Exxon Threatens to Divert Investment Away from the EU over the Energy Windfall Tax

Essay by Eric Worrall

Life in the EU – If it moves, tax it, if it stops moving, subsidise it.

ExxonMobil launches legal challenge to EU’s windfall tax on energy firms

US oil firm contests legal authority for ‘solidarity contribution’ to raise funds to offset soaring energy prices

Richard Partington
@RJPartington Thu 29 Dec 2022 04.57 AEDT

ExxonMobil has launched a legal challenge against the EU in an attempt to derail the bloc’s windfall tax on the profits of energy producers.

Agreed in September as part of a package of measures to tackle the surge in oil, gas and electricity prices triggered by Russia’s war in Ukraine, the EU hopes the “solidarity contribution” could raise €25bn (£22bn) in public revenue for governments across the 27-nation bloc, while acting to curtail energy demand and bring down prices.

“This tax will undermine investor confidence, discourage investment, and increase reliance on imported energy and fuel products. European industries already face a very real competitiveness crisis and governments should be supporting the production of reliable and affordable energy.”

“Whether we invest here primarily depends on how attractive and globally competitive Europe will be,” said Casey Norton, a spokesperson for the company.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/dec/28/exxonmobil-launches-legal-challenge-to-eus-windfall-tax-on-energy-firms

Exxon’s suggestion they will reconsider investment priorities is no idle threat.

Leftist Western leaders simply don’t understand how precarious their position is, in terms of attracting energy investment. After decades of stagnation, Africa is finally getting back on its feet, with enormous pipeline and energy projects drawing the attention of transnational energy majors.

If the EU and other states go forward with these taxes, they might find themselves on the receiving end of even more severe energy shortfalls in coming years.

5 38 votes
Article Rating
42 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nevada_Geo
December 31, 2022 2:08 am

Europe, the new Africa.
Africa, the new Europe.

Last edited 29 days ago by Nevada_Geo
Ron Long
Reply to  Nevada_Geo
December 31, 2022 6:08 am

Amazing how Geologists working in Nevada go right to the heart of an issue. Must be breathing in all of that gold dust.

Philip Mulholland
December 31, 2022 2:14 am

Life in the EU – If it moves, tax it, if it stops moving, subsidise it.

And if you are a politician – if it does not exist, believe that it does.

son of mulder
December 31, 2022 2:21 am

The EU needs to replace the funding it is losing from the UK since Brexit which was about £12Bn net per year. Poor things sob,sob,sob.

Hivemind
December 31, 2022 2:26 am

How on Earth does increasing taxes reduce prices?

Chasmsteed
Reply to  Hivemind
December 31, 2022 2:53 am

“We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle” Sir Winston Spence Churchill.

strativarius
December 31, 2022 2:39 am

So the EU would like Exxon to stump up for the failure of EU foreign policy and energy policy.

And now the fourth reich has jumped into bed with Qatar instead of Russia

“Suitcases stuffed with cash seized by police investigating Qatar bribery of European politicians” – MSM

Looks every bit as dodgy as before. Exxon should walk

Chasmsteed
December 31, 2022 2:51 am

Windfall Tax ? if successful, the next time these energy companies turn a loss – they will almost certainly have a case to sue for subsidies to tide them over.

Last edited 29 days ago by Chasmsteed
MarkW
Reply to  Chasmsteed
December 31, 2022 9:34 am

That’s how it is with socialists. Heads I win, tails you lose.

Rod Evans
December 31, 2022 3:09 am

There is something quaintly appropriate, that the EU would call its raid on Oil and Gas suppliers a “Windfall tax” That sums up the EU perfectly. They are relying on wind for energy and when the wind falls they think they can just rob the fossil fuel industry to cover their flawed energy policies.

Streetcred
Reply to  Rod Evans
December 31, 2022 4:11 pm

Thinking to myself that if there’s any true windfall tax to be levied, it would be more appropriate to have a go at the Ruinables industry. The entire industry is a windfall.

Last edited 29 days ago by Streetcred
Rich Davis
December 31, 2022 3:11 am

could raise €25bn (£22bn) in public revenue for governments across the 27-nation bloc, while acting to curtail energy demand and bring down prices

Let’s parse this out.

