Here’s a fun one.
Nato should examine how it can power tanks and jets with alternative energy, such as solar panels, to reduce its carbon emissions, the alliance’s secretary general said.
Reducing reliance on fossil fuels would also make troops less vulnerable to attack because they would not have to rely on long supply lines getting fuel to the front line, Jens Stoltenberg said.
The Nato chief suggested that militaries should advance research into low-emitting vehicles because of the advantages they bring, at an online seminar titled New Ideas for Nato 2030.
“Nato should do its part to look into how we can reduce emissions from military operations,” he told the Chatham House event. “We know that heavy battle tanks or fighter jets and naval ships consume a lot of fossil fuel and emit greenhouse gases and therefore we have to look into how we can reduce those emissions by alternative fuels, solar panels or other ways of running our missions.”
https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/europe/nato-chief-suggests-battle-tanks-with-solar-panels-as-militaries-go-green-1.1160313
Best line in the story.
He told the seminar that his background as a UN envoy on climate change helped with the proposals.
https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/europe/nato-chief-suggests-battle-tanks-with-solar-panels-as-militaries-go-green-1.1160313
Willis commented about this news story on social media thusly
The stupid, it burns … an M1 tank gets 0.6 mpg. A gallon of diesel contains ~ 40 kWh of energy. A solar panel puts out ~ 1 kWh per day. A solar panel is about 17 sq. ft. You MIGHT fit four of them on an M1 tank without impairing the weapons and sensors. Then you’d need four Tesla Powerwall batteries, weight half a ton.With that setup, every ten days you could move your tank 0.6 miles …w.
The GWPF also covered this story with this excellent cartoon by Josh.
Obviously what the army needs is a Dinochrome Combat Unit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolo:_Annals_of_the_Dinochrome_Brigade
I have a better idea, how about no more military interventions. Then we wouldn’t need this general, his identity politics, or his idiotic solar powered weapons. Why don’t don’t we just make a Sun-powered death ray, oh wait what’s this we have already it is called a magnifying glass.
But a magnifying glass is more effective against ants than soldiers.
If they REALLY want a “green” military, why not just eliminate tanks and other war vehicles completely? Or better yet, just eliminate the military? After all, military conflicts are not exactly environmentally friendly, right? No combat at all is the REAL green alternative.
we have met the enemy, and he is us
Pogo would be proud that you remembered what he said.
How about shutting down Nato and the UN. NATO’S task ended about a quarter century ago and the UN has morphed into a néomarxiste Global Gov run by oldy moldy apparatchicks. That would improve the climate immeasurably and cut the pressure on our “disposable” income.