"Kill Climate Deniers" 2018 Season

David Finnigan, author of “Kill Climate Deniers”

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

The award winning play “Kill Climate Deniers” is back.

How a climate change play got Bolt and Breitbart News hot under the collar

FEBRUARY 17 2018 – 11:45PM

Helen Pitt

Playwright David Finnigan has a slew of conservative commentators to thank for reshaping his new play Kill Climate Deniers.

The provocative play centres on a militant cell of eco-activists who take the audience hostage during a concert at Parliament House. Led by charismatic spokeswoman Catch, they demand Australia immediately cease all carbon emissions and coal exports – or they’ll start executing their 1700 hostages. The embattled Environment Minister has no choice but to pick up a gun and stand up for her ideals.

Such was the controversy around the play’s performance in the nation’s capital a few years back it had to be cancelled.

“It completely blew up,” recalls Finnigan. “I was getting messages from Americans in Kansas and Idaho who had seen his criticism through Fox TV so we had to cancel moving ahead. There was too much risk – the Abbott government had just introduced new legislation around anti-terrorism and we thought it was too risky – we didn’t want to reignite a culture war,” he said.

It’s really only politicians and some members of the media who deny climate change these days … this is a way to keep the climate change conversation going in an imaginitive and fictional way – it asks the audience to think about what sort of world they want to be living in 30 years from now,” he says.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/theatre/how-a-climate-change-play-got-bolt-and-breitbart-news-hot-under-the-collar-20180214-h0w2og.html

The play website provides the following helpful description;

… Lee Lewis will direct this controversial take on the climate change ‘debate’ in Australia. It’s a play within a play, an action film inside a documentary, a satire inside a rave. It is the kind of play the major theatre companies can’t put on. It’s why Griffin exists.

It’s Kill Bill meets Tim Flannery, and it’s all true. The science is real. The media fracas is real. Only the blood is fake. No one dies…at least, not yet. Come join the party. …

Read more: http://www.griffintheatre.com.au/whats-on/kill-climate-deniers/

What can I say? The kind of people who think a climate video which features exploding schoolchildren is funny likely also have no problem seeing the “provocative” side of a fantasy gun hostage situation – as long as the fictional threat of violence is aimed at their political opponents.

The following is a short mock news video produced by “Kill Climate Deniers” author David Finnigan, which fantasises about the aftermath of real terrorists inspired by his script attacking Australia’s parliament and taking hostages.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bruce Cobb
February 17, 2018 2:06 pm

Yeah, murdering your opponents is so hilarious.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 17, 2018 3:24 pm

Maggots like David Finnigan are not too bright. I say, “bring it on”, but what he will learn is that we are capable of shooting back against far-left zombies like Finnigan.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 17, 2018 6:41 pm

Playwright David Finnigan is a few short step from being Nikolas Cruz.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 17, 2018 8:31 pm

Why not employ the “exploding head button” in their dark production? They apparently found it quite comical on the television ads. I wonder if “Kill Bill” might be McKibben.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 18, 2018 2:51 am

It’s their favourite fantasy, remember the ads with schoolteachers executing students who didn’t adhere to the Green philosophy by blowing their heads off.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 18, 2018 10:40 am

No, David, that is decending to their level and has no place here.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
February 18, 2018 10:41 am

Apologies, that should read “No, John, etc.”

Brent Hargreaves
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
March 1, 2018 3:30 am

Moderator: John Silver’s posting has no place here. It’s unacceptable and in some countries illegal.
it was removed. Thanks for alerting us – mod

Bryan Johnson
February 17, 2018 2:13 pm

Very strange on several levels. First, that the Left/Warmistas are so willing to go the guns for their own concerns. Also, that Australia — land of the greatest gun-grab in the past half-century — should be the site of their bloodthirsty revenge fantasy.
Once again we come to the basic philosophy of the Left: “Those who disagree with us are not only wrong, but evil. And should be killed.”
Speaking as an American, and despite whatever weird creature may decide to shoot up a school in Florida, I’ll hold onto my firearms, thank you very much.

Reply to  Bryan Johnson
February 17, 2018 3:36 pm

Once you have insured that your opponents are unarmed, resorting to violence comes easy.

Reply to  schitzree
February 18, 2018 4:14 am

‘ ensured ‘

Reply to  schitzree
February 18, 2018 11:56 am

How about “once you assure that your unarmed opponents are insured, it is easy to resort to violence”?

Reply to  Bryan Johnson
February 17, 2018 3:49 pm

It takes a good guy with a gun to stop a bad guy with a gun.
Unfortunately when seconds count, the police are minutes away.

Reply to  MarkW
February 17, 2018 4:19 pm

Yup. Plus many. The truth.

Reply to  MarkW
February 18, 2018 12:17 am

….”minutes away”, at least. Sometimes, hours, days or never….

Bryan Johnson
Reply to  MarkW
February 18, 2018 5:18 am

Absolutely, MarkW, but this goes beyond situations of personal safety (what you might consider as a tactical situation). On a much larger scale, disarming the “enemy” (i.e., those who dare to oppose the Left/Warministas) would make them feel naked and helpless and therefore less willing to speak out, let alone advocate alternate approaches to the issue that they have created..
A Venn diagram of the Left/Warministas and those who loudly proclaim that that personal possession of firearms should be banned would, almost certainly, be >0.9. That’s my experience and belief, anyway.

Pillage Idiot
Reply to  MarkW
February 18, 2018 8:05 am

Lefty to American family man, “Why do you carry a gun?”
Family man, “Because a cop is too heavy!”

Reply to  MarkW
February 19, 2018 12:06 pm

“Because a cannon is too heavy.”

February 17, 2018 2:15 pm

Lovely, following to to a long string of insane mass murders in the US and Europe — promotion of mass murders in the name of climate activism. Can one get any crazier than that?
YES! The same crazies can then later make a mock news cast in which their fantasy mass murders are presented as actually have taken place.

Reply to  Kip Hansen
February 17, 2018 3:32 pm

I agree Kip. I wrote this soem time ago:
Marxism made simple!
The Groucho Marxists are the leaders – they want power for its own sake at any cost, and typically are sociopaths or psychopaths. The great killers of recent history, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot. etc. were of this odious ilk – first they get power, then they implement their crazy schemes that do not work and too often kill everyone who opposes them.
The Harpo Marxists are the followers – the “sheeple” – these are people of less-than-average intelligence who are easily duped and follow the Groucho’s until it is too late, their rights are lost and their society destroyed. They are attracted to simplistic concepts that “feel good” but rarely “do good”.
George Carlin said: “You know how stupid the average person is, right? Well, half of them are stupider than that!”
One can easily identify many members of these two groups in the global warming debate – and none of them are ”climate skeptics”.

