So what does “climate justice” have to do with women’s rights and pussyhats?

I’ve never understood what “climate justice” is all about. I understand it even less now.

This happened in my town today:

Hundreds march in downtown Chico for women’s rights 

I could not help but notice this photo, and the elements within.

People holding signs and cheering speeches gathered Saturday in City Plaza for the third annual Chico Women’s March in Chico. (Kayla Fitzgerald — Enterprise-Record)

Me thinks they are a bit confused.

What do you think?

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
160 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
R Shearer
January 19, 2019 6:59 pm

Urinals must be installed in all womxn’s restrooms.

Richard
Reply to  R Shearer
January 19, 2019 7:24 pm

Shurinals. For those that self identify as such.

R Shearer
Reply to  Richard
January 19, 2019 8:55 pm

🙂

icisil
Reply to  R Shearer
January 20, 2019 3:47 am

I would post a picture of a woman using a urinal, but I better not.

Barbara
Reply to  icisil
January 20, 2019 5:56 am

Please don’t, icisil.

icisil
Reply to  Barbara
January 20, 2019 7:00 am

No worries. I do like living on the humorous edge, but this is not the place to show what drunk people do sometimes.

Roger Knights
Reply to  icisil
January 20, 2019 10:47 am

In WW2 some war-industry plants, in women’s restrooms, there were female-oriented urinals.

Paula Cohen
Reply to  Roger Knights
January 20, 2019 2:03 pm

Can’t imagine what they looked like, but I wish they were in all women’s restrooms. Might relieve (no pun intended) some of the incredibly long lines that form in the hallways outside…

Gil
Reply to  icisil
January 20, 2019 11:36 am

Quite a few years ago there was exactly such a cartoon in a national magazine known for its many cartoons. Can’t remember which one – perhaps New Yorker or Playboy.

marlene
Reply to  R Shearer
January 20, 2019 5:23 am

LOL!!!

n.n
January 19, 2019 7:01 pm

A common cause. Cats in hats for social justice were pioneers of “carbon sequestration”.

Greg
Reply to  n.n
January 20, 2019 2:29 am

“Me thinks they are a bit confused.”

Do you really expect logic from a movement based on walking around with a woolen vagina on your head ??

Dave Fair
Reply to  Greg
January 20, 2019 1:02 pm

Vaghats.

Walter Sobchak
Reply to  n.n
January 20, 2019 7:42 am

All cats sequester their carbon waste. At least if you keep their litter boxes clean.

January 19, 2019 7:03 pm

Its obvious that men do more driving than women and should take responsibility for their actions!

Greg
Reply to  aletho
January 20, 2019 2:30 am

Yes, all men who drive should stop doing so and walk around with pink woolen vaginas on their heads. The world would be a much better place.

January 19, 2019 7:05 pm

Presumably, ‘Climate Justice’ comes when everyone in the population gets the climate that is just right for them. Who is going to engineer that change? Was it voted for under universal suffrage?

Hivemind
Reply to  Nicholas William Tesdorf
January 19, 2019 10:28 pm

And who is going to decide what is “right”? I, for one, would like Canberra’s winters to be about 6 degrees warmer. And snow at Christmas (summer)!

Greg
Reply to  Nicholas William Tesdorf
January 20, 2019 2:25 am

Yes, most people in Britain work hard all year to put a little money aside for a fortnight in Spain. The only way they get to see a bit of decent weather. Meanwhile lazy Spanish sit around all year in luxurious sunshine. This is most unjust.

30 deg. C is called “heat wave” in the UK. Climate must be changes so that everyone gets a fair amount of sunshine.

Milder winters must also be implemented because working households ( particularly in Scotland and northern England ) pay a large amount of their income simply to prevent them dying of cold in the winter. This is very unjust and hits the poorest hardest.

Global warming is not only good it is essential if we are to have climate justice !

Walter Sobchak
Reply to  Greg
January 20, 2019 7:50 am

I live in Ohio where it frequently his 30°C (86°F) in the Summer. I was in England last May. It was beautiful sunny spring and the temperatures got above 25°C (77°F). The locals mopped their brows and complained about how hot it was. I laughed at them, and told them that it was beautiful spring weather, and that I would tell them when it was hot.

