By Steve Goreham
Republished with permission of The Washington Times.

On January 10, the city of New York filed suit against BP, Chevron, Conoco-Phillips, ExxonMobil and Royal Dutch Shell. The suit accuses oil companies of causing dangerous climate change and damage to New York City, seeking monetary compensation. But history will rank this action high in the annals of human superstition.
The 67-page suit claims that burning of fossil fuels marketed by the oil industry changes the climate and that these changes are “injuring New York City.” The suit projects an increase in deaths from heat waves, flooding from extreme weather that would impact the city’s water supply system, increasing frequency of droughts that would diminish water to upstate New York reservoirs, and catastrophic flooding from rising oceans.
Hurricane Sandy is mentioned several times in the suit as an example of both extreme weather and rising oceans from human-caused warming. As a result of Sandy, New York launched a $20 billion effort to prepare for the effects of climate change in 2017. The city wants oil firms to pay for this effort, claiming they are causing “continuous and reoccurring injuries to the city.” But these claims border on the superstitious.
Hurricane Sandy hit New Jersey and New York City on October 29, 2012 with Category 1 hurricane-force winds of 81 miles per hour. It came ashore at high tide causing extensive flooding. The storm resulted in 147 and over $50 billion in assessed damage. But this has happened before.
More than 80 tropical or sub-tropical storms struck New York State during the last 300 years. An example was the Norfolk and Long Island Hurricane of 1821. It hit New York City with Category 3 force winds, much stronger than Category 1 Sandy. Although it came ashore at low tide, when ocean levels were five feet lower than when Sandy hit, the 1821 storm flooded New York City up to Canal Street.
According to the National Hurricane Center, 170 hurricanes made US landfall during the twentieth century. Fifty-nine of these storms generated at least Category 3 wind speeds, stronger than Category 1 Sandy. How then was Hurricane Sandy evidence of human-caused global warming?
Ocean levels have risen about 120 meters (390 feet) in the last 20,000 years, according to data from NASA. Tidal gauges show a rise of about 7 inches per century over the last 150 years. No scientist can tell us when natural sea level rise stopped and man-made sea level rise began. New York City is correct to prepare for rising seas, but wrong to believe that greenhouse gases from burning oil are causing the rise.

Throughout history, people have believed that human actions can change the climate and cause extreme weather. The Aztecs of the 1500s practiced human sacrifice in an attempt to control the weather and to keep the Sun moving across the sky. After King Henry divorced his wife, Catherine, in 1533, Englanders believed that nine months of unusually heavy rainfall were a result of the divorce. During the cool climate of the Little Ice Age between the fourteenth and nineteen centuries, hundreds of thousands of people in Europe were executed for the crime of witchcraft, blamed for short growing seasons and crop failures.
Today we still live in a world of superstition. Climate advocates tell us that if we change our light bulbs we can save polar bears. If we erect wind turbines we can make the storms less severe. And if we drive electric cars we can stop the oceans from rising. Our modern witches are the oil and coal companies.
Steve Goreham is a speaker on the environment, business, and public policy and author of the new book Outside the Green Box: Rethinking Sustainable Development.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
For every horsepower provided by an oil fired fossil fuel, it would be supreme justice if a years worth of horseshit were dumped in Manhattan streets, and enough wood smoke to choke those horses were injected into the city’s air. Let’s have just a small taste of the way it used to be might humble some of the idiots.
These lawsuits from leftist cities and states are, at their core, an attempt to extort money from the named businesses. If these suits result in an award or settlement, the money would be used for the typical “propping up” of the failing budgets of these entities.
The “award” is political donations not monetary damages from the defendant.
To Observa, “…the higher price bill…”
Exactly. But who pays any settlement? The consumers, of course! Corporations don’t pay taxes, their customers do. So any settlement costs will be passed onto the consumer. Just another cost of doing business. Heating oil in the winter is not optional.
And the financials of the Tobacco Settlement are a good guide: the price of a pack of cigarettes went up to pay for the $250B penalty. But note that the stock price of the major tobacco companies rose after the settlement.
To W Blair: thanks for the Oil Co. links.
Exxon-Mobil’s statement is not a confession to any climate crime. It is a typical lawyer weasel worded piece that could be read several ways. Basically says climate change is real (duh!), CO2 is adding to it (97% of skeptics would agree), more research is need to assess attribution and how society can balance the benefits vs costs. It is not a guilty plea.
And the irony of counter suits against NYC for not notifying investors of the climate risks to the city!
oops.
…not notifying BOND investors of the climate risks…
Witches, eh? Where is Elizabeth Montgomery when we need her?
New York is built of concrete and steel made by coal and heated and fed with oil-fired machinery. Are they returning to wood and draft animals? Or is this suit an elaborate ritual of biting the hands that feed them? To benefit only the tort bar?
“Hurricane Sandy hit New Jersey and New York City on October 29, 2012 with Category 1 hurricane-force winds of 81 miles per hour”: None of y’all picked up on this, and you are just letting lies persist. I was watching NWS weather stations and buoys during Sandy and at and after the time of landfall none of them came near hurricane force. But a lie told often enough becomes a truth even to those you would expect to question it.
Rich.
If the public is so easily swayed that a couple of press releases (if they happened) from Exxon are enough to convince them there is no danger, then why can’t the constant drumbeat of doom in the NYT, TV, National Geographic, Time ad nauseum convince them there is danger? The magnitudes of the two communications don’t even compare. Like 1:100000 or more.
When did climate change by humans received the Chemistry Nobel Prize, the ultimate recognition of independent corroboration? I must have missed that one! JBVigo, PhD Environmental Science.
Sent from my iPhone
>
How’s that go?
“Correlation is not Causation”?
Here we have a case of “‘The Cause’-ation proves Correlation”.
(As long as they can find the right judge.)