Survey Results: Where Are All the Sick People?

Survey Results and Opinion by Kip Hansen – 21 November 2020

The “Where Are All the Sick People?” survey has had nearly 3000 participants since its inception at 10 a.m. EST on 17 November. Three questions were posed to illuminate the issue of the effects of the SARS-CoV-2, which is causing the current Covid-19 Pandemic, on the readers of this blog, WUWT. 

The readers here are a diverse, eclectic, multinational cohort.  A totally unscientific cross-section of the general public.  My experience in responding to thousands an thousands of comments over the years – comments in response to my essays on a rather wide variety of topics – has convinced me that readership here has a broad range of professional and occupational backgrounds.  I have found it interesting and surprising – I write about insects and an entomologist weighs-in in comments.  I write about dogs and veterinarians weigh-in in comments.   I write nuclear power – nuclear power technicians weigh-in. 

Please don’t think that this survey is meant to be a broad sociological study of Covid-19 and the various governmental responses to the pandemic.  It is nothing more than a snapshot of actual experience of the readers here who have taken the few moments necessary to go to the online survey and answer the three questions. 

I was hoping for three thousand participants before writing up the results, but the response percentages have not shifted since about participant 1000 – which is a good indicator that the snapshot is at least “in focus”. 

SURVEY RESULTS (with 2851 responses)

Question #1:    “How many people among your immediate family, extended family, friends, acquaintances and colleagues are CURRENTLY sick (ill enough to voluntarily stay home from work, school, or normal activities) with Covid-19?”

A strong majority of people, 85.8%, know no one who is currently ill with Covid-19.   Some people know some sick people:  13.5%.  There have been complaints in the comments that using a range like “1-5” prevents us knowing that many people selecting 1-5 know only 1 sick person – a valid criticism.  How many people know many sick people?  O.66%  (19 of 2851) know 6 or more.  Comments reveal that there are some nurses and doctors and nursing home staff answering the survey, which may account for some of these response with higher numbers.

Question #2:    “How many people among your immediate family, extended family, friends, acquaintances and colleagues have been sick (ill enough to voluntarily stay home from work, school, or normal activities) with Covid-19 during the last nine months?”

Since the beginning of the pandemic, characterized as “the last nine months”, a majority of people, 54.4%, know no one who has been ill with Covid-19.  Again, some people know some-but-not-many (1-5) people who have been ill – 39.5%. That is about four-out-of-ten have had someone in their circle of family, friends and acquaintances become ill with Covid-19.  In total, 93.9% who know either none or only a few (less than 5) people who have actually been ill during the entire pandemic so far.   However, 6.1% know “more than a few” (6-10) or “many” (11 or more) that have been ill.   How ill?  We don’t know.  A more complete survey might have asked additional questions, like “How many of those were ill enough to require hospitalization?”

Question #3:   “Covid-19 has caused many deaths, particularly, but not exclusively, among the older population and those already ill with serious conditions. How many of these deaths have occurred among your immediate family, extended family, friends, acquaintances and colleagues since the beginning of the pandemic in January 2020?”

As the question itself acknowledges, Covid-19  has caused or contributed to a lot of deaths around the world.  More deaths than an average annual influenza pandemic, less deaths – so far – than the worst of the influenza pandemicsGreat Influenza Pandemic of 1918 which reportedly killed between 50 and 100 million people out of a world population of 1.8 billion.  Today’s population is about four times that — 7.8 billion.  A pandemic that deadly today would kill 200 to 400 million people. As of today, Covid-19 is reported to have contributed to the deaths of about 1.37 million humans.  (for more on “contributed to”, read my upcoming essay on Cause of Death).