Raise revenue…check!
Curtail demand…check!
Bring down prices?
What are you smoking?

It will either raise prices and curtail demand or if consumers will get some sort of subsidy to “bring down prices”, then it won’t curtail demand. It can’t do both.

Well, it could do both for a subset of the population. If the goal is to eat the rich (and when isn’t it?), and when we further understand “the rich” to mean everyone who works for a living, then the fascist EU state could lower prices for their parasite clients at the expense of productive citizens whose demand for energy might drop more than the parasites’ demand increases in response to lower prices.

That seems almost convoluted enough to be an EU policy, so it’s probably about right.

MarkW
Reply to  Rich Davis
December 31, 2022 9:36 am

It wasn’t too long ago that politicians were bragging about how their policies were causing energy prices to rise.
It’s how they intend to curtail demand.

Yooper
December 31, 2022 5:11 am
Scissor
Reply to  Yooper
December 31, 2022 6:46 am

Where does the price of oil go?

Rich Davis
Reply to  Scissor
December 31, 2022 7:17 am

My crystal ball says down, driven by lower demand (recession)—unless it goes up, or stays the same!

Scissor
Reply to  Rich Davis
December 31, 2022 7:45 am

I was thinking about the same. Short term gyrations being unpredictable.

On a longer timeframe, peak oilers continue to be proven wrong as supply and demand have risen, except for 2020 drop today’s subsequent recovery.

Fundamentally, we need energy (and materials) and the cheaper, the more reliable the better. Eventually a deflationary recession will hit but can it outpace the ever accelerating printing presses?

In any case, happy new year!

Rich Davis
Reply to  Scissor
December 31, 2022 8:51 am

It seems that the goal is to transfer wealth from the middle class to the elite crony “capitalists” and to the client parasites who keep them in power via the sham democracy.

They hope to avoid a deflationary recession, but is there any historical precedent for the printing presses NOT leading to hyperinflation? A trillion here and a trillion there…pretty soon you’re talking real money to paraphrase Everett Dirksen.

Happy new year, against all odds!

Rich Davis
Reply to  Yooper
December 31, 2022 6:51 am

Greenwashing is annoying but in today’s environment that is probably not an indicator of poor management. I think you intended that comment as sarcasm since the article fairly gushes about XOM outperforming.

Drake
Reply to  Rich Davis
December 31, 2022 9:41 am

And IF they use “carbon recapture” to get “carbon” credits, pumping the CO2 into the ground to increase pressure in older oil fields, they get a win/win from the insane net zero windfall tax credit/deduction benefits and green washing the “perception” of the public, with a good PR campaign, at the same time.

As long as the “green washing” is all just that, no actual wasted expenditures other than PR, then EXXON/Mobile looks like a really good future investment.

Richard Greene
Reply to  Yooper
December 31, 2022 9:31 am

The article says almost nothing about how XOM is run
Did you read it while a Yooper polar bear was chasing you?

I compared ExxonMobil (XOM)
with Chevron (CVX)
for the past 12 months

XOM
Sales $387 bis
Net Profits $52 bils
Profit Margin 13%

CVX
Sales $277 bils
Net Profits $34 bils
Profit Margin 12%

So how do you conclude that XOM is “badly run” ?

R Greene in SE Michigan

Last edited 29 days ago by Richard Greene
Scissor
Reply to  Richard Greene
December 31, 2022 10:02 am

A couple of us, at least, think it was meant as sarcasm.

Peta of Newark
December 31, 2022 5:17 am

“divert investment

Surely they can do better than that….

1saveenergy
December 31, 2022 7:01 am

All oil companies should stop supplying ALL product to any governments that have taken up the ‘let’s go green‘ policies …
Give them a taste of ‘Net Zero‘.

6 months should do it !!

Any surviving politicians will soon change their minds.

Rich Davis
Reply to  1saveenergy
December 31, 2022 7:31 am

That would require a level of collusion only seen in the fevered minds of certain trolls contemplating Trump and Putin.

