likes.
Are you an anti-semite as well as a climate loser..
How very leftist of you.
I have never seen you get a “like”, so your got that part wrong…. !
The Antisemites are entirely on your side.
“here”?
You must be talking about Bl@ck people then.
Wild that this kind of stuff is left unmoderated by site admins. Any visitor must assume the silence is implicit endorsement.
Did you know that before Musk, Twitter was mostly leftist garbage and censorship..
… you know… the crap you regurgitate.
Now it is about 50/50.. you know.. BALANCED.
The platform has vastly improved by the removal of a lot of putrid leftist censorship and deviancy.
It counts for a vast improvement is leftist scum leave because they are too weak to contribute in a BALANCED conversation.
It is also far LESS racist that Twitter was.
Izaak, would a person who adopted as a blog name a Royalist (the epitome of a white supremacist) i.e. one Izaak Walton, be classified these days also as a racist?
or to be kind – just a hypocrite?
“Out in the corporate world where if a business is not profitable. it goes bankrupt” ISTVAN
That is a conservative economic myth
Over a full business cycle about half of publicly listed corporations do not earn a profit. The current percentage profitable is about 60% with average profit margins at the highest level in history and only one US recession quater since 2009
About 1/3 of small businesses are not profitable. But roughly half of new small; businesses fail within their first five years of operation.
For two surprising example, Tesla was not profitable for its first 17 years. Amazon was unprofitable for almost a decade, from its founding in 1994 until 2003, when it reported its first full year of profit:
“Over a full business cycle”
Define that
A full business cycle includes one recession, which is usually two quarters of GDP declines in a row
You again with your “conservative myth” horseshit. Did you get that phrase trademarked?
No, businesses aren’t profitable every year. Most startups aren’t profitable and aren’t expected to be for a period of time.
Marks himself as a staunch brain-washed leftist… goes along with his AGW-cultism.
I still can’t figure out if this “Richard Greene” commenter is a real person or some amalgamation of a few different people, since his lines of thinking are inconsistent with what he claims to be. When I was trying to figure out if he was a single account holder earlier this year, I ran across one of his other logins where he claimed to have the self-description of being “The Cliff Clavin of Finance.” But here he demonstrates having no real idea of how businesses operate successfully. Sorta dovetails with his now-routine trashing of skeptic climate scientists while claiming to be on the AGW skeptic side.
I wrote a for profit economics and finance newsletter for 43 years. When I added a blog for the subscribers, I used the funny moniker The Cliff Claven of Finance for each article. That blog existed from about 2009 to January 2023, when I combined my three blogs into my existing Climate and Energy blog, now approaching one million lifetime pageviews:
Honest Climate Science and Energy
A self-aggrandizing yapper.
We have seen your lack of comprehension and scientific evidence to back up your AGW-cult climate claims.
I can only think your economics understanding is of the same low level.
Right. Sure. Uh, huh … aaaaaannnd how many of those “one million lifetime pageviews” went to that bimbo photos section of your ‘combined blog’? As I pointed out in one of my early jousts with you, a desperate need for approval to justify a person’s relevance is a hallmark of leftists who have lousy self-esteems. I had to laugh a few years back when I discovered another guy I was jousting with in the Disqus commenting system was gaming its upvotes feature by actively interacting with bot accounts that auto-generated uncountable thousands of upvotes for accounts. He and his pals complained bitterly when vast swaths of their upvote counts vanished.
ClimateDepot, WUWT, and other such blogs get massive pageview counts because they offer new worthwhile info every day. I looked at your “blog” the one time (got an archive capture for posterity’s sake – scroll down to the “bonus” photos there). There’s nothing in it to bring in repeat views, it’s nothing more than what looks like an auto-generated article links aggregator which a computer program designed to fish for certain catchwords could create. I won’t look at it again because who knows what “else” is attached to your links.
So says the WUWT Court Jester
Were you talking to yourself again, dickie??
Have you got answers to those three questions yet.
Or still FAILING completely, clown !
The statistics I quoted are the best available information about business profitability.
There are approximately 33.2 million businesses in the United States, with 99.9% of them being small businesses: Ther are about 4.7 million business start ups each year.
I only read conservative websites, so any economic myths I read are accurately defined as “conservative myths”
Seeing such EMDS is quite funny !!
Mr. Greene: The article is about wailing, teeth-gnashing government teet-sucking cli-scis who are anxious because they have cli-sci make-work gov’t jobs that don’t exist in for-profit enterprises. Istvan, a very well-educated and experienced commenter, posts a hard economic truth that applies to the wailing cli-scis. That’s when you decide to pounce?! By splitting a long-term undeniable truth into shorter “business cycles” not contemplated in Istvan’s remark??!!
