NEWS FLASH: World’s Library Sabotaged

Commentary by Kip Hansen

library

BREAKING NEWS — SABOTAGE  @ The Library of The World

The Library of the World — the greatest collection since the Ancient Library of Alexandria — is the world’s largest and most complete library ever collected —  and which is claimed to hold a nearly complete written record of human knowledge — has been found to have been secretly sabotaged by a cabal within the library’s Indexing Department.

The sabotage was so subtle that it has only become apparent within the last few days.  Here’s what we know so far:  Over the last year, the group within the Indexing Department,  calling themselves The Enlightened,  have been quietly altering the Master Index to the vast collection by altering the individual indexes of works they consider “objectionable” or “evil” or “not helpful” to the social, political and scientific world view of cult’s leaders.

The result of this sabotage is that as of this moment when library users search the computerized library index they no longer find any materials that contradict the views of The Enlightened — the cross-indexes and “popularity ratings” have been manually altered to bury materials The Enlightened have deemed “ill-informed” — which simply means in practice that they are contrary to what The Enlightened think you should know.

The deception has escaped detection for so long because no materials have actually been removed from the library shelves.   Original index entries have not been removed.  If one knows the title and author, the computerized index returns a pointer to the material and it can be called up.  But, no matter how popular the specific item or material, if one searches the index for a list of entries by subject, the resulting list of library materials returned to the user is listed in an order pre-determined by The Enlightened — showing at the top all materials the cabal has secretly tagged as “authoritative” and wishes users to read (in order of its own preference), then all materials not specifically proscribed by them, and only then, buried under all the other entries, are listed the materials marked down by the malefactors as “not-Enlightened”.  The determination of what is “authoritative”, “Enlightened” and “not-Enlightened” has depended entirely on the whim of those heading up the secret cabal.

Bringing immediately to mind the fictional themes of 1984 and Farenheit 451, investigators have found that this secret campaign has been carried out with the misguided intention to “make the world a better place” by combating “bad ideas” held by the common man who is, in the view of The Enlightened,  “self-interested and dumb”.

The full scale and scope of the sabotage is unknown at this time — investigators are digging into the indexes to determine how many topics, and exactly which topics,  have been affected.   At this early stage in the investigation, it has been discovered by mere chance that the following topics appear to have been subject to sabotage:  gun rights, abortion, illegal immigration and climate change……

 

More at 11…….”

This fictional news flash is horrifically not fictional at all….only the name of the “library” has been changed  — in reality, it is today’s World Wide Web and “The Enlightened” are the top executives at Google.

More to follow in this series as the story breaks.

# # # # #

Author’s Note:

I only wish that this were a joke.  Unfortunately, it is shockingly true.

Some of the background on story was covered by Adam J. White in an article in the New Atlantis titled “Google.gov”.

White’s worst fears for the future have been already realized …this series will cover the story, its real world effects and its societal implications.

As always — this is a societal controversy — verify facts for yourself.  Try a Google Search for “Climate Change”.  Try a Yahoo Search for “Climate Change”.  Try a Bing Search for “Climate Change”. Compare results.   Try Google searches of other controversial topics with which  you are personally familiar — see if the listings are obviously tampered with.

Hint, search engines are not independent. Guess who they depend on.

# # # # #

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
195 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ResourceGuy
July 20, 2018 8:52 am

Hide the scrolls before the Chinese masters order their burning at the diligent hands of Google employees.

Don K
July 20, 2018 8:57 am

I think you folks are assuming that everyone sees the same search results in the same order from a search engine like Google. I’m not completely sure why I don’t think that’s the case, But I’m pretty sure that it isn’t true.

For one thing, check out this Wikipedia article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Personalized_Search

I’m guessing that personalized search probably isn’t the only variable controlling what you see vs what I see vs what that guy over there sees when the same keywords are used.

Reg Nelson
Reply to  Don K
July 20, 2018 10:29 am

If browser history is a major factor, why is it that when I google “climategate emails” SKS comes up first in the search results, and WUWT is on page 3. I’ve visited this site nearly everyday (for many years) and only been to this SKS propaganda site maybe a dozen times.

It’s clear that google rigs the results if it suits them, either for financial or political reasons. You have to be incredibly naive to not believe that.

sycomputing
Reply to  Reg Nelson
July 20, 2018 10:32 am

Do you clear your browser history?

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Reg Nelson
July 20, 2018 9:24 pm

“when I google “climategate emails””
OK, I did it (with quotes). Screenshot below. Top is David Archibald’s skeptic Lavoisier Group. Next Wiki, then Guardian, but it’s Fred Pearce, a bit on both sides. Then an anti-CRU article in Forbes, then Heartland, then Carbonbrief, with also an anti-CRU analysis.

comment image

ps I put the phrase into the WUWT search box. Just 1 result. Apparently the reason WUWT is not high is that it rarely uses the phrase in articles.

Pompous Git
Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 21, 2018 12:55 am

Nick, I suspect that many are too lazy to learn how to make the most out of their Google searches. A few years ago I was approached by an acquaintance who wanted to build his own oxygen generator. He’d asked a friend who declared there was “nothing on the Internet”. It took me about 60 seconds to discover full instructions for a device intended for use in third-world countries.

20 Tips To Use Google Search Efficiently just scratches the surface: https://www.lifehack.org/articles/technology/20-tips-use-google-search-efficiently.html

Philip Schaeffer
Reply to  Pompous Git
July 21, 2018 1:38 am

Yep, most people suck at google-fu. I can’t stand watching most people try and find stuff. I either have to walk away, or do the search myself.

Pompous Git
Reply to  Kip Hansen
July 21, 2018 9:44 am

“Google “climate change” and look at the first two pages….The Environmental Defense Fund, a radicalized propaganda outfit, is shown as an “authoritative” site…”

No it isn’t. That’s what you get. What I get is mostly Australian government websites, a few university websites, a couple of MSM websites and two websites outside Australia (Nature and Wikipedia). “The Environmental Defense Fund” did not feature in the first 20 pages, never mind the first two. Similarly there were no hits for “Daily Intelligencer” in the first 10 pages. “TakePart” didn’t get any hits in the first 5 pages.

I think it might just be you that’s missing the point, Kip. Google is the premier ad-flinger on the planet and what it does is whatever it takes to remain so. Part of that is making an assessment of what keeps most Google users coming back for more. If Google are conspiring to privilege The Environmental Defense Fund, The Daily Intelligencer and TakePart as you claim, then they’re doing a lousy job of it.

Philip Schaeffer
Reply to  Reg Nelson
July 21, 2018 1:42 am

Reg Nelson said:

“why is it that when I google “climategate emails” SKS comes up first in the search results,”

I get https://www.lavoisier.com.au/articles/greenhouse-science/climate-change/climategate-emails.pdf as the first result…

If that’s a result of google is rigging the search results, then it must be that they are on the other side of the issue to what you expect.

Pompous Git
Reply to  Philip Schaeffer
July 21, 2018 2:12 am

I too get the lavoisier.com hit at the top. Never been there to my recollection. The wiki-bloody-pedia gets second place. What’s yours?

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Pompous Git
July 21, 2018 5:20 am

I think we’re getting the same. I posted mine a few comments up.

Pompous Git
Reply to  Don K
July 20, 2018 11:37 pm

You are correct Don K. Google tailors the result based on browser history and purchasing history. Quite why it’s assumed I’m in the market for another television when the one I have just purchased is for the benefit of the Missus rather than me… There’s a reason I likes me books 🙂

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Pompous Git
July 21, 2018 10:15 am

My wife once used my Amazon account to purchase some romance novels. That was probably 3 years ago. They STILL pop-up on my amazon recommended stuff.

Roger welsh
July 20, 2018 9:52 am

What is anyone going to do about it? What can anyone do?

Power an corruption have been with us since humans existed it seems.

Correction is in order. How is this going to happen?

sycomputing
Reply to  Roger welsh
July 20, 2018 10:17 am

What is anyone going to do about it?

Nothing.

What can anyone do?

Assume it, not care, and move on, else, spend your days worrying about that over which you haven’t a smidgen of control.

Power an corruption have been with us since humans existed it seems.

Thank you, sir!

Now you’ve stated the key to the entire problem in my view. Power and corruption have always been with us, but somehow we’ve still managed to make it through to the next time power and corruption were with us.

If history offers any evidence upon which to make a judgement regarding this matter, then it would appear the best evidence suggests we’ll somehow yet again muddle through this instance of power and corruption (assuming it is) as well.

July 20, 2018 10:06 am

Very good satire. + + + +

Robert of Texas
July 20, 2018 10:17 am

Here’s the thing… As Google tampers with search ratings, they open the door to new search engines to maybe catch on. It happens all the time when big business gets arrogant. There will be regulations passed to start tempering how much they can control (going to happen, for better or for worse, they need to be regulated, but when a government sticks their nose in its usually inefficient).

Likely a small search engine already in existence will start promoting itself as a more fair and balanced one, and researchers will start using it. At first the flow of users will be small, and then sudden there is a huge wave as the new search engine catches up to the features that everyone really uses (as opposed to the billions of nice to haves that few use).

When Google finally wakes up to the revenue loss, they will either compete and try to become more fair, or more likely become more extreme like most cable news outlets did until they have a small fanatic group of followers.

I for one have already stopped using Google as much as possible. Yup, I still have an Android device but I have deleted most of Google apps off of it. If you don’t like the way Google turns information into propaganda, then abandon it.

July 20, 2018 10:22 am

OK. So I was trying to remember the movie-maker that had challenged Marc Morano to a climate debate – and backed out at the last minute. It was just an idle thing so I Googled it. Nothing. Just now I tried duckduckgo “Marc Morano debate movie maker” and the tenth line was James Cameron. Maybe it’s just me though – I can be a real techtard; but score one for duckduckgo.

OK S.
July 20, 2018 10:48 am

I don’t think this is off-topic, maybe, and I don’t know any more than this article says:

https://medium.com/@martingeddes/wwg1wga-the-greatest-communications-event-in-history-698ba926df64

ResourceGuy
July 20, 2018 1:23 pm

Bonfire of the (advocacy) Vanities

ResourceGuy
July 20, 2018 1:31 pm

Are there special job titles for this at Google? like maybe….

Director of Chinese Yes-Man Services
CIO, Chief Inflame Officer
Darkweb Director

ralfellis
July 20, 2018 1:53 pm

PR companies do exactly the same.

If you pay a PR company to place your news release into all the majors, like reuters, nyt and yahoo, they will do so. And there will be a web-page there with all your details. And they will charge you $2,500 dollars for the service.

But…… Your page will in none of their indexes, and will not be on GoogIe, and so nobody bar you will ever see your expensive PR news release.

Ralph

David Paul Zimmerman
July 20, 2018 2:40 pm

I usually “throw away” the first page of a google search as it is mostly advertising. Drilling down through pages gives you the feel for what is being manipulated and allows you to construct a better search, even to the point of using minus signs to specifically exclude certain items. My behavior has been trained in this area by the google environment. In my opinion google still has the most complete searches, they have just become weighted by SEO and biases of all kinds.

Ragnaar
July 20, 2018 5:16 pm

Try Googling Roy Spencer, Judith Curry or Jordan Peterson.

Pompous Git
Reply to  Ragnaar
July 20, 2018 11:46 pm

“Try Googling Roy Spencer…”
Google proffers me the choices of roy spencer uah, roy spencer architect, roy spencer temperatures, roy spencer permaseal, roy spencer actor and roy spencer. What’s wrong with this thing that it can’t tell which roy spencer I’m after? [/sarc]

Pop Piasa
July 20, 2018 9:12 pm

Kip, I think Ray Wiley Hubbard said it best in a song title a while back…
A: Enlightenment, B: Endarkenment, (Hint: There is no C)

July 21, 2018 3:13 am

Google’s Alphabet Eric Schmidt now heads up Pentagon Innovation. Google has come home to roost. Maybe now the Pentagon will find where all that money vanished to.

Chino780
July 21, 2018 3:47 am

Duck Duck Go.

JCalvertN(UK)
July 21, 2018 7:13 am

Why use Google at all? I don’t

Hocus Locus
July 21, 2018 4:47 pm

I got a wild hair in 2015 and wrote a short piece of techo dystopia fiction: The Time Rift of 2100: How We lost the Future It describes in retrospect a series of successive ‘innovations’, each a worthy improvement, but hidden in growing complexity a fragile thread weaves through everything. Probably the best and only story ever written about Network Time Protocol.

Google and The Cloud makes an appearance though not by name. As is happening now, paper was nil and everything — including essential documentation — was stored in ‘The Cloud’, a global storage array that was storage and index combined. An excerpt,

[…] A FEW RESPONSIBLE ENGINEERS of the era took the time to publish diagnostic procedures with which one could fix these amalgamations, should one have the patience to pull them apart to do so, like the SAMS Photofacts of old. Every piece had its own direct interface for configuration and in theory at least, one could fix problems or reconfigure the pieces by simply talking to them directly. They documented these diagnostic and configuration interfaces, often cribbed from the documents of other engineers, which were scarcely ever used now, probing them to discover the more primal pieces within to gather documentation on those too.

BUT IT WAS THANKLESS to do so, and these engineers found themselves out of work or forcefully retired. Their productivity paled besides younger geniuses who were simple hunter-gatherers, whose cleverness in assembling working prototypes was deft and swift. From concept to bubble-wrap technology companies had little interest in deep documentation. It was seen as a fetish. The thing works! Clone it and done. These hastily made things flooded the market and soon replaced other well-documented things. At times something failed and its inventors could not say why, they just assembled a new one or went bankrupt.

IN A SAD IRONY as to the supposed superiority of digital over analog — that this whole profession of digitally-stored ‘source’ documentation began to fade and was finally lost. It had became dusty, and the unlooked-for documents of previous eras were first flagged and moved to lukewarm storage. It was a circular process, where the world’s centralized search indices would be culled to remove pointers to things that were seldom accessed. Then a separate clean-up where the fact that something was not in the index alone determined that it was purgeable. The process was completely automated of course, so no human was on hand to mourn the passing of material that had been the proud product of entire careers. It simply faded.

THEN SOMETHING TOOK THE INTERNET BY STORM, it was some silly but popular Game with a perversely intricate (and ultimately useless) information store. Within the space of six months index culling and auto-purge had assigned more than a third of all storage to the Game. Only as the Game itself faded did people begin to notice that things they had seen and used, even recently, were simply no longer there. Or anywhere. It was as if the collective mind had suffered a stroke. Were the machines at fault, or were we? Does it even matter? Life went on. We no longer knew much about these things from which our world was constructed, but they continued to work. […]

So when you’re fixed on deliberate censorship and evil derrings-do, always remember the words of Einstein,

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity.

dscott
July 22, 2018 8:24 am

Hence use Duckduckgo.com for independent searches.

jack
July 23, 2018 12:52 am

the Enlightened is a very poor use as the Enlightenment sprung Freedom, Liberty, Capitalism as many of USA’s founders were of the Enlightenment. more accurate would be ‘the Progressives’ ‘the Left’ ‘the Liberals’ ‘the Socialists’