January 19, 2019 7:06 pm

So they want colder? Looks cold to me but I’m an Aussie.
What is ‘Climate Justice’, anyway?

commieBob
Reply to  John of Cloverdale, Western Australia
January 19, 2019 7:28 pm

Climate justice is when protesters protesting global warming are met with a blizzard. Some have called it the Al Gore effect.

dennisambler
Reply to  commieBob
January 20, 2019 9:27 am

Appropriately, it was VP Al Gore who encouraged the whole “climate justice” meme. The link below contains commentary on Environmental Justice by long-time activist Robert Bullard and a critic, David Friedman.

https://web.archive.org/web/20041124165112/http://www.d.umn.edu/~bmunson/Courses/Educ4234/ERacism-4234.pdf

David Friedman’s article from 1998 was entitled The “Environmental Racism” Hoax. He showed the origin of the policy and how it was used by the Clinton Administration in the person of Carol Browner, to force through environmental regulations: This is how he described it:

“Environmental justice” entered the activist playbook after a failed 1982 effort to block a hazardous-waste landfill in a predominantly black North Carolina county. One of the protesters was the District of Columbia’s congressional representative, who returned to Washington and prodded the General Accounting Office (GAO) to investigate whether noxious environmental risks were disproportionately sited in minority communities. A year later, the GAO said that they were. Superfund and similar toxic dumps, it appeared, were disproportionately located in non-white neighborhoods.”

“Few of the relevant studies were peer-reviewed; all made critical errors. Properly analyzed, the data revealed that waste sites are just as likely to be located in white neighborhoods, or in areas where minorities moved only after permits were granted.”

In 1992, a Democrat-controlled Congress ignored environmental justice legislation introduced by then-Senator Al Gore. Toxic racism made headlines, but not policy.

All of that changed with the Clinton-Gore victory. Vice President Gore got his former staffer Carol Browner appointed head of the EPA and brought Chavis, Bullard, and other activists into the transition government. The administration touted environmental justice as one of the symbols of its new approach.

In 1994, Bill Clinton issued an executive order, directing that every federal agency make environmental justice part of its mission.”

In 2004, the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation published a document called “Climate Change and the African American Community”: https://web.archive.org/web/20110910052827/http://www.nccecojustice.org/downloads/Climate%20of%20Change.pdf

One claim they made was:
“African Americans are less responsible for climate change than other Americans; historically and at present, African Americans emit less greenhouse gas.”

The same theme is now applied to developing countries in the efforts to garner £100 billion a year for the UN “Green Climate Fund” and compensation for our past “carbon” sins against them.

Krudd Gillard of the Commondebt of Australia
Reply to  John of Cloverdale, Western Australia
January 19, 2019 9:08 pm

Climate Justice is a two part saga:

Part 1: we sign up to agreements to transfer our wealth to China and a bunch of under developed countries. We end up poor. They end up rich without having to get out of bed in the morning. They dictate terms to us. We become enslaved, ruled over by a quisling government made up of those who got us to transfer our wealth.

Part 2: The beneficiaries of our wealth squander it. Everyone ends up equally poor and wretched.

And there you have it. Climate Justice.

Reply to  Krudd Gillard of the Commondebt of Australia
January 19, 2019 10:07 pm

How come no Political leader of Think Tanks of Developed Countries understand this simple logic.

Reply to  Ashok Patel
January 19, 2019 10:18 pm

Typo:
How come no Political leaders or Think Tanks of Developed Countries understand this simple logic.

LdB
Reply to  Ashok Patel
January 19, 2019 10:41 pm

Left wing main stream media only reports think tanks from left wing groups. There are plenty of right wing think tanks that take a very different view but they won’t get leftist media attention.

Let us call it the Griff effect 🙂

Serge Wright
Reply to  John of Cloverdale, Western Australia
January 19, 2019 11:49 pm

Climate justice is just another fake lefty moral cause that provides yet another justification to extract more of the government largesse.

January 19, 2019 7:11 pm

It’s the dress sense I love…

Kenji
Reply to  Jimmy Haigh
January 19, 2019 8:36 pm

None of them will be hurrying home to get ready for a date tonight. Not even a scissor the timbers date.

R Shearer
Reply to  Kenji
January 19, 2019 9:10 pm

It’s nice to see Michelle Obama [pruned].

Percy Jackson
Reply to  R Shearer
January 19, 2019 9:18 pm

And it is good to see that casual racism is alive and well on this website.

