Donald Trump and Kamala Harris will have their first and probably only debate on Tuesday. Climate is likely to come up as a debate topic, after not being emphasized for a while. How should Trump handle this topic? We have some tips for him to win “bigly” on climate and energy policy.
On The Heartland Institute’s Episode #126 of The Climate Realism Show, H. Sterling Burnett, Anthony Watts, Linnea Lueken, and Jim Lakely will also review the “Crazy Climate News of the Week,” including the idea that logging forests would make wildfires worse, climate change causing bridges to “fall apart like Tinkertoys, and NOAA being called out for pushing a false climate alarmist narrative.
Join us LIVE on YouTube, Rumble, and X at 1 p.m. ET on Friday, Sept. 6 and participate in the chat. We’ll try to answer as many questions as we can.
This video will be archived at our ClimateTV page
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The world moves on from the ideas of exxon and koch how to handle energy topics.
https://cleantechnica.com/2024/09/06/graph-the-rapid-growth-of-batteries-as-electricity-source-on-us-grid/
I heard trump admitted 2020 wasn’t stolen. Looks like he’s trying to pander to moderates instead of his cult.
Trump: And he beat us by a whisker. It was a terrible thing. They used covid to cheat. It was a terrible thing. I thought it was very sad. The election brought great division to the country.
That has been misrepresented as ‘not stolen’ – which is grotesque since the word ‘cheat’ is integral.
I thought the main argument cheating done on election day.
In other words you are totally ignorant of the arguments.
… as you are about basically everything.
And totally determined to remain ignorant.
I feel sad that you believe a rumor is the same as a fact. You could look it up. You could ask is it true but you and your ilk would rather smear people with rumors. What does that tell us about you and your kind?
Another FAIL from the Luser.
I have a feeling that, excellent though your tips may be, Donald Trump won’t actually need them. He has a knack of bypassing detail and cutting straight to the core. His platform for the coming presidenrial election is stunning for its directness. For example:
.1.Seal the border and stop the migrant invasion
.15.Cancel the electric vehicle mandate and cut costly and burdensome regulations
.17.Keep men out of women’s sports
There’s plenty more where that came from.
Please mention that the state of art is that attribution as done by the IPCC is refuted.
(That 2023 R. McKitrick Papier still stands) Whatever they find in their model has no relevance to the real world!
https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-prepares-for-debate-against-kamala-by-going-to-wine-bar-and-arguing-with-drunks
At least he’s preparing, while vance is having fun at the furniture store.
J.D. Vance is kicking ass. I wasn’t keen on J.D. at first. What does he add to the ticket? What demographic does he bring in, that’s not already firmly in Trump’s camp? J.D. brings in the butt-kickers, that’s who. A-Walz is a creepy imitation of someone pretending to be a nice guy. Harris is an imitation of a person. Vance is the real deal.
Just don’t put him in a donut shop.
what a moronic comment !
So how long have you been posting here?
Long enough to know everything you say is moronic and comes from a mind the size of a peanut.
Wasn’t it Walz who didn’t know what a donut is?
Wasn’t it the Harris-Walz campaign who thought donut shaming was more important than policy explaining?
One of Walz’s supporters posted a picture of him outside of a donut shop in Rochester, Minnesota that went out of business two or three years ago as a result of the draconian Covid lockdown policies in place in that state. It was the ultimate self-own.
Saw the clip.. he was buying a selection of donuts, probably for his team, and talking to the staff while doing it.
SO WHAT !! Only the most moronic leftist, could make anything of that.
But the far-left MSM tried and failed anyway.
Don’t let Harris anywhere near Ikea…. The whole store would fall apart.
Vance has been prepared all his life.
The camel still needs prep notes !… pathetic.
I guess you are referring to the far-leftist initiated TOTALLY FAKE comments that went around the internet.
Why are you so incredibly gullible to ultra-leftist scams and LIES.
Is it that you are stuck in a ghetto basement being fed hallucinogenics by your granny and unable to get out to face any sort of reality?
😎
I also liked the trailer video in the story below, “January 6: The Deadliest Day”.
I’m waiting on the BluRay release to home video.
You must understand that the Dem objective in its climate disaster story is for government to take control of our energy and dictate how when and from whom and in what form we are allowed to obtain our energy. Yes, this is a communist manifesto.
Trump has many priorities after he gets elected, but one of them should be to arrange a debate among experts about the climate crisis. The “deniers” should win easily. That would blow a huge hole in the left’s agenda.
It would be good if someone at CO2 Coalition or Heartland would convince Trump to say that US Net Zero by 2050 would reduce temperature by only 0.015F with no feedback, or 0.061F with IPCC feedbacks, as per Lindzen, Happer et al. Too small to measure. Or some similar facts. I’d like to see the look on Kamala’s face.
https://co2coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Net-Zero-Averted-Temperature-Increase-2024-06-11.pdf
The problem for Trump on climate is he is literally ignorant on the topic (like so many things he tries to sound smart about) . You hear him make the most silly comments that obviously have no basis in fact. The most recent one (which he has repeated numerous times) is about sea level rise.
“The biggest threat is not global warming, where the ocean’s going to rise one, one-eighth of an inch over the next 400 years. The big — and you’ll have more oceanfront property, right?”
So first that figure is just pulled out of his arse and second … No Donald you wont have more oceanfront property.
And before anyone here wastes my time saying Trump is right, maybe find a quote from a person working in the field who has ever said this?
This is a political debate, which you have apparently confused with the SATs.
Trump question for Kamala: If CO2 is the predominate driver of global warming—as you and your climate alarmist friends assert—why is it that there is no spike in atmospheric CO2 levels to explain the obvious spike in global temperature as measured by UAH using satellite sensing over the most recent 12-16 months?
WUWT readers can find the up-to-date UAH global temperature trending in a graph in the right-hand column of this webpage.
Is that you, Kamala?
Given that much of the national audience is predominantly scientifically illiterate and thoroughly indoctrinated, he should use examples that are easy to visualize and briefly communicated.
I would suggest (and he hasn’t asked…LOL) he explain that alarmists have for 30 years insisted that islands such as the Maldives are going to disappear beneath the rising seas; but that they have actually grown.