By Steve Goreham
Republished with permission of The Washington Times.

On January 10, the city of New York filed suit against BP, Chevron, Conoco-Phillips, ExxonMobil and Royal Dutch Shell. The suit accuses oil companies of causing dangerous climate change and damage to New York City, seeking monetary compensation. But history will rank this action high in the annals of human superstition.
The 67-page suit claims that burning of fossil fuels marketed by the oil industry changes the climate and that these changes are “injuring New York City.” The suit projects an increase in deaths from heat waves, flooding from extreme weather that would impact the city’s water supply system, increasing frequency of droughts that would diminish water to upstate New York reservoirs, and catastrophic flooding from rising oceans.
Hurricane Sandy is mentioned several times in the suit as an example of both extreme weather and rising oceans from human-caused warming. As a result of Sandy, New York launched a $20 billion effort to prepare for the effects of climate change in 2017. The city wants oil firms to pay for this effort, claiming they are causing “continuous and reoccurring injuries to the city.” But these claims border on the superstitious.
Hurricane Sandy hit New Jersey and New York City on October 29, 2012 with Category 1 hurricane-force winds of 81 miles per hour. It came ashore at high tide causing extensive flooding. The storm resulted in 147 and over $50 billion in assessed damage. But this has happened before.
More than 80 tropical or sub-tropical storms struck New York State during the last 300 years. An example was the Norfolk and Long Island Hurricane of 1821. It hit New York City with Category 3 force winds, much stronger than Category 1 Sandy. Although it came ashore at low tide, when ocean levels were five feet lower than when Sandy hit, the 1821 storm flooded New York City up to Canal Street.
According to the National Hurricane Center, 170 hurricanes made US landfall during the twentieth century. Fifty-nine of these storms generated at least Category 3 wind speeds, stronger than Category 1 Sandy. How then was Hurricane Sandy evidence of human-caused global warming?
Ocean levels have risen about 120 meters (390 feet) in the last 20,000 years, according to data from NASA. Tidal gauges show a rise of about 7 inches per century over the last 150 years. No scientist can tell us when natural sea level rise stopped and man-made sea level rise began. New York City is correct to prepare for rising seas, but wrong to believe that greenhouse gases from burning oil are causing the rise.

Throughout history, people have believed that human actions can change the climate and cause extreme weather. The Aztecs of the 1500s practiced human sacrifice in an attempt to control the weather and to keep the Sun moving across the sky. After King Henry divorced his wife, Catherine, in 1533, Englanders believed that nine months of unusually heavy rainfall were a result of the divorce. During the cool climate of the Little Ice Age between the fourteenth and nineteen centuries, hundreds of thousands of people in Europe were executed for the crime of witchcraft, blamed for short growing seasons and crop failures.
Today we still live in a world of superstition. Climate advocates tell us that if we change our light bulbs we can save polar bears. If we erect wind turbines we can make the storms less severe. And if we drive electric cars we can stop the oceans from rising. Our modern witches are the oil and coal companies.
Steve Goreham is a speaker on the environment, business, and public policy and author of the new book Outside the Green Box: Rethinking Sustainable Development.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Really hope this is the first of many actions against the oil boys who’ve kindly documented their guilt:
https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/sustainability/climate-change.html
https://www.chevron.com/corporate-responsibility/climate-change
http://www.conocophillips.com/environment/climate-change/
http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/current-issues/climate-policy/climate-perspectives/our-position
https://www.shell.com/sustainability/environment/climate-change.html
Hope BHP is taken to the cleaners in Australia:
https://www.bhp.com/environment/climate-change
A bunch of left-wing opportunistic CAWG fraudsters and enablers who deserve to be vexatiously litigated into financial ruin.
Hope the Chinese buy them all out for a song!
I noted the slippery slope of such stupidity starting with the tobacco companies and moving on to James Hardie and asbestos in Australia. My take then was with epidemiological risk (as distinct from known technical or engineering risk), it should be perfectly legal with no threat of compensatory suit to trade freely in any such product until such time as we as a community decide otherwise. In that respect the computer revolution beginning in the early 80s has allowed us to gather such statistical evidence more effectively although that has produced it’s own attendant risks.
Retrospectivity was simply being wise after the event and rather than the ability to claw back the true social costs from consumers and/or suppliers and investors who had absconded with the cheap private costs in the past, it was a feel-good witch hunt for those left holding the bag. Nowhere was this more apparent with the lynch mob mentality pursuing James Hardie, who had seen the epidemiological light by the mid 1980s and ceased all asbestos product manufacture because they had given the world alternative cement fibre product.
No matter that it was still perfectly legal to supply asbestos brake linings up until January1st 2003 because the vehicle industry hadn’t developed a suitable alternative and depositing all that brake dust dropping off the munchkins at school and kindy, the current shareholders and employees of James Hardie had to be held to account for their wicked evil ways once a nation didn’t need asbestos products anymore. Welcome aboard the hypocrisy train NYC.
a home in a small town ner me was on fire
possibly could have been saved
did they?
no
the ohs regs banned firies from doing so because…
they had asbestos sheeting in parts of the home
nearly all homes in Vic do prior 2000 or so
so the entire home was gutted and placed behind warning tape
while the wind and weather could carry the asbestos dust from the charred home all over the town for some months until they sorted the insane cost special crews in to remove it.
now thats an example of public service n safety to “admire ” isnt it?
Reading Carl Sagan’s book “The Demon Haunted World.”
Yes, Sagan bought into the CAGW bamboozle, but he would have been open to evidence, discussion, counter-arguments and not disenfranchise the skeptics as witches.
Should be laughed out of court.
The oil companies should send a one liner – What time tomorrow do you want the oil and gas shut off?
Then New york city could rightfully declare to be blackmailed by oil companies and declare state of emergency with the army taking over, I personally believe that climate change comes from too much carbon dioxide in the air, One cannot change the atmosphere so drastically and have no effects on the wheather, I also believe that climate change denial is hyped by the oil industry, Who else should have an interest in going against science?
deBlasio and buds did not sue the Oil Companies with headquarters in New York City! Ha ha!
Ref: http://www.icc.org/gas-oil-companies/new-york/new-york.htm
Here is the list:
Belco Oil & Gas Corp
Addum Mobil Gas Station
Aquila Capital Partners LP
Aquila Productions
Barnwell Industries Inc
Calray Gas Svc Inc
Edible Oil Trading Co
Electric Vehicle Progress
Energex Ltd
Enron Energy Services Inc
Falcon Oil & Gas Inc
Free Gas Zone
A G I P Petroleum Products
Gaseteria Oil
Gerard C H C & Associates
Gross Oil Delaware Corp
Jrp San Juan LP
Khanty Mansiysk Oil Corp
Kuo International Oil Inc
Levcor International Inc
Little Oil & Energy Corp
Midnight Oil Co
Midwood Petroleum Corp
Ny City Dept- Enviro Protect
Oil Space Inc
RPI Institutional Services
Shell
Shell is a wholly owned subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell – one of the defendants.
I hate to root for the green nuts but they are insane. The oil dudes laid out a gamble against humanity, knowing full well it was a scam. I hope they get skewered on their own green pikes.
The Green Suicide comes to Mind – DOh!
There goes my fat paycheck. Might have to sell my Lamborghini, it wasn’t that good in the snow anyway.
New York prosecutors are going to get a master class from the legal beagles of these seasoned companies! Where a lot of bucks are made, a legal department is kept busy by shysters trying to grab some of their green. These legal guys know where to look for buried bodies and slipshod documents that reveal the city government’s compromised position 9n the same subjects.
I wonder if the city of New York would like to tell all the residents to shut off their heaters during the current winter because the heat comes from evil fossil fuels?
If they are really serious they would, otherwise they are complicit and perhaps even accessories after the fact since they “know” all the evils of fossil fuels yet continue to use them?
Well, if oil companies shut off supplies as a result of the NY lawsuit, then I will sue NY for many damages to my own, my relatives’ and my friends’ well being.
Watch out, NY, I’ve got YOU in my litigious cross hairs now.
I used to think of NY as the national center for culture. Similarly, I used to think of California as the national center for innovation. How times change! Now I seem to be arriving at the point of thinking as both places as centers for stupid — I use this word so much more these days, I know.
Can I file a suit for pursuing futile (i.e., frivolous times ten) claims that tie up courts in such a way that serious law work making my society safer does not occur in a reasonable time, thus causing me greater risk and potential harm?
Kernodle vs. New York … has a nice ring to it.
I wonder if the city of New York would like to tell all the residents to shut off their heaters during the current winter because the heat comes from evil fossil fuels?
If they are really serious they would, otherwise they are complicit and perhaps even accessories after the fact since they “know” all the evils of fossil fuels yet continue to use them?
Maybe as others have suggested, the oil, has and electric companies should just shut off the flow of energy.
Sorry for double post
Seems like more Alinksyite projection. California is under attack from geo-engineering. First the manufactured drought; then DEW lasers setting fires at 2am, people running for their lives; then torrents of rain at 4am, sweeping them away in their beds. California is in the grip of psychopaths and I know it’s outside WUWT’s paradigm, but it really deserves legitimate attention.
I wonder what would happen if as a result of these lawsuits these oil companies announced that they were going to stop providing their products to New York City? Just the threat posed by the announcement may cause the city to drop the lawsuits.
Good, they’ll lose the lawsuit because statistics and facts will demonstrate that the alarmist are wrong. Maybe this needs to happen.
I can I sue NY since they burn fossil fuels? Seriously, use their own filing to sue them.
You shouldn’t have mentioned human sacrifices. That may be the Plan B after the lawsuit blows up in their faces
So New York and these other plaintiffs sold bonds knowing about the damage caused by climate change in their respective territories? And did not inform the bond buyers? That’s fraud. They have left themselves open to a lawsuit. Great time to be a lawyer.
I have a dream . . . in which the State of New York sues the fossil fuel-producing companies and wins. Which results in legal action which makes the production, sale, or utilization in any manner of any fossil fuel-derived product illegal.
I know it won’t happen, but it was a really fun little daydream while it lasted.
Maybe New York will be able to increase taxes on fossil fuels like the tobacco taxes have been increased?
If it wasn’t for fossil fuels there wouldn’t be any courts to be able to sue anyone! Should they not be suing themselves for using energy or any modern technology or products. Yep, its like witch trials. What next, sue god for any bad weather?
Well the good burghers of NYC are working on the first adopter, beggar thy neighbours principle and hopping in for their chop. Clearly the fallacy of composition will dawn on the other States that NYC can’t be allowed to get away with that by effectively taxing these national oilcos and leaving the rest of the States to wear the higher price bill that has to be passed on. Or will they react?
How much in taxes has NY levied? Should be offset against any dumb decision made by one of the NY judges. Meanwhile oil ompanies and those sued should immediately stop supplying NY with those proudest to avoid any “additional environmental damage” until the case is decided. Equally all non- politically correct power service should be with drawn immediately. Then we wait until NY comes to its senses. should take about 24 hour given the current freeze. Pity that it will be the citizens that are the collateral damage but then they are already anyway.
Can anybody post the evidence and or link that sandy was a cat 1 at landfall?
This is a rather poor piece. What is needed is a proper, specific and thoughtful examination of the filing. It is a truly bizarre document, and as one reads it, it seems increasingly probable that it will never come to trial. In this respect it reminds one of the Steyn – Mann case, which has not come to trial for something like 6 years now, and probably never will.
I don’t have the time or the stamina. But Anthony needs to find one of the regulars to do a proper analytical account of it. I am sure someone would, if asked. It will have to be quite long and detailed, because there are a huge number of absurdities to be exposed.
The thing reads like a sort of telethon with McKibben, Oreskes, Mann and perhaps Klein all talking in soundbites one after the other for 67 pages.
But it still needs analysis and exposure.