Our survey reveals, that among survey respondents, a huge majority, 88.4%, know no one in their circle of family, friends, acquaintances or colleagues that have died from or with Covid-19, since January 2020 – the earliest possible date for the pandemic in the United States and Europe.  Unfortunately, some readers, 327 of them, have suffered losses of at least one family member, friend or colleague.  My condolences go out to them, each and every one.  Only three (3) respondents report a range of higher than 5 – two report 6-10, and one reports >20.  (This “>20 deaths” response came in very early in the survey, and may be a troll trying to spoil the survey – or it may be a legitimate response from someone in the medical or nursing home field.)

Discussion:

Those of your who know no one who is currently ill with Covid-19 are not crazy and not terminally isolated from society.  That is the experience of over 85% of others reading here and participating in this survey.  So, you are not alone.   I would interpret >85% as “most everyone”.  Yet, more than one-out-of-ten (13.4%) do know one or more (up to 5) people who are sick right now.  Comments indicate that many of these folks know only 1.  I do wish that I had created more categories in the lower range, such as 1, 2, 3 4 & 5. 

However, the result for the first question – “know any people currently ill?” — is that most people don’t know anyone or just know a few.   Readers should compare this to any of the very bad recent flu seasons, trying to remember when we all knew many people ill with the flu simultaneously.  Here are figures for the last three flu seasons in the United States:

2017-2018  45,000,000 Symptomatic Illnesses

2018-2019  36,000,000  Symptomatic Illnesses

2019-2020  38,000,000  Symptomatic Illnesses

These flu seasons saw massive workplace absenteeism, school closures (mostly due to too many teachers out with the flu), hospital ERs overrun with flu patients and a media pouring out Flu Panic.  The numbers above are Symptomatic Illnesses – people who were actually sick – unable to go to school, work, or do their daily activities.  For the most part, they were simply miserable for days – some died.  Those of you with sharp memories will remember these years and some of you will recall your own bouts of influenza. 

We should not compare these numbers with what is being reported today as “Covid-19 Cases” — these are not sick people but simply people who have tested “positive” for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA fragments in their nasal swabs.  “Positive Test” does not mean infection.  The current standards of the RT-PCR test are way too sensitive to produce “actionable” results and do not return positives that indicate a current ongoing infection and nothing even resembling a “Symptomatic Illness”.   According to the World Health Organization the vast majority of Covid-19 infections are asymptomatic– which just means “not sick”.

The Public Health viewpoint is that a “positive test” might mean “infection” and “if infection then maybe infectious, now or later”.   Most testing done today does not test for the one thing health officials need to know to protect the population:  “Who has an infectious case of Covid-19?”  Public Health viewpoints cause authorities to do stupid things – such as closing an entire school because five pupils – pupils not sick and at school – “tested positive” – and ordering a “deep cleaning” of the school before pupils can return. 

And there have been sick people —  while a majority of respondents (54.4%) don’t know even a single person who has had Covid-19 in the last nine months, the remainder of respondents,  45.6%, know at least one person who was sick.  From the comments, many of the early cases could have simply been any one of the influenzas – testing was not rampant in Jan-Feb-Mar.  There is some evidence that the current ramp up of “Covid Cases” might include the new flu season’s Influenza Cases.  Influenza season generally begins the first of October, we are now halfway through November – six weeks into flu season. 

And sadly, many people have died in in the Covid-19 Pandemic.  Most of us, almost 9-of-10, know no one who has died.  But the other 1-of-10 have lost a family member, a friend, an acquaintance or a colleague.  It is suspected that susceptibility to serious, life-threatening, severe illness involving SARS-CoV-2 has a genetic basis.  This may mean that families suffering deaths of loved ones may experience multiple deaths – as the family shares genetic material.  Everyone has been exposed to the idea that the risk of severe Covid-19 illness and death involves, almost invariably,  a list of common comorbidities:

“Adults of any age with the following conditions are at increased risk of severe illness from the virus that causes COVID-19:

Source:  CDC here

In fact, any condition that weakens the immune system or cardiovascular system or the pulmonary system places one at higher risk of developing a severe illness from SARS-CoV-2 than those without those conditions. 

