Claim: COP29 Failed because the Original Charter was Designed for Failure

Essay by Eric Worrall

“… Arguably, self-destruction was baked into “The Process” from the start. …”

Climate conferences are dying. How to save the world now?

This year’s U.N. climate change summit wore its contradictions and failings on its sleeve, prompting existential anxiety.

By Karl Mathiesen
in BAKU, Azerbaijan

The mood on the plane was grim, and more than one of those on board must have been wondering: Are these United Nations climate summits doomed?

In the beginning

Arguably, self-destruction was baked into “The Process” from the start.

When countries were erecting modern climate diplomacy in 1991, Saudi Arabian negotiators insisted that, unlike most U.N. discussions, climate decisions must require consensus, rather than, say, a two-thirds majority.  

Advising the Saudis and other Gulf states was Don Pearlman, a Reagan-era energy official and lobbyist for major American fossil fuel companies, whom the German magazine Der Spiegel dubbed the “High Priest of the Carbon Club” at the time. 

He was advising the push to give every country a veto. And ever since, the Saudis and others have used it to obfuscate on issues large and small. Just days ago, they teamed with other conservative autocracies to block talks about gender inequality and climate change. That played out at COP29 as large emerging economies derailed attempts to seriously discuss cutting greenhouse emissions, insisting that rich countries first pony up the money to do so. Impotence and frustration with the Saudi delegation boiled over into shouting in the final 24 hours.

In fairness, consensus does add weight to every COP decision. But it has also undeniably slowed things down. There are many who want to ditch it. But doing so would, of course, require consensus.

Read more: https://www.politico.eu/article/climate-conference-die-how-save-world-cop29/

Most of the online material about Don Pearlman is greens venting their frustration.

Vagueness is credo of High Priest of the Carbon Club

Every United Nations conference on global warming since the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro – and there have been eight such…

Wed Dec 03 1997 – 00:00

Every United Nations conference on global warming since the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro – and there have been eight such meetings so far – is populated by the same cast of characters. They haunt the corridors and the lobbies, buttonholing delegates to find out what’s happening and to put forward their points of view.

Not many people have heard of Mr Pearlman, though his influence has been enormous. He has never missed a meeting and is believed to have read every single line of well over 1,000 UN documents on climate change.

A profile in Der Spiegel during the 1995 First Conference of the Parties to the UN Climate Change Convention in Berlin memorably described this publicity-shy lawyer as the “High Priest of the Carbon Club” and said his aim was to “ensure that climate protection negotiations end in the nevernever land of vague declarations.”

Read more: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/vagueness-is-credo-of-high-priest-of-the-carbon-club-1.133164

But I discovered the following positive article;

Donald Pearlman Obituary

PEARLMAN, DONALD H. Donald H. Pearlman, age 69, formerly of Portland, Oregon died August 13 ,2005, at Washington Hospital Center in Washington, DC from complications arising out of lung cancer. Mr. Pearlman had a distinguished career in public service as the Executive Assistant to the Secretary of Energy and then of the Department of the Interior for over six years during the Reagan Administration. In this position he was responsible for the close oversight of significant and wide-ranging policy initiatives of those departments. When President Reagan left office in 1989, Mr. Pearlman became a partner in the Washington, DC, law firm of Patton, Boggs, where he established himself as a top expert in global climate change matters. He participated in numerous international conferences on that and related subjects. Prior to joining the Reagan Administration, Mr. Pearlman, a member of the Oregon State Bar, had served as a senior partner in the firm of Keane, Harper, Pearlman and Copeland in Portland. He joined the firm after clerking for a federal judge in Nevada, following his graduation from Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut. Mr. Pearlman graduated from Grant High School, in Portland, and then attended Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, graduating cum laude in economics. He is survived by his wife of 45 years, the former Shirley Block, his son, Bradley, of Seattle, his daughter, Stephanie Mennitt of Bristow, VA, 6 grandchildren and his brother, Gary, of Portland. The service will be held in Portland at 1 PM on Wednesday, August 17, at Ahavai Shalom Cemetery. Remembrances may be made to the American Cancer Society.

