Please tweet and share.
From Jim Lakely at the Heartland Institute:
A viral heat wave video was just nuked by YouTube. It’s not just no longer being promoted by YouTube’s algorithm, it’s being actively suppressed. It went from 8,051 total views between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m. yesterday to 181 views in that same time period 24 hours later.
A video doesn’t drop in views by 98% in 24 hours “organically.” That is literally impossible — especially since it has the most comments and likes of any of our videos in months. Those are the things that YouTube says its smiles upon because viewers are choosing to engage with the video. People engaged with videos keep watching YouTube, which makes revenue for Alphabet/Google/YouTube. This was done on purpose by ideologues in power at YouTube.
We suspect that many of our climate skeptic videos are suppressed by YouTube, but it’s very hard to prove. How do you prove someone at YouTube is suppressing views to your content? Maybe your video just isn’t “hitting” with audiences. So make better videos next time! Well, this is about as clear as any evidence can be, because it was a HUGE hit with audiences — a timely short video addressing a big story (heat waves) that exploded in views almost instantly — until it suddenly wasn’t.
Please Tweet and Share this post so that the video is watched – pushback against corporate suppression.
URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnSyDr0F9_M
The block is coming from the Google browser. No block occurs when using my iPhone via Safari or with my W11 PC using Edge. The block only occurs on my W7 PC using Brave which is a derivative of the Google browser.
I’ve run into this block before. I think google/yootube looks at the referring web site – WUWT – and blocks based on our unvarnished record of blatant climate misinformation and radical screaming denialism. I have beaten the block by copying the link (right-click menu) and then pasting it into a new tab, thus no referring url involved.
We should do simultaneous posts on both youtube and Rumble.
I lived in a town that had two 123 F + days in a row in 1906. In a semiarid region of Australia who’s highest temp at the current airport site is 116.5 F. There have been plenty of excuses to ignore the early temps, and they are most likely slightly higher than if recorded at the new site using modern equipment, but it does highlight how subjective choices have a huge bearing on what is presented as objective evidence.
Old issues of NASA’s GISTEMP Land Ocean Temperature Index (LOTI) found at the Way Back Machine compared to what GISTEMP publishes today shows an ever increasing trend produced by the monthly corrections. This month they made 384 corrections. Over time the trend tends to change:
Let’s see if that can be made less fuzzy:
That is adjusted data.
It is pure hogwash.
2001 was after the really big alterations.
And it mixes in purely made-up ocean temps with land-based measurements.
The fact that they keep changing it ever more is small potatoes, compared to the fact that it is 100% meaningless as a source of info on any actual measured temperature time series.
“And it mixes in purely made-up ocean temps with land-based measurements.”
Yes, the temperature data mannipulators have to inject bogus sea surface temperatures into the “global temperature” mix because if they only use the land surface temperature records, then the temperature profile shows it was just as warm in the Early Twentieth Century as it is today, so to create their bogus Hockey Stick temperature profile, they added in bogus sea surface temperatures which cooled the past all the way back to the end of the Little Ice Age, thus making it appear that today is the “hottest day evah!”.
If it was just as warm in the Early Twentieth Century as it is today, then that means we are not experiencing unprecedented warming today, as the climate alarmists claim, and must have, to make their case.
More CO2 today, yet it is no warmer than in the past when there was less CO2. Therefore, CO2 is, at best, a minor player in the Earth’s atmosphere.
97,513 now. Let’s get to 6 figures…
What is missing from most of the ‘data’ that is used, is the 1930s. Saskatchewan (Canadian prairies) still has records from that decade. My mother grew up in Saskatchewan during that time, and she often recalled the number of small children who died of heat stroke in her community.
One of the big mistakes that is used in recording ‘data’ is using the temperature readings from sites that should have been abandoned years ago. When the meter was installed 60 years ago it was in an OK location, but in those 60 years, the surrounding environment has changed – too many buildings, some are next to exhaust pipes etc. Their readings are biased. Anthony Watts did a huge review of this a couple of years ago, but I wonder how many of those meters were abandoned?