A note on “Covid-19 Deaths”:  The CDC has asked that all death certificates [link is a .pdf] that list Covid-19 or even suspected Covid-19 anywhere, in any portion, of the Cause of Death portion of a death certificate be reported as a Covid-19 Death.  This means that the mortality figures are reported far higher than they should be in order to be released for public consumption without serious caveats. (There are valid epidemiological reasons for this requirement –  responsibly informing the general public about the Covid Pandemic is not one of them.)  They are reporting all deaths that in any way involve Covid-19 or look like they might involve Covid-19 or might be suspected of involving Covid-19 as a “Covid-19 Death.”   That is the subject for another essay – savvy readers can confirm this for themselves. 

The GIANT omission on the list from the CDC, known almost from the first month of the pandemic, is this:   The older you are, the higher your risk of dying from Covid-19 if infected.  Person aged 80 or greater had nearly a 1-in-3 chance of dying if they had a Covid-19 infection. Those 70-79 had a 1-in-6 chance of dying, and those 60-69 a 1-in-16 chance.   We can look at this another way. Percentage of all Covid-19 deaths by age group.

Over 85% of all Covid-19 deaths occurred in those over 65 years of age.   Advancing age itself is a major risk factor for death by Covid.

The next chart is Rate Ratio (akin to Risk Ratio) of Covid Death by age group compared to young adults aged 18 through 29.

Moral to this story?  Don’t get old?  Well, not really – but we should have been protecting our aging population, those 65 and older, from the very start – all while keeping our economies and societies functioning full-blast so that governments at all levels could afford to take the steps necessary to protect the elderly.  Sensible guidelines for their protection should have been the first order of business accompanied by plans to safely serve the elderly in nursing homes.

BOTTOM LINES:

  1. If you don’t know any people sick with/from Covid-19 you having the same Covid-19 experience as the vast majority of other people – at least according to this somewhat unscientific survey.
  2. If you don’t know anyone who has died, or only one or maybe two, you are again having the same experience as almost everyone else.
  3. While most of us don’t know anyone who has died from/with Covid-19, we probably know someone who does know someone who has sadly lost a family member or acquaintance during the ongoing pandemic.
  4. Opinions vary wildly on the subject of Governmental Responses to the pandemic.  It will be years before the historians, sociologists, medial researchers, and others sort out the quagmire of mistakes that have been made at all levels of governance.

# # # # #

[ Some minor typing and formatting errors were corrected — kh ]

# # # # #

UPDATE: 1900 hrs, 22 November 2020

The survey has now had 3040 respondents. The percentages for the three questions are as follows — with comparisons to those given in the essay above:

In the essay With 3040 respondents:


The percentages have not changed significantly with more respondents, meaning the first pass was pretty well in focus. I’ll leave the survey operating for a week or so.

# # # # #

Author’s Comment:

This survey was just a quick peek at the real-world experience of the readers here.  I have not fooled myself into thinking that it tells the full truth about Covid illnesses or Covid deaths.  It does tell us something interesting – but what is up to the readers.  

Bias Alert:  Both my wife and I fall into the most vulnerable category by age.  But we also have children and grandchildren – and they are more important to us than ourselves. 

Let me hear from you in the comments.

# # # # #

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

274 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 21, 2020 9:28 am

We have a very short time left to Slow the Spread with the vaccine coming around the corner. Just having most people use the vaccine will solve the “overcrowding”.
But those that don’t trust the “models” really know that it is just socialist bureaucracies that want more money and power. The more panic they make, the more they can emphasize on how they are important and at high risk.
This gives them the power to control each person, because they are the “authorities” that are empowered by the socialist mob, and because it is the “frontlines” of the battle, they need more money because it is the most dangerous.
The ChiComs, UN and the socialist EU governments, band together to shout down any dissenting voice to all their nonsense.
Once the vaccines are out. we will have many that will go so far for their beloved Socialism that they will voluntarily die for the Big Brother.

jdgalt1
November 21, 2020 9:58 am

I see only one reason that any countries or states would still be urging, much less enforcing, any COVID precautions, and that is that it is a power grab in preparation for inflicting some more severe artificial calamity upon us, such as The Great Reset. I hope it’s OK to discuss that topic here.

