We’re saved! U.S. Army sets 2050 net-zero emissions goal 

From Climate Depot

We’re saved! U.S. Army sets 2050 net-zero emissions goal – ‘The time to address climate change is now’

Christine E. Wormuth Secretary of the Army: “The time to address climate change is now. … I challenge our Army to examine climate threats, prioritize resources, and take swift action.”

Politico: “The strategy also set milestones for electrifying its vehicle fleet. It would go all-electric for light-duty non-tactical vehicles by 2027 and across all non-tactical vehicles by 2035…The U.S. Army outlined a climate change strategy Tuesday that included halving greenhouse gas emissions compared with 2005 levels this decade, greening its vehicle fleet, running on carbon-free power and ultimately hitting net-zero emissions by 2050. The Army’s strategy comes after President Joe Biden’s December executive order exempted the military from the federal government’s 2050 net-zero commitments.” 

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin: “We face all kinds of threats in our line of work, but few of them truly deserve to be called existential. The climate crisis does. … Climate change is making the world more unsafe and we need to act.”

By: Admin – Climate DepotFebruary 8, 2022 6:28 PM

Army sets 2050 net-zero emissions goal – Subscription requird

Politico: Army sets 2050 net-zero emissions goal

BY: ZACK COLMAN | 02/08/2022 01:02 PM EST

The U.S. Army outlined a climate change strategy Tuesday that included halving greenhouse gas emissions compared with 2005 levels this decade, greening its vehicle fleet, running on carbon-free power and ultimately hitting net-zero emissions by 2050.

The Army’s strategy comes after President Joe Biden’s December executive order exempted the military from the federal government’s 2050 net-zero commitments. That order left an enormous gap, as the military accounts for a bulk of the federal government’s planet-heating emissions. A 2019 Brown University study estimated the military has been responsible for up to 80 percent of federal government emissions since 2001.“

The Army must adapt across our entire enterprise and purposefully pursue greenhouse gas mitigation strategies to reduce climate risks,” Army Secretary Christine Wormuth wrote in the strategy. “If we do not take action now, across our installations, acquisition and logistics, and training, our options to mitigate these risks will become more constrained with each passing year.”

The details: The Army said it wants to hit net-zero emissions across its more than 130 global installations by 2045. It would do that by installing a microgrid by 2035 and procuring entirely carbon-free power by 2030 at every installation. The Army also wants to curb emissions at all buildings 50 percent below 2005 levels by 2032.The strategy also set milestones for electrifying its vehicle fleet. It would go all-electric for light-duty non-tactical vehicles by 2027 and across all non-tactical vehicles by 2035. It will invest in 470 new electric vehicle charging stations this year to help jump start that transition, the Army said.

The Army said through 2020 it retired 18,000 non-tactical vehicles. Over the last three years, it boosted hybrid vehicles by 3,000 units. Those shifts cut Army non-tactical vehicle fleet costs more than $50 million and cut emissions per mile by 12 percent.

Full U.S. Army plan here: https://www.army.mil/e2/downloads/rv7/about/2022_army_climate_strategy.pdf

 #

‘Global warming’ causes war claims — debunked – ‘Warm periods are more peaceful than cold ones’ – Bonus Chapter #2 for Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change

Bonus Chapter #2 from The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change:

Excerpt: The climate activists have it backward. A 2011 study published by the Center for Strategic and International Studies titled “The Climate Wars Myth” found, “Since the dawn of civilization, warmer eras have meant fewer wars.” As author Bruno Tetrais explained, “History shows that ‘warm’ periods are more peaceful than ‘cold’ ones…

John Horgan, the director of the Center for Science Writings at the Stevens Institute of Technology, explained, “In spite of the recent surge in violence in the Middle East, war-related casualties have fallen over the last half-century, as temperatures have risen…

A 2013 study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that cold eras were dark times in Eastern Europe. “Some of Eastern Europe’s greatest wars and plagues over the last millennium coincided with cold periods,” explained a summary of the study in Science News.

