Aussie Climate Crusader Turns Wind Power Nimby

Aussie Green Activist Bob Brown. By Australian Greens website – Australian Greens, CC BY-SA 2.5 au, Link

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

h/t JoNova – Former Greens leader Bob Brown, leader of a recent high profile electric car expedition to protest the Adani coal mine, has finally discovered a place of natural beauty which is too precious to spoil with ugly wind turbine monstrosities.

Crusader Brown turns against wind farm

Monday, July 15, 2019 
GRAHAM LLOYD
ENVIRONMENT EDITOR

Former Greens leader and veteran activist Bob Brown is campaigning to stop a $1.6 billion wind farm development in Tasmania because it will spoil the view and kill birds. 

The proposed Robbins Island wind farm in Tasmania’s northwest will be one of the world’s biggest, with up to 200 towers measuring 270m high from ground to blade tip.

If it goes ahead, electricity from the Robbins Island project will be sent to the mainland via a new undersea cable to help make Tasmania a “battery for the nation”.

But in a letter to local media and on his foundation’s website, Dr Brown has slammed the project, which he said had echoes of earlier attempts to build skyscrapers in Hobart which were stopped by protests.

Despite the criticisms levelled at former prime minister Tony Abbott and treasurer Joe Hockey for describing wind turbines as “ugly”, Dr Brown said the Robbins Island plan was, visually, a step too far. “Mariners will see this hairbrush of tall towers from 50km out to sea and elevated landlubbers will see it, like it or not, from greater distances on land,” Dr Brown said. “Its eye-catchiness will divert from every coastal scene on the western Bass Strait coastline.”

Read more: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/former-greens-leader-brown-declares-war-on-wind-farm/news-story/e18af2b914517377bad4dddae68fb440

Makes you wonder where Bob Brown, who is mostly based in nearby Hobart, intends to retire.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

78 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
July 17, 2019 4:18 am

Anthony, I realise that to properly explain Bob Browns rise to political
power takes a lot of test, but I cannot shorten it. So you decide if its best in two parts, or even the possibility that some “”Wordsmith”” makes a full article of it.

This matter of Federal over Stat power made it all the way to the Australian High Court. I still cannot understand how the Judges finally ruled in favour of the Federal Government.

Michael.

——————————————————————————

Craig from OZ, July 16. sums it up well, but it goes back to a very minor matter, that is to the rest of us. that of Lake Pedder in Tasmania, it was a dam which created the lake or perhaps enlarged it.

Now Tasmania unlike the rest of Australia which is mostly flat, has lots of high mountains on its West side. It is a natural for Hydro electric power and a government body, the Tasmanian Hydro electric Commission had over the years brought the small population of Tasmania cheap and of course very realisable electricity. Which of course was very green.

Tasmania was apart from a few mines, a very rural community, and was thus Conservative in its politics. There was a lot of Federal Crown land on the island.

Bob Brown was a keen bushwalker and was concerned that Tasmania
reman a isolated bit of Greenery, unlike the mainland, especially the likes of NSW and Queensland.

Now just as with a recent proposal in NSW to raise a existing dam wall,
to reduce the flooding in the area, this is being opposed by the usual Green propaganda, that some small creature will be drowned, it was proposed to raise the Dam at Lake Pedder just a little to increase the power potential at a minimum cost.

Now up till then Bob Brown had never objected to Lake Pedder, as we
sensible folk already know, a Dam created Lake is just as nice as a natural one, and the wild life love them.

So what was he problem with Lake Pedder. While I think it may have
simply been a case in Brown’s thinking of a “Dam too far “”, officially it was because there was a tiny sandy beach which had formed and that would disappear as the water rose.

Now initially Browne supporters would have been few in number, just
fellow bushwalkers but events elsewhere changed all of that . World wide this was the time of the of the “”Hippy movement”, people who considered that the World owned them a living. But just as right now the Social security, i.e. the Dole, was not sufficient to cover the cost of such things as renting or worse buying a property.

