An0maly on Twitter

Bob Dylan was a master poet.

@Hugs,

It’s fine to believe in science but when it is polluted by political activism that becomes ‘very dangerous.

The temperature data from GISS, HADCRUT etc is so heavily processed (homogenised) as to be meaningless. They show slight warming over the last 30 years, claiming the hottest years on record are there.

But those “temperatures” are not what was actually recorded, they are what comes out from processing the raw, actual recorded temperature using some magic formulae. If you look at the Raw Data, as recorded at weather stations, which is published by the Japanese and the Danish Meteorological agencies you see a very different picture showing around 1C COOLING over the last 30 years. ( you can find data on this over at NoTricksZone.com )

Global temperatures only show as getting warmer After the recorded temperatures have been “processed” by the likes of HADCRUT and GISS.

Similarly the Hottest years, from originally recorded temperatures, were back in the early decades of the 20th century. How they were measured didn’t change until the introduction of electronic thermometers near the end of the 20th century. But recorded temperatures in the 80s and since could not beat or equal those earlier temperature records !

I’ve lost track of just how many times now the temperature “record keepers” have adjusted and revised those earlier temperatures, it may be 4 or 5, but seems to happen when global temperatures haven’t risen as predicted – and each time the records are revised the earlier years end up cooler than the previous revision and the recent ones a little warmer.

Looked at dispassionately it is very easy to be led into concluding that the data is being made to fit the theory. Something that is far from unknown in climate “science”.

The IPCC report published last year claimed that a 2C rise in temperature above 1850 would be the most earth could stand without catastrophe. 1850 was the tail end of the Little Ice Age, accepted as being at least 2C COLDER than normal, although it may have been much worse than that based on contemporary records of ships trapped in sea ice a mile and more off the East coast of England in some years.

In prophesying doom, the IPCC appear to have ignored the empirical and historical evidence of the Minoan, Roman and Medieval Warm Periods, respectively circa 3, 2 and 1-1.5 degrees C WARMER than today. Periods that were so benign for mankind, earth and the environment that they saw some of civilisations great advances.

There were no major “species extinctions” during those hotter periods, so current scare-mongering from IPCC and the likes of Extinction Rebellion about this happening soon are nonsense. Recently published research has shown that earth had More Species than today in hotter times – 6c warmer! Extinction events, other than catastrophes such as asteroid strike, occur during Cooling events.

If you count species from a pole to the tropical rainforest you find the warmer the environment the greater the number and diversity of species there are.

The only worrying thing to bear in mind is that these warm periods appear as roughly 1000 year cycles, each one around 1C COLDER than the previous, giving an overall cooling trend over the last 3000 years of -1C per millennium.

Currently we are 1000 years since the last warm period, and given the raw temperature data from JMA and DMA zhowing cooling over the last 30 years it is perfectly feasible to suggest that our current warm period may have plateaued or be about to end. Increased CO2 doesn’t seem to have managed to create much if any warming !

Suspicion of that could explain the hysteria about “Climate emergency”, because once people see there is no real climate the plans to politically change and deindustrialise the developed nations fall apart.

A recent study by James Cook University calculated the amount of CO2 now being removed by the 20% Increase in global vegetation (NASA data) over the last 25 years or so. An Increase because of the higher levels of plant food (CO2) in the atmosphere. Compare that amount with mankind’s emissions and it seems that plants and trees are now removing as much or more CO2 from the atmosphere each year as man puts into it ! That doesn’t seem like much of a crisis .

Global communism was largely defeated and discredited in the 45 years after the end of WW2, but it didn’t disappear it morphed into the “Solutions” demanded to stop climate change. Those solutions would change western democracies into quasi-marxist-socialist states along the lines proposed by amongst others Cortez in the USA, Trudeau in Canada and Corbyn in the UK.

The emergency is not about climate it is all about forcing political change through fear – worth looking into. It is democracy that is under catastrophic threat – not the earth.

Susan so while the fact that science…tells fibs for money on warming you dont think for a weee second that big pharma who blackmailed the FDA to allow no easily accessible lawsuits for proven vaccine damages in a deal for cheaper vaccines might be a tad “iffy?
and the recent admission that Poilio vax IS and has for some time been a source of the few outbreaks OF polio, and theyre hoping…to have a better vaccine sometime.
of course its only??? warmists who lie and minipulate facts n figures?
the 50% or more of dud research on serious issues like cancer treatments dont give you pause?
or that the once perfect gene splicing wasnt perfect at all?
that what you thought was researched and proven(never in humans though) isnt?
and the new CRISPRtech is also NOT precise as claimed and some serious harm to humans occurred already and unintended results are shown..but lets go ahead use it in food animals and people with little oversight and less control, Im so sure that self regulation BY industry is just dandy..are you?
dont you see that throwing big baccy vax skepticism and gmo and climate skeptics in one basket is rather careful manipulation too?

Actually, the geologic record of ice advances and declines provides a very good rationale for supposing that the present interglacial epoch may be about to end, and is presently in the process of actually ending.
There may have been some unwarranted alarmism sprinkled in amongst the reportage, but it was nothing compared to what is going on nowadays with global warming hype and alarmism.
Global warming climate science is based on a false premise.
Worries about a new ice age was not. It was based on observational evidence, logical inference, and legitimate concerns.
As such, it was not propaganda.
There is no comparison.
Few scientists that were heavily involved with climate science at that time were alarmist, and even fewer asserted surety regarding a new ice age being imminent.
It was a relatively small field with very little funding and no huge industry backing it, such as is the case at the present time with the gigantic global warming alarmism based industries and attendant government backed funding.

They can’t attack the argument so they attack the person.