Did “Che” Greta Call for Execution of World Leaders Who Defy Her Commands?

Guest counter-revolutionary activity by David Middleton

From Breitbart

Nolte: Greta Thunberg Says We Will ‘Put World Leaders Against the Wall’

By JOHN NOLTE 14 Dec 2019

Time’s “Scold of the Year,” Greta Thunberg, told a crowd in Italy that “we will make sure we put world leaders against the wall” if they do not do what she tells them to do.

On her way home, the 16-year-old Swedish eco-activist and chronic truant stopped to address a Fridays for Future gathering in Turin, Italy, at which she went the full-Fidel Castro.

“Unfortunately, we probably already know the outcome. World leaders are still trying to run away from their responsibilities but we have to make sure they cannot do that. We will make sure that we put them against the wall and they will have to do their job to protect our futures,” she said, according to the Daily Mail.

“Against the wall” is fairly common jargon in revolutions, especially youthful revolutions, and the accepted translation means executions — lots and lots of executions, specifically firing squads, where the old leaders are permanently removed by fresh-faced revolutionaries.

During the speech, and while wearing what looks like a plastic — and, therefore, a petroleum-based — yellow rain slicker, Greta shouted her usual spiel about how The Children should be in charge of everything because The Children will have to live in a future that will not exist unless we return to the Dark Ages of wind and solar power, unless we accept socialism.

[…]

Breitbart

Anyone who’s ever read Douglas Adams or listened to the great Jerry Jeff Walker knows what “up against the wall” means.

The Hitchhiker’s Travel Guide describes the Marketing Department of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation as:

“A bunch of mindless jerks who’ll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes.”

Curiously, an edition of the Encyclopedia Galactica which conveniently fell through a rift in the time-space continuum from 1000 years in the future describes the Marketing Department of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation as:

“A bunch of mindless jerks who were the first against the wall when the revolution came.”

Fandom

Although, I’ve never quite figured out who was getting put up against the wall. Did Ray Wylie Hubbard mean the redneck or his mother?

Che Greta-vara blames it all on “Swenglish”…

It does appear that “up against the wall” has a different meaning in Swedish:

Vi har beslutat att ställa ett land, ett folk, mot väggen och begär vidare att det skall avrusta fullständigt – till på köpet vi, och i ännu högre grad Förenta staterna, som tillverkar, exporterar och använder massförstörelsevapen.

English translation:

We have decided to stand a country, a nation, up against the wall and then we demand that it totally disarm; we – or more to the point the United States – who manufacture, export and use weapons of mass destruction. 

https://www.linguee.com/english-swedish/translation/against+the+wall.html

I’m not sure that’s any less insane.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
160 Comments
Hanuman
December 14, 2019 8:13 pm

Home work assignment for Greta etal.

How many sheep farts equal one volcano explosion?

Show your work.

Toto
December 14, 2019 8:15 pm

For the history of the more familiar American expression see
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_Against_the_Wall_Motherfucker

It might have a PG meaning in Sweden now, but I suspect the origin even there involves guns.

J Mac
December 14, 2019 8:30 pm

This spoiled brat needs a spanking….. until she stops ranting “How dare you!”, threatening to kill people, and learns a bit of humility for her own ignorance and a heaping helping of respect for others.

SarahW
December 14, 2019 8:31 pm

Look, I am not Swedish, but I read and speak Swedish (I comprehend and read much better than I speak.) While it is fair to say that there is a more benign use of “ställa något (upp) mot väggen,” even in that particular idiomatic use, it derives from the scenario of aggression, and cornering…aggressively pinning, roughing up, searching, interrogating.
Swedes, however, sometimes use it much more literally and in the sense and context that Americans do. “Up against the wall”, for execution. this is not an uncommon or rare use, and it would not be lost on any Swede with a normal relationship to language, In Greta the child- parrot’s case, I don’t think anyone should assume she knows exactly what she is saying, but the people around her certainly do, and I am cynical enough to believe that ambiguity was intentional. that might be giving her too much credit for understanding the freight of words that come out of her mouth.

I will limit to one example, very googleable and Google-translatable, a quote from a contemporary book. Original Swedish above, English below.

Svenskarna som stred för Hitler: Ett historiskt reportage

Bosse Schön · 2015

Bokförlaget Forum, Nov 2, 2015 – 396 pages

“Organisationen borjan av 1944. I ett polisforhor berätter knut M från Norrkoping, som på 1990 talet forfarande var aktiv Nazist, att Bruna Gardets uppfift var att bekampa kommunismen.
Att ställa judarna mot väggen var något helt annat än att sparka ut dem ur landet. De skulle skjutas.”

The Swedes who fought for Hitler: A historical reportage
Bosse Schön · 2015

Bokförlaget Forum, Nov 2, 2015 – 396 pages

“The organization began in 1944. In a police interview, Knut M from Norrkoping, who in the 1990s was still an active Nazi, tells us that Bruna Gardet’s task was to fight communism.
Putting the Jews against the wall was something quite different from kicking them out of the country. They should be shot.”