To plant trees in memory, please visit the Sympathy Store.

Published by The Oregonian on Aug. 17, 2005.

Who could have imagined? President Reagan and his team are still protecting us all from green communism, even from beyond the grave.

I believe we owe these gentlemen a big vote of thanks. Who knows what kind of horror show world we would be living in today, if Saudis hadn’t followed Pearlman’s advice and insisted on inserting those critical clauses into the COP charter, and if Pearlman hadn’t spent much of the last decade of his life providing his own brand of enrichment to the climate conference process.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 16 votes
Article Rating
67 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 26, 2024 10:18 am

Just days ago, they teamed with other conservative autocracies to block talks about gender inequality and climate change.

You’d think that if climate change WERE an existential threat, then blocking side issues such as ‘gender inequality’ would be lauded. Why get distracted by such nonsense when there is world to be saved? Guess not.

Reply to  Mumbles McGuirck
November 26, 2024 10:28 am

My paper tiger beats your paper tiger.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Mumbles McGuirck
November 26, 2024 12:10 pm

“Conservative Autocracies”. Hmm, no mention of leftist tyrannies.

KevinM
Reply to  Mumbles McGuirck
November 26, 2024 12:11 pm

Same quote was sitting in my cut-and-paste buffer for comment.

observa
Reply to  Mumbles McGuirck
November 26, 2024 5:49 pm

Stuff the planet and gender whatever when there’s racism to stamp out-
Race discrimination commissioner releases plan to end racism in 10 years
Let the truth-telling begin or else!

November 26, 2024 10:27 am

I knew I voted for Reagan for a reason.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Phil R
November 26, 2024 12:11 pm

I turned 18 in 1980, voted for him.

KevinM
Reply to  Phil R
November 26, 2024 12:12 pm

(2024-1980)=44
44+18= 62

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  KevinM
November 26, 2024 12:44 pm

That’s my age. Coincidentally, just suffered my first heart attack on Saturday.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Eric Worrall
November 26, 2024 5:15 pm

Thanks Eric.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
November 26, 2024 3:33 pm

Not something anyone looks forward to. No plus or minus from me because it could be interpreted in different ways.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  RickWill
November 26, 2024 5:14 pm

Thanks Rick, appreciated.

Bryan A
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
November 26, 2024 5:57 pm

On a bright note you can still live long enough to see the doom and gloom predictions of the great Climate Goricle et.al. prove fruitless and inconsequential

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Bryan A
November 27, 2024 7:15 am

hah! Yeah, I’m looking forward to that. I’ll just tell my Dr, i’ll be fine, since none of Gore’s prognostications are anywhere close to being validated.

Bryan A
Reply to  KevinM
November 26, 2024 7:41 pm

(2024-1980)=44

44+18= 62

Good thing you didn’t use the Climate Science AlGore-ithims on that equation😉

KevinM
Reply to  Bryan A
November 26, 2024 8:32 pm

The reply was to Phil’s message, not Jeff’s. I was writing out the math other people might have been doing in their heads – a service for overburdened millennials. I was barely too late to vote for The Gipper myself, but I remember Dana Carvy saying “wouldn’t be prudent” shortly thereafter.

Bryan A
Reply to  KevinM
November 26, 2024 10:07 pm

Not gonna do it, wouldn’t be prudent.

Reply to  Bryan A
November 27, 2024 4:33 am

That was George H.W. Bush, who said that. You probably know this but others may not: George H.W. Bush was Reagan’s vice president and after Reagan finished his two terms, George H.W. Bush ran for president (and won) and his “Nagada”(Saturday Night Live) meant he wasn’t going to raise taxes and it wouldn’t be prudent to do so.

