UNIVERSITY OF READING
Climate models may be underestimating the impact climate change will have on the UK, North America and other extratropical regions due to a crucial missing element, new research has shown.
Scientists at the University of Reading have warned that current projections of how a warming world will affect regional temperatures and rainfall do not take into account the fact that extratropical winds – which have a strong influence on climate in the mid-latitudes – vary greatly from decade to decade.
The research team used observations of these winds over the 20th century to better represent their variability in climate model predictions of the future. They found that this made the predictions of future climate less certain in the extratropics – particularly in the North Atlantic region and particularly in winter – and that unusually hot, cold, wet or dry decades are projected to be much more likely by the middle of the century in this region than existing climate simulations suggest.
Dr Christopher O’Reilly, a Royal Society University Research Fellow in the University of Reading’s Department of Meteorology, said: “Variations between decades in the strength of winds in the more temperate regions of the world are a crucial missing ingredient in projections of the future climate of those regions.
“By adding this extra variability into climate models, we showed that these winds may be an additional source of uncertainty on top of climate change. This could mean that within these regions, temperatures are pushed to relatively extreme highs or lows more often. While in some decades they could counteract increases to temperatures and heavy rainfall caused by climate change, in other periods they could make these extremes even more extreme.
“This is yet another reminder that preparation will be crucial as we face up to more variable regional climates as an impact of climate change in the future.”
The team used wind observation data from the Met Office, Copernicus Climate Data Store and NOAA, among others, to carry out their analysis and bolster the climate model predictions.
The range of temperature and rainfall most likely to occur in future decades increased by 50% across Northern Europe, Northern America and the Mediterranean – with uncertainty nearly doubling in some cases.
This strengthens previous research that suggests rainfall and temperatures that are very unlikely today will fall within the likely range in future due to climate change.
The updated projections showed that the Mediterranean would see a higher frequency of drier-than-average winters. As studies show that dry winters in this region make heatwaves in Europe more common the following summer, this has health and infrastructure implications for several countries.
JOURNAL
Communications Earth & Environment
DOI
METHOD OF RESEARCH
Computational simulation/modeling
ARTICLE TITLE
Projections of northern hemisphere extratropical climate underestimate internal variability and associated uncertainty
ARTICLE PUBLICATION DATE
20-Sep-2021
from bad to worse…
Boris predicts winter (will not be harsh)
BBC Headline:”Boris Johnson dismisses fears over tough winter”
I really am struggling with his logic in that article:
We are informed that:
Aren’t those things mutually contradictory?
There again and knowing Boris, he’ll be drunk & hungover
And, if I understand it, what they did was add the additional uncertainty into the models and that made the models upper range much more extreme. Adding uncertainty makes the models more uncertain so they can claim even worse worst case scenarios.
So yet another reason why things might be ‘worse than we thought’. They never give up, these clowns, do they.
Climate science today is like a fantasy role playing game. The climate cult gets all excited about some new calculation and what it might mean to their narrative, until an adult walks into the room and reminds them that it is all fiction.
So is there a consensus that “additional variability on top of variability” adds uncertainty to the “settled science” consensus, or is this denier false consciousness?
There is consensus that they want more money for an unfinished and inferior product, their research.
“The range of temperature and rainfall most likely to occur in future decades increased by 50% across Northern Europe…”
Given that England and Wales monthly mean rainfall has no trend since 1766, their model integration must be badly wrong.
er… no.
As well as increased temperatures, the UK has been on average 6% wetter over the last 30 years (1991-2020) than the preceding 30 years (1961-1990). Six of the ten wettest years for the UK in a series from 1862 have occurred since 1998.
Climate change continues to be evident across UK – Met Office
So the only thing that is worse than we thought, once again is the (so called) science and the scandalous manipulation of data!
Wind providing 34% of UK electricity as I write, 11 am UK time on 23rd.
Renewables total 49%