You have the right to type and then cancel your remark before posting it, and you should exercise it.
He has the right. Apparently he lacks the good judgement.
Lacks any judgement of himself…
… just of others, if they dare to put forward something real that his tiny mind doesn’t like.
You should exercise silence
Poor dickie,
Please keep “sommenting” so we can all have a good laugh at your clown
act.. !Although, it isn’t an act, is it. ! Just you.
Mr. Greene: Thank you for the advice, and for letting us know that you got my point. Good and hard!!
Now repeat while gazing in the mirror.
In the early 1980s I was in the private sector as an employee in a large corporation, before I started my own business. There was a real problem with filling affirmative action quotas and an even bigger one getting rid of such hires that didn’t work out.
I will set their minds at ease. Donald Trump IS their President and the pink slips are going to flow!
They will still be able to stay at home.. 🙂
What goes around, comes around. Once protected and nourished by politics will now be held accountable to science. Let the wailing begin.
climate
translatorsdogmatistsJob description: take dubious science and make it sound terrifying to the hoi poloi
We were harangued a couple of decades ago that climate studies were “settled science”.
So what’s the need for any more of this activity?
Based on their own prognostications, redundancies were never more justified.
English to American translation: Redundancy = laid off.
Or for a different euphemism—RIFed, reduction in force
Redundancy =
laid off.YOU’RE FIRED. !!Having worked in government offices a bit over 10 years ago for a couple of years, I learned the meaning and the reality of “White Collar Welfare.”
I reviewed over 10 years of reports and presentations while I awaited office space in the government building. Of the 20 serious technical issues reported 20 years prior only 1 was solved, and by my group before I arrived. Through the course of that review I came to the remarkable conclusion that the government “agency” had made one improvement. They had learned how to effectively use color in the power point presentations.
So, from a certain point of view, I can see how these people might be concerned.
I better stop before I say something that should not be said.
Accountability flows from the top. When was the last time you ever saw a senior “appointed” government official fired for incompetence? I can’t remember one. That lack of accountability flows downhill. Nobody worries about failing, only about adding people so their pay class can be increased.
If Musk is anything, he is a boss that demands accountability. There are many that should be afraid, very afraid!
I also like the rumor going around of dispersing agencies throughout the nation. Have three letter agencies picked at random and have a monkey throw a dart at a U.S. map to see where they end up. If the dart misses the map, bye bye agency.
The heck with darts; move them to N. Dakota, Alabama, Mississippi, Oklahoma. Only those that move keep their jobs; no new hiring to replace those that quit.
Nope. All done randomly so no blaming politics or inequality. Kinda like the treatment of temperature averages. All uncertainty is Gaussian, random, and cancels. Thus no complaining allowed.
I agree on not replacing those that quit.
How about California.
After all, according to Ms. Word Salad, equity means “We all start from different points but equity means we all end at the same place.” (or words to that effect)
Please no quote marks around things people did not say, even if we can safely assume they’d say it proudly.
It was a paraphrase, and yes she said words exactly to that effect.
Please don’t add to the woes of the 38% of Californians that were rational enough to vote for Trump.
You notice that she never defined where we should all end up. Dragged down to the lowest common denominator seems to have been her goal.
Well she is a Maoist commie, so you can presume dead or living in abject poverty.
That is exactly my response when I first saw the video clip.
Make it a *small* US map.
A monkey? Ok. Or the equivalent? Biden perhaps? /humor
Let’s Go Brandon!
I worked with many competent government marine scientists, most all in the last century but the virus model invasion was there with interesting caveats, try this (1999) about fish populations– “……..Questionable data will necessarily lead to a questionable assessment. Nevertheless, the results of the base case and sensitivity trials all seem to suggest that the stock is overfished ……” I used to grade reports on subjects with limited knowledge, nevertheless this one I know about but that didn’t matter.
If the old adage about the pendulum swinging too far operates, some deserved would get hurt. This is a huge organization based on many papers they publish that I have read on marine subjects widely ranging from currents to phytoplankton and others. Regardless, don’t recall this lack of logic being so common. It looks like lots of disciplines have been invaded by the model virus without adequate understanding. I guess I’m insensitive.
Insensitive? How about clear headed, educated, and experienced? Yea.
Anyone who has worked in any government office figures it out eventually. Putting checkmarks on forms and attending training sessions is a great idea to get an easy paycheck.
Ditch digging is much harder and doesn’t pay as well.