George H.W. Bush ended up raising taxes, which caused him a lot of trouble within the Republican Party..

Bryan A
Reply to  Tom Abbott
November 27, 2024 5:36 am

Dana Carvey used it in a skit on SNL..back when the show was still funny

November 26, 2024 10:40 am

COP 29 just made it a lot clearer that it’s about how much money industrialized nations send to tree farming non-industrialized countries to prevent them from emitting industrialization produced CO2….the ulterior motive of maintaining the industrialized countries economies for as long as possible…remains well hidden.

Reply to  DMacKenzie
November 26, 2024 10:52 am

That’s an interesting take, but explain why so many industrialized nations are intent on deindustrializing?

Bill Toland
Reply to  More Soylent Green!
November 26, 2024 11:35 am

That’s because we are currently being ruled by politicians with no understanding of science or how the world actually works outside of their own little bubble. They only want to be elected and they think that green virtue signalling will achieve that for them.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Bill Toland
November 26, 2024 12:13 pm

I disagree. They’re all part of the plan. And yes, it’s a global conspiracy. That should be blatantly obvious by now.

sturmudgeon
Reply to  Bill Toland
November 26, 2024 12:25 pm

Particularly the ‘science’ of Economics.

November 26, 2024 10:48 am

Story tip

Biden administration to loan $6.6B to EV maker Rivian to build Georgia factory that automaker paused
https://apnews.com/article/georgia-rivian-loan-electric-vehicle-biden-2b7831551e0d31f29b7b05109606bdd1?utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter

Despite lack of consumer demand and a trouncing at the polls, lame-duck Biden continues Green New Deal Scam spending.

John Hultquist
Reply to  More Soylent Green!
November 26, 2024 11:09 am

 The often result of such “loans” is the factory will be shut and dismantled with equipment, fixtures, chairs, desks, etc., being bought for 10¢ on the dollar by the principals of the failed company or friendly companies. Biden and friends will be gone (one way or another) and Uncle Sam’s share won’t pay the costs. We might as well show the “loan” as a loss – – red ink, minus sigh, and parentheses. 

KevinM
Reply to  More Soylent Green!
November 26, 2024 12:15 pm

Some of the Rivians look kinda cool.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  KevinM
November 26, 2024 12:46 pm

A lot cooler than those god-awful Tesla trucks.

Scissor
Reply to  KevinM
November 26, 2024 2:16 pm

I saw one parked at the ski resort today. The chargers are located almost closest to the main lift. I thought to myself that $100K for a rolling battery means the owner probably has a lot of money, perhaps more than brains, though the close parking is nice.

sturmudgeon
Reply to  More Soylent Green!
November 26, 2024 12:28 pm

6.6 Billion here, 6.6 Billion there… pretty soon it adds up (back in brandon’s pocket)

SwedeTex
Reply to  More Soylent Green!
November 26, 2024 12:46 pm

Is there a Biden on Rivian’s Board? Wonder how much Rivian stock the Biden’s and their Democrat Uniparty bretheren own. Bet Nancy has a strong position.

Izaak Walton
Reply to  SwedeTex
November 26, 2024 2:55 pm

Similarly how much stock does Musk own in Space X and how much more funding do you think will go that way now that he is apparently best friends with Trump and in charge of improving government efficiency. That is a clear case of conflict of interest if there ever was one.

Mr.
Reply to  Izaak Walton
November 26, 2024 3:44 pm

I doubt though that Elon could get as much as 10% from Donald like Joe (“The Big Guy”) got from the Ukrainians.

After all, Donald literally wrote the book on “The Art Of The Deal”.

Izaak Walton
Reply to  Mr.
November 26, 2024 5:17 pm

Actually Tony Schwartz wrote the book. And Biden got nothing from the Ukrainians.

Reply to  Izaak Walton
November 26, 2024 6:01 pm

Schwartz is a Trump HATER.

Just another MSNBC lackey with deep DTS !!

Take anything he says with a heavy dose of laxative.

Biden’s son got FAKE employment in Ukraine, and funnelled large amount to the “Big Guy.”

Who knows how much other corruption Hunter was into, and how many millions were channelled to the many Biden trust accounts.

Reply to  Izaak Walton
November 26, 2024 6:27 pm

Schwartz and the MadCow get on well.

He has said he will leave the USA if Trump is re-elected, that is how sick-minded he is.

I hope he does leave the USA, goes to Iran or somewhere like that where he can feel “safe”…

But you can bet he won’t. being in with to the MSNBC.. you know he is a perpetual LIAR .

Reply to  Izaak Walton
November 26, 2024 6:29 pm

Schwartz also said that he was scared if Trump got the nuclear codes after the 2016 election….

Guess what.. Trump stopped a few wars and didn’t start any.

Let’s all hope that Biden can’t remember were he put the suitcase before the end of January. !!

Reply to  Izaak Walton
November 26, 2024 4:31 pm

Downsizing NASA is good for Space X. Tariffs on Chinese cars, Swedish and Canadian batteries are good for Musk. He knows how to arrange his toast to fall buttered side up.

Reply to  SwedeTex
November 27, 2024 4:47 am

Yeah, people who knew about this deal before it became public could make a lot of money if they invested in the right place, at the right time.

Editor
Reply to  More Soylent Green!
November 26, 2024 2:21 pm

Why wouldn’t Joe Biden get rid of as much money as he can, before Donald Trump takes over.

Scissor
Reply to  Mike Jonas
November 26, 2024 3:06 pm
Reply to  More Soylent Green!
November 26, 2024 11:25 pm

The goal is to spend as much as they can, and commit as many funds as they can, by January 19th, 2024.

KevinM
Reply to  Corrigenda
November 26, 2024 12:18 pm

Knowing almost as much about Corrigenda as I know about farming lanthanides, I can write:

Climate scientist says “But, but, but…

November 26, 2024 11:03 am

The reason they fail is because every policy enacted by leftists will fail. They’re tragically inept at identifying cause, effect, and solutions. The ineptitude arises from their religious devotion to their dogma. For leftists, dogma always overrides reality.

As Ernest Benn said,

“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies.”

No one is better at getting it wrong than leftists.

Reply to  stinkerp
November 26, 2024 11:55 am

The Left blows things up with ineptitude. The Neo-Right (which is also left since all bureaucracy ultimately leads to the same place) does it the old-fashioned way, with high explosives and bullets.

sturmudgeon
Reply to  Mark Whitney
November 26, 2024 12:37 pm

They must have used that ‘ineptitude’ stuff on the pipeline. Maybe it works under water.

atticman
Reply to  stinkerp
November 26, 2024 12:59 pm

Someone once said, “For every problem there is a solution that is obvious, simple, and WRONG”, or something like that… He was famous, anyway.

Reply to  stinkerp
November 27, 2024 4:57 am

“No one is better at getting it wrong than leftists.”

This is true.

We are living through a very good example of just how wrong leftists can get things. The Left’s delusional thinking gets to the point of being downright dangerous and detrimental to society. It’s there now in many places.

The United States just got a four-year reprieve from this radical leftist insanity. The Radical Left is still insane, but they don’t have the political power now. We need to keep it that way.

Coeur de Lion
November 26, 2024 11:51 am

Look, fellows, it’s quite simple. There is no climate crisis-indeed the IPCC can’t find any trends in extreme weather . The current increase in CO2 is unstoppable whether outgassing or Asian coal burning . It has no effect on tke weather

mikewaite
Reply to  Coeur de Lion
November 26, 2024 1:44 pm

The current increase in CO2 is unstoppable whether outgassing or Asian coal burning . It has no effect on tke weather
I am beginning to be sceptical about my scepticism on that topic , Cause? A sideways look (on my browser screen) at the ENSO meter which is rapidly increasing over last two or three weeks . We seem to be heading for another El Nino before being rid of the last one . Now that surely is unprecedented isn’t it ? Please tell me my fears are ungrounded .