Jeff Mitchell
Reply to  Percy Jackson
January 19, 2019 10:08 pm

Google “Bush chimp” and report back.

LdB
Reply to  Percy Jackson
January 19, 2019 10:44 pm

I doubt you will find many remotely condone but you do nothing but straw man argument drive bys.

icisil
Reply to  Percy Jackson
January 20, 2019 3:51 am

It’s not good to see casual identity politics alive and well anywhere.

MarkW
Reply to  Percy Jackson
January 20, 2019 7:17 am

Good to see that leftists still consider any criticism of a minority to be proof of racism.
Then again, it’s not like we’ve ever been presented any evidence that Zeus’s illegitimate son is even capable of thinking.

cosmic
Reply to  Percy Jackson
January 20, 2019 11:44 am

She looks like a heavyweight boxer. I mean those arms…THOSE ARMS! Has nothing to do with racism. Just like my disagreeing with her husband on almost all political issues. Not his color…his content. See how that works.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  Percy Jackson
January 20, 2019 8:44 pm

During his term, Obama has brought us closer to the brink of war with placement of military assets closer to the border of Russia.

TeaPartyGeezer
Reply to  R Shearer
January 19, 2019 9:48 pm

Moderator … I agree with Percy Jackson. The comment by R Shearer is disgusting AND is totally off-topic. It can be used as an example of WUWT ‘racism’ and ought to be removed.

RobR
Reply to  TeaPartyGeezer
January 19, 2019 9:58 pm

Mods?

Lancifer
Reply to  R Shearer
January 19, 2019 10:26 pm

I haven’t a PC bone in my body, but comparing Michelle Obama, or any other African American, to a non-human primate is ugly and invites people to label this site as racist.

The Cob
Reply to  Lancifer
January 19, 2019 11:05 pm

Are we able to compare white people to primates? Or is it only Africans that you’re concerned about. Don’t you think white people are comparable?

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Lancifer
January 20, 2019 3:50 am

so go look for bushchimp
it was damned funny and i know i spent time there laughing.
NO ONE said diddly about that being racist
and its just dandy to call trump the orange man, I hear jackschitt about that racism either.
oh I forgot
its ONLY racism if your anything but white? right?

Bryan A
Reply to  Lancifer
January 20, 2019 9:00 am

Genetically speaking 98.4% comparable
But it’s that 1.6% difference that gives us the abstract thought to create over utilize

Greg
Reply to  R Shearer
January 20, 2019 2:36 am

Who pruned Michelle Obama , why is this good to see? I’m confused.

LdB
Reply to  Greg
January 20, 2019 6:02 am

It had an obvious racist rant after it if you read the comments you can work out what it was. The mods pruned it but personally I would removed the post and ban the poster but that isn’t my call.

Hivemind
Reply to  Jimmy Haigh
January 19, 2019 10:31 pm

You know what the little girls said. If I grow up ugly, I can always be a feminist. And these women dressed for it.

commieBob
January 19, 2019 7:20 pm

Pink pussy hats are so ‘last month’. They have to get with the times.

The reason: The sentiment that the pink pussyhat excludes and is offensive to transgender women and gender nonbinary people who don’t have typical female genitalia and to women of color because their genitals are more likely to be brown than pink. link

Don’t they know that women have penises these days?

My brain hurts. That’s OK, I have an antidote, a wonderful bottle of single malt that I have been saving for just this occasion.

Graemethecat
Reply to  commieBob
January 20, 2019 1:51 am

Leftists are locked in a terminal purity spiral, and are starting to turn on one another.

Dave Fair
Reply to  Graemethecat
January 20, 2019 1:11 pm

All radical movements end up like the French Revolution; killing each other, along with their perceived enemies.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  commieBob
January 20, 2019 3:47 am

get another bottle;-) cos in UK theyre now running classes”boys have periods too”
because?
notboys wanna use the lil boys rooms

Reply to  commieBob
January 20, 2019 9:21 am

Don’t they know that gender and sex aren’t the same thing?

Glen Michel
January 19, 2019 7:20 pm

As they say these days – you gotta come out before you go in!

Donald Kasper
January 19, 2019 7:20 pm

Movements converging to look for funding and donation sources.

