Democrat Members of the Climate Crisis Committee Showed Up for a Meeting!

Kathy Castor
Chair of the Climate Crisis Committee US Representative Kathy Castor

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

After the excruciating embarrassment of having so many no shows for their first climate crisis meeting Republicans managed to adjourn the session, Democrats have finally decided to pretend to do something about climate change.

The following from the Democrat head of the committee Kathy Castor (h/t Breitbart);

“Hello, I’m Representative Kathy Castor from Florida, and I chair the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis.

This week, the House passed the first major legislation to address the climate crisis in nearly 10 years. And it won’t be the last, because we are committed to passing climate legislation that works for The People, not the corporate polluters.

The Climate Action Now Act is a straightforward bill I sponsored that prevents the Trump Administration from breaking America’s commitment and leaving the Paris Climate Agreement.

We need to stay in this agreement because it was a major breakthrough. After years of finger-pointing, the United States, China, India, Europe and countries all around the world came together and agreed to cut carbon pollution dramatically.

Support for the landmark agreement is overwhelming. A bipartisan group of 23 Governors, nearly 300 cities, and more than 2,000 businesses pledged to honor the Paris climate goals. Now they’ve been joined by the U.S. House of Representatives.

But we know this is just a first step. To address the climate crisis, we need to stop carbon pollution from accumulating in our atmosphere. That requires action. Urgent action. Ambitious action.

We simply don’t have any more time for denial or delay. An entire generation has grown up in a rapidly warming world and we are personally experiencing the harm. Scientists say it will get worse, unless we act.

I know. A year and a half ago, I boarded up my home, packed my belongings and fled with my family as that monster Hurricane Irma loomed off the coast of Florida. We were petrified of a devastating storm surge from the Gulf of Mexico and Tampa Bay.

We were lucky because we had time to get out of the way.
But for too many Americans, the climate crisis is inescapable.
Seas are rising. America’s heartland and coasts have suffered unprecedented floods. Snowpack is shrinking and droughts are getting worse. Hot, humid heat waves are becoming more intense, with more days where people cannot safely work outside or play outside. And higher temperatures mean that other pollutants, like ground-level ozone from car exhaust are growing even more damaging to our health.
The bottom line is that the climate crisis is costing us. It’s increasing the cost of our health care, our flood and fire insurance, and it’s making costly weather disasters even worse. So we need to cut carbon pollution for the people in our communities, and because we need to do it to create incredible economic opportunities.

Already, more than 3.2 million Americans are working in clean energy jobs. We can do more and make those quality, family-sustaining jobs that are accessible to everyone.

And we can save people money on energy. Efficiency standards will save us $2 trillion by 2030. And fuel economy standards for our cars are saving the average household $2,800 a year at the pump.
I believe in American ingenuity and leadership. When America leads, people, countries and businesses across the globe are inspired to do more.

But the Trump Administration has been a revolving door for powerful special interests in the fossil fuel lobby. That’s why the President said he wants to take us backwards and cut and run from our commitments.
But America doesn’t cut and run. America keeps its commitments.

So despite what the Trump Administration says, we are still in this agreement. We have not formally withdrawn. And if – and when – this bill becomes law, we never will. Because we need climate policy that works For The People, not well-connected corporate polluters in the Trump Administration.

That’s why we’re going to cut carbon pollution, protect the people and places we love, advance climate justice, and create a clean energy economy that works for everyone.

This is just the start of climate action in this Congress.”

Source: https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/05/04/castor-we-dont-have-any-more-time-for-denial-or-delay-in-combating-climate-change/

The video of Kathy’s speech;

Well done Democrats for turning up on the right day. But they didn’t achieve much; the legislation of course is pure political theatre, it is guaranteed to be rejected either by the senate or President Trump.

The sad thing is there is an obvious emission reduction strategy Republicans would likely support – zero carbon nuclear power. President Trump is a strong supporter of Nuclear Power.

But I doubt emissions reduction is their real goal. Most greens and left wing politicians (with a few honourable exceptions) would prefer to see ongoing political stalemate over climate policy, rather than supporting an obvious unequivocally viable solution to reducing CO2 emissions which does not involve the abolition of Capitalism.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

179 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alex
May 4, 2019 8:41 pm

She should get together with Tyrion. He will supply the wine.

David Chappell
May 4, 2019 8:57 pm

“we’re going to cut carbon pollution, protect the people”
If Ms Castor really believes that “carbon” is pollution she hasn’t thought the matter through. Given that all life forms are carbon-based she is, in effect, saying that all life must be eliminated. How does that “protect the people”?
Bollux (being the twin of Castor)

Lancifer
May 4, 2019 9:01 pm

“After years of finger-pointing, the United States, China, India, Europe and countries all around the world came together and agreed to cut carbon pollution dramatically.”

Either she is ignorant of the Paris Accord or she is a big fat liar.

My money is on liar.

Coeur de Lion
May 4, 2019 9:12 pm

That I like, David!!

Kevin R. Lohse
May 4, 2019 9:41 pm

Surely if you take into account the enormous amounts of CO2 released in the construction of nuclear power plants due to building the concrete housing and manufacturing the equipment, nuclear power isn’t that CO2 free after all?

A C Osborn
Reply to  Kevin R. Lohse
May 5, 2019 1:52 am

You jest surely, a Nuclear power plant lasts circa 60 years, producing 24/7/360, the is co2 spread over 60 years. Wind Turbines have a major Concrete and Steel component and based on current use last about 15 years and produce miniscule amounts of power.

MarkW
Reply to  A C Osborn
May 5, 2019 9:38 am

Given the number of wind turbines needed to replace a single nuclear plant. The wind turbines use way more concrete.

Melvyn Dackombe
Reply to  Kevin R. Lohse
May 5, 2019 6:18 am

Kevin,

CO2 is not a problem.
See comments elsewhere outlining the benefits and necessities of this gas.

Kevin Lohse
Reply to  Melvyn Dackombe
May 5, 2019 8:41 pm

Worry not! I’m a dyed-in-the-wool climate sceptic and am well aware of the critical part the trace gases labelled “Greenhouse” play in the existence of life on this planet. It’s a travesty of scientific probity when activists with a scientific background carefully ignore the part water vapour, the most significant greenhouse gas, plays in global temperature. The effect of clouds on the climate is not well understood, but this enormous gap in knowledge is ignored by the activists. I was just making the point that nuclear energy production is not CO2-free, as no energy production is entirely CO2-free.

Reply to  Kevin Lohse
May 6, 2019 5:12 pm

Current design (package) reactors don’t use the big cooling towers and need no concrete (except for the road base to get them where they need to go).

Reply to  Kevin R. Lohse
May 5, 2019 9:02 am

Over time the calcined cement in concrete takes back all the CO2 evolved! I have been a lone voice here on WUWT on this topic for years. It doesnt recover that emitted by the fuel used of course. Oh well here is a peer reviewed link, ignore it and it will go away for another few years.

https://link.springer.com/

tty
Reply to  Gary Pearse
May 5, 2019 11:33 am

Isn’t it a bit optimistic to think that anyone will locate your paper in the entire output of the Springer publishing house?

Reply to  Kevin R. Lohse
May 5, 2019 1:41 pm

Kevin, you forgot to include the CO2 emitted in mining the uranium and shipping it to Russia.
That’s much greater than the CO2 emitted in mining and shipping to China the rare earth elements needed to produce the rare earth magnets and batteries the windmills need.
(Those kids in Africa have pretty small lungs.)/sarc

Dave Fair
May 4, 2019 9:52 pm

Such a smug look on her face.

Reply to  Dave Fair
May 4, 2019 10:55 pm

They are all like that. Their ignorance protects them from reality.

Jim Powers
May 4, 2019 10:21 pm

A genuine technology disrupter may be upon us. The problem with geothermal has always been the availability of steam. The Geysers has been depleting gradually. They are recharging with treated wastewater. Finding both high geothermal gradient and groundwater in the sample place has been the limitation. If geothermal energy were abundant we would not need to burn coal or natural gas to generate electricity. Producing geothermal energy for the purpose of large scale power generation in hot dry conditions has been elusive without a closed loop. That may be about to change. For those versed in geothermal energy, look at GreenFire Energy’s web site. They use in-well closed loop technology using supercritical CO2 as the heat exchanger. If this works, the future of electrical power generation may belong to GreenFire Energy.

Reply to  Jim Powers
May 5, 2019 1:28 am

Get your personal Greenfire Energy Howto guide, delivered to your mailbox, and we’ll throw in a set of complimentary Ginsu knives from Ronco FREE, for 5 easy payments of just $19.95 … + s/h.

Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
May 5, 2019 8:06 am

And, while supplies last, a year’s supply of spray-on hair!

R2DToo
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
May 5, 2019 10:11 am

Double the offer for a “small additional fee” and I’ll think about it.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Jim Powers
May 5, 2019 4:33 am

If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

MarkW
Reply to  Jim Powers
May 5, 2019 9:40 am

Just re-inject the condensed steam.

tty
Reply to  MarkW
May 5, 2019 11:47 am

That is more or less what they propose. Though they use ordinary water (or CO2) which is certainly better than the corrosive muck you will ordinary find in hydrothermal fields:

https://www.iflscience.com/environment/man-fell-yellowstone-hot-spring-completely-dissolved-day/

Dave Fair
Reply to  tty
May 5, 2019 1:26 pm

As someone who directed development of a geothermal power plant: It ain’t that easy.

Take a look at what is happening (ignore the wishful thinking) at one of the globe’s best geothermal sites: The Geysers in Northern California. It is declining rapidly, with no good options to increase output.

Unless you have really hot rocks close to the surface (plus located near loads), forget it.

Reply to  Dave Fair
May 5, 2019 2:14 pm

The “Yellowstone National Park and Geothermal Megacaldera Power Facility”?

Dave Fair
Reply to  James Schrumpf
May 5, 2019 5:23 pm

Yep, James. Just create a major population center on a massive caldera of an active super volcano.

tty
Reply to  Jim Powers
May 5, 2019 11:43 am

Apparently they haven’t even run a field test yet, much less built a real power plant.

And even if everything works according to plan it is not easy to find areas where the thermal gradient is steep enough to make geothermal energy practicable. Still it is certainly worth trying.

Jim
May 4, 2019 10:22 pm

A genuine technology disrupter may be upon us. The problem with geothermal has always been the availability of steam. The Geysers has been depleting gradually. They are recharging with treated wastewater. Finding both high geothermal gradient and groundwater in the sample place has been the limitation. If geothermal energy were abundant we would not need to burn coal or natural gas to generate electricity. Producing geothermal energy for the purpose of large scale power generation in hot dry conditions has been elusive without a closed loop. That may be about to change. For those versed in geothermal energy, look at GreenFire Energy’s web site. They use in-well closed loop technology using supercritical CO2 as the heat exchanger. If this works, the future of electrical power generation may belong to GreenFire Energy.

Rod Evans
May 4, 2019 10:43 pm

Since when did the reduction of carbon (CO2) protect people?
Every emergency vehicle currently protecting people is powered by fossil fuel. Every coast guard helicopter every air ambulance, every road ambulance every police vehicle every military vehicle is powered by fossil fuel.
Every home in every major conurbation is heated and cooled thus protecting people from weather extremes by fossil fuel. Every rescue boat, every emergency relief delivery plane and every doctor or medic rushing to help and protect people is transported there by fossil fuel.
Can anybody think of any service protecting people, that is not reliant on fossil fuels?

nottoobrite
Reply to  Rod Evans
May 5, 2019 2:13 am

Rod Evans,
Yep, Politicians !!!!

John F. Hultquist
May 4, 2019 10:46 pm

Will she start by giving $2,000,000,000 (Billion) to the UN Green Slush Fund?
That’s all any of the others from the Paris meeting want.

Maybe she doesn’t know how much the US has already contributed.
She seems to be information free.

May 4, 2019 10:53 pm

Kathy, it was Obama’s commitment, not America’s. In order to be America’s commitment, it would have to be submitted to the Senate and ratified. Neither happened.

Greg
May 4, 2019 11:30 pm

How does she do that with her lips ??

Reply to  Greg
May 5, 2019 8:08 am

It’s called picking a photo that puts the person in a bad light. It’s a sleazy tactic, apparently Eric isn’t above it.

May 4, 2019 11:34 pm

Re Ian Russell, May 4th. Recall reading many years ago that the
Maldives government actually “Mined”, their coral reefs to provide the material for the airstrip that now handles the big jets.

On thing that is worth looking into was that during WW2 the Americans in the Pacific actually used a vast amount of coral to build their airstrips.Would be of interest to see what has happened to the Islands since then, has the coral regrown, probably

MJR VK5ELL

Steve Reddish
May 5, 2019 12:18 am

I am trying to understand Rep Kathy Castor’s math for fuel savings:

“fuel economy standards for our cars are saving the average household $2,800 a year at the pump”

But – United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration says average American drove 13,476 in 2018. If both spouses are average Americans, that totals to 26,952 miles. If these average Americans drove 2-year-old cars meeting 2016 CAFE standard of 28.8 MPG, buying gas at average gas price in 2018 of $2.60, their annual expenditure for gas was 26,952/28.8*2.60=$2433.17
If that was a savings of $2,800, their expenditure would have been $5,233. To have spent $5,233 to drive 26,952 miles would require their cars to get only 13.4 MPG.

She is claiming that without CAFE regulations, the average American would be driving a car getting only 13.4 MPG? My pre-CAFE 1977 Dodge Volare station wagon averaged 18 MPG, getting 20 MPG at 55MPH. Surely, gas prices climbing to over $4.00 per gallon in 2009 would have forced the auto industry to do better than my Volare.

I think she gives too much credit to CAFE standards.