Many moved to North Queensland, the tropics, and were happy at finding a beach not too far from a post office which they could use to collect their dole cheque. But a lot in Victoria, th Southern State, they moved to Tasmania and took up residence on Crown Land.

This was the time of the Hawke-Keating Labour Government, and Hawke knew that as Hippies always voted for whatever government would pay then for not working, so would always voted Labour. Thus he did not remove them from the Crown Land.

They cut down many trees and built some quite good houses,amd lived by their standards a good carefree life. So of course they were natural “Useful Idiaots”” just waiting for the likes of a Bob Brown to comer along.

The early Greens campaign about Lake Pedder failed, but the publicity from the Media encouraged Bob Brown and the next big event was about to happen. The Tasmanian Hydro got the go ahead from the Liberal (Conservative) government of Tasmania to commence the very big project of what became known as “The Gordon below Franklin”” scheme.

Now we had already had the giant sized Snowy Mountains scheme, plus the Victorian bit, the Kiewa scheme, both had been pre WW2 projects and it was with a largely ethnic work force, recent migrants , it was finally built.

It involved damming a previously wild and fast flowing river “”The Snowy” which headed to the East and into the sea, to be instead turned around to the West and via numerous Hydro electric turbines, finally into the inland river system of the Murray Darling , enabling vast irritation systems to be commenced.

Now while at the time it was considered to be a wonderful bit of engineering, later the Greens said that it was the death of the Snowy, a wild and natural river system. Just as of now the Greens wanted all things to stay the same, no progress.

So back to Tasmania in the 1980 tees, the Hippy time. The proposed Gordon below the Franklin rivers was a major undertaking, this was no small scale version of Lake Pedder, a far better comparison would be with the now completed Snowy scheme. ”The weather pattern over Australia is a West to East air movement, with a dip South in the winter and a rise to the North in the summer.

The high mountains to the wet of Tasmania collect all of this moisture, which then via the Gordon ends up in the sea. It was proposed to drill through the Mountains going East, then to Dam the Franklin and put all of its waters through the tulle to the East. On the way it would of course just as with the Snowy pass through many turbines and produce lots and lots of cheep electricity, so much that there would be the possibility ova a submarine cable, to export it to the State of Victoria to become a part of the Eastern States, plus South Australian grid system.

A added benefit would be irrigation of the central part of Tasmania, which while in comparison with the rest of Australia was well watered, was in fact a bit dry as it was in the “”Rain shadow”” of the Mountains to its West.

So lots of cheap electricity, the prospects of being the battery to mainland Australia , plus irrigation of the darkish centre of the Island. Whatever could possibly go wrong with such a good idea. . Now note, there was never any mention of Global warming plies CC all due to CO2, It was all about Tree hugging, back to nature semi Green types who liked things just the way it was, no changes needed, and certainly no mention about “”Saving the Planet”That all came later.
————————————————————————-

End of part one, Part two will cover how the Media changed everything, and that sniffing the Political breeze, of a darkening sky, PM Bob Hawke decided to use this matter as a election issue. He was facing defeat in his seat in Victoria, and needed a issue. But a big snag was that Tasmania was while he smallest State, it was still legally a State, thus the Federal Government could not tell them what to do., especially as it had a Liberal (Conservative) government.
How he got over that makes very interesting political history.

MJE VK5ELL

ramblingidiot
Reply to  Michael
July 17, 2019 9:41 pm

The above comment is nonsensical in its ignorance. The original Lake Pedder was a small isolated natural lake that as I recall could only be reached by air. The lake was quite beautiful due to its sandy beach and natural surroundings. The proposed (now existing) dam would flood the entire area including the original pristine lake. Its now a large hydroelectric lake similar to any other.

Krudd Gillard of the Commondebt of Australia
July 17, 2019 5:34 am

I would like to agree that Bob Browneye has lost all credibility.

But he never had any in the first place.

Sheri
July 17, 2019 5:44 am

Did anyone have any doubt how selfish, lying and evil these people are?????