Rob
December 14, 2019 8:31 pm

How dare you.

SarahW
December 14, 2019 8:33 pm

Test

Michael
December 14, 2019 8:54 pm

The mask is slipping.

December 14, 2019 9:10 pm

“I’m not sure that’s any less insane.”

I do not believe the meaning is any different.
“Stand against the wall”, and then gets forced to so something alien to their nature.

Which directly implies a very limited choice. Do it our way or suffer consequence…

Molon Labe!

will
December 14, 2019 9:43 pm

world leaders saving our futures…thats rich. they can barely handle the present.

RockyRoad
Reply to  will
December 15, 2019 5:48 am

World leaders working for a Globalist future only work for their own interests, and to hell to the average man, whom they conside inferior and deplorable! A reckoning is coming!

Fin
December 14, 2019 9:58 pm

This 16 yo ignoramus is an unpleasant package. No doubt 2019 has not contributed anything in the way of her geophysical knowledge and has given her zero understanding of the philosophy of science.

Instead, she manifests a soup of neurological problems, even (as a neurologist ex-colleague of mine points out) accompanied with the classical asymmetric mouth slant of one such ingredient. She is unable and unwilling to field answers to questions, has delusions about “seeing” CO2 and is selectively mute. Of course, she is able to whip herself into a fury of indignation for an audience and it’s unfortunate no one has laughed out loud and long during any such ludicrous performances.

And what penalties do Swedish education authorities have for wilful truancy? Or has Sweden become a larger version of downtown Malmo?

Carl Friis-Hansen
Reply to  Fin
December 15, 2019 4:27 am

Or has Sweden become a larger version of downtown Malmö?

Think of Malmö vs Sweden as San Francisco vs California.

Malmö is just the extrapolation of the sharp division in the population elsewhere. The subject of division is many-fold, such as CAGW and salon communism. Thoughtful middle ground is becoming a rarity, resulting in a polarization so strong and intolerant to each other, that normal peaceful means of rule becomes very difficult.

Malmö and San Francisco share some some commons. I Malmö there was recently a huge influx of “refugees” with totally different culture, habits and ideals than the traditional Swede.

put them against the wall

The phrase can be interpreted in different ways and I see it being no better or worse than many of the statements used on either side of the CAGW issue, used by prominent and high profile persons lately. With Greta’s “accountable” statement, she is rejecting the capital punishment, but still stating severe punishment. Diplomacy is an unknown quality to particular the CAGW believers and adoption to reality is totally out of the question.

The solution:
Ban all electrical and fuel power for farming, and let the city slickers work as farm helpers and the horses pull the plows. Suddenly the they will debate next weeks weather, instead of the weather in a hundred years from now. They will beg for the tractors and combine harvesters to come into action again, go back to their factory jobs and enjoy long weekends, comfortable heated/cooled homes and commercial air travel to the Bahamas. Thereafter the CAGW is lost in Limbo.

Fin
Reply to  Carl Friis-Hansen
December 16, 2019 2:57 am

Carl, I would see it as Sweden sharing many of the problems of Malmo. And for the same reasons. Now there are no go districts in Stockholm as a result of the “immigrant problem”. Just as in Malmo. Burnings, looting, destruction and assaults or worse. Who would be surprised if authorities in Malmo didn’t pursue the relatively minor offence of truancy. Now the disease is in the capitol and other regional cities.

Greg
December 14, 2019 10:46 pm

David Middleton:

Did Ray Wylie Hubbard mean the redneck or his mother?

The lyrics say: “you red-neck mother”. That is what you put in a song to call someone a M.F. before screaming out mother-fuukker in every line became fashionable.

I hope that helps you understand the words of the song you chose to put up.

December 14, 2019 10:54 pm

Thinking about Greta on “no name” island with others of like kind is a rather pleasant thought for me at times. The flies would most certainly be the lord.

Alasdair Fairbairn
December 14, 2019 10:59 pm

The Greta phenomenon says a great deal about the UN and it’s acolytes; for she is merely expressing the objectives of this organisation. -: Namely to take over the global levers of power with no constraint on the consequences for those who dare to challenge its agenda. It’s arrogance is unbelievable.
This organisation must be immediately starved of funds and eventually dismantled.
Voters should now require their governments to be transparent on the funds given to these institutions and called to task through the ballot box.

Editor
December 14, 2019 11:18 pm

So she now claims it is just a translation problem. Seems that to put someone “up against the wall” in Swedish doesn’t mean to shoot them. It means to force them.

So what?? It’s still an appeal to raw threats and force, the liberal staples, and it is still as despicable. She truly thinks if people don’t do what she wants, they should be forced to do it.

And it is still despicable. She’s a snotty brat who refuses to go to school until the world changes the climate to suit her fantasies … and if we won’t do it, she’s happy to force us.

w.

John Endicott
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
December 16, 2019 9:49 am

Exactly Willis. IF you are putting people “against the wall” to do your will, that implies some means of force (at gunpoint is the commonly used method) to get them to do what you want and some kind of unpleasant consequence (using those guns) if they do not comply. It’s a threat no matter how one tries to sugarcoat it.