Heavy equipment operators can be well paid.
Hand shoveling, not so much.
If it is a county crew, 11 stand around while one shovels. Then rotate. Each has a specific task and none of those can be performed concurrently. So in an 8 hour day, you actually work less than an hour.
I’ve worked on county crews, nice paycheck for the college fund.
Mr. 4: Remember when the financial crisis hit in ’08-’09, and governments were forced to trim down? I remember that the road crew joke was the ’11 man stand around watching one guy with a shovel’. Budget constraints forced them to let the guy with the shovel go.
STORY TIP
from Dec 2022 –
Postal Service anticipates increasing the quantity of purpose-built Next Generation Delivery Vehicles (NGDV) to a minimum of 60,000 of which at least 45,000 will be battery electric by 2028. NGDV acquisitions delivered in 2026 and thereafter expected to be 100% electric.
From Dec 2024 –
The US Postal Service’s electric delivery truck is super behind schedule. The mail agency was supposed to have 3,000 electric delivery trucks by November, but instead defense contractor Oshkosh has only delivered 93. And the trucks that have been delivered are in rough shape:
The trucks required significant fixes before they could be declared fit for use. Oshkosh employees found parts installed incorrectly, shoddy construction and faulty software, according to three people familiar with the situation.
I would agree, just this week at least three problems occurred and reported which may be top down policy related. Another one may not. Taking pictures of mail and emailing some of what you will get may not be as bad as electric vehicle deliveries, but getting two deliveries yesterday seems like a waste and it was not the first time. At least part of our problem has been that our deliveries were made by non-government bidders who weren’t competent but used petroleum fired vehicles.
United States Postal Service creed
“Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds” is a phrase long associated with the American postal worker
Hey, Bubba, hold my Latte, watch me run this electric mail delivery truck through that flooded street….the mail must go through, you know.
As a kid, I learned it as the motto of the Pony Express.
A slight variant, but it’s essentially the same.
Ugh. So now the mail *might be* delivered every *two* days (so charging of the stupid electric toys can take place)?
You guys are lucky if you get mail every two days. Up here in Canada our entire postal service has gone on strike, so now we get no mail whatsoever.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/usps-9-5-billion-loss/
“Two years after $107 Billion Taxpayer Bailout, U.S. Postal Service Reports $9.5 Billion”
I wonder….
Must be all those *Mercedes* delivery trucks. 🙄
I got curious about what the hundreds of PNNL ‘climate translators’ actually do. So I went to PNNL to find out. After reading all their bafflegab, I still don’t know. Their head has a BS in coastal oceanography and a masters in ‘environmental science’—neither very climate sciency. Looks like a good albeit small DOGE target.
I am guessing, of course, but it looks like a “climate translator” is providing the what it really means to whoever. Of course, if true, it translates everything it climate crisis rhetoric.
I was scratching my head on this one also.
There was a guy at my former place of employment who left and became the “Director of Green” someplace else. Never have figured out what this title might require one to do.
This topic makes me ask about the Michael Mann vs Mark Steyn lawsuit ruled in favor of Mann and whether Mark ever appealed the outrageous activist ruling or is paying the laughable $1 Million. Does anybody know?
I googled and found this at climate etc (no news since April)
:
https://judithcurry.com/2024/03/11/mann-v-steyn-round-2/
https://www.steynonline.com/documents/14133.pdf
“Steyn has filed a motion for a new trial, a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, and an alternative motion for remittitur of the grossly excessive and unconstitutional $1 million punitive damages award. Given the very substantial constitutional and other legal issues arising from that punitive award, Steyn respectfully asks this Court to continue the stay under Rule 62 without a bond pending the resolution of his motions and appeal.”
Steyn might have spoken about it in September:
https://www.steynonline.com/14669/the-politicization-of-american-justice
“.@MarkSteynOnline I didn’t think it would take four months to litigate a four-paragraph blog post. My case is now in its thirteenth year! “We are currently on our fifth trial judge–a phrase that does not exist in functional jurisdictions.”
Thank you for doing the research I was unable to do. As George Strait said in his song “Amarillo By Morning,”……I hope that judge ain’t blind.
That verdict was outrageous, but what else would one expect from Mos Eisley on the Potomac?
May the future for (most of) these folks be as bleak as they expect.
Think of a Derecho or Haboob approaching D.C. with Trump’s face and wearing a MAGA hat.
Pournelle’s Iron Law of Bureaucracy works until there is real outside pressure. Learning the internal politics of an organization, and exploiting that to end up leading the group works only internally. General Motors “worked” until they had real competition.