Plus the concept of an ‘average’ global temperature is silly and a huge misuse of stats. Averages are only useful when all the data point in the original data is very close, but if you have outliers an average is useless. I walk my dog at 6 a.m. (because in his mind that is pee o’clock) – there has only been ONE day that I have not worn my light winter jacket. And some of those days, even that jacket was not warm enough. Summer in Regina, Saskatchewan has not been overly warm – we have had a few hots days (gee it is July on the Canadian prairies – duh!) but nothing what would lead to summer being called a heat wave
“some are next to exhaust pipes”
Including jet engines, as reported in previous articles on this site.
“ I walk my dog at 6 a.m.”
My dog refuses to go for a walk while there is frost on the grass..
… looks like around 9am this morning !
If you do a search for
are more extreme weather events happening
…it is disheartening to see how many hits there are answering in the affirmative, but without presenting any real evidence or data. But there are a few that attempt to set the record straight.
The lies from the left must be continually fought. Sadly most people see only the lies and not the truth. Thanks for sites like this and a few others that help to present the facts!
“it is disheartening to see how many hits there are answering in the affirmative, but without presenting any real evidence”
That’s because there is no such evidence that CO2 is overheating the planet. So the alarmist “journalists” just pretend there is evidence, or if they are really dumb, actually think there is evidence, but as you noted, they never produce any, and again, that’s because there is no evidence of this to produce, so if they think there is evidence, they are fooling themselves along with some of their readers.
There is not one shred of evidence showing CO2 is doing anything to the Earth’s atmosphere. CO2 may be doing something, but it is so minimal that we cannot spot it, and present it as evidence. If we cannot spot it, then we shouldn’t be worrying about it.
You mean to say that the YouTube ecosystem was threaten by that video.
Suppression is what the leftists do. Even when it comes to songs.
CMT Pulls Jason Aldean’s Music Video After He Enrages Liberals | The Daily Caller
https://youtu.be/b1_RKu-ESCY
It was reported yesterday that Aldean’s song has hit number one on the iTunes list.
All Aldean was saying is you won’t see the leftwing riots in small towns because the people in small towns won’t put up with it.
The radical Left doesn’t like it when their violent rioting is criticized, so they try to make Aldean out to be a racists.
Yeah, radical Leftists, come to my small hometown and try that violent stuff. You’ll be seeing the inside of jail cell real quick, if you are lucky. You want to destroy our town? No, sir! As George H.W. Bush used to say: “Nogadaw” (not going to do that).
Yeah, radical Leftists don’t like their violence and mayhem being criticized. When that happens, they attack, attack, attack. And their usual method of verbal attack is to call the target a racist.
Aldean should tell them to go to Hell. Where they belong.
I’m going to mow the yard in the heat. Will I get climate reparations for that, or does it require special organizational representation with lobbying/fundraising?
Maybe the science cheaters can elaborate on getting to high places with altered data.
story tip
Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne to resign following findings of manipulation in academic research | CNN
I was going to mow the lawn this morning..
… but will have to wait until the frost dissipates
Maybe they can use the heat to blame for mass transit fails when private transport is banned.
story tip
Why is SEPTA canceling trains? Here’s the reason and it might get worse. (yahoo.com)
Google (owners of YouTube) is a company stridently committed to evil. Read up about their collaborations with the Communist Party of China, the most evil organization on Earth, and you’ll find this sort of despicable censorship is a pretty minor evil deed for them.
For the last 5 days or so Drudge has had “HOTTEST DAYS EVAHHHHH” as it’s headline….today…crickets. But that is how it goes…..screech for days then silence. The only thing peoiple remember is the screeching not the actual numbers. Just the headlines baby.
Seems very tepid as a response to a pack of dangerous lies intended to dupe the gullible and scare kids.
What’s with this smackdown of the Heartland Institute? My nephew sent me the link. I need something to counter it. Must be a counter to it out there somewhere.
https://www.desmog.com/heartland-institute/
Popular Technology.net: The Truth about DeSmogBlog
Thanks!
Even though we’re really chilling out at present we’re gunna drop like flies next summer-
European heatwaves a warning for scorchers Down Under (msn.com)
The End is Nigh!
So the bottom line here is that this so called “record” temperature is NOT the global temperature record at all it is NCEP reanalysis ( which is an opaque term in itself ).
I spent quite some time when I saw these claims in the Guardian, following their links to their own propaganda before I found a reference to what data they were actually basing the claims on. Then some more chasing before I got NCEP and found it was a “reanalysis” and not the usual temperature record.
If there really was a “crisis” they would not need to continually lie trick and mislead in order to convince people.