February 20, 2018 10:38 am

I have often claimed to be a marxist, a harpo-Marxist. I won’t join any party that would have me as a member.
Tom G

Reply to  Kip Hansen
February 17, 2018 3:50 pm

Yup. Not to mention, some of us US deplorable skeptics are more than just a bit well armed should these nutters ever actually try what they espouse.

Reply to  ristvan
February 17, 2018 4:37 pm

Bradley – yeah but Cruz wasn’t being attacked by anyone – just anohter lefty with a gun wanting to kill because he has ‘issues’ and everyone else is to blame.
The point being made is the US sceptics are ARMED and so trying to remove opposition to the Church of AGW scam will not go well for the snowflakes.

Reply to  ristvan
February 17, 2018 4:57 pm

Yes. Against a defenseless ‘No Guns Zone’ sign. Wherever I am is usually NOT a No Guns Zone. That makes a big, big difference.

Reply to  ristvan
February 17, 2018 5:39 pm

Same here in Oz.Keep a few around for “security”.Legal,of course. Nothing gets a leftie subversive going when you tell we’re the ones with the hardware.Still,I despair at the mindset of these idiots.Brainwashed urbanites.

Reply to  ristvan
February 17, 2018 6:37 pm

Rob, thanks to an insane law, everyone he attacked was unarmed.

Samuel C Cogar
Reply to  ristvan
February 18, 2018 4:59 am

Rob Bradley – February 17, 2018 at 4:03 pm

Nicholas Cruz was also “well armed.”

Rob B, ….. Cruz shur nuff was.
But you can bet your “bippy” that iffen there were more male Teachers in that school and some of them had “concealed carry” permits ……. or some of the older students had “concealed carry” permits ….. then Cruz would never have attempted his “killing spree” or would have been shot dead shortly after entering the school.
Of course, only “bleeding heart liberals” and Criminal Defense Lawyers are avid proponents against “shooting such criminals dead”. There is no money in defending dead people.

Reply to  Samuel C Cogar
February 18, 2018 5:04 am

I was shocked to hear about that shooting in Florida. Didn’t Obama ban private gun ownership following Sandy Hook ?

Reply to  ristvan
February 18, 2018 7:57 am

For two years, the Democrats had the presidency and majorities in both houses of congress.
They didn’t even bring up gun control during that time. As well as ignoring many of the other issues that they are always whining about.

Reply to  MarkW
February 19, 2018 10:55 am

Oop, there it is. Ever body cabbage patch! I have family members who are not talking to me because I made that point last summer. Oh, well.

Carbon Bigfoot
Reply to  Kip Hansen
February 17, 2018 6:28 pm

Bringing truth to a controversial subject:

Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
February 17, 2018 6:46 pm

Just to re-emphasis the point.
Those places in the US with the highest murder rates, are also those places with the most stringent gun control laws.
When gun laws are lessened, violent crime goes down.

Reply to  MarkW
February 19, 2018 10:44 am

Minnesota. ‘nough said.

Reply to  MarkW
February 19, 2018 10:47 am

Crap, my link did not work. http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2018/02/15/reality-check-gun-permit-background-checks/ watch the vid and enjoy how puzzled they are by the facts they are reporting!

Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
February 17, 2018 6:48 pm

Those countries with low violent crime rates and strict gun control laws, had low violent crime rates prior to the implementation of those strict gun laws.
In other words, Europe isn’t violent not because they don’t have guns, but because it is occupied by Europeans.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
February 17, 2018 9:13 pm

I agree with the message, but Plano is a very affluent area with no urban blight, quite different from Detroit or St Louis. It appears statistically that urban blight and murder rates correlate notably from what he presents. But, it also definitely validates the the axiom that when guns are outlawed, only outlaws have guns.
Allen MacRae posted an 1841 Charles MacKay quote which contained “Men, it has been well said, think in herds…”
Could it be that our youths are being “herded” by the Hollywood and computer game desensitization to gun play and gun violence?

Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
February 17, 2018 11:41 pm

Europe not violent?
1914 – 1917?
1939 – 1945?

Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
February 18, 2018 12:35 am

Europe is quite violent, they just dont use guns very much to do it.

Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
February 19, 2018 12:15 pm

There’s many ways to murder somebody. A firearm is just one way. But a firearm kept for personal defense effectively dissuades most other means of murdering.
Gun ownership prevents many more violent deaths than it enables.

Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
February 19, 2018 12:30 pm

Pop Piasa,
I shot thousands of virtual Russians in N64 Goldeneye in my youth. In that game they didn’t just fall over dead; there was at least a dozen different death animations depending on where the lethal shot landed, some lasting a good 10 seconds or more. One took almost a minute to finish for a gut/crotch kill, the character sinking to his knees in slow-motion, clutching his stomach and writhing in agony, then finally falling over and expiring.
I have yet to shoot a real-life Russian (or any person of any nationality for that matter). And am highly unlikely ever to do so, unless I’m forced to in the defense of myself or others. Violent video games didn’t make me any more violent than I was before. If anything, the cathartic release they provided probably prevented some violent incidents in my youth.

Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
February 20, 2018 12:14 pm

Europe not violent?
1914 – 1917?
1939 – 1945?

Europe is a chessboard of violence and peace. Swiss army, Andorra, Iceland. Auschwitz-Birkenau, Utøya, Malmö, Srebrenica. Solovetsky, Crimea, Moldova, Caucasia. Bilbo, Belfast, Cyprus. Königsberg, Kaliningrad, Vienna, Waterloo, Flander, Poltava. Places of dreamy peace mix up with scenes of genocide, terrorism, political terror, and nationalistic expansive crimes of war. Heavily armed small mountaineous pockets of the Lord and towns divided by iron curtains. Extreme tolerance follows extreme hate. Dictators follow each other and the people are called slaves.
Guess twice why calling the EU a peace project works so well. Guess twice what I think of dictator Putin.

Mark - Helsinki
Reply to  Kip Hansen
February 18, 2018 8:40 pm

The timing is not an accident Kip, maximization

Tom Halla
February 17, 2018 2:15 pm

So the green blob admires the Taliban? Fanaticism is a syndrome independent of content, like paranoia.

February 17, 2018 2:29 pm

Over at Bart Verheggen’s site, I got threatened with a lawsuit, then told I should be imprisoned when I pointed out that their silly polar bear paper was pointless, unscientific and based on logically absurd argument. Bart didn’t threaten me. He mostly just ignored me and occasionally blocked my posts—probably because he couldn’t come up with any effective counter argument.

joe - the non climate scientist
Reply to  Thomas
February 17, 2018 3:02 pm

Bart’s last post when he closed comments was that No one has disputed the underlying facts – What was the underlying fact – That people who agree with us agree with us. A simple translation is that people that dont exam all the facts agree with the experts who also dont exam at all the facts objectively.