Coeur de Lion
December 14, 2019 11:56 pm

Luckily there is say a couple of billion brown and black people who are benefiting from an increase in energy through fossil fuel consumption and are not aware of any of this.

Ed Zuiderwijk
December 14, 2019 11:58 pm

Not bad for a Nobel peace prize nominee. /s

Michael F
December 15, 2019 1:10 am

I thought that people got locked up for threatening anyone in the community. Perhaps not if you are of the left and 16 years old.

December 15, 2019 1:17 am

Greta does hate speech.

SJR
December 15, 2019 1:37 am

It is clear that putting against the wall has very aggressive connotations, even reaching the wish of death of someone by execution. But I honestly wouldn’t worry about this crazy little girl, since on some of her multiple trips on luxurious yachts around the world she will end up, naturally by some strong storm at the bottom of the sea. (And I do not wish evil on anyone).

tty
December 15, 2019 2:26 am

In this particular case Greta is probably innocent and simply not very fluent in English.

In Swedish, “ställa någon mot väggen” (= put someone against the wall) is an expression that means to force someone to make up their minds or to take action.

Her controllers were simply careless and had failed to rehearse properly.

F1nn
Reply to  tty
December 15, 2019 6:04 am

A quote from SarahW
December 14, 2019 at 8:31 pm / from up there ^

****I will limit to one example, very googleable and Google-translatable, a quote from a contemporary book. Original Swedish above, English below.

Svenskarna som stred för Hitler: Ett historiskt reportage

Bosse Schön · 2015

Bokförlaget Forum, Nov 2, 2015 – 396 pages

“Organisationen borjan av 1944. I ett polisforhor berätter knut M från Norrkoping, som på 1990 talet forfarande var aktiv Nazist, att Bruna Gardets uppfift var att bekampa kommunismen.
Att ställa judarna mot väggen var något helt annat än att sparka ut dem ur landet. De skulle skjutas.”

The Swedes who fought for Hitler: A historical reportage
Bosse Schön · 2015

Bokförlaget Forum, Nov 2, 2015 – 396 pages

“The organization began in 1944. In a police interview, Knut M from Norrkoping, who in the 1990s was still an active Nazi, tells us that Bruna Gardet’s task was to fight communism.
Putting the Jews against the wall was something quite different from kicking them out of the country. They should be shot.” ****

That is the meaning of “ställa någon mot väggen”.

lgp
Reply to  tty
December 15, 2019 1:47 pm

I think the more appropriate equivalent of “force someone to make up their minds or to take action” is an American expression which, in Swedish for Greta’s greater good, is “Skit eller gå ur potten”

December 15, 2019 2:33 am

Whenever I hear “up against the wall” I mentally add “bop, bop, bop” and think of Wolfie Smith in the BBC’s Citizen Smith the incompetent revolutionary. A young Corbyn.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  Ben Vorlich
December 15, 2019 3:00 am

“Ben Vorlich December 15, 2019 at 2:33 am

Wolfie Smith in the BBC’s Citizen Smith the incompetent revolutionary.”

Crikey, going back there! I recall those comedies. All in the era of 1980’s “Thatcher”. Rick Mayall as “Rick” in “The Young Ones”, impoverished student, anti-capitalist, anti-Thatcher. Then “Alan B’stard”. Made a shedload of money. He was talented.

December 15, 2019 2:45 am

Greta is gonna take a holiday? Perhaps her handlers are pulling her back for more indoctrination, or maybe they’re concerned for her safety after she threatened world leaders, then tried, unsuccessfully, to explain it away.

Also, Greta is nothing more than a spider puppet in human form, a spider that spins a dream-destroying web of dread and loathing in ungrateful young people toward a world chock full of gifts their predecessors have handed them.

Craig from Oz
December 15, 2019 3:02 am

Maybe if she didn’t skip so many school lessons she would have realised what she was saying.

Or…

She is actually a manifestation of evil. Make your own decision.

Peter Müller
December 15, 2019 3:17 am

I don’t like Greta, but:
Greta Thunberg apologizes after saying politicians should be put “against the wall”
“Yesterday I said we must hold our leaders accountable and unfortunately said “put them against the wall”. That’s Swenglish: “att ställa någon mot väggen” (to put someone against the wall) means to hold someone accountable,
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/474608-greta-thunberg-apologizes-after-saying-politicians-should-be?rnd=1576377470

Fanakapan
December 15, 2019 4:03 am

The yellow plastic raincoat will be useful in protecting the wearer from the blood of the planetary criminals, come the day, and as it becomes a reddish colour. 🙂

Greta and her immediate handlers (family) seem to be unaware that the media will inevitably build up the likes of herself with the express purpose of burning them down when the entertainment factor of the primary message declines ? I’d have to think she has maybe reached her apogee of value in the building up phase, and we’re witnessing the start of the tearing down phase. If so, and assuming the naivete of her enablers is correct, we can expect much more entertainment as the Greta Phenomenon lashes out in its decline.

To paraphrase the film words, ‘I’m going to need a bigger spoon’ 🙂