China's New State Climate Change Religion

Smog hangs over a construction site in Weifang city, Shandong province, Oct 16. 2015. Air quality went down in many parts of China since Oct 15 and most cities are shrounded by haze. [Photo/IC]
Guest essay by Eric Worrall

China has stepped up its efforts to promote sham green narratives, while simultaneously waging a brutal crackdown against Christianity and other faiths.

China Pushes Electric Vehicles and Makes Producing Fossil Fuel Vehicles Tougher

Chinese carmakers have been issued new standards by the government as part of a plan to reduce the manufacture of fossil fuel-powered vehicles. China is becoming a leader in reducing fossil fuel emissions.

CHINA’S NEW EV RULES

China has announced that automakers that want to manufacture fossil fuel-powered cars first must produce low-emission and zero-emission cars to attain a new energy vehicle score. The new rule applies to companies that make or import more than 30,000 fossil fuel cars annually. This means that by 2019, carmakers must be producing a fleet with a total of 10% or more electric vehicles, and 12% or more by 2020.

China’s new rule is part of an aggressive plan to phase out fossil fuel vehicles, a goal it shares with the UK and France, which both plan to ban sales of fossil fuel cars by 2040. A recent report indicates that China’s auto market will be all electric by 2030. While the country’s original plan was to ban fossil fuel vehicles outright — which was criticized as too ambitious — this revised version of the plan is aggressive, yet workable, allowing automakers time to adjust to the changing market.

REDUCING EMISSIONS WORLDWIDE

This is part of a larger effort on China’s part to reduce carbon emissions and fossil fuel dependency. In 2017 alone, China has surpassed many of its own ambitious environmental goals. By August, the country had already reached its 2020 solar energy installation target, reasserting itself as the largest producer of solar power on earth. In June, an entire region of China ran on 100 percent renewables for seven days. China has begun to build a large-scale carbon capture and storage plant — the first of eight — as part of its attempts to reduce its carbon footprint. The nation has invested more into renewables than any other country in the world, including the US, and has begun to reap the benefits, turning around many of its pollution problems.

Read more: https://futurism.com/china-pushes-electric-vehicles-makes-producing-fossil-fuel-vehicles-tougher/

Of course, China is still burning a lot of coal.

China’s Image Campaign: Green on the Outside, Black on the Inside?

BY KENNETH SZABO SEP 30, 2017

“Green mountains and clear water are as good as mountains of gold and silver,” said Chinese President Xi Jinping as he underscored his country’s commitment to becoming an “ecological civilization” at the 2016 UN climate change conference in Marrakech. Fine words. But should we believe them?

After years of being known as one of the dirtiest countries on the planet, China is now making a concerted effort to re-brand itself as a proponent of green energy. This forms part of a wider, multi-channel effort to boost its global soft power that encompasses everything from building new language institutes to trying to head major UN bodies. However, whether this is a legitimate strategy or just good PR is a question Beijing still struggles to answer convincingly.

Undoubtedly, China is making some positive changes. The country has been catching up with its counterparts by planning new national parks. Aimed at protecting areas of outstanding beauty and preventing environmental damage from construction, mining, and pollution, the parks are due to open in 2020. This is also the deadline China has set for ploughing $361 billioninto renewable power sources. The Chinese government hopes that in just three years, these sources will account for half of new electricity generation in the country.

So far, so good. But scratch beneath the surface, and there are indications “Green China” is actually just a veneer disguising a less palatable reality.

China is still the world’s largest producer of “black” aluminum. In 2016, coal still powered 88% of production. Pollutants released by aluminum production and other shady practices are among the many reasons that China’s inland waters are so befouled. According to Greenpeace China, 80% of shallow ground water wells are polluted.

Read more: Modern Diplomacy

Why do I think these simultaneous initiatives are part of an effort to establish climate as a new state religion? The reason is the Climate cult almost uniquely emphasises the need for a strong state to address the crisis.

Greens regularly praise China’s tyrannical government. Many greens seem to think that Democracy leads to climate change paralysis.

Of course, a strong state can control the media. And if a few stories leak which contradict the official narrative, if evidence emerges that China’s embrace of green ideology is less than complete, it won’t matter. Greens have already demonstrated their total willingness to forgive China’s fossil fuel excesses.

Christianity by contrast emphasises the supremacy of God’s law. The Apostle Peter says “We must obey God rather than human beings” (Acts 5:29). The Christian bible carries an instruction to pay your taxes (Matthew 22:19-21), but the first loyalty of a Christian is to God.

China doesn’t do divided loyalty.

A climate cult which demands a strong state, and emphasises the need for authoritarianism to solve their global crisis, and which appeals to the kids, is a ready made solution for a tyranny which is struggling to suppress rising social unrest and demands for more freedom, is alarmed by the rapid growth of Christianity within their borders, and which desperately needs a new message of unity to replace their failed Communist ideology.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

163 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TA
October 1, 2017 2:47 pm

How many animals do the Chinese windmills kill every year?
U.S. Interior Secretary Zinke estimates 650,000 to 750,000 animals are killed annually by U.S. windmills.
What is the mindset of people who advocate such slaughter? They must be pretty cold fish.