Reply to  joe - the non climate scientist
February 17, 2018 3:50 pm

It’s amazing how easy it is to claim that nobody has disputed the underlying facts, when you delete any post that does so.

Reply to  joe - the non climate scientist
February 17, 2018 4:51 pm

Bart didn’t really delete my arguments, he deleted post where I got a little too hot and bothered. What Bart did was totally ignore my argument. He never once addressed it in any meaningful way.
Bart said the main conclusion of the paper was that, “the positions taken by the contrarian blogs is very different from that taken by the science based blogs and the peer review literature.”
This is true but it’s meaningless. It only tells us that people who disagree, actually disagree. It tells us nothing about which side might be correct, or closest to correct. The paper is not science it’s propaganda and a vicious attack on a scientist who may have shown that the “science based” blogs and peer reviewed literature did get it mostly wrong.
When a scientists shows data that contradicts your research, the correct response is to show data and reasoning that refutes the claim, or admit you got it wrong. The fact that they did not do that, and instead resorted to a hatchet job dressed up to look like science, makes me think they don’t have a valid response to Crockford.
It is shocking that after a month of debating it, not one of the 14 scientist authors admitted they were wrong. They did a great disservice to their own cause by publishing intellectual garbage to defend their papers and positions.

joe - the non climate scientist
Reply to  Thomas
February 18, 2018 8:35 am

As stated by others – consensus is an accurate measure of the prevailing bias.

February 17, 2018 2:30 pm

Just more proof that the Left are the most mentally ill among us. As has been the case throughout modern world and US history, they are the first to resort to violence when things don’t go their way. Their tendency to think with their emotions versus intellect makes them prone to “lashing out”, resulting in tantrums and violent response to every issue.

Reply to  stingray1
February 17, 2018 3:51 pm

It’s their education. It causes them to be removed from reality in a manner that mimics schizophrenia.

Samuel C Cogar
Reply to  commieBob
February 18, 2018 6:20 am

commieBob, I prefer calling it “nurturing”, rather than “education”.
And here is the way to “nurture” another Cruz, to wit:

Demonic’ child throws 8-hour tantrum on Lufthansa flight in viral video

Hot under the collar
February 17, 2018 2:32 pm

… and for their next hilarious comedy play, “Genocide” a play set in eco death camps to exterminate anyone who doesn’t agree with their alarmist religion!
On the one argument they should be allowed the freedom to go ahead with it to show how ridiculous they are, but on the other hand they actually may incite some impressionable nutters to ecoterrorism!

Reply to  Hot under the collar
February 17, 2018 7:46 pm

ah- so you did learn the obvious lesson.
i did too- but still looking for a producer of my musical Troll Rulez! that starts out with an overworked employee for a national public opinion polling company that’s vertically integrated with a global network of ‘like bots’ at their subsidiary Click a Claque. his lamentations are interrupted when he gets a text from a friend who is about to livestream his suicide and break the internet but is stumped in a conundrum concerning the carbon footprint of his corpse- which is further interruped when a young lady from greenpeace appears soliciting donations – but i don’t want to give away the plot…
outrage theater is at the peak! all aboard!

February 17, 2018 2:34 pm

Nothing surprises me about these looney-tunes any more.
Again, I ask, if it is so important to THEM, why don’t they set the example that take themselves out This Finnigan person exudes such enormous waves of hostility and lack of real reasoning ability, I have to ask how he functions in the real world. He seems to be as close to psychotic as one can get..

Reply to  Sara
February 17, 2018 3:43 pm

Wasn’t there a troll here on WUWT just a few days ago that was trying to deny that nobody on the alarmist side had threatened violence?

Reply to  MarkW
February 17, 2018 4:02 pm

Could be. This becomes stranger and stranger.

Greg Cavanagh
Reply to  MarkW
February 18, 2018 1:58 pm

Yes there was; but for the same reason teachers blowing up their students in a video isn’t displaying violence, that particular troll couldn’t see it either. Mind-blindness. This guy needs professional care and constant supervision.

February 17, 2018 2:35 pm

Soooooooooo………..hate speech is OK now, except for we plebs, who dare not articulate a word of non PC opinion, whilst the liberal elite are permitted to express themselves in any way they see fit.
F*ck that!

Reply to  HotScot
February 17, 2018 3:44 pm

You don’t understand. Hate speech is anything a leftist disagrees with, and that should be banned, with violence if necessary.
Anything their side says is at worst, an impassioned plea for understanding.

Reply to  MarkW
February 17, 2018 4:13 pm

They are actually applying these invented “laws” right now across Marxist Europe including the UK. It isn’t going to end well.

Reply to  MarkW
February 18, 2018 5:00 am

……And, bottom line, if the things that they say are wrong then nothing they do or can do to suppress someone pointing out that they are wrong will make it be anything other than wrong. The modern political discourse around just about every topic pits reason against faith —— Or faith against reason, if you prefer.
I think it is beyond bizarre that anyone can believe that a .01% increase in atmospheric CO2 will produce catastrophic climate while at the same time believing that by some miracle (wrought by faith-based government, maybe) renewable energy sources will be able to replace fossil fuels and provide the amounts of energy that we must have to sustain the civilization that we would like to sustain.
When reason is pitted against faith, will reason ever convince the majority of people or are we, as humans, so strongly biased emotionally toward fear of catastrophe that we are only able to appeal to faith in higher powers, supposed experts and governments included, to be our protectors?

February 17, 2018 2:41 pm

“It’s really only politicians and some members of the media who deny climate change these days” That might the case in Australia but not here in the USA. There are lots of us normal citizens who totally oppose the extreme measures being pushed by environmentalists.

Reply to  JohninRedding
February 17, 2018 2:59 pm

My impression from Jo Nova’s site is there are quite a few regular folks down under that don’t buy into human caused climate change and damned well don’t appreciate what their government has been doing in the area.

Reply to  RAH
February 17, 2018 4:16 pm

Jo rocks and is way prettier than Anthony Watts.

Greg Cavanagh
Reply to  RAH
February 18, 2018 1:36 pm

I would say the 50% of Australians have never considered the issue (meaning they accept whatever the media say they should), the other 50% have looked into it and don’t believe it.
I know of only one person who does believe it, and my conversations with him are as predicted, he utterly refuses to look at anything counter to his view of the world, and he’s rude about it as well.