November 21, 2020 10:30 am

I suffered from Hong Kong Flu in 1969, it was the worst illness I have had since Scarlet Fever at 4 years. Completely knock me down for a fortnight, whereas Scarlet Fever saw me in isolation hospital for 4 months.

So I’ve been interested in the stats for Asian and Hong Kong Flu pandemics during the current one. Taking Hong Kong Flu, in the UK it killed over 30,000 in a population of just over 50 million whose life expectency was just over 70. On purely population considerations, UK currently about 70 million over 42000 would have died as a direct consequence of CV19, as opposed to 54,626 (worldometers) who’ve died within 28 days of testing positive. For Hong Kong Flu there is a large chunk of population, the over 70s, missing. My thoughts are that CV19 is on a par with Hong Kong Flu as worst and on the population of the UK in 1969 less deadly

Bruce Cobb
November 21, 2020 11:02 am

Speaking of masks, John Sununu, the Republican governor of NH recently issued a statewide mask mandate. A number of towns had already issued mask mandates, so I guess he buckled to the pressure. I thought he had more backbone than that, though. Guess I won’t be voting for him next time around.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
November 21, 2020 3:33 pm

Chris Sununu – John’s son. Not that John Sununu was any great defender of freedom; I think if he had the same proportion of refugees (that failed to learn by their own mistakes) from the People’s Republic of Massachusetts, he would have had about the same responses.

Grumpy Bill
November 21, 2020 11:07 am

Since taking the survey and posting in that thread, a close friend has been confirmed to be “under the weather” from the virus. He’s home with flu-like symptoms. His wife hasn’t shown symptoms.
Still brings family and other associates to less than five confirmed infections plus one death.

Windsong
November 21, 2020 11:10 am

For any readers who are thinking the news about surges, overcrowding, triage tents in hospital parking lots, etc, sounds familiar, you would be correct.
https://wmbriggs.com/post/33597/

ferdberple
November 21, 2020 11:16 am

Average age covid deaths – 84
Average age non covid deaths – 84

Shutting down the economy is futile. It is no different than trying to save lives through human sacrifice.

Reply to  ferdberple
November 21, 2020 9:50 pm

FerdPurple
This is GREAT news for people who are 83 or 85 years old.

Joe Prins
November 21, 2020 11:29 am

Kip,
You may want to add some sort of dementia to your list.
This from the government of Alberta: https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm

Tom in Florida
November 21, 2020 11:45 am

I got to thinking today (yeah I know that can be dangerous), has there been an accounting for those individuals who take a biologic such as Humira for arthritis and then died from COVID? Those people are highly susceptible to infections are are warned that even slight infections can turn life threatening when they would not otherwise be. If they do not account for that, I would suspect it is because biologics like Humira are widely prescribed and it would be a huge financial hit to the manufacturers if word got out not to take it and switch to Plaquenil (which is hydroxychloroquine and does not affect your immune system).

jl
November 21, 2020 11:50 am

Just saw a news story that “Minnesota officials counted 86 cases that they said were related to the [Sturgis motorcycle] rally”. Wow, shocking. Seems there was actually some criticism in the mainstream about the earlier report by economists (!) claiming that 260,000 cases nationwide could be attributed to Sturgis.

November 21, 2020 11:53 am

Hi Kip,

Looking at your results I don’t see anything that might suggest Covid-19 has been overblown, or that it isn’t widespread in the US.

Taking your first question: “How many people among your immediate family, extended family, friends, acquaintances and colleagues are CURRENTLY sick (ill enough to voluntarily stay home from work, school, or normal activities) with Covid-19?”