January 19, 2019 7:20 pm

What they have in common is the people behind the protests. They reject logic and elevate their feelings above reason. “I feel…” has become more important than “I think…”

Barbara
Reply to  stinkerp
January 20, 2019 6:05 am

stonkerp: “I feel…” has become more important than “I think…”

There’s no “has become” with these clowns; they don’t understand “I think”; they’ve always “felt” those words are a foreign language they can’t be expected to speak – maybe Martian.

Paula Cohen
Reply to  stinkerp
January 20, 2019 2:08 pm

That’s because they’re incapable of thinking!

John F. Hultquist
January 19, 2019 7:21 pm

Regarding the signs —
I’ve not paid attention to the visuals of this art form, being more inclined to read the opinion pieces about how the whole movement has fractured.
In the posted photo I see 2 signs on round cut-outs. Nearest says “climate justice” and the other (of a different color combination) says Chico 350.”
Can I assume the #350 refers to weepy Bill’s group? If so, someone should tell the person to re-calibrate.
Regarding shape and color: Is there a meaning in the ‘sun’ or ‘sunflower’ aspect?

Finally, is there an “app” that can remove everything in the image that is Carbon-based?

Fraizer
Reply to  John F. Hultquist
January 19, 2019 8:10 pm

Got your app right here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKbtnviUfHc

Do it from orbit, it’s the only way to be sure.

markl
January 19, 2019 7:23 pm

Just another chance to blow their horn.

Barbara
Reply to  markl
January 20, 2019 6:07 am

That’s the only thing that will get blown around them. (Oops – did I say that?)

Tom Halla
January 19, 2019 7:30 pm

“Climate justice” is about being an orthodox trendy person on the left. It doesn’t matter if the causes you are backing are mutually inconsistent, as long as one is on the correct side.

Kenji
Reply to  Tom Halla
January 19, 2019 8:48 pm

Climate justice: if you are a Caucasian Western 1st worlder, you OWE everything you own to a person ov culller from the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th worlds. You OWE them every institution and industry you’ve built. Oh, and all your money. Why? Because you MADE China a disgusting eco-shithole. Because you STOLE every resource of Africa. Because people ovvv culller want your stuff. Want … reparations … and there are so many sucker white folk who will fall for the “eco-angle” … we gonna get over on ya. Oh, and yeah, we be teachin dis to all dem white girls in college. Deys can make up de reparations in other ways, yo!

Why, yes … we did learn this shakedown tactic from Jesse Jackson. Give us FREE STUFF or we’s gonna scream RACIST!

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Kenji
January 20, 2019 3:58 am

🙂 here in aus the greens and others are since last yr now trying to ban Australia day from being held on the day cook and his pommy mates landed.
I dont personally give a rats re Cook and his thuggee mob who were running white slaves ie prisoners for the King back home.
I dont go the park for the bbq and nationalism
but, that said that was the day they landed and claimed land
and whatever anyone else thinks they can have their get togethers as they see fit.
been a bit latch on by usa agitprop types trying to get out aboriginals to call emselves first nations copying amerIndian memes.
damned near 230?+ yrs
the land got claimed developed and weve spent billions on housing education n health nd whatever for our “opressed???”
dont see much improvement
the same issus you have there in usa
never happy always wanting more.

Barbara
Reply to  ozspeaksup
January 20, 2019 6:11 am

“never happy always wanting more”

That pretty well sums up the whole Left everywhere, ozspeaks. I’d try it, but just thinking about it wears me out.

Reply to  ozspeaksup
January 20, 2019 9:29 am

They’ve done the same in parts of the US, getting rid of Columbus Day and renaming it Indigenous Peoples Day. I can see why people might feel that way. But, are we to roll back EVERY civilization that invaded another in anyway since the dawn of time? Og Day should be renamed Glug Day, since Og’s tribe invaded Glug’s back in 100,000 BC.

Geoff Sherrington
Reply to  ozspeaksup
January 20, 2019 6:39 pm

Try Governor Phillip, 1788 and forget Capt Cook 1770 sailing by.
Do try for at least a little historical accuracy. Geoff

Rich Davis
Reply to  Kenji
January 20, 2019 7:47 am

There are race hustlers like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton who deserve to be called out, but I don’t think you advance your argument mimicking black dialect. It can be interpreted as a slur on all black people. If you want people to be reasonable, be reasonable.

January 19, 2019 7:32 pm

Some of those Women’s March signs read:
Climate Justice, Stop 45, Chico 350.

Nothing to do with women’s rights.
All clear signs of a derangement that pre-dates Donald Trump as 45th US President.

President Trump has just been their trigger to anxiety attacks.
And the socialist-Democrats play their “Chicken Little mind games” on these vulnerable mentally ill people.

The only way forward to not to hide the insanity, but to let sane middle America see what the Democratic Party has become — total insanity in the pursuit of power to take away liberties so far guaranteed by the US constitution. Those Bill of Rights liberties gone forever are no more than a 5-4 Supreme Court ruling away. It is why the Liberals have made Supreme Court justice confirmations so nasty the last 30 years. A progressive Supreme Court was their path to socialism in the US.

Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s recent lung cancer and lobectomy is just another major source of anxiety for that group in your photo Anthony. IMO, RBG will be in hospice care by this coming summer: two tumors on one lung are not a primary tumor, but simply evidence of a metastasis — a spreading malignancy that will claim her life within the year. The battle to replace her with Trump as President and 53 Republican votes in the US Senate will make last October’s Brett Kavanaugh circus-come-tragedy confirmation look mild.

John F. Hultquist
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
January 19, 2019 7:44 pm

About Ruth Bader Ginsberg, you may be correct.
About this time of year in 1980, my mother — then 72 — was diagnosed with lung cancer.
She died July 1 of that year.
This is a terrible ordeal.
I wish her, family, and friends the best that it can be.

Reply to  John F. Hultquist
January 19, 2019 7:57 pm

John,
My Grandfather (my mother’s father), age 57, in Spring 1975 was diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancer. He was a life-long smoker. He died in July 1975, age 58, almost the same age I am today (I turn 57 soon).

My Grandmother (my father’s mother), a life-long smoker, age 64 in 1980 suffered a mild heart attack. In the hospital recovery a lung x-ray revealed as small tumor on one lung lobe. She had a lobectomy at age 62. And she lived another 31 years. The difference was both age and catching the primary tumor before it spread (metastasized). In my Grandfather, his cancer had already metastasized to his lungs and internal organs. He was dead in less than 4 months.

I do not wish that on anyone. But life and death happens. We each need to be prepared for that.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
January 19, 2019 8:02 pm

errata: my Grandmother was 64 when she had her lobe-ectomy.
(I miss edit)

Dave Fair
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
January 20, 2019 1:21 pm

Please note that Robert Francis O’Rourke (of Beto fame) said the U.S. Constitution was out of date because our Founding Fathers came from an earlier age.

There are no enduring truths for radical socialists.

Windsong
January 19, 2019 7:33 pm

What is the fascination with 350 ppm for CO2? Why not 250, or whatever magical number existed in the climate utopia pre-industrial period? Chico and the Sacramento River Valley are prime farming areas. I think the person holding the “Chico 350” would be better off holding a sign that says “Chico 450.” Wonder if anyone would even notice, let alone understand the message.

noaaprogrammer
Reply to  Windsong
January 19, 2019 9:18 pm

Try “Chico 666!”

Hivemind
Reply to  Windsong
January 19, 2019 10:36 pm

1,000 ppm is way better for plants than 250 ppm, which stresses them because it is so low.

MarkW
Reply to  Windsong
January 20, 2019 7:29 am

350ppm was just a little bit above the CO2 concentration at the time the group was formed.
There were a lot of climate “scientists” who were proclaiming that breaking the 350 barrier would result in irreparable harm to the environment.

Paula Cohen
January 19, 2019 7:34 pm

I’m with John Cloverdale of Western Australia. What in the hell is “climate justice?” Does that mean it should be warm and sunny on me, but cold and miserable on people I dislike? And how does one engineer that particular feat? We’re talking about one weird bunch of people in one weird state!

John F. Hultquist
Reply to  Paula Cohen
January 19, 2019 8:00 pm

“climate justice” has nothing to do with the weather/climate.
It is the framework on which the redistribution of wealth and Agenda UN2030 is constructed.
In simple terms:
If you have more quality of life than anyone else, give it up until everyone is equally distressed.
Someone has to be in charge of this process. That’s where the UN enters the picture.

Eric Brownson
Reply to  John F. Hultquist
January 19, 2019 8:19 pm

John, thanks for the brilliant analysis and explanation. I hope you don’t mind that I am borrowing it for future use.

Reply to  Eric Brownson
January 20, 2019 3:59 am

“Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.” —Perth, Scotland, 28 May 1948

“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.” —House of Commons, 22 October 1945

Winston Churchill

Gary
Reply to  HotScot
January 20, 2019 5:17 am

Regarding equal sharing of miseries:

“Some animals are more equal than others.”

-George Orwell, in Animal Farm.

Barbara
Reply to  Paula Cohen
January 20, 2019 6:15 am

Paula Cohen: “What in the hell is ‘climate justice?’ Does that mean it should be warm and sunny on me, but cold and miserable on people I dislike?”

Nailed it! 😀

Paula Cohen
Reply to  Barbara
January 20, 2019 4:49 pm

Thanks! Occasionally I do get the reality of things. 🙂

William
January 19, 2019 7:36 pm

They are playing to self-identified emo idiots.

Paula Cohen
Reply to  William
January 19, 2019 8:09 pm

California should secede from the U.S. They believe they’re superior to the rest of the country anyway, so good riddance to ’em. My brother, who lives there (and is not your typical Left-coaster) had a joke about CA. Why, he would ask me, is California like a breakfast cereal? Answer? Because it’s full of flakes, fruits, and nuts. And that’s truer now than ever before!

MarkG
Reply to  Paula Cohen
January 19, 2019 8:55 pm

Thing is, it’s not California per se, it’s the big cities. As is true in much of the West, the cities are mostly left-wing and the countryside around them is mostly right-wing; as is inevitable, because living in the country tends to require an actual connection to reality, which life in a modern city does not.

But LA and SF seceding will never happen, because the rural areas don’t need the cities, but the cities need the rural areas.

Dave Fair
Reply to  Paula Cohen
January 20, 2019 1:25 pm

Actually, the Continental U.S. tilts to the SW and everything loose rolls into CA.

Jon Jewett
January 19, 2019 7:37 pm

I have read (and it may be true) that pink p***y hats have been deemed racist by SJWs.

They exclude women of color. (I am not making it up. It could be true although I haven’t made a statistically valid sampling.)

Garland Lowe
Reply to  Jon Jewett
January 19, 2019 8:08 pm
R Shearer
Reply to  Garland Lowe
January 19, 2019 8:47 pm

Most of them should be wearing hats of a different orifice, sounds something like the planet Uranus.

Jon Jewett
Reply to  Garland Lowe
January 19, 2019 8:54 pm

Thank you for the link. I still need to make a statistically valid survey to verify the racist claim. Given my age (old) and my wife (ill humored) I doubt that I will complete the survey in my life time.

Reply to  Jon Jewett
January 19, 2019 8:24 pm

It is also rank discrimination against those who identify as “womyn” – but without the corresponding parts (natural or artificial).

LdB
Reply to  Writing Observer
January 19, 2019 8:44 pm

Those of us who identify as toasters definitely victimized we generally only come in white, black and silver.

Bryan A
Reply to  LdB
January 20, 2019 9:04 am

I have one of your hard working brethren in red

Reply to  LdB
January 20, 2019 2:36 pm

The best toaster I ever had was an old Sunbeam “Radiant Control”.
Just put the bread in and it would automatically lower it and then raise it when it was done.
Old toasters had a bi-metal arm with the contacts on the end that would bend as it got hot. When it bent enough it would break the electrical contacts. Most responded to the internal temperature of the toaster itself. (Some had a small element wrapped around the bi-metal.) This Sunbeam responded to the temperature of the surface of the bread. All I ever had to do to it was readjust it and replace the cord.
It was date stamped Nov 4, 1955. It finally died around 2013.
They make ’em like they used too.
It was silver with a black “Bakelite” base.
I never identified with it but I did like it a lot.
(Not that I ever wanted stick anything but bread in it.)

Patrick MJD
January 19, 2019 7:38 pm

All those synthetic, fossil fuel derived, warm clothes. Try same wearing a burlap bag.

IainC of The Ponds
January 19, 2019 7:38 pm

Given what hats they are wearing, perhaps the signs are meant to say “climax justice”?

MarkW
January 19, 2019 7:53 pm

As near as I can tell, “Equal Rights” means “I get everything I want”.