Scissor
Reply to  mikewaite
November 26, 2024 2:30 pm

Your fears, at least about ENSO, are ungrounded for as surely as rain follows a dry spell and vis versa, it’s situation normal.

https://ggweather.com/enso/oni.htm

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  mikewaite
November 27, 2024 7:21 am

We have no idea what’s precedented or not. We can’t see ENSO (or temperature) with any kind of accuracy beyond the last 50 years.

strativarius
November 26, 2024 11:52 am

You don’t see them [aliens] frigging each other over for a percentage… – Ellen Ripley.

Denis
November 26, 2024 12:20 pm

Just what does the word “consensus” mean in Karl Mathiesen’s mind? He says that a 2/3 majority is not a consensus? The dictionary calls “consensus” general agreement. Two thirds seems pretty overwhelming agreement to me. Like all those immersed in climate speak, they try to be as imprecise as possible to admit all possibilities. It was once “global warming” which at least means something (it’s getting warmer). Now it’s “climate change” which means nothing because climate always changes. And on it goes, doing nothing and saying nothing but for countless false claims and costing us lots of money nonetheless.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Denis
November 26, 2024 12:33 pm

Control the language (and word definitions become highly fluid), control the ideas (rigidly).

StephenP
Reply to  Denis
November 27, 2024 4:38 am

Has the COP xx ever detailed where the XXXbn dollars are going to end up, apart from being a bit of pin money for the recipients. Some may say Swiss and Seychelles bank accounts.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Denis
November 27, 2024 7:22 am

It’s been “climate change” for almost 40 years.

Bruce Cobb
November 26, 2024 1:00 pm

It’s almost like Paris never happened.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
November 26, 2024 11:29 pm

Now, now, “we’ll always have Paris”.

November 26, 2024 1:33 pm

“Save the world?!” From WHAT?!

What ABSOLUTE MORONS!

(But then I’m probably insulting morons.)

Mantis
November 26, 2024 2:11 pm

The mood on the plane”

They immediately lost all credibility, not that they ever had any. I suppose the irony is completely lost on the writer. A bunch of mid level bureaucrats jet setting around the world claiming that people jet setting around the world is killing the planet, and making promises of OPM with no authority to do so, which of course will have zero impact on the CO2 boogieman anyway.

Enjoy it while you can, bureaucratic dead weight…a new sheriff is coming to town.

Bryan A
November 26, 2024 5:53 pm

COP 29 failed because it was built on the back of a failing COP 28
COP 28 failed because it was built on the back of a failing COP 27
COP 27 failed because it was built on the back of a failing COP 26
COP 26 failed because it was built on the back of a failing COP 25
etc…etc…etc
COPs have failed because they are nothing but empty promises pledged around vague platitudes propped up by building blocks of little consequence on a foundation of faulty and fake data harvested from models of inadequate skill.

UK-Weather Lass
November 27, 2024 1:22 am

To know how to lead you must first know how to follow.

The problem with the UN is that it is apparently a jack of all trades and master of none, attributable one would suppose to the person at the very top of the hierarchy. When power is misplaced or abused by such a person then there will come a moment when the whole body destroys itself. Perhaps we are just glimpsing the beginning of this process and if the guy at the top doesn’t resign very soon, then we all know who to blame, don’t we?

We need to curb political power and its rapidly grown interference in so many other areas of community since these interfering busybodies and their billionaire sponsors have obviously been caused by climate change and carbon dioxide emissions. Change that and we will save the world in a way it really does need saving.

November 27, 2024 4:09 am

From the article: “Just days ago, they teamed with other conservative autocracies to block talks about gender inequality and climate change.”

Oh, My god! Say it ain’t so!