Some hypocritical findings after attending a climate conference at the University of California at Berkeley
UC Berkeley is just a short drive away, about three hours.
We are often told by the “holier than thou” types who lecture us on the evils of modern energy consumption that we should travel less, reduce our use of fossil fuels, have less children or no children, and suggesting we even kill ourselves for the betterment of the planet.
However, these same people don’t seem to practice what they preach. First, let’s set the stage. For example Eric Holthaus, who is meteorologist and staff writer for Grist (formerly Slate) wailed that he will have a vasectomy to prevent population growth.
Then he said, kids are OK while telling the world how “fucked up it is”, and announces his first child with this tweet:
He’s now reportedly got two children and is in the process of divorce (according to his Twitter feed – his choice to make such details public).
Then there was the flying debacle:
Then a year later, suddenly, flying is OK again.
But he talks about a bus trip that fossil fueled trip is somehow better for the climate than flying as opposed to just staying home. The destination was the American Meteorological Society’s 2014 annual meeting in Atlanta:
Over the past year, I’ve had to make a few small sacrifices, sure. (My 28-hour bus ride from Wisconsin to Atlanta wasn’t the most relaxing travel experience I’ve ever taken. I’d have much preferred one of these.) But an amazing thing has also happened since I’ve embraced slow travel: My world has shrunk and become richer. (It’s also easier to escape those awkward family reunions.)
This article ISN’T about Eric Holthaus, but I used his claims and self-rationalizations as a very epic and public example of climate hypocrisy. Having set the stage, read on.
Yesterday and the day before there was, in Berkeley CA, a large international climate change conference officially titled the “Tenth International Conference on Climate Change: Impacts & Responses” — here’s its website: http://on-climate.com/
And here’s a PDF of all the seminars presented at the conference:
http://on-climate.com/assets/downloads/Climate-Schedule-of-Sessions_1.pdf
There were some real gems there, like this one:
However, my finding has little to do with the content of the conference, but with the mind-boggling hypocrisy of its participants.
Although the conference itself (look at the program below) is essentially little more than a gigantic condemnation of humankind’s carbon footprint, the vast majority of the participants took long-distance commercial airplane flights to reach the conference (and return home afterwards); because they’re special and the rules don’t apply to them.
Basically it’s a life-lesson posing as a conference about why people shouldn’t ride on carbon-spewing airplanes – attended exclusively by people who rode on carbon dioxide-spewing airplanes to get there. Of course, they could do this conference entirely over the Internet via via conferencing, slide sharing, and online publication, but what fun would that be? Plus you don’t get to leave your country on a “vacation” to the United States, all expenses paid.
Since we at WUWT find great entertainment in pointing out the outrageous hypocrisy of people like Leonardo DiCaprio and Al Gore who lead extremely high-carbon lifestyles as they jet around the world lecturing everyone about how they shouldn’t lead high-carbon lifestyles, it might be sobering to note that Leonardo DiCaprio and Al Gore are not unusual in the climate change community: the truth is that MOST climate change researchers are equally hypocritical and spend the year constantly jetting around to an endless series of pointless conferences, often in resort destinations.
I got my hands on a copy of the otherwise “secret program” for the conference (which is NOT posted online), which reveals the identities of all the participants and (most importantly) where they came from to reach the conference – which turns out to be from nations all over the world.
I compiled this list of nations from which the participants traveled to Berkeley, California to attend this conference about the need for “low-carbon lifestyles”: I also completed the map below which highlights not only the countries, but the locations from within countries where participants traveled from. Due to pin density issues, not all locations are visible in some places like the Eastern USA. And, some pins may not be exactly accurate in location but approximate, but that doesn’t detract from the story it tells.
- Bangladesh
- Australia
- Nigeria
- Brazil
- Great Britain
- Saudi Arabia
- Thailand
- India
- South Korea
- Spain
- Malawi
- Israel
- China
- France
- Uganda
- Mexico
- Japan
- Costa Rica
- Switzerland
- Pakistan
- Canada
- Iran
- Taiwan
- South Africa
- Italy
The map: (click to enlarge)
Imagine what the map must look like for the COP conferences, now up to COP24 held last November. There’s another smaller one coming up in Bonn on April 30th.
I found this all quite amusing, and also politically significant, because it reveals that these people are not really serious about their “policy recommendations”: They themselves feel completely free to spew as much carbon as they want into the atmosphere, which means they actually aren’t really concerned about the issue (i.e. the whole field is a hoax) or they’re flaming hypocrites of the worst sort.
In conversations with some people at the conference, I learned that they all basically confessed that the conference was “totally unnecessary” and nothing but a bunch of “time-wasting bullshit.”
But there is a constant merry-go-round of academic conferences scheduled all over the world every year which they are required to attend to maintain their academic status – and also to get free vacations, of course. There are dozens of conferences like this every year, year after year, all over the planet, all similarly purposeless and unnecessary – part of the endless academic gravy train of grants and free travel.
Follow the money, because that’s really all climate change policy, sustainability, and science seems to be about these days.
Pages from the conference guide:
Eric was right. He shouldn’t have children the poor little blighters as they’ll never know what being snowed is.
That Wendy Lynn Lee author (she idolizes China’s new neo-Marxist Emperor Xi) must be a real piece of work. I’d love to have a televised debate with her. She’d be a heaping mass of tears and screaming in minutes as reality and facts hit her.
Sadly, those types avoid open debates at all cost. They’d end up with their world view utterly shattered if they did so with an informed opponent.
I wish these lunatics would sterilize themselves or better yet, off themselves “for the planet”. I was in Rio for a couple of weeks leading up to the last climate conference there. Not only is Rio a very expensive city to begin with, but prices skyrocket whenever there are large conferences. Also, it’s relatively isolated from other population centres, so the “carbon footprint” of the flights to and from the conference are huge. This did not stop the city from being packed with delegates and their groupies. If the delegates cared about people, they would have chosen a less expensive and closer venue and sent the money they saved to Rio to help the millions of impoverished people living in favelas. The stench of their hypocrisy is overwhelming.
If they were really concerned about increasing CO2 in the atmosphere then they would hold the conference on the Internet. The technology is in place so there is no excuse not to.
I like this comment the best, although I’m only going to read over a 100 of them.
“Why would scientists want to write for such an inhospitable, disrespectful, distrustful crowd? It wouldn’t matter what they say since they are constantly portrayed as frauds, hypocrites and fools.”
If this person is worried about being treated badly at least they get treatment here. Their article would never get displayed and they also would have their comments deleted on most big social media sites.
Mods what happened to by post?
@Benben: I have been working productively with some people over the Net for over a year. Three of them I have met in person, two of them *after* the work began. The other two I have never met. It is sheer NONSENSE to say you have to meet people face to face the first time. There’s a large international software company with a branch here that does all its meetings over the Net; the leader of the local group goes overseas from time to time to meet other group leaders, but the people at the coal face never do this. It is sheer NONSENSE to say you have to meet people face to face the first time. As for conferences being cheap, suppose there is a conference in London I’d like to go to. The cheapest return air fare I can find is EUR 1264, and that doesn’t include accommodation or registration. At the university I worked at for the last 20 years, if we wanted to go to a conference, we had to tell the university a year in advance (before even *submitting* a paper, let alone having it accepted), and there was a limited contestable pool of money for this. The Northern Hemisphere is by no means the whole world.