Reply to  JohninRedding
February 17, 2018 4:47 pm

Us Aussies kicked a Govt out and installed the Rabbit to nuke the carbon tax. The Rabbit, with all his faults, was never going to sign Paris so his deputy did a Brutus and we got Turnbull who wet himself to get Paris signed.
If Labor didn’t have such a cretin in charge we would have booted Turnbull at the first opportunity – as it was he lost a HUGE majoprity the Rabbit had earned.
The tragedy is, Shortonbrains is such a horrible choice it makes Turnbull look sufferable. I’m voting all independents and minor parties in the hope we get enough of them in there to stop Turdballs in his tracks – he’s NOT good with people (which begs as to HOW he ever got anywhere in politics) so attempting to negotiate with (say) 30 or more independents would see his party boot him hard.
And now you begin to understand why Howard took our guns with the Port Arthur false flag event.

Reply to  MarkMcD
February 17, 2018 5:45 pm

Er. We are in the majority.
The Looney Left are a minority that spends their eternity outside of the fire light howling at the moon.

Reply to  MarkMcD
February 17, 2018 5:50 pm

Describing Turnbull as sufferable is very much over generous.
In answer to your last question….
Turnbull is in politics because he donated cash the the LNP. That’s about the start and end of it.
It is rumoured he iffered the Cash to ALP but they rejected it because the tax havens in the Caribbean couldn’t deliver Turnbulls donation in used notes in a brown paper bag……

Reply to  MarkMcD
February 18, 2018 6:14 am

Turnbull has never been Libs and definitely not coalition, he got into libs to enter politics. he has always said that the coalition are too far to the right and that his idea of the party is more toward the middle not conservative, and he has done what he said he would. pulled the party to left, but his idea of the middle is different than the base he is supposed to be representing. the Liberals are a dead party. if they win anything, it is only because people have no other options.

John in Oz
Reply to  JohninRedding
February 17, 2018 10:49 pm

Just to reassure you, I live in Oz and am neither a politician nor a media employee.
I will proudly stand beside you US ‘normal citizens’ and push back against the environmentalists.

February 17, 2018 2:43 pm

This in a country that has less than full 1st amendment rights because they forbid writing deprecating things about religion, or races? This in a country where Jo Nova could not allow me to post the quote from Winston Churchill’s ‘River War’ first addition because of the law?

Reply to  RAH
February 18, 2018 1:04 am

Brilliant, thank you. I have never seen that extract before.

Reply to  HotScot
February 18, 2018 8:41 am

What is amazing is that Winston wrote that when he was 24 years old.

February 17, 2018 2:47 pm

Psychotic wackadoodle ideas disguised as art…
Imagine the screaming if I penned a play called “Kill all climate alarmists”, but justified it by saying it’s a parody of Futurama’s robot, Bender who says… “Kill All Humans”

The Reverend Badger
Reply to  Anthony Watts
February 17, 2018 3:38 pm

Try crowd funding it.

NW sage
Reply to  Anthony Watts
February 17, 2018 5:05 pm

Anthony (or someone here) SHOULD write such a play – under a pseudenom of course. Lots of sci-fi precidence for that approach. A new genra would be invented ‘sci-fact’.

Reply to  NW sage
February 17, 2018 8:34 pm

Would go over like an osmium balloon with all of the half-life.
Competing with fictionalized propaganda is a losing proposition, if not for the fact that the Disasterists can type faster than you, they have better press.
Insist on public debates.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  Anthony Watts
February 18, 2018 12:01 am

“Anthony Watts February 17, 2018 at 2:47 pm”
My personality aligns with “Bender”, except the “Kill All Humans” bit…all else, that’s me that is!

February 17, 2018 2:53 pm

I keep waiting for these wackadoddles to come kill me and they never show up. Oh, well, guess I got to set some more targets and open another can of 7.62×39. Anyone know where I can get a deal on an AK mag loader? My thumb is a bit sore.

February 17, 2018 2:57 pm

The left is fond of these homicidal fantasies. There was a film about the assassination of George Bush. Kathy Griffin performed an ISIS-inspired skit involving Trump’s severed head.
Of course, we have many examples of leftists in power inflicting real violence upon political opponents. Stalin, Pol Pot, Castro.

Reply to  Adam
February 17, 2018 3:39 pm

Kathy Griffin and others on the left who act out their homicidal fantasies in public claim it is “art” and therefore protected by free speech. But statues and monuments of Confederate soldiers are also works of art. That certainly doesn’t stop the left from censoring them or outright destroying them. Apparently, only the things they agree with are worthy of free-speech protection. And it is they who get to decide for everyone else, based on what they think is PC at the moment. In that sense, they are no different from Taliban leader Mullah Omar, who ordered ancient Buddhist statues destroyed just because they were of no worth to him.

R. Shearer
Reply to  Louis
February 17, 2018 7:15 pm

Great points.

Leo Smith
Reply to  Adam
February 17, 2018 8:46 pm

sadly there are plenty if ‘rightists’ who have killed thousands.
South American dictators mostly..

Reply to  Leo Smith
February 18, 2018 8:01 am

Not being an open communist is not sufficient to make one a rightist.

February 17, 2018 3:02 pm

“It’s really only politicians and some members of the media who deny climate change these days …”
…this guy lives in a iddy biddy small little world

Reply to  Latitude
February 17, 2018 3:46 pm

Everybody he knows agrees with him.
The problem is that he refuses to have anything to do with anyone who disagrees with him.

Leo Smith
Reply to  Latitude
February 17, 2018 8:49 pm

No, he is correct. Its only politicians and the media who deny the reality of climate change – namely that its natural and not man made.
By and large scientists and mathematicians have worked out that its all bogus but are keeping their mouths shut and their jobs intact.

February 17, 2018 3:14 pm

People who feel justified in killing those with whom they disagree with most certainly also feel justified in lying, cheating, or breaking the law to beat them in an election. It also explains why they are not the least bit contrite when they are caught lying or breaking the law. In their minds, their cause justifies any and all means. That explains a lot about the recent behavior of leftists, doesn’t it?

Reply to  Louis
February 17, 2018 3:47 pm

What do you mean “recent” behavior?
That’s how they have always behaved.

Reply to  MarkW
February 17, 2018 6:57 pm

We see more of it now due to the internet. Which also encourages even more attention-starved idiots. The DSM is going to have to be rewritten with social media in mind.

February 17, 2018 3:17 pm

Messaging that murder for deeply held beliefs is okay. This involves the development of cultural acceptance of murder when goals of the righteous cannot be achieved politically. Except that in the U.S. people hold 450 million guns. Eco activist war will involve police only briefly, then there would very likely be a social response beyond legal control.

Reply to  Donald Kasper
February 21, 2018 5:25 am

The “Social Warrior” youth have already got the message that murder is ok – not murder of “innocents”, but they’re fine with “eat the rich”. (I haven’t yet discovered what the rich are guilty of.)

