These mega-droughts and mega-floods all occurred well before ‘climate change’ was blamed for every weather event
Previously published in The California Globe, December 13, 2021 12:44 pm
For those wondering about the recent heavy rains in the west, going from drought to deluge in a few short months, here’s some data and history to illustrate that it is nothing new, and it has nothing to do with the claims of a “climate change” influence.
Before the industrial revolution, electricity, eight lane highways, and gas-guzzling SUV’s, there was a 43-day rainstorm that began in December 1861 that put central and southern California underwater for up to six months.
The highest rainfall ever in California during recorded history likely occurred in January 1862, during the “Great Flood”. This was an atmospheric river event like we are experiencing now, but lasted several days, dumping 24.63 inches of rain in San Francisco, 66 inches in Los Angeles, leaving downtown Sacramento underwater.
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA):
“Atmospheric rivers are relatively long, narrow regions in the atmosphere – like rivers in the sky – that transport most of the water vapor outside of the tropics. These columns of vapor move with the weather, carrying an amount of water vapor roughly equivalent to the average flow of water at the mouth of the Mississippi River. When the atmospheric rivers make landfall, they often release this water vapor in the form of rain or snow.”

That’s exactly what is happening now, and exactly what happened in 1861-62.
The photos below are Lithographs of K Street in the city of Sacramento, California during the Great Flood of 1862 The flood affected the Western United States, from Oregon through California, and Idaho through New Mexico.

(Photo: The Online Archive of California: California Digital Library.
Copyright © 2009 The Regents of The University of California)
Today, the same Central Valley areas that were submerged in 1861-62 storm are home to many of California’s biggest cities. It is sobering to note that a great flood of similar magnitude can happen again; all we need is a sustained atmospheric river event like that one. It isn’t a matter of if, but when.
In fact, in a publication by the U.S. Geological Survey in 2013, it was noted that, “Geologic evidence shows that truly massive floods, caused by rainfall alone, have occurred in California about every 200 years.”
“Scientists who created a simulated megastorm, called ARkStorm, that was patterned after the 1861 flood but was less severe, found that such a torrent could force more than a million people to evacuate and cause $400 billion in losses if it happened in California today.”
If we have another weather event like 1862, California would be crippled.
If California had more water storage, some of the flooding could be mitigated, unfortunately, the last major new reservoir built in California was the New Melones Reservoir, on the Stanislaus River in Calaveras County, in 1979. Apparently, we’ve learned nothing from events of the past, be it drought or deluges.
There have been other deluge events, though none as large as 1862. December 20, 1955, had huge amounts of rain in 24-hours, with Shasta County recording a record 15.34 inches in just one day. On December 23, 1955, the Russian River reached a crest of 49.7 feet in Guerneville, the highest ever recorded there, and a broken levee along the Feather River on Christmas Eve flooded Yuba City, drowning 37 people.
And then there was the Lake Oroville Dam failure in 2017 that was the result of a days long atmospheric river event, which resulted in precipitation totals greater than 150 – 200% above normal for many Northern California locations. According to a scientific paper published in Geophysical Research Letters about that event:
“In February 2017, a 5-day sequence of atmospheric river storms in California, USA, resulted in extreme inflows to Lake Oroville, the state’s second-largest reservoir. Damage to the reservoir’s spillway infrastructure necessitated evacuation of 188,000 people; subsequent infrastructure repairs cost $1 billion.”
That was just a 5-day event, imagine what would happen to California if it was 10, 20, or even 40 days long like what happened in 1862. But, anecdotal evidence suggests such events go back a very long time.
The American River Watershed Project noted that Native Americans who’d lived for centuries in the region “knew the Sacramento Valley as an inland sea when the rains came,” and their “storytellers told of water filling the valley from the Coast Range to the Sierra.”
On the flip side of our wet weather, drought, there is evidence of droughts in California lasting as long as 200 years.