3.9 17 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

166 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Old Cocky
February 11, 2022 12:51 pm

It looks like the top brass are viewing this as a Y2K-style funding opportunity to upgrade from ageing equipment.

ResourceGuy
February 11, 2022 12:56 pm

Well, at least they will be able to defend Camp David.

February 11, 2022 1:14 pm

They are making the army less capable.

guest
February 11, 2022 1:54 pm

On the bright side, this would make US military interventions unfeasible. As expensive as renewables are, this could save far more lives and money, just not in the way intended.

Martin Pinder
February 11, 2022 2:08 pm

And what about explosives? Made from coal & oil & produce CO2, CO & oxides of nitrogen, or has someone invented a carbon free explosive? Hell, they could use electrically generated compressed air! This climate change decarbonisation madness gets more looney everyday.

February 11, 2022 2:37 pm

More reposts from other website hoo humm.

MatrixTransform
February 11, 2022 3:34 pm

Those solar panels look like they’re shaded to me

max
February 11, 2022 5:12 pm

I’ll take “Things That Will Never Happen for $1000, Alex”.

February 11, 2022 6:14 pm

The “Rating” is for the “Article”, not for bonus chapter #2 add-on.

The U.S. Army outlined a climate change strategy Tuesday that included halving greenhouse gas emissions compared with 2005 levels this decade, greening its vehicle fleet, running on carbon-free power and ultimately hitting net-zero emissions by 2050.”

Any high ranking military officers that believes this specious plan should be sacked before they destroy the military.

The Army said through 2020 it retired 18,000 non-tactical vehicles.”

Catastrophically leaving vehicles in Afghanistan is not “retiring” them!

Tom
February 11, 2022 7:23 pm

I did some work on a military truck in the early decade of this century. It started production in the 90s but was first designed not long after WWII ended. That’s far less time than now until 2050. Some of its unclassified performance requirements included:
Start and run at -40 in Alaska or Siberia and Start and run at 100+ in the Sahara.
Drive away from extraction from a flying airplane without a parachute to slow the decent.
Protect the occupants from an IED under the hull and run with only a day to repair.
Protect the occupants from a close range .50 cal bullet.
Structure to be lifted with a crane or helicopter.
Store protective gear for toxic gas and nuclear exposure.
Ford a river deeper than the top of the engine.
Drive away with bullet holes in all of the tires.
And more.

And now Biden thinks he can make them run on sun beams and unicorn farts?

February 11, 2022 9:17 pm

“Government is the Entertainment division of the military-industrial complex” ~ Frank Zappa

Dennis
February 11, 2022 10:11 pm

A new kind of cavalry but armed with electrical plugs, standing in a row waiting for the order ….

CHARGE!

Dennis
February 11, 2022 10:15 pm

Very recently I read a blog comment about a family in Australia caught in the December 2019 bushfires on the South Coast of NSW, with their EV. Police ordered people to evacuate the area as quickly as possible so the driver headed to a service station that stocks liquid fuels and has an EV recharging unit.

The electricity supply had been cut by the bushfire, the family was stuck without transport, but a local young man driving his 4WD crew cab ute offered to take them and their luggage to a safety zone.

The EV was burnt out, an insurance claim.

MR166
February 12, 2022 5:55 am

The US military better reevaluate it’s mission. Are they going to prepare to fight an imaginary climate change or prepare to fight an actual threat to the US. It looks to me that they are only preparing to fight a domestic war, i.e. the non-woke conservatives.
The US military better reevaluate it’s mission. Are they going to prepare to fight an imaginary climate change or prepare to fight an actual threat to the US. It looks to me that they are only preparing to fight a domestic war, i.e. the non-woke conservatives.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/11/pentagons-national-defense-university-host-lecture-case-democratic-socialism/

Enlightened Archivist
February 12, 2022 12:14 pm

No wonder the Russians are threatening Ukraine.

Carbon500
February 13, 2022 6:01 am

How the enemies of western society must be laughing at this idiocy!