Reply to  Hermit.Oldguy
February 21, 2018 10:25 am

They disguise their violence under the “punch a n-a-z-i” slogan.
Of course, anyone slightly right of Karl Marx can be called a n-a-z-i.

February 17, 2018 3:17 pm

Hilarious, and a fairly typical liberal response to disagreement

February 17, 2018 3:20 pm

I absolutely deny climate. And I’m not in favor of weather either.

Reply to  M Simon
February 17, 2018 3:32 pm

I’m in England.
I have weather
If I don’t like it, I’ve probably chosen the wrong clothes.
And, at the moment – the ‘right’ clothes involve(s) several layers!
Auto – snug & warm in my layers!

Reply to  M Simon
February 20, 2018 12:24 pm

Say no to climate! Climate is killing our children, flooding cities, scorching Africa, melting Siberia, drowning white furry mammals and leveling New Orleans.

John Bell
February 17, 2018 3:28 pm

The True Believers use the very existence of “climate deniers” as a way to excuse themselves from having to give up using fossil fuels. Then they complain about “climate deniers” as public virtue signalling.

February 17, 2018 3:30 pm

Any relation to Tim Finnigan? Or was it Tim Finnegan?

Reply to  M Simon
February 17, 2018 3:34 pm
charles nelson
Reply to  M Simon
February 17, 2018 4:00 pm

The Dubliner’s version is better.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  M Simon
February 17, 2018 9:23 pm

Every time I try to fish out the truth, I get poked by a Finnegan.

February 17, 2018 3:33 pm

“they demand Australia immediately cease all carbon emissions and coal exports”
No, wait. This needs more emphasis.
Think about that for a minute. How many Millions would die if any First World country were to ‘cease all carbon emissions’? For more then a day. Major reduction in electricity production. Most forms of transportation shut down. Hell, are we supposed to stop breathing?
‘Everybody die or the hostages get it.’

Reply to  schitzree
February 17, 2018 3:53 pm

Cease all Carbon Emissions.
The green beans dream and if it happened they would wake up in night mare . They have absolutely no idea how the world or even their country functions . And a lot of green MPs are just as bad clueless . Do they learn this stuff in the hallowed halls of universities ?

John in Oz
Reply to  schitzree
February 17, 2018 10:55 pm

The idiot wants us all to stop exhaling.
I wonder how long he can hold his breath.
Plus, he confuses carbon with CO2, the normal state of confusion with enviro-whackos.

Greg Cavanagh
Reply to  schitzree
February 18, 2018 2:10 pm

I believe the carbon budget for Australia includes the wild camels of NT, fires that burn uncontrolled in central Australia, and others similar. Just how do you make a continent Zero carbon emissions?

Reply to  schitzree
February 20, 2018 12:37 pm

Absolutely. Yes of course. We cease carbon emissions. What, lights went out? I’m sorry. Oh there’s no water? What a coinsidence! Now, you can google and check the emissions have stopped – what, googling doesn’t work? You want some food? I’m sorry again, you have to go get it yourself. By foot. From the countryside. Horses? No, they’d emit more, so we decided to just eat them to stop emissions. Oh you’re going to kill your hostages? I’m sorry again, but I think nobody cares as the Internet is down and most people are hungry already. Did I tell you there’s no water? There’s no water, so they’re thirsty as well.

The Reverend Badger
February 17, 2018 3:36 pm

Surely you fight fire with fire. I envisage a piece of modern art entitled ;
An effigy of the offending person is hung from a rope with limbs half cut off and artificial blood is pumped over the onlookers while a loudspeaker repeats “LIAR LIAR..” starting softly and reaching 110dB.
Could be interesting to see what the various factions make of it.

Joel O'Bryan
February 17, 2018 3:40 pm

This really is how neo-Marxists think.
This is exactly the same kind of irrationality to encourage revolution and destruction that allowed Chinese Communist Mao and his Cultural Revolution Red Guard thugs to murder hundreds of thousands and beat, persecute and imprison many millions of fellow countrymen.

February 17, 2018 3:40 pm

Threatening to kill those who disagree with you is now debate?
I guess the left really has changed society.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  MarkW
February 17, 2018 9:34 pm

Mark, don’t forget the glee over Bob Carter’s and John Coleman’s passing. These folks have figured out that they can only prevail through attrition of the old and indoctrination of the young.

February 17, 2018 3:48 pm

they demand Australia immediately cease all carbon emissions
They propose to make breathing against the law?

Reply to  davidmhoffer
February 17, 2018 3:49 pm

I’m a bit lost. Would the not breathing apply to just humans? Or would animals have to comply also?

Reply to  davidmhoffer
February 17, 2018 4:41 pm

I’m forced to the conclusion that many of the Climate Faithful truly belive that ‘Carbon’ really is a pollutant that only comes from Fossil Fuels, and that you can see it come from the exhaust as smoke. It’s the only thing that explains some of the crazy things they say.
Remember, these are the same people who often think ‘cemicals’ are artificially made poisons, and ‘Organic’ means ‘contains no cemicals’.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  davidmhoffer
February 17, 2018 9:49 pm

Hold it Dave, plants Give off CO2 at night, so it looks like the hostages are toast to me.
I can’t imagine sitting through this in a theater, let alone paying to do so.
I’m sure this kind of theater would have been quite acceptable in pre-WW2 Germany, though. Of course the enemies would be a different faction of the population.

Reply to  davidmhoffer
February 17, 2018 11:02 pm

They count polluting the earth with Cu, which is a poison for trees, as organic!

James Griffin
February 17, 2018 3:49 pm

As the more rational of us know the change in the Sun Cycle from 24 to 25 is already having an effect. Throw in the reduction of Sun Spots. and the influence of Cosmic Rays then there certainly is Climate Change…but not one that corresponds to what the “Warrmers” are thinking.
With CO2 being 4,500ppm 500 million years agio then Planet Earth is a somewhat more difficult problem to assess than the current 390 ppm which apparently thinks we are doomed.

Joel O’Bryan
Reply to  James Griffin
February 17, 2018 6:54 pm

It’s currently about 410 ppm. Starting in May, pCO2 will decrease this summer to about 405 before heading back up.

February 17, 2018 3:51 pm

Its just another extreme form of the intellectual fascism promoted by people like David Suzuki calling for government to “Deny the Deniers the Right to Deny”comment image

February 17, 2018 3:51 pm

we didn’t want to reignite a culture war
LOL. Sure you didn’t.

February 17, 2018 4:04 pm

It’s been done as a big budget movie called Kingsman. Only the eco terrorist is the bad guy.

Reply to  MikeN
February 17, 2018 5:53 pm

You know, that’s what gets me most about this. How do you make a play, movie, whatever that involves a group taking hostages and threatening to kill them if their clearly impossible demands aren’t meet, and NOT have them be the bad guys?
It’s the same thing that made the 10/10 video so inexplicable. There’s just no way to make their actions seem reasonable. You don’t convince anyone you’re right by proving your willing to do anything to get your way.
No one is impressed by a fanatic’s devotion except otherlike minded fanatics.

February 17, 2018 4:07 pm

Maybe then people will realize that the whole climate change issue is satire.

February 17, 2018 4:09 pm

Maybe Finnigan thought his message was that anyone who disagrees with his views should be slaughtered, but I see it in a different way.
I see this insane (by our standards) proposal as a warning that none of us should take our freedoms, our rights and our liberty for granted. It can be leached right from under us if we don’t pay attention. Look at it as a wakeup call: it happened in Paris in 1798; Russian 1915 – 1917; Germany 1930s, Cambodia 1963; Venezuela 2013.
Snap out of it, and understand just how dangerous these people really are. If you don’t, you will lose and wonder what happened.

Reply to  Sara
February 17, 2018 4:30 pm

Yup. And is why the US Second Amendment is SO important. Not that we want to own M1 tanks or F16s. Just effective local deterrents to ANTIFA and such. Very effective terminal deterrents.

Reply to  ristvan
February 18, 2018 1:33 am

A group calls themselves ANTIFA, and they don’t get the irony.
Perhaps it’s their IQ?
I’m dumb, but not that dumb.

Reply to  ristvan
February 18, 2018 8:08 am

They’ve been indoctrinated since first grade with the notion that anything to the right of Mao, is a fascist.

Joel O’Bryan
Reply to  Sara
February 17, 2018 6:57 pm

The best recent historical analogy to what the Left is trying to accomplish today is the Cultural Revolution in 1966 under Communist Party Chairman Mao.

Reply to  Sara
February 18, 2018 7:20 am


February 17, 2018 4:24 pm

Meh. It’s more of the same: just another way to cash in on the CAGW swindle, this time by selling theatre tickets. I’m sure the theatre (lights, HVAC, snack bar, etc.) runs on 100% renewables. Oh, and the patrons, actors and assorted unionize support staff will arrive on foot only, no fossil-fueled transportation allowed of course.

John Bell
Reply to  PaulH
February 17, 2018 4:35 pm

EXACTLY! They are like fish not aware of the water, they are not aware of their minute-by-minute use of fossil fuels – but they are so idealistic it blinds them to it.

Reply to  John Bell
February 18, 2018 7:19 am

Do not insult idealistic people by calling this cynical ignorant sociopathic twit “idealistic”

February 17, 2018 4:41 pm

Reminds me of a campfire song we would sing at school,
“There was an old man called David Finnigan
He grew fat and then grew thinnagan
Then he died and had to beginngan
Poor old David Finnigan beginnagan …”
(Repeat … )

Pop Piasa
Reply to  ptolemy2
February 17, 2018 10:17 pm

Well, every time I made a campfire at school I got expelled, so we never got to the song part.

February 17, 2018 4:55 pm

These people are walking balls of hate and evil.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Sheri
February 17, 2018 10:12 pm

Here’s their theme-song:

February 17, 2018 5:01 pm

If you can’t kill the truth, your next best option is to kill the speaker. Intimidation is so much easier than rational discusion, especially when you have to debate from a position of emotion rather than reason and fact.

February 17, 2018 5:06 pm

The whole premise seems so contrived for heated controversy.
Let’s see now, what can I write a play about that will really shock and interest people? … oh, I know … a play about holding the IPCC hostage, threatening to kill everybody, unless they learn some real facts.

Reply to  Robert Kernodle
February 17, 2018 5:20 pm

Kill Climate Idiots
The purpose of my play is to capture the plight of marginalized scientists, who symbolically find their collective voice via employing tactics of their harshest critics, taking a public stance in a high-profile, socio-politico-economico scam-fest architectural edifice, where global benevolence is subverted to pursue global domination in the guise of “saving the planet”, blah, blah, blah, bulls**t, blah, blah, … more art-speak, manifesto crap, … you get the idea.

Reply to  Robert Kernodle
February 18, 2018 7:17 am

Now that could make a good play.

Philip of Taos
February 17, 2018 5:07 pm

Given that the Democrat party just tried to steal an election and then unseat a sitting President using the DOJ, FBI and possibly the NSA, and the CIA leadership with false evidence, illegal surveillance and false Russian information. I will keep my firearms thank you.

Peter Morris
February 17, 2018 5:24 pm

And people said the plot of Shadow Complex was unrealistic. Ha! It was maybe a little too on the nose, given Antifa and this loon.

February 17, 2018 5:27 pm

Once they are deemed unworthy, inconvenient, or profitable, a-bort them, a-bort them NOW, a-bort them all. Send them to the a-bortion chambers. It works at the beginning and end of human evolution, and it can work throughout to reduce the anthropogenic footprint.

LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks
February 17, 2018 5:47 pm

I predict this will end badly for the schizophrenic reality-denying anti-science eco-wackos… they’re attempting to legitimize murder and denial of rights as a means of achieving their socialist ends.
When it finally sinks in for the majority of the populace of the world that the planet is cooling and they’ve been lied to for decades..
when it finally sinks in for the majority of the populace of the world that for CO2 to contribute to global warming would mean it somehow violates the laws of thermodynamics (because it is completely transparent to downwelling radiation, and very nearly so to upwelling, and because our atmosphere is not a greenhouse, it convects heat upward, lessening the mean free path length of infrared radiation out to space)…
when the world’s populace finally realizes that the whole CO2 scam was merely a vehicle for the humanity-hating anti-capitalist socialists to push their depopulation / deindustrialization plans while enriching a select few, a means for them to push through legislation that otherwise would have zero chance of being passed…
when the world’s populace realize that right at the time when their leaders should have been preparing for and telling people to prepare for extended periods of brutal cold, they were instead squandering resources on pie-in-the-sky schemes that destabilized electrical grids and greatly increased the cost of food…
and when that populace starts chopping the heads of those pushing this lie, and denying the right to speak against reality to those sheeple who were gullible enough to go along with the CO2-scammers…
well… have they any basis for complaint when their own tactics are used against them?

February 17, 2018 6:04 pm

Related to the public debate.
A prestigious debate between three climate science experts (including Gavin Spit) and three deniers (including Lindzen and novelist Michael Crichton). I seem to remember that similar debates were conducted worldwide in places like Oxford and Harvard to highly educated audiences.
The so called experts lost because they were so arrogant they thought they could simply tell lies, sneer at the opposition and get away with it. They didn’t realise that both the audience and deniers were considerably more intellectually capable than they were.
IQ2US Debate: Global Warming Is Not A Crisis

Dr. Strangelove
Reply to  Eric Coo
February 17, 2018 7:26 pm

Alarmists don’t want debate because they will lose. The Inquisition was invented to enforce the dogma and persecute the heretics. Change “dogma” to “consensus” and “heretics” to “deniers” and here we are.
Why debate Galileo when you can arrest him for heresy?
comment image

Pat Frank
Reply to  Eric Coo
February 18, 2018 12:01 pm

Gavin Schmidt accused Dick Lindzen of lying in that debate. Lindzen had a few words to say about it, at the end.
Gavin, who has unfailingly supported Michael Mann, has no appreciation of the bitter irony involved when he accuses someone else of lying.

February 17, 2018 6:13 pm

The ongoing efforts of the reality manipulators have created a collective and shared delusion that is self-sustaining. Sadly, even intelligent minds are not immune to this crowd-think. The entertainment industry has joined pseudo-science as a paid political tool and it’s usually subtle, but this one stoops to the pits of violent intimidation and may just trigger some crazies.

Reply to  Tim
February 17, 2018 7:10 pm

“Sadly, even intelligent minds are not immune to this crowd-think. The entertainment industry has joined pseudo-science as a paid political tool and it’s usually subtle, but this one stoops to the pits of violent intimidation and may just trigger some crazies.”
You lost me there…first you mention “intelligent minds” then you mention “The entertainment industry”. I don’t see the connection.

Reply to  Ricdre
February 17, 2018 9:16 pm

But some TV shows have good description of so academia people, focused on tiny details, having often useless “culture”, clueless about many real world facts.
I like the TV show “The Big Bang Theory”. I think episode “The Prestidigitation Approximation” is quite realistic.

Episode “Bear Bad” in Buffy the Vampire Slayer is good too.
In The Simpsons, the (“non canon” ie out of the ordinary narration) episode about Marge Bouvier’s past, when she was a univ student in love of a prof is good too.

Dr. Strangelove
February 17, 2018 6:36 pm

The Alarmists of Oz are bringing back the Inquisition. Burn the climate heretics! James Cook U stands for cook the heretics!

Greg Cavanagh
Reply to  Dr. Strangelove
February 18, 2018 3:45 pm

Who commissioned the picture to be created?
This not an isolated incident, and you’ll find many paintings of such atrocities. Some are from the artist who recognises the import of such public events, and records it for history. But many are commissioned by the Church for their own records.
Further; these events are done in the public square to demonstrate clearly to everybody the consequences of heresy.

Joe G
February 17, 2018 7:05 pm

Who are they kidding? We haz the guns! And the President…

Walter Sobchak
Reply to  Joe G
February 17, 2018 8:03 pm

For how long?

February 17, 2018 7:52 pm

Threatening violence is just more evidence that the Alarmists think they are losing the CAGW argument. They are getting desperate.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  TA
February 17, 2018 10:43 pm

The Church of Omnipotent Greenhouse In Carbon seems to be increasingly militant in their mission of global conversion. Winning by elimination seems to be the ultimate goal.

February 17, 2018 8:15 pm

Is that the same crowd that claimed that ads featuring a bullseye on a map (*) was encouraging gun violence against politicians and resulted in one Democrat being attacked by a gunman?
(*) a visual device that was used by both parties to indicate areas that could be flipped during next election

February 17, 2018 8:42 pm

Why do these people want to kill CAGW acolytes (who are the REAL “climate deniers”)?

February 17, 2018 9:30 pm

The environment minister in the clip is clueless about pop music lyrics.
She quotes the lyric “you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone” crediting Fleetwood Mac.
The words are from the song Big Yellow Taxi written by Joni Mitchell covered by many groups but not Fleetwood Mac.

February 17, 2018 9:46 pm

Since Leftists can’t persuade people to follow their destructive ideas through words, they prefer the barrel of a gun to get peoples’ minds right….
Leftists’ killed 100+ million citizens around the world in the 20th century and this plight continues.
When will people ever learn the lessons of history?

Eyal Porat
February 17, 2018 10:23 pm

Amazingly it completely eludes them how they equate themselves with terrorists like ISIS –
All terrorists believe their way is the only way.
All terrorists think they are right and the rest are ignorant heretics.
All terrorists think they are superior to others who deserve to die for being “non-believers”.
If I was just a bit less busy I would have taken their “play” and switched the roles – the terrorists wold have been “climate skeptics” and the victims would be the eco warriors.
See how THAT would have played out for them.

Phillip Bratby
February 17, 2018 10:26 pm

Well I for one don’t know any “climate deniers” or any “climate change deniers”.

Greg Cavanagh
Reply to  Phillip Bratby
February 18, 2018 3:47 pm

Michael Mann produces his hockey stick demonstrating that the climate never changed (until now).

michael hart
February 17, 2018 11:22 pm

A pretty standard operating procedure among the SJWs these days is to publicly say something sufficiently inflammatory about a selected group of people such that some of them, or indeed anyone, then makes some intemperate replies or threats.
With that in hand, you then claim to be oppressed and start a Patreon or Go-fund-me account to start collecting money from individuals, “charities”, and some corporations with advertising budgets feeling the need to virtue-signal. It works like an absolute charm for the Anita Sarkesian types, and often also seems to open the institutional public funding spigot.

Reply to  michael hart
February 18, 2018 7:33 am


Reply to  michael hart
February 19, 2018 12:13 am

some of them had classes in activism at prestigious universities where their professors set examples.
exhort and extort is the fundamental premise of activism. they don’t believe their schtick. it’s pure theater.

Patrick MJD
February 17, 2018 11:57 pm

More BS from Australia. While we have pollies who can’t keep their baby making apparatus in their trousers away from their “staffers”, or from declaring their citizenships (Joyce), we have idiots like this getting airtime. Australia is lost! And Musk urges Australia to take more use of his batteries (Sorry, I can’t find the link).

Reply to  Patrick MJD
February 18, 2018 9:20 pm

Joyce did offer to euthanise Johnny Depp’s dogs … that’s got to count for something.

Brett Keane
February 18, 2018 2:17 am

Yep, it is for nuts like these we remember Guy Fawkes on 5 Nov.. No more!

Nigel S
February 18, 2018 2:35 am

A classic state subsidised theatre problem. Every so often they have to come up with something to justify where all the money went. See ‘The Great Immensity’ for instance.
‘Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury
Signifying nothing.’
From the days when theatre really was ‘edgy’ and losing your head was a possible outcome.

February 18, 2018 3:06 am

“…“It’s really only politicians and some members of the media who deny climate change these days …”
So, I’m guessing he thinks the rest of us out her in real world land don’t have a position on the CAGW fantasy? Does he even know we exist? Does he even know that real people exist outside the inner city latte and “avant guard” theatre-going set? Nah, probably not.

February 18, 2018 4:49 am

No, it’s about what kind of world I want to live in NOW! I don’t want censorship, so I think tthese idiots should get to put on their play, but I don’t want to live in a world where people are stupid enough to think this is rational discourse.

Keith J
February 18, 2018 6:16 am

So much antisocial thought in that brain all logic is stifled. Mental illness for sure

February 18, 2018 6:26 am

Noooo one expects the Climate Inquisition!! Our chief weapon is the firing squad.

February 18, 2018 7:11 am

Pol Pot would have been such a huge backer of Finnigan and his cause.
Nothing shows how empty and corrupt a cause and its backers are like murdering thise who disagree.

J Mac
February 18, 2018 10:15 am

Bigoted, murderous hate speech and terrorist recruitment ‘plays/simulations’ by AGW xxxtremists increasing? Hmmmmm…….
Note to self: Time to improve the ‘offhand’ and ‘return fire while moving to cover’ skills.

February 18, 2018 11:02 am

Isn’t it strange? All the media/politicians always warning everyone to DON’T HATE (nanny culture), but this kind of thing is perfectly appropriate. Just shows their psychosis in wide-open display. LOL

February 18, 2018 11:30 am

When will the climate warriors find time to kill the deniers when they are so busy trying to find ways to kill people by denying them access to cheap energy?

David Cage
February 18, 2018 11:37 am

I wonder what the climate believers who support this sort of play would have to say about the fact that one of the major reasons I disbelieve is that I ran it through the digital filter used in a cruise missile which gives a very different picture of normal climate progression to the one that climate scientists get.
As a side benefit it means that I could readily build my own far better cruise missile than your average conformist left wing jerk who swallows the garbage whole from the numerous but limited ability climate scientist flock.
Freedom of speech is fine up to a point but this is a clear cut threat to those who do not believe. Many of those I know who do not believe climate scientists come from military design environment so threats like this are not a good idea.
More so we all we are asking is that instead of being told that climate scientists are superior to god and must be believed without question we want the data to be quality assessed like proper science or engineering by an external quality control group with the power to demand access to all data and background information.

Bruce Cobb
February 18, 2018 12:20 pm

“it asks the audience to think about what sort of world they want to be living in 30 years from now,” he says.
Oh I dunno, how about the sort that no longer has climate cuckaloos running around telling everyone what to do, and how to live?

February 18, 2018 12:36 pm

“It’s really only politicians and some members of the media who deny climate change these days …”
That’s funny I thought it was the other way round!

Greg Cavanagh
Reply to  Sunderlandsteve
February 18, 2018 3:51 pm

I think he’s say that politicians aren’t doing enough. Therefore they don’t believe just how devastating Global Warming is, therefore they are deniers. It’s a leap of logic to be sure.

Pamela Gray
February 18, 2018 12:58 pm

So. Given the past week of devastation Hollywood liberals can threaten and even blow up people in their movies over political differences and get away with it because they hide behind their free speech mantra, and their weird notion that they know best because…”Hollywood”. Maybe now they can see their current blinged-up 4 fingers pointing back at them while they point a finger at me. Yes, me. Conservative. Gun owner. Patriot.

February 18, 2018 1:20 pm

These are obvious and straight death threats, which is I think could be prosecuted as a crime…
Climate science is the first science in history which has ever needed to eliminate people with a different point of view. This all alone should raise warnings in all sane people’s heads about the true nature of the climate agenda. We haven’t seen such extreme positions since the Nazis rose to power in the 1930’s. It would be best to treat the problem at the root, before it’s too late, this time. But the population is surprisingly indifferent towards this movement. Doesn’t “save the planet” sound like a good idea? But the hell is paved with good intentions.

February 18, 2018 1:39 pm

Well, if they want to kill me because of my opinions about climate change, I’m not afraid. I’m ready to die.
It will not change my point of view, which is that CO2 greenhouse warming won’t be a threat for the planet for at least the next 200 years.
The sea level rise between the end of the last ice age, and the start of the current inter glacial was going at an average rate of 100mm per year, triple the current rate (+123 meters in ~1250 years). The polar bears and all other animal species as we know of survived, with the exception of mammoths which went extinct because of over hunting by humans.

George McFly......I'm your density
February 18, 2018 1:45 pm

“In order to get our message before the public, we’ve had to kill people” The Unabomber Manifesto.
I wonder what this twisted little boy Finnigan thinks about at night.

February 18, 2018 1:59 pm

Art is full of atrocities, smears, insult, nonsense, satire, etc. All is permitted, and all is forgiven if it is entertaining.
The biggest crime in art is to be boring. Which you always are, when preaching and lecturing.
My bet this will just be boring.

February 18, 2018 5:40 pm

Just don’t turn your back on them for even a few seconds. okay?
They can’t be trusted. That much is clear. Threatening to kill enough people to populate a small town in my state? That will get you arrested, charged with terrorism, and if you’re still alive (meaning no self-sacrifice while in jail) when you’re sentenced. you might be able to get Charlie Manson’s cell in the state prison.

Joel Snider
February 19, 2018 12:16 pm

They will act out these fantasies in fiction until they work themselves up enough to act them out for real.
Or at least inspire others to.
Any means necessary, remember, and their higher morality is saving the planet.

Jonathan Griggs
February 20, 2018 12:58 pm

funny, I don’t think the lesson I take away from this is the one they anticipated. What I see is that the left is becoming even more radicalized every day and I need to stock up on guns and ammo so with it hits the fan I can do my duty and defend the ideals that my country was founded on.
And if I were a politician the take away I would have is that terrorism, regardless of the cause or reason, is still terrorism with dire consequences. Perhaps we should start investigating fringe left groups like we do the fringe right ones.

February 21, 2018 5:40 am

An aspect of this not covered thus far – a play like this will attract an audience of like-minded people, who will then meet each-other in the lobby. This play will help these people to find each-other and reinforce their views through social acceptance. This is not accidental.

February 24, 2018 7:29 am

“Folks keep talkin’ about another Civil War. One side has 8 trillion bullets. The other doesn’t know which bathroom to use. Y’all do the math” Cloyd Rivers (former Navy Seal)

Reply to  stingray1
February 25, 2018 7:33 am

Democrat Party started a civil war to keep blacks in slavery. Look how that worked out for them.

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights