President Trump Trolling Climate Change Activists Again

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Gets them every time.

Dear Mr. President, that’s not how global warming works

By Deanna Paul
January 20 at 3:20 PM

Sunday morning began with a stern, concerned warning from President Trump to thousands of Northeasterners expected to be affected by a massive weather system:

“Be careful and try staying in your house,” the president tweeted. “Large parts of the Country are suffering from tremendous amounts of snow and near record setting cold. Amazing how big this system is. Wouldn’t be bad to have a little of that good old fashioned Global Warming right now!”

It’s far from the first time a Trump tweet turned acidulous; some climate scientists refuse to humor his mockery as a real discussion point. Others are more aligned with the approach taken by Jason Furtado, an assistant professor of meteorology at the University of Oklahoma.

“One down day on the Dow Jones doesn’t mean the economy is going to trash,” he said. “One cold day doesn’t suddenly mean that the general trend in global climate change is suddenly going in the opposite direction.“

Climatologist Gavin Schmidt, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, voiced concern that the general public connects with “global warming” merely as a breaking-news headline or in the wake of a natural disaster.

“A wildfire or massive rainfall dumped in Houston makes headlines, and if you only look at headlines, you won’t know about the incremental changes or the thresholds being crossed and pursued,” he said.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2019/01/20/dear-mr-president-thats-not-how-global-warming-works/?utm_term=.1d539ed4bc72

President Trump’s tweet;

Climate change activists simply cannot seem to handle even a joke which contradicts their obsession, without getting riled about it and providing long boring monologues about why they disagree with whatever was said.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
166 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Abbott
January 21, 2019 8:52 am

From the article: “Climatologist Gavin Schmidt, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, voiced concern that the general public connects with “global warming” merely as a breaking-news headline or in the wake of a natural disaster.

“A wildfire or massive rainfall dumped in Houston makes headlines, and if you only look at headlines, you won’t know about the incremental changes or the thresholds being crossed and pursued,” he said.”

What “thresholds” are being crossed, Gavin?

Gavin implies that he sees CAGW showing itself in our current weather. Gavin should provide some evidence of this happening.

I don’t expect Gavin to provide any evidence because he doesn’t have any evidence for this. All the evidence says just the opposite: The weather is not more extreme now than in the past.

jim heath
January 21, 2019 9:59 am

Most people aren’t evil they’re just gullible. They have been taught bullshit for the last 30 years and they believe what they are taught.

Ivan Kinsman
January 21, 2019 12:56 pm

Most US sceptics have very little idea of the impact of climate change outside the US. Lucky for them they don’t live in a country being drastically impacted by it: https://www.dw.com/en/mali-resisting-climate-change/av-44648479

[Dupe comment in two other threads. .mod]

Marcus
Reply to  Ivan Kinsman
January 21, 2019 3:38 pm

Try living in Canada idjit !
“Coldest Ottawa snowstorm in more than 100 years”

https://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/articles/ottawa-sees-coldest-snowstorm-in-more-than-100-years-heavy-snow-extreme-cold-coldest-capital-on-earth/122869/

I would prefer a little more “Globull Warming” thanks….

Ivan Kinsman
Reply to  Marcus
January 21, 2019 11:03 pm

So how about if you did live in Mali? And why are you focusing on a one-off weather event like the wizard-in-chief does?

Reply to  Ivan Kinsman
January 22, 2019 11:53 am

Here’s the average annual rainfall graph for Mali from 1919 to 2017. Looks like a much bigger drop in the 1980s than now, and now appears to be much the same as 1919.

comment image?s=mliprec&v=201801181707a1&d1=19190101&d2=20191231

So where’s the “climate change” there?

Ivan Kinsman
Reply to  James Schrumpf
January 22, 2019 12:06 pm

All I see is a graph from Trading Economics that could be about the annual price of donkeys in Mali.

Ivan Kinsman
Reply to  James Schrumpf
January 22, 2019 12:10 pm

All I see is a graph from Trading Economics that could be referring to the annual price of donkeys…

whiten
January 21, 2019 3:47 pm

He is Great, isn’t he… 🙂

cheers