Somebody will sell oil to them and somebody will profit off the transaction. The most that can be done is to drive up the cost for the nut zero crowd.

antigtiff
December 31, 2022 8:03 am

Here’s Joey’s plan…..shut down the Keystone pipeline as part of ending fossil fuels, kiddo. Take from those who have (Big Oil) and give to those who want(Big solar/wind). Joey learned from his pal Xi Jinping….Joey knows climate….Joey knows economics….Joey was in the top of his class.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
December 31, 2022 8:22 am

It’s the EU that is doing all the “threatening”. Exxon is acting with good business sense. If your business isn’t making money in an area it’s good judgement to protect the shareholders and leave. The EU is in no position to play this game.

Paul Johnson
December 31, 2022 8:36 am

Newton’s Third Law applies to economics – every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

ThinkingScientist
December 31, 2022 8:41 am

EU budget 2022 = 168 billion Euros

ExxonMobil annual revenue to Sept 2022

= 403 billion dollars

Hmm…maybe the EU should think twice before catching a tiger by the tail. (See what I did there 😏)

Jackdaw
December 31, 2022 9:20 am

Waste of time taking the EU to court, Exxon will lose. Better to quid investing and go somewhere that appreciates the money, investment and job opportunities such companies provide.

MarkW
December 31, 2022 9:32 am

Leftists have always taken great pride in not knowing how anything works.
This is especially true when it comes to economics.

Elliot W
Reply to  MarkW
December 31, 2022 1:48 pm

Actually, Leftists take great pride in not working, period. How else do they have the time to attend all those conferences and protests?

Gary Pearse
December 31, 2022 9:38 am

I have been waiting for Atlas to shrug! This is the end game to stop the totalitarians in their tracks within days. Ayn Rand wrote this book in 1957. Everyone should read it (all wattsupers over 70 have probably read this blockbuster, but education was abolished in the West a decade later so I’m not sure how widely read it is).

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/662.Atlas_Shrugged

AndyHce
Reply to  Gary Pearse
December 31, 2022 12:57 pm

Most people would both starve and freeze if they attempted to implement that plan. Government goons are not quite so stupid as portrayed in fiction. THEY read the book and they proceeded to hedge their position by making sure almost everyone is dependent on government in some respect for some necessities.

Gary Pearse
Reply to  AndyHce
December 31, 2022 2:12 pm

Well, I was referring to Atlas in a different context here. Exxon is going to redirect where it invests and who it supplies at the price, they decide on.

The oil companies had gone all-in to appease the green goons so that they could carry on with business. They got pushed around, defunded, sued and were told they would be gone in a decade or two. Now, in the driver’s seat, with energy commodities desperately needed by their malefactors despite high prices, they are dictating the terms to the UKs, EUs, USs and everyone else.

Moreover, they will be developing Africa’s deposits, a big boost to this much maligned continent, and a further blow to the idiot policies and plans of the WEF and Euro-centric totalitarians. That’s what I meant.

AndyHce
Reply to  Gary Pearse
January 1, 2023 12:53 am

So far the big oil companies have failed to defend themselves in any way beyond technicalities, without addressing the fictions that they are actually responsible for everything bad. I don’t think they had even a tiny chance of winning anything in an EU court.

So far, it seems as if all develop African resources are being undertaken purely for the benefit of non-Africans (except for the bribes).

Mantis
December 31, 2022 10:31 am

It’s one thing to pander to the extreme left, but if the EU leadership sincerely believes that taxing energy will bring energy prices down, as does the California state leadership, then we are really in trouble.

doonman
Reply to  Mantis
December 31, 2022 11:07 am

California returns “carbon credit” once yearly on the highest utility bills in the country and claims it reduces energy costs.

Editor
December 31, 2022 3:04 pm

Hooray, finally a corporation grows a pair!

Hatter Eggburn
December 31, 2022 3:37 pm

The EU’s energy windfall tax is revenge for America’s IRA – inflation reduction act which massively subsidies US electric car makers. Now there’s a full blown trade war between the US and EU.

Redge
January 1, 2023 5:22 am

It should be called a wind fail tax

ResourceGuy
January 3, 2023 9:42 am

I thought they already were.

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights