Forget El Nino, StormFest is about to Hit the West Coast

Reposted from Cliff Mass Weather and Climate Blog

Thursday, January 3, 2019

Forget El Nino, StormFest is about to Hit the West Coast

Things often calm down after January 1 during El Nino years….but not this year…with the U.S. West Coast from central California to Washington State about to be pummeled by a series of storms.   Rain, snow, wind?  Plenty for everyone.

A view of the latest infrared satellite imagery shows an amazing line-up of one storm after another stretching way into the Pacific.  A traffic jam of storms.

Let’s examine our stormy future, using a series of sea level pressure forecasts from the UW WRF weather forecast models (solid lines are sea level pressure, shading in lower atmosphere temperature).

At 10 PM today, a  strong low is just off the northern tip of Vancouver Island.

slp.30.0000

10AM Saturday brings an energetic low center into northern CA.

10 PM Sunday?   Another storm hits central Oregon!  And another system is in the wings.

That storm is right off our coast late Wednesday.

El Nino late winters generally have less action—not so this year! 

What about precipitation you ask?   Do you really want to know?  The accumulated total through 4 AM next Thursday is impressive, with 5-10 inches over many mountain areas and even 10-20 inches over parts of northern CA, the Olympics and southern BC.

 

Snow?   There will be abundant amounts.   For example, here is the accumulated snowfall for the 72 hours ending 4 PM Wednesday.  2-3 feet for the high terrain from the central Sierra Nevada to southern BC.  Our winter ski season is secure.

Wind?  You bet.  Each of these storms will bring strong, damaging winds to a favored area of the coastal zone and mountain peaks.

There is a silver lining of all this action of course:  it will provide an immense amount of water to fill our reservoirs and enhance our snowpack, a snowpack that is now in pretty decent shape (see latest summary below).  Water resources should be fine next summer.

But all these facts on the ground and favorable forecasts don’t stop some of Seattle’s wacky local media from talking about drought for our region, with the Seattle Stranger being one of the worst (see below).  Facts should matter—apparently not at the Stranger.

HT/DavidB

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
82 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bear
January 6, 2019 10:06 am

Of course there’s actually a drought. It’s just a very wet one.

Gary Hagland
Reply to  Bear
January 6, 2019 10:18 am

Agree. This is the wettest drought we’ve seen in a long time.

shrnfr
Reply to  Gary Hagland
January 6, 2019 10:33 am

That is because it is oxygen-di-hydride this year instead of di-hydrogen-monoxide.

Reply to  shrnfr
January 6, 2019 10:34 pm

Oxidane sounds scarier.

Rich Davis
Reply to  Bear
January 6, 2019 10:52 am

It’s much worse than we thought. These extreme weather patterns are just what we would expect from Climate Change.

Reply to  Rich Davis
January 6, 2019 11:50 am

True.
Also what we expect from Climate Same.

Bryan A
Reply to  Menicholas
January 6, 2019 9:41 pm

Exactly what Ca saw in Feb 1862

Esteban Cafe
Reply to  Rich Davis
January 7, 2019 10:29 am

In South America we call it “weather.”

brians356
Reply to  Rich Davis
January 7, 2019 12:20 pm

The current weather patterns are not “extreme”, they’re “normal”. But you meant well.

ggm
Reply to  Bear
January 6, 2019 2:41 pm

It’s just like that global warming that’s colder. And that sea level rise that doesn’t rise. And the worsening and more frequent storms that occur less frequently and are less powerful. And the reduced crop harvests that are record crop harvests. And as for no more snow – that’s usually an extra foot of snow.

Kenji
Reply to  Bear
January 6, 2019 5:29 pm

Jerry Brown’s … neverending CA drought caused by your sinfulness for using fossil fuels.

Aka … EXXTREME weather … REALLY EXXXXXTREEEME!!!!!

Esteban Cafe
Reply to  Bear
January 7, 2019 10:28 am

It’s a ‘man caused disaster drought’ because CA is simply going to flush all their H2O into the ocean.

January 6, 2019 10:17 am

This is obviously due to climate change,
or aliens.

I noted this forecast was not as precise
as forecasts of the planet’s average temperature
100 years in the future, which are accurate
to three decimal places.

2hotel9
January 6, 2019 10:27 am

Folks in Cali where the fires were so bad? Get your debris and flooding control fencing up, quick.

kenw
Reply to  2hotel9
January 6, 2019 11:13 am

…but get approval 1st….

2hotel9
Reply to  kenw
January 6, 2019 3:51 pm

[snip…clean up your act…mod]

Reply to  2hotel9
January 6, 2019 4:08 pm

Your comment appears to have hit the threshold of three strikes:
.
1) No vulgarities of any kind
2) ditto for people that make threats.
3) other detritus that add nothing to further the discussion
.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/policy/

Moderator?

2hotel9
Reply to  Steve Heins
January 6, 2019 4:10 pm

[strike 2…mod]

rah
January 6, 2019 10:40 am

The blob is gone. The El Nino a Modoki has finally manifested in the SSTs. If Joe Bastardi and the guys at Weatherbell are correct, we in the east are in for an extended period of far below average temps starting about the middle of this month and stretching into March. Old Man Winter hasn’t forgotten about us in the Ohio Valley and points south it seems.

January 6, 2019 10:57 am

I remember El Nino winters that had late season storm activity on and near the West Coast. For example, storms in SoCal in February 1983, including one that produced a tornado. Also, with this winter’s storm activity being mostly in and north of northern California, with the weakness of this winter’s El Nino, and with a history of storms like these having happened before in non-El-Nino winters, I don’t think the current El Nino is the main reason for these storms.

January 6, 2019 11:08 am

I think the expression ‘one should be careful what one wishes for’ is appropriate here.

But the thing is, alarmists don’t actually want rain. They really do want the world to burn to a crisp just so they can say “Told you so”.

That’s their only motivation.

Reply to  HotScot
January 6, 2019 11:31 am

Where it matters, this sequence of storms will bring snow and lots of it. Snow rather than rain is another thing that alarmists can’t reconcile with CAGW. For some reason they fail to understand that it always gets cold in the winter. In the same way they fail to understand that polar ice will always reform in the winter because it’s dark for 20-24 hours a day.

dave g
Reply to  co2isnotevil
January 6, 2019 4:53 pm

More importantly than being dark, it get cold. Much colder than necessary to form ice… Like Much much colder than necessary.

January 6, 2019 11:13 am

I like this site for storms hitting the west coast.

https://opensnow.com/dailysnow/tahoe

Reply to  co2isnotevil
January 6, 2019 12:38 pm

Open Snow is the best! I use them for storm updates in the central rockies

January 6, 2019 11:17 am

When folks get fixed on an opinion or with the climate stuff a dread, no change is allowed.
Too many want anxiety and fear. Then when counseled that CAGW is no real threat, they don’t smile with relief. They get angry, right up to furious.
And then there are the mildly delusional.
A long time ago I was transferred to Winnipeg, where it can get really cold.
I found out what it is like to walk (ten minutes) to work at 49 below. No wind chill BS.
But the locals when learning I was from Vancouver, would tell stories about how cold it was on the West Coast when it was only at freezing.
“Because it was so damp.”
But in the Prairies while the cold was down to whatever, it was OK. “Because it is a dry cold.”
This would be in the face of a weather report saying it was sunny, blue skies, no wind, at 30 below–and–95 percent relative humidity.
It is the way the physics works, but locals were OK because they really believed it was a “dry cold”.
The subject of blindingly thick ice fog at 35 below will be left to another posting.

Pamela Matlack-Klein
Reply to  Bob Hoye
January 6, 2019 12:02 pm

Yeah, you know how they are always saying 110 F in Arizona is ok because it is a dry heat? Well, I was hauling a trailer full of Arabians through some of that “dry heat” and the horses, the truck, my co-driver, and I were all in total agreement, it was HOT and we were all miserable until we got back east.

getitright
Reply to  Pamela Matlack-Klein
January 7, 2019 10:46 am

I was hauling a trailer full of Arabians through some of that “dry heat”

___________________________________

Had to do a double take there as I at first visualized a trailer full of illegal aliens……..LOL

BillJ
January 6, 2019 11:25 am

“Water resources should be fine next summer.”

Early January seems way too early to make such a statement. At least in California the wettest months are February and March.

After last night’s storm Mammoth is about 1/3 of normal for the season which is a great start but obviously no where close to ensuring adequate summer water supplies.

Reply to  BillJ
January 6, 2019 7:37 pm

There are 4 or 5 storms stacked up in the Pacific, so if it keeps up, we’ll have Fourth of July skiing at Mammoth this year, or even into August like a few of years ago. That same year, even Squaw was open on the 4’th of July.

The summer snow patches I hike to and ski North of Yosemite along the PCT have been steadily increasing since the end of the last drought and I anticipate they will continue to grow.

Esteban Cafe
Reply to  BillJ
January 7, 2019 10:34 am

Where are the Californians going to store all this “adequate” rain fall ? They haven’t put up a dam in years–in fact they’ve torn several down. They’ll flush this god-send and then bitch about it later when they have to put in AZ lawns.
20 years ago I recall many Californians driving around with a bumper sticker stating, “Build it, Dam it !”

January 6, 2019 11:32 am

It would seem that ‘el nino’ weather patterns are no more predictable than any other type of weather patterns.
Full marks to the Planet for refusing to read from the script!

Esteban Cafe
Reply to  Charles Nelson
January 7, 2019 10:35 am

But, but, the climate models !

January 6, 2019 11:37 am

Southern Arizona is already on track to have a spring wildflower season the likes of which haven’t been seen in a while. 1 inch of slow steady rain last night soaked everything and put more snow in the high elevations.

Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
January 6, 2019 2:16 pm

Most likely. A day trip up towards the Biosphere / Oracle is indicated for around mid to late March.

We’ll probably have a lot of blooming (and fat) cacti, too.

2hotel9
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
January 6, 2019 4:04 pm

Cool! Please get us some nice pictures, ya know, so we can throw them in the blank, un-reponsive faces of the Humanity Haters. That is always fun!

Olen
January 6, 2019 11:51 am

Not unusual, just overdue.

John F. Hultquist
January 6, 2019 11:53 am

60 mph wind knocks out power to over 320,000 across Western Washington

Scott Sistek, KOMO Seattle

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  John F. Hultquist
January 7, 2019 6:35 am

A very strong thunderstorm came through Whidbey Island on Saturday night/Sunday morning. I was awoken by an explosion, which turned out to be thunder. It only took about 5 minutes, very close lighting and very heavy driving rain swept through. Extremely rare for this area.

I grew up in Northern VA, so I am used to thunderstorms in the spring and summer, but here, lighting is almost non-existent. So it was kind of a treat. Didn’t lose power for more than a half second or so, not like a couple weeks ago when power was out for 4 days and our 10kw generator decided to give up the ghost.

Olen
January 6, 2019 11:53 am

Can’t be a duplicate. Never posted comment this article before. Check your checker.

Bryan A
Reply to  Olen
January 6, 2019 9:55 pm

When posting a comment, if you hit your enter key twice by accident (like a double click) you will get that duplicate posting warning.

January 6, 2019 11:57 am

The headline sez:
“Washington State Could Face Drought in 2019”

Well, they did say “could”. So they didn’t actually lie.
Just like all of climate change pseudo-science BS, there could be 3 deg C climate warming by 2100. Global SLR could reach 1 meter by 2100. Liberals could stop lying their asses-off for political power. Pigs could sprout wings and fly.

My money is on the pigs with wings thing happening before any of the others.

Glacial Erratic
January 6, 2019 12:05 pm

If you’re a skier looking for fresh powder I like this site: https://powderchasers.com/

Hot, dry summers and drought are a fact of life in Washington State no matter how much snow we get in the winter. Sometimes a long, cool spring helps preserve the snow pack a bit longer, but inevitably most of the snow pack melts and we get hot and dry. At least that’s what I’ve noticed after living here for the last 43 years. However, the Cascades have permanent snow fields and glaciers plus the volcanoes, so we ski year round in Washington State.

John F. Hultquist
Reply to  Glacial Erratic
January 6, 2019 12:35 pm

We live in Washington State about 100 miles east of Seattle.
We get about 9 inches of total precipitation (water equivalent) per year.
Southeast of us 50 miles, total precip is close to 5 inches. Every summer the temp goes to 100°F (38C°), and higher. Winter temp can get to -15°F (-26°C), although that seldom happens.
From a climate and biome perspective, Washington is very diverse – ocean beach, permanent mountain snow/ice, cold desert, and forests of pine, fir, and spruce.
In fact, this is what climates (note the s) are all about – not a tiny change in temperature over 50 years.

rah
Reply to  Glacial Erratic
January 6, 2019 1:08 pm

Yea but you better know what your doing if your going off-piste:
https://www.sierraavalanchecenter.org/advisory

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  rah
January 7, 2019 6:37 am

You’re and you’re. Fixed it for you.

Kevin A
January 6, 2019 1:02 pm

F. Hultquist
I’ve never seen a better skeptic talking point:
I live in a high desert area where last week it was -2F, during the summer it reaches over 100F and to prevent the temperature from reaching 101.5F they want to take 10% of my earnings, put me in a electric car and have me hunting down wood for a fire place for heat during the winter when storms roll thru. So far this winter I’ve burned up 35 gallons of fuel grading roads and the bad storms haven’t hit yet.

January 6, 2019 2:08 pm

What El Nino ? There is none.

rah
Reply to  Salvatore Del Prete
January 6, 2019 3:22 pm

Please tell me what that blob of warm water is in 3.4 then?
comment image

Reply to  rah
January 6, 2019 6:02 pm

El Nino 3.4 is below +.50c threshold last time I looked.

Bryan A
Reply to  Salvatore Del Prete
January 6, 2019 10:25 pm

currently at 0.58

Reply to  Bryan A
January 7, 2019 9:55 am

Wrong currently at+.49c

January 6, 2019 2:10 pm

It is not an El Nino winter. Those start rain in California in September. La Nina years, the rain starts in January to February. The rains this year started in November, and so are transitional.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Donald Kasper
January 7, 2019 6:40 am

Nino/Nina don’t always give you the same weather patterns. If you look at the data, it’s about 50/50 for either of them to be wet/cool or hot/dry, or vice versa.

Haverwilde
January 6, 2019 3:15 pm

Love the pictures. All those lovely storms normally they are aimed straight at me in SE Alaska. This year, (thank you God of Weather,) they are headed south of me toward lower B.C., WA, OR, and CA. Today the skies are clear, the weather is just below freezing and I am happy. Have a Great New Year all you What’s-up-ians.

Windsong
January 6, 2019 3:49 pm

Now that power is back on, I can check in and see what is going on. We may have hit a gust of ~60 mph at my house during last night’s windstorm. It was hefty enough to take off shingles above my garage, and knock down several sections of my neighbor’s fence. McChord Field at JBLM (TCM) had a gust of 61 mph at the same time we lost power. Cliff’s post on Saturday about the coming storm stated peak winds in southern Puget Sound could be quite high, based on UW forecasts. By comparison, the NWS did not issue a High Wind Warning for the Puget Sound area until approximately 1830 on Saturday. The NWS pinpoint forecast for my neighborhood was for gusts less than 50 mph. I wish.

Also, Cliff and Ryan Maue both have posts or tweets out today (1/6/19) showing the monster storm headed for the west coast with an ETA of Wednesday, 1/9/19. Could be an exciting week for weather geeks on the coast.

RACookPE1978
Editor
Reply to  Windsong
January 6, 2019 6:01 pm

windsong

Now that power is back on, I can check in and see what is going on. We may have hit a gust of ~60 mph at my house during last night’s windstorm. It was hefty enough to take off shingles above my garage, and knock down several sections of my neighbor’s fence. McChord Field at JBLM (TCM) had a gust of 61 mph at the same time we lost power. Cliff’s post on Saturday about the coming storm stated peak winds in southern Puget Sound could be quite high, based on UW forecasts. By comparison, the NWS did not issue a High Wind Warning for the Puget Sound area until approximately 1830 on Saturday. The NWS pinpoint forecast for my neighborhood was for gusts less than 50 mph.

(Raises hand, waves it briskly, wants to ask question!!! !!!!!)
So, with all of this “very predictable” windmill-power being generated across the Washington-Oregon-CA State grids by this storm, just how much wind energy was uselessly created during this “predicted” wind power “boom” and subsequent “bust” cycle? When the storm was over, how much was suddenly lost – and had to be made up by fossil generators being re-started? How much was generated across the TX state grid AFTER the rains and winds of 12-30, 12-31 were swept away and the whole state was basking in calm cloudy air with essentially NO winds on 1-2, 1-3, 1-4 this year?

Windsong
Reply to  RACookPE1978
January 6, 2019 7:34 pm

I can only report that fossil fueled backup electrical power in my own neighborhood kicked in immediately after the electricity was interrupted. Two of my neighbors, including the one directly behind me, had their Generac NG powered standby generators kick on at 1:40 am. (Gawd, those are noisy. And expensive to run.) And by mid-morning the din of the gasoline powered generators in the immediate vicinity added to the racket. This is the only year I have ever had my little Honda cranked up twice in one year after an outage from a windstorm. First one was just 17 days ago.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Windsong
January 7, 2019 6:43 am

I have a Generac Propane 10kw hardwired. It’s not that loud, nor expensive to run. Of course mine is 25 years old and decided it didn’t want to run a couple weeks ago when the big power outage occurred in Western Washington. Maybe they’re louder when you’re down the street? Or they don’t have a muffler?

MarkW
Reply to  RACookPE1978
January 7, 2019 9:40 am

With winds that strong, wouldn’t surprise me if all the wind mills were feathered.

Esteban Cafe
Reply to  RACookPE1978
January 7, 2019 10:39 am

I’m curious how many of the sainted windmill’s made it through the high winds. There are frightening YouTube vids of them flying apart in high wind.

Grant
January 6, 2019 3:54 pm

One of the windiest trips over the bay bridge yesterday I’ve experienced. Lots of white caps on the bay. Quite beautiful!

January 6, 2019 4:30 pm

Pretty good odds El Nino will still develop later this summer according to CPC. The Mjo is likely part of the forcing of the current series of west coast storms. It will be getting into central Pacific soon and so the following week should see more splitting systems affecting Southern CA more.

January 6, 2019 4:31 pm

Forget El Nino, StormFest is about to Hit the West Coast
Things often calm down after January 1 during El Nino years….but not this year…with the U.S. West Coast from central California to Washington State about to be pummeled by a series of storms

Before someone tries to characterize this “stormfest” as “unprecedented”, allow me to point out that such extreme _atmospheric river_ phenomena have been recorded on the West Coast since the mid 19th century. One of the worst happened in 1862:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pineapple_Express

Such events do occur in El Nino years. And they are related to planetary Rossby waves and meandering Arctic troughs, which can be seen here in the 6-micron “water vapor” IR channel.
https://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/west/nepac/h5-loop-wv.html

A better way (IMHO) to view these water vapor rivers from overhead sensors is to use passive microwave signals (85-89gHz), which more accurately record WV phase changes compared to 6-micron IR. Microwave can’t be imaged directly, so it is “blended” with wind data flow, producing imagery that is modeled by blending microwave sensor reading with blended GFS winds. So the output is averaged over more of the troposphere, thus capturing/filtering more of the “deep convection” aspect of these equatorial waves than the IR WV imagery:
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/mtpw2/product.php?color_type=tpw_nrl_colors&prod=global2&timespan=24hrs&anim=html5

Basil N
January 6, 2019 5:18 pm

Actually it’s the other way around, most El nino effects across the West coast especially California happen from February through April, and often continue to produce a wet spring into May in many areas. Mostly with moderate to strong El Monos.