According to Worldometers, which we might call a ‘ballpark figure’ for argument’s sake, there are currently 37,216 per 1 million US citizens infected with Covid-19. (That would include non-symptomatic cases, I presume; whereas your question would only identify the smaller population of symptomatic.)

US population is given as ~333 m. 37,216 per million is a small proportion of the US population. The number of symptomatic cases is an even smaller fraction of that. It is unlikely, outside pockets of concentration anyway, that any one individual in the US would know someone currently infected by, and symptomatic with, Covid-19. That doesn’t mean it’s not a problem, of course.

I’m a bit rushed here, but my back-of-envelope figure wasthat the average US citizen currently has about a 3-4% chance of knowing someone who has tested positive for Covid-19; probably much lower than that for people who are actually displaying symptoms. The response to your WUWT survey does not contradict the official figures. In fact they strongly support them.

nc
November 21, 2020 12:05 pm

Kip, your thoughts on the precautions mandated and voluntary people are taking. Do you think these have an affect on the numbers one way or the other? I am not saying all the precautions work, just an overall thought.

Robber
November 21, 2020 12:15 pm

Worldometer reports 37 total cases per 1,000 population for the USA, so the odds of anyone knowing someone who has had the virus per Kip’s survey seem reasonable.

n.n
Reply to  Robber
November 21, 2020 1:23 pm

Case: past (e.g. viral fragments, seroconversion), probable (e.g. positive test), possible (e.g. Covid-19-correlated symptoms), and progressive (i.e. Covid-19).

James Donald Bailey
November 21, 2020 12:26 pm

Imagine what your answers would be if you are a surviving resident of a nursing home in the greater New York area?

Since this disease has an age dependent hospitalization and fatality rate, your survey probably has an age dependent bias in how many people one knows who have been killed, etc. People do tend to have broader social circles, so the effect won’t be as pronounced.

I expect three basic groupings. Children – through college graduation, these people tend to associate most with others near their own age. Working age adults, work forces associations with people over broader spectra. Retirees, rapid change from forced association to voluntary associations, slow change to retirement communities, assisted living, nursing home, etc, gradually restricting associations.

Anyways, I find it interesting that there is similarity in the numbers for knowing someone who is sick, and knowing some one who has died. Freak of timing?

And the numbers of people who haven’t known someone who was sick show that a lot of us are still susceptible to the virus. I won’t get my hopes up on natural immunity building up to stop it.

Reply to  James Donald Bailey
November 21, 2020 2:41 pm

Sorry if this is a repeat.

85% of US positive cases are in people under 65 years.
80% of C-19 deaths are among people over 65 years.
24% of C-19 deaths occurred in elder care, nursing, hospice situations.
Half of the US’s 520,000 deaths occurred before June 30.

So, what does the data tells US.
Fauce and the MSM are full of it!

glen ferrier
November 21, 2020 1:07 pm

Well done Kip! In three or four years time there will be many disertations written on this topic. How these papers will untangle the data is a huge question. With politicians around the world and the WHO openly and agressively speaking out about how Covid 19 has presented a wonderful opportunity to pursue totalatarian objectives it will be difficult to disentangle data that has been purposely corrupted. Currently the US is enduring a disaster of a presidental election, largley because certain politicians used this wonderful oportunity to monkey around with election procedures.

I look forward to reading disertations and analysis specifically from stataticians and economists. I hope that Dr. Lomborg takes an interest.

Cheers,

Glen

rah
November 21, 2020 1:22 pm

Listen to this Pathologist/Virologist with other very impressive credentials.
His radio testimony bears out what is being said here. Stream takes a second to get started.