SR

H.R.
Reply to  Steve Reddish
May 5, 2019 5:04 am

Steve Reddish: “My pre-CAFE 1977 Dodge Volare station wagon […]”

Oh… so you’re the one. I heard that Dodge only sold one of those and I was wondering who bought it. Did it have Corinthian Leather?
;o)

MarkW
Reply to  H.R.
May 5, 2019 9:42 am

They couldn’t build to many, the supply of rich Corinthians is limited.

Reply to  MarkW
May 5, 2019 2:36 pm

Boss, boss! De plain interior, de plain interior!

Reply to  Steve Reddish
May 5, 2019 9:05 am

Dodge produced the Aspen. Volare was Plymouth.

MarkW
Reply to  Steve Reddish
May 5, 2019 9:43 am

The market supplies what the consumers want. (Assuming it is possible. If it isn’t possible than even government mandates won’t help.)

E J Zuiderwijk
May 5, 2019 12:43 am

The seas are rising. Perhaps someone should ask the lady by how much. Bet she doesn’t know the answer.

Harry Passfield
May 5, 2019 3:15 am

As I predicted – and not alone, I know – the new meme is ‘pollution’ – ‘carbon pollution’. Castor is not alone: she is also giving succour to the XR lefties who are pushing the ‘pollution’ for all they’re worth.

Mark Broderick
May 5, 2019 3:19 am
Reply to  Mark Broderick
May 5, 2019 8:11 am

You mean her parents landed a major book deal. Unless minors in Sweden can enter into contracts.

jim heath
May 5, 2019 3:25 am

Leave your fridge door open an hour a day! There problem solved.

Sara
May 5, 2019 3:42 am

I really enjoy it when someone shows her iggernance by saying “Hot, humid heat waves are becoming more intense, with more days where people cannot safely work outside or play outside.” That just slays me.

Coming from someone who lives, breathes and works in air conditioning, likely 100% of the year, and never ventures outside unless she has to, the worst thing you can do to yourself is to live in air conditioning. I’m sure she never has a hair disturbed on her empty head.

And FWIW, there is ZERO lack of summer activity outdoors in my county and other counties in this states. She could not be more full of IT if her eyes were brown. What a dimwit!!!

Bruce Cobb
May 5, 2019 3:56 am

Kathy Castor is a moron, spouting utter lies and drivel. The “climate crisis” is pure fantasy, as are any claimed financial benefits of “green” energy, or any government-imposed energy-saving schemes, such as CAFE. Indeed, the lies the Climate Liars tell are many-layered and interwoven ones out of whole cloth, designed to weave a structure which is difficult to tear apart. Sickening.

ColMosby
May 5, 2019 5:01 am

Just about everything Kathy said was certifiably false. The GOP needs to point out reality and respond to Kathy’s lies.

Eamon Butler
May 5, 2019 5:07 am

Hard to take anything she said, and nod in agreement.
Does she think that if Globally, we manage to reduce the CO2 levels in the atmosphere by a small few PPM, that suddenly there will be a Climate harmony, with ideal weather where ever you happen to live?No more boarding up homes and running away from hurricanes. No more droughts floods, etc….These people call Sceptics, ”D*nrs”. They live in absolute Dnial themselves. They are so far removed from reality, probably from constant bombardment with propaganda, they are unable to think logically.
Where are the voices of reason? Every utterance from these scaremongering Alarmists, needs to be publicly challenged. Broadcast across the World and in to every home. It’s a disgrace that everyone knows who Gretta Thunberg is, but, outside of those with keen interest in the subject, no one has heard of any of the real scientists, let alone, what they have to say.

Walt D.
May 5, 2019 5:52 am

Kathy Castor—“Seas are rising” = Relativistic version of Chicken Little -“The sky is falling” !

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Walt D.
May 5, 2019 7:08 am

Seas are rising! – Fires are raging! – Hurricanes are howling! – Ice is melting! – Tornadoes are devastating! – Floods are drowning! – Droughts are baking! – Corrals are bleaching! – Species are dying! – etc., etc. You can’t say “climate crisis” without “scream”.

Sara
Reply to  Walt D.
May 5, 2019 10:22 am

Oh, yeah??? I have photos of snow (3 inches) in my yard on April 15 this year, and two inches from April 20, 2018.

Must be something in the water she’s drinking.

Craig Rogers
May 5, 2019 5:53 am

the real Crisis is the massive lying and propaganda that is misleading mankind from the real issues..

Rev 12:9 So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devill and Satan, who is misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him.

Tim
May 5, 2019 6:21 am

“Climate Justice”, “Clean Energy”, Climate Crisis”… The PR army has been busy.