The chart above uses data from the 2007 E.R.Cook et al. study showing severe droughts lasting as long as 200 years going back to 1200 years ago. Meanwhile, at the far right, the drought we’ve experienced in the 21st century is clearly evident and minuscule by comparison.
Clearly there have been long-lasting severe droughts in the Western USA long before the modern occupation of California. California’s weather patterns are clearly at the whims of what patterns occur in the Pacific Ocean, which can have long-term pattern changes lasting decades. One, called the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), only became known to science in the 1990’s. NOAA says, “…it is often described as a long-lived El Niño-like pattern of Pacific climate variability. Extremes in the PDO pattern are marked by widespread variations in the Pacific Basin and the North American climate.”
These mega-droughts and mega-floods all occurred well before “climate change” started being blamed for every weather event. Imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth from “woke media” and keyboard warriors if those events occurred today.
The bottom line is this: climate is what you expect, weather is what you get. California should plan for major weather events in the future, be they wet or dry, by improving and hardening our reserves and infrastructure.
People have known about Pretty Da** Obvious (PDO) for eons.
When it was wet it was PDO, when it was dry it was PDO, just wasn’t peer reviewed yet.
You mean back when The Drought Monitor wasn’t using satellite imagery and photo-chromatography to calculate the amount of “green” and the “hues” and “values” of “green” to calculate CA’s leftist “never-ending” FAKE “drought”?
Or when underground aquifers were measured to certify “drought” … Nevermind the agricultural drawn down of those aquifers because politicians withheld surface water allocations.
in 1982 there were severe rains that caused a major deadly land slide in Love Creek, in the Santa Cruz mountains.
In 1962 there were severe rains in Pacifica, California, that produced a mud slide that killed some children when their bedroom was destroyed.
I lived on Love Creek during the Winter of ’63-’64 on 100 acres of second growth redwood. The owner of the property had intended to build a large house on the hill above the apple orchard. However, after he removed all the trees, the hill started to slump, with escarpments up to 8′ high. He was so discouraged that he and his wife decided to spend a year traveling in Europe. That is how my wife and I had an opportunity to live there.
A few years later, around 1967, after the owner of the property got tired of the small, frequent landslides on the unpaved access road, he offered a logging company the rights to log the trees above the cabin, where the spring was located that provided water for the cabin, in exchange for a concrete bridge across the creek, allowing a second access point. On Christmas Eve, the hill behind the cabin failed and pushed the cabin into Love Creek, while he and his wife were sleeping in the cabin. He died the next day from a heart attack when he saw what had happened.
Much of the Santa Cruz mountains are landslides waiting to happen because of the poorly consolidated sandstones and heavy Winter rains. It is mostly the roots of trees that stabilize the hillsides. The 1982 event you mentioned was a small subdivision downstream that had been cleared of trees to make room for the houses.
We are certainly having a good rain season this year. There is snow accumulating at higher elevations as well as moderate rain falls over the last 6 weeks. The current 10 day forecast is for some rain or snow on every day. A cold wave is just moving in off of the ocean. Temps here will be in the low 20s F. … https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/isobaric/500hPa/overlay=temp/orthographic=-118.41,40.52,774/loc=-122.560,40.667
“We” = Whiskeytown, CA ???
There have been other deluge events, though none as large as 1862. December 20, 1955, had huge amounts of rain in 24-hours, with Shasta County recording a record 15.34 inches in just one day. On December 23, 1955, the Russian River reached a crest of 49.7 feet in Guerneville, the highest ever recorded there, and a broken levee along the Feather River on Christmas Eve flooded Yuba City, drowning 37 people.
An interesting time-1956 Murray River flood – Wikipedia
More recently, there was an unprecedented flood event in January 1997 when a Pineapple Express flash melted the snow around Bucks Lake, above the sparsely-vegetated Serpentine Canyon on the Feather River.
https://cnrfc.noaa.gov/storm_summaries/jan1997storms.php
The Climate Liars don’t do History. Or Math. Or Science. Or facts, logic, or truth. They are inconvenient.
Evidence is easy to find by examining the tree rings of old cut redwood trees in Muir Woods. the closer the rings together are indication of low water years, the further apart the rings show more growth due to high water absorption.
Excellent! Now let’s run THIS experiment … measure those rings for every year “The Drought Monitor” has claimed Muir Woods (a virtual rain forest) has suffered through “SEVERE” “drought”. Wanna bet you’ll find a 180 degree disconnect? I do.
We were told growing up in the foothills east of Oroville that the 1955 Yuba City flood was the catalyst for the construction of the Oroville Dam. It’s three main goals were flood control, irrigation and recreation. Anyone who grew up in Cali has seen plenty of floods, drought and wildfires, not to mention earthquakes.
What you need to believe … to agree with California’s “never-ending drought” …
https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/data/pdf/current/current_CA_trd.pdf
That RECORD rainfall and snowfall from October to mid-December has had ZERO impact on California’s “never-ending drought” … that > 18” of rain in 2-1/2 months has had NO impact on lessening the “drought”.
The longer CA can pretend there is a “pandemic of drought” … the longer the Proles can be punished and controlled. After all … “drought” … is an “existential health threat” … Right?
People born in this State know better. We KNOW when the “science” and “data” of ‘The Drought Monitor” are FAKE. Designed to deceive.