Izaak Walton
November 21, 2020 4:17 pm

I am not entirely sure what this survey is meant to do but it doesn’t seem to be very useful or surprising.
Currently worldwide there are 7000 cases per million people and so if you imagine that every one of those people tells 50 others that they have the virus then you still get a number that is less than the numbers reported by Kip. With deaths again the global fatality rate is less than 1 in a thousand so it is hardly surprising that 80% of people in Kip’s survey don’t know someone who died.

Reply to  Kip Hansen
November 22, 2020 6:39 am

Harnsen sez:
” … I am not crazy nor am I clinically socially isolated. ”

DO YOU HAVE A CERTIFICATE TO PROVE THAT?

“I have a wide circle of friends and colleagues, and a vast extended family. ”

I HAVE A SMALL FAMILY, OR PERHAPS I SHOULD SAY A HALF VAST FAMILY

I used to do surveys of engineers back when when I used to work, in the early 2000, and the most useful survey results were from anonymous surveys using paper forms, not online surveys at work, which many engineers feared, because their online comments about corporate management, that I requested, might be traced back to them.

On line survey typical comment:
‘Engineering VP Joe Shmo should be promoted to corporate CEO’
Anonymous paper survey typical comment:
‘Engineering VP Joe Shmo should be promoted so we engineers can get finally rid of that jerk’

This COVID survey was probably a lot of work, but better than 95% of the COVID articles and studies so far, whether “scientific” or not. It was interesting, and interesting is the most important aspect of good communications. In the climate science field, “scientific study” has sort of become an oxymoron.

John Endicott
Reply to  Richard Greene
November 23, 2020 2:43 am

Harnsen sez:
” … I am not crazy nor am I clinically socially isolated. ”

DO YOU HAVE A CERTIFICATE TO PROVE THAT?

He’s not crazy, his mother had him tested. (spot The Big Bang Theory reference)

John F Hultquist
November 21, 2020 7:34 pm

I note lots of variation from place to place.
I’m in a small population area, several small towns, with essentially one hospital. As of Friday, 2% of the hospital beds are occupied by virus patients.
[Yakima at 35 miles has a large hospital; Seattle has many. There may be leakage.]
The county had reported 22 deaths as of August 4, none since.

Some WUWT readers are also following the series at https://wmbriggs.com/

November 21, 2020 8:02 pm

“Some people know some sick people: 13.5%. “

Currently, I do not know anyone directly that has tested and verified COVID-19.

I have heard multiple people state that they had/have COVID-19, but they did not bother getting a test.

Both of my Doctors do not see patients that might have COVID-19.
Both have signs and voice mails, that is a patient thinks or worries that they have COVID-19 they are to vitis one of the local emergency wards.

T this date, I have only known one person, a family member that had COVID-19 and that was back in early March.
He worked in spite of feeling poorly. Came home one evening and told his wife, my cousin, that he was having trouble getting his breathe.

Off they went to the hospital where he waited for hours (not knowing that he had contact direct with a verified COVID-19 patient).

The hospital finally admitted him and within a couple of days moved him to the ICU where he was intubated and sedated. For almost thirty days he was sedated into motionlessness.
Can you guess that they lived in a democrat run state?

He turned the corner and slowly regained health, but it was another couple of weeks before they removed the inserted tube and lessened his sedative.
Then he went into physical therapy and several more weeks before he was allowed to go home.

Bringing us back to the “know some sick people”
That question really should be stated as tested and verified, since the false positives are so common, people who have COVID-19.
I’ve met too many people who assumed they had COVID-19 and have never been tested. Nor do they report any of the serious COVID-19 symptoms; only the runny nose and sore throats. Self isolation is immediately accepted whenever anyone claims COVID-19.

Several times, I’ve had people claim that the ICU beds are filled that the local hospitals can not accept any more ICU patients.
Fortunately, every hospital that I’ve checked ahs an online status of their hospital beds.

Not even back in March through May were any of the hospitals I checked in danger of refusing patients because of a bed shortage. Most have a very low occupancy rate with very low COVID-19 numbers of COVID-19 patients.