LdB
Reply to  MarkW
January 19, 2019 9:12 pm

Yep they are alive so they are entitled to a percentage of the worlds resources it’s a straight socialist mentality.

Reply to  LdB
January 20, 2019 2:52 pm

I remember reading “The Little Red Hen” when I was a kid.
http://www.glodwick.oldham.sch.uk/_documents/%5B13748%5DThe_Little_Red_Hen.pdf
I doubt it’s still readily available to kids today. (Wrong kind of “red”.)

H.R.
January 19, 2019 7:53 pm

The appropriate response to these protesters was given long ago by a great American philosopher.

“Stuff a sock in it, Edith!”

~Archie Bunker

John Boland
January 19, 2019 8:12 pm

Big mistake giving women the right to vote…they are driven by emotions and not reason. That is why humanity is on a death march toward Marxism…

Reply to  John Boland
January 19, 2019 8:30 pm

I will defer one one point and state:

We are not Humans without our emotions.
Our emotions can help us stop another Nazi-style genocide on an entire population. We must.

But also our emotions are what leads to the genocide to begin with. The hatred of another group is also emotions. What Women’s March has strayed from IMO is Gentle Compassion. That compassion you find in the truly humble priest/pastor when you are looking for the Grace of God.

Those Women in Anthony’s photo are not full of compassion. They are filled with a hatred. A hatred fueled by a progressive Democratic Party messaging that they consume now like bread. The Party of Nancy Pelosi and Chucky Schumer – The Party of Hate and Envy – today’s Democrats.

John Boland
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
January 19, 2019 8:50 pm

I agree, of course…Your points are well taken and I know a lot of women who do have their emotions in check, but there seems no doubt that emotions are ruling the day in western societies, so much so that we are now even confused about our biological sex…and we come up with absurdities such as climate justice.

Michael Jankowski
Reply to  John Boland
January 19, 2019 8:31 pm

Morons like you still get to vote.

LdB
Reply to  Michael Jankowski
January 19, 2019 8:46 pm

+1000 if IQ was a requirement he is definitely missing out

John Boland
Reply to  Michael Jankowski
January 19, 2019 8:52 pm

So do beta males like you…think a little.

LdB
Reply to  John Boland
January 19, 2019 9:15 pm

Trolling is probably stretching your intellect to the max all we can hope for is Darwinian theory to kick in and without a mate your genes will be removed from the pool.

old construction worker
Reply to  John Boland
January 19, 2019 11:24 pm

Under our first voting laws only property owners could vote. Sex didn’t make a difference. Guess which political party started changing the state voting laws where men could only vote? Democrats.

Juan Slayton
Reply to  old construction worker
January 20, 2019 6:53 am

…property owners could vote. Sex didn’t make a difference.

Interesting, if true. Got a reference for that, maybe an example of women voting around 1800?

Bryan A
Reply to  Juan Slayton
January 20, 2019 9:11 am

Are there any examples of women holding property titles around 1800?
Just curious…

Reply to  Juan Slayton
January 20, 2019 3:58 pm

Women and free blacks could vote in New Jersey from 1776 – 1807. This according to Smithsonian, which initially claimed it was Republicans who changed the law. They now have a disclaimer at the bottom of the page, but for ignorant Democrat partisans the misrepresentation probably stuck. There was no Republican party in 1807.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/why-black-people-and-women-lost-vote-new-jersey-180967186/

ozspeaksup
Reply to  John Boland
January 20, 2019 4:07 am

oh yeah right…. so the UNreasoning idiot men who keep starting wars are not the teeniest bit driven by emotions?
like greed/ hate/power?
at all?
roflmao!
females n marxism?
che? mao, and the rest appeared to be blokes to me.

Carl Yee
January 19, 2019 8:18 pm

Hairy Armpits, legs and pussy hats? Is that what it means?

Kenji
January 19, 2019 8:33 pm

What do I think?

I think the pussyhat wearing womyn marcher (more like shuffling) in San Diego this morning, who chastised (screamed at) my son in law for opening and holding a door for my daughter needs to go fkcu herself. I assume it will be a solo operation based on her looks and personality. Hint: Listen Miss … there is no “equality” in bitchiness … you’ve got wayyyy more of that than any of my daughters … which is the way I raised the,. Yes, You are a nasssssssty womyn. One to be avoided at all cost.

1 2 3