Ed MacAulay
July 17, 2019 8:00 am

His math and knowledge are quite off, as is his science.
For a tower with a height of 100 m, the horizon distance is 35.7 km.
So with a 270 m height, the hairbrush would be visible at 96 km if the base was at sea-level.

tty
Reply to  Ed MacAulay
July 17, 2019 9:35 am

It’s not that simple, the Earth is round (approximately), so visibility distance does not increase linearly with height. A 270 m high tower will be visible from about 58 kilometers away from purely geometrical consideration (if seen from eye-level, 1.7 m). However atmospheric refraction must also be factored in which (on average) increases the visibility distance to about 63 km. However it will vary considerably depending on the temperature profile.

So he is approximately right though a bit low. However “mariners” are usually more than 1.7 meters above sea-level, so 70 km might be more correct than 50 km.

EternalOptimist
July 17, 2019 9:19 am

Hahaha, here we go again. You would need the brain of a sea sponge to think that Brown was being a nimby. It takes true integrity to put the welfare of the orange bellied parrot above ones lifetimes love of wind turbines.
And dont forget the yellow bellied skunk. And where did Turney plant all those kukri trees to offset his footprint when he proved that all the ice had melted in Antartica? Exacterly, STOP these particular wind turbines NOW

TomB
July 17, 2019 11:01 am

I agree with him. Huge windmill farms are unsightly.

john
July 17, 2019 12:08 pm

I am amazed that after Australia threw Brian Caffyn out with his Zeehan Zinc fiasco plus his Evergreen/ UPC/IVPC (mafia) then First Wind, they let him do this.
He’s another Jeffrey Epstein now in Indonesia and have no doubt involved with other nefarious endeavors and connected to CIA.

July 17, 2019 7:40 pm

My part one of July 17th.

PART TWO.

For more detail about Green versus economic interests see “” Our wide
brown land”” by Adam Morton. “The Franklin river would be dammed today””

Its difficult to point a finger at who is responsible for a given action, but it seems this PM Fraser was the one who proposed the World Heritage Listing of the Franklin, but it was Bob Hawke who had just become Opposition leader, who took full advantage of it in his “”Look at me, I am so very Green” election campaign. Both the then PM and Hawke were playing the Green emotion card, but remember back then there was no mention of CO2 and to saving the world. That was all in the future..

If a future Liberal National government, both Federal and Tasmania were to re-open the matter again, it would still be based on the “”Wild River” excuse, so any major economic issues could swing it back in favour of it going ahead.

While the now PM Hawke looed at offshore island laws, it was a refer back to PM Fraser submission to the UN to place the Tasmanian Franklin river on the World Heritage listing which was finally considered by the High Court decision, a 4 to 3 in favour of stopping the Dam project.

Australian politicians love to stride the World stage in the UN buildings in New York. Sadly long term such decisions come back to bite future governments.

The likes of Bob Brown promised that “”Saving” the wild rivers would be of benefit to all of Australians. Sadly most people are too busy earning a living and also far too old when retired to tramp along a wilderness area to view the rushing waters…

When later commercial interests wanted to organise a tour of such areas , Brown and Co violently objected saying that only bushwalkers should be allowed.

If vie follow the basic rule of a democracy that it should always be the
“Greater Good”” factor which determines such decisions, the Greens would miss out.

Later on, possibly as people start to question this tendency to only be for the favoured free, we see the introduction of the good gas CO2 being demonised and that was followed by “Save the Planet””
“Think of the children’s children’s. “”

MJE VK5ELL

July 18, 2019 2:58 am

R e. my Part one and two on Bob Brown, I forgot to mention the big Media Event which really got the Green Ball rolling. The Dam workers turned up on the Gordon, and were met with a flotilla of small
“”Rubbie Duckies” boats. The Media had of course being told what was about to happen.

So the Greens tried to stop the worker, and the Police intervened.
fighting broke out and hundreds were arrested.

The Media was delighted and that was when it became a big election issue.

MJE VK5ELLi

Lexley Crispin
July 19, 2019 1:39 am

Green is a beautiful colour. I hate to see it associated with such a load of s..t which is the colour of and consistency of the complainant