Many government programs seem to exist as both show and jobs programs for apparatchiks. Demanding real, objective results is just not playing the game.
Do we want them to have results? Someone said “That government which governs least…”
Oh but they are governing more. The lack of “results” isn’t preventing them from doing a lot of damage.
Secretary of State Anthony Blinken was grilled by Florida Republican Rep. Brian Mast, who proved he was the right pick to head the Foreign Affairs Committee in the next session. Mast demanded to know why the Biden White House has sent $3 billion of our tax money to Afghanistan since the Taliban took over, including $15.9 million to teach Afghans how to weave carpets. He asked, “How does this help America?”
https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2024/12/11/gop-rep-torches-blinken-why-the-heck-are-we-sending-billions-to-the-taliban-n2183094
He’s right: the money could have been better spent teaching everyone in the Biden Administration how to weave carpets so they could have a marketable skill once they’re all unemployed.
Hey, that last idea would apply perfectly to all the Green Scammers about to be shown the exits.
The Afghan Taliban should thank the US for donating to them billions of dollars of advanced military equipment that was left behind during the withdrawal.
I thought they did. I mean they held a parade….
“$15.9 million to teach Afghans how to weave carpets” That’s a lot of money, but I’ve bought an Afghan carpet. Do American’s weave carpets anywhere? I really don’t know.
Afghans already know how to weave carpets, been doing it for ages and ages. Sounds like Department of Redundancy Bureau Department at work.
Or more kickbacks into marxist-leftwing NGOs.
Just keyed afghan rugs into Copilot. They’ve been making them for centuries.
You’ve bought an Afghan carpet.
Which kind of underscores the fact that the Afghans already possess that skill and didn’t require $15.9 Million of US taxpayer money to acquire a skill they already have.
They are nervous and scared because they KNOW they are crooks pushing a scam.
Why do geophysicists need a union? Are they a trade group?
You are thinking of the wrong “union”.
more like the union in a Venn diagram or even matrimony
If plumbers or trash collectors downed tools ordinary people would miss the services they provide.
Who will miss the service provided if every AGU climate scientist loses their government funding?
Minnesotans for global warming would miss them for sure. Great fodder for memes and…
Looks to me like these clowns are doing the equivalent of yelling to Elon and Vivek…
….” me, me !!”
That is what perpetual attention-seeking does though… 🙂
With respect to shuttering the EPA: regulation without representation is tyranny.
So is taxation without representation and with the uni-party model favored by the Democrats, I do not see me being represented. Maryland is a “blue State” so essentially my vote does not count and my voice is not heard.
Too old to move.
Hopefully the incoming Trump administration will take on the entire ‘C02 is the control knob of the climate’ cluster f***. Who knows, perhaps terms like ‘propagation of error’ might be introduced into our political discourse?
Thanks for the like, Frank. 🙂
Even better. How about we finally expose the biggest lie of all…the ridiculous notion that a warmer climate is worse.
Warmer is BETTER.
Very nice Charles. A good way for some of these guys to preserve their job would be to do real science, show their work and explain why it matters. Elon and Vivek wouid notice.
What if some of these guys say different things in different meetings? I hope Elon and Vivek would identify those ones.
Same data, one conclusion for E&V, another conclusion for NYT.
Most of these bozos haven’t a clue about doing real science.
Take the featured senior professor Andrew Dessler from Texas AM. His 2010 paper proudly claimed to empirically prove positive cloud feedback. He fit a regression thru an almost perfect clear sky/all sky scatter resulting in an R^2 of 0.02! And it got peer reviewed published, then featured by NASA!!
? Was it in the journal of Negative Results.
They must have “redefined what the peer-reviewed literature is.”
Whew. I saw “https://www.eenews.net…etc…” and worried the site was related to Electrical Engineering. That would have been embarrassing.
“Trump officials could once again shutter websites, concealing years of research from the public”
vs
Phil Jones to scientist in Feb. 2005: ‘We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?’
They weren’t so worried about hiding ‘research’ when it suited them
From the article: “The resistance he faced didn’t come from leftists—it came from Republican appointees”
Would love to hear some names. Are they still hanging around?
It is doubtful the AGU meeting was focused on TDS.
I don’t know.. It has been driving a fair part of their recent agenda. 🙂
Absolutely beautifully written Roger!
One AGU official went so far as to declare, “Everybody at AGU is nervous. The unknown is what makes people nervous.”
I thought that the unknown was the entire reason for science.
Therein lies the problem. They don’t do any science, but think they “know” everything.