Reziac
November 21, 2020 11:32 pm

The sharp drop in influenza the past couple seasons is likely due to increased use of high dose vaccine (now recommended for everyone over 65), which produces better immunity.

Bill Parsons
November 21, 2020 11:57 pm

Hospitals have enough beds to deal with sick patients. What they don’t have are staff. The big money-making elective procedures that keep large staffs employed have been curtailed because those patients are justifiably fearful of hospitals at this time. When hospital administrators see funds drying up, they cut staff. That is what they have been doing – in the millions.

Layoffs and Losses: COVID-19 Leaves U.S. Hospitals in …
http://www.usnews.com › News › Health News

May 6, 2020 — In response, hospitals and health care companies have announced a wave of layoffs and cutbacks: Mayo Clinic said it will cut $1.6 billion in …

Hospitals Lose Money During Pandemic; Healthcare Workers …
http://www.npr.org › 2020/05/08 › as-hospitals-lose-revenue-th…

May 8, 2020 — It’s an ironic twist as the coronavirus pandemic sweeps the nation: The very … And 1.4 million health care workers lost their jobs in April, a sharp … has taken steps to align staffing with current needs as we seek to avoid layoffs.

Covid-19 is causing hospital layoffs and furloughs – The …
http://www.washingtonpost.com › nation › 2020/06/01 › ame…

Jun 2, 2020 — Even in parts of the country that haven’t been hit hard by the virus, hospitals are at risk of bankruptcy.

Connecticut Hospital Layoffs A Consequence Of COVID-19’s …
http://www.wnpr.org › post › connecticut-hospital-layoffs-co…

Jul 15, 2020 — Johan Lee Thompson has been a registered nurse for three years at Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center in Hartford, a member of Trinity …

266 hospitals furloughing workers in response to COVID-19
http://www.beckershospitalreview.com › finance › 49-hospita…

August, 2020 — The health system also plans to lay off some employees and implement other “staffing changes.” The furloughs, layoffs and other staffing adjustments are expected …

Hospital workforce tracker: COVID-19 spurs layoffs, furloughs …
http://www.healthcaredive.com › news › hospital-workforce-t…

Sept. 17, 2020 — Hospital workforce tracker: layoffs, furloughs and pay cuts … challenges of sick COVID-19 patients and a precipitous decline in patient volume, are struggling to balance quickly shifting staffing needs. … By Shannon Muchmore • …

Iowa City news: Mercy hospital to lay off 29 amid in wake of …
http://www.press-citizen.com › story › news › 2020/10/08 › i…

Oct 8, 2020 — An Iowa City hospital will lay off 29 employees because of losses suffered during the coronavirus outbreak, it recently told state officials.

Biden talks COVID-19, layoffs, mental health in roundtable …
http://www.ems1.com › coronavirus-covid-19 › articles › bid…

2 days ago — Biden talks COVID-19, layoffs, mental health in roundtable with FF-medic, healthcare workers. The president-elect stated he would ensure first …

To exacerbate the layoffs, there also appears to be a bureaucratic (med schools and nurse’s unions) bottleneck blocking semi-qualified nurses – LPNs and LVNs – from being licensed and put to work doing entry-level health care.

In my opinion, hospital costs are out of control because of a bloated system of middle men, administrators, insurance companies and over-paid specialists. As commenters above have noted, hospitals have created an untenable situation for themselves. Much of this is reminiscent of the Spanish Flu era when low-salaried nurses were spurned by the nurse’s union bosses, causing hospitals to be similarly overwhelmed. Now that they face moderately increased numbers and many of their own sick staff facing quarantine, the chickens are coming home to roost.

Reply to  Kip Hansen
November 22, 2020 8:31 am

Apart from underfunding and low staffing caused by right wing philosophies of Boris etc., Most modern civilised countries have free health care for all. so there is no need for hospitals to show “profits” from expensive operations.

Seems sensible to me. I would much rather have my course of treatment decided by need rather than fincial gain.

Bill Parsons
Reply to  Kip Hansen
November 22, 2020 1:27 pm

RE: “…another topic for another time.”

I realize your post asked for a personal response. However, answers to your survey question “Where are all the sick people?” really refute the mainstream media’s assertion that there are hordes of positive virus cases “overwhelming” overworked healthcare providers across the country.

Another way to answer the question (besides personally surveying readers) is to find out how many people are going to hospital. The 14-state “Covid-Net” has logged the numbers of confirmed Covid virus admissions to U.S hospitals as percentages of our U.S. population: During the third (most recent) surge, U.S. hospitalizations of all age groups peaked at around 9.8 per 100,000 population. That was the week of November 7 and that number was just short of hospitalizations during the virus’s first, most potent, surge in April. In the last few weeks we’ve ticked down to 8.4.

In absolute numbers that means confirmed Covid hospitalizations have declinded from ~30,000 to ~29,000 for the last week. That’s the actual sick count for weekly Covid admissions. Maybe it doesn’t answer your question, but it’s beginning to address one of mine, which is: How can the media claim hospitals are overwhelmed?

https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/covidnet/COVID19_3.html

There are around 924,000 hospital beds across the U.S. Why can’t they handle the numbers?

WRT personal data: 3 residents died in last 3 weeks in my mother’s nursing home. I didn’t know any of them, and I’ve only been able to see her once in the last year through the facility’s plexiglass window. Only other person I’ve known was an ACE harware guy who told me his local clinic had declared him a “presumptive positive” for Covid back in March, and told to “Stay home.” Only when he was struggling for breath was he given a green light to hospitalize himself, whereupon he was finally tested and shown to be positive.

Thanks for the survey.

Perry
November 22, 2020 12:34 am

I’m choice 0 in all three questions. I hope to turn 78 in another four day & have COPD, hypertrophy of the left ventricle & an aortic root aneurysm. All these ailments are caused by Alpha 1 Antitrypsin Deficiency, a form of genetic emphysema. My parents were carriers, as is my younger brother. I inherited both abnormal genes, so now I require Oxygen & time is fast running out. If I catch the CCP virus, what will the cause of death be on my death certificate?

mwhite
November 22, 2020 1:22 am

There is No Asymptomatic Spread

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w

“Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China”

“The detection rate of asymptomatic positive cases was very low, and there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts. There were no asymptomatic positive cases in 96.4% of the residential communities”

November 22, 2020 2:06 am

They’re not interested. They have us exactly where they want us, almost. The only person standing in the way of total domination is Trump.

Andrew Lale
November 22, 2020 3:57 am

‘As of today, Covid-19 is reported to have contributed to the deaths of about 1.37 million humans.’ That is a highly contentious statement. All that the 1.37 million figure represents is people whose death certificates mention Covid-19, a statistic that has been completely corrupted. Everywhere I know of, Covid-19 deaths have been deliberately exaggerated. We don’t know by how much, obviously, as many of the death certificates were filled out without any physical reference to the person who died. Since the very beginning, the British health authorities corrupted British death certification so that every person who could remotely be assigned as a Covid-19 death would be. This has gone to absurd lengths, even including road accident deaths. So we know that the 1.37 million number is bogus, but not by how much.

Reply to  Andrew Lale
November 22, 2020 6:20 am

Flu deaths are always exaggerated because no one dies from flu alone. Sometimes underlying health problems or genetic defects are not known, but that doesn’t mean a person who dies with the flu was perfectly healthy. SARS1 and MERS might be exceptions, because they were so deadly that even previously healthy people were at risk.

So it is a computer model assisted guessing game.
So goobermint people make up a flu deaths number every year.
Most doctors feel the flu death estimates are always too high.
But it’s good enough for goobermint work.
Besides, what goobermint bureaucrat in his right mind would ever say “we don’t know”?