Reply to  TA
October 2, 2017 7:47 pm

TA, it’s all a Trade Off, slow death and low birth rates caused by mercury emissions from Coal Fired Power Plants. I’m sure the Carrion Clean Up Crew is on Standby waiting for Blade Kill. Just as they fly over Farmers Fields waiting for the smorgasbord of Field Critter Kill when the farmer is Cultivating and Harvesting his Crops. The numbers of Field Critter Kill will rise sharply if the vega dream of a Plant Based Diet comes to fruition. Monoculture has lots of negative aspects reliant on herbicides and GMO seeds.
Personally I opposed Nuclear Power Plants planned for the shore of Nipigon Bay on Lake Superior in 1970.We conceded to Coal Power Plants if they built Nox SCR Scrubbers. I took 30 years before Ontario Hydro built Nox Scrubbers at Lambton GS and Nanticoke GS on the north shore of Lake Erie, North Americas largest Coal Power facility with 8 Units in 2002-03 with both of these Power plants closed by 2014. Ontario does NoT burn coal anymore.
They offered FIT Contracts 0.80 cents a Kw for Solar only 1,500% more than our Base Rate Pre $mart Meters of 0.051 cents a Kw. Wynnd Farms are paid 700% more 0.40 cents a Kw. As Captive Consumers we are exploited without consent.

Edwin
October 1, 2017 3:32 pm

Someone please explain to me how all these electric, so called zero emissions, vehicles are going to be charged. It seems California and the People’s Republic of China are of like mind. Of course California can buy electricity from other states so their emissions will go down while the other states increase. In 1985 the standard mode of transportation in the PRC was bicycles, buses and brand new coal fired trains. The PRC wants to ban personal internal combustion driven cars for far more reasons the CO2 emissions. Also they want to put their automobile industry on a better footing than those company importing into the PRC. Of course in a communist country no one every really knows the truth and was is the official truth today may get you thrown in jail tomorrow.

Neo
October 1, 2017 5:44 pm

It’s this China really taking a leadership position or rather, chasing the market that is being dictated from Sacramento and Brussels ?

October 2, 2017 4:28 am

The Russians started building a nuclear powered Ice Breaker Fleet in 1959. I stumbled upon the video on YouTube about a month ago. They use steam turbines turning generators for Electric Drive. They are quiet and do not emit the Black Carbon that Ocean going Ships burning the Bottom of the Barrel, dirty Bunker C Oil which must be heated to flow. It is stated that the 15 largest Container Ships in the world emit as much pollution as all the vehicles in the world plying the Shipping Route from Asia and to North America’s conn/sumers, many who lost their jobs when Corporation’s fled to Asia to exploit cheap labour and non existent environmental regulations.

TA
Reply to  Gerald Landry
October 2, 2017 8:34 am

“It is stated that the 15 largest Container Ships in the world emit as much pollution as all the vehicles in the world”
Interesting. I had not heard this before.

MarkW
Reply to  Gerald Landry
October 2, 2017 12:38 pm

By vehicles do you mean just cars, cars and trucks, or every vehicle that is not one of the 15 largest container ships in the world?

Reply to  MarkW
October 2, 2017 8:00 pm

MarkW, this was mentioned on a Cbc Newsfeed recently, A google produced a full page of Links; One Ref:
One Container Ship Out-Pollutes 50 Million Cars | Ryan Eric Well …
https://www.linkedin.com/…/one-container-ship-out-pollutes-15-million-cars-ryan-eri…
Aug 27, 2015 – For ships at open sea, it’s pretty much an emission free-for-all. … amount of sulfur and carbon dioxide spewing out of the ship smokestacks. … Environmental organizations from all over the world have called for a ban on bunker … lumbering, belching black engines that occupy present-day container ships.
At 1300 feet long, it’s not hard to notice the gargantuan profile of a container ship. Even miles out, their immense silhouettes are easily spotted against the horizon. What is less visible is the near-unfathomable amount of fuel emissions generated by a single container ship – an amount equal to the emissions of 50 million cars. For perspective: The 760 million cars that are currently operating worldwide emit “only” as much pollution as 15 container ships running at full capacity. There are currently over 5000 massive container ships operating globally and 85,000 commercial cargo ships on top of that.

kent beuchert
October 2, 2017 5:36 am

Not mentioned it the fact that the “Seven days of renewable power” required 73% coming from
( more or less reliable) hydropower. An China is likely pretty much tapped out for more hydropower – they built that enormous series of dams that prodiuces, as I recall, about 7 to 10 gigawatts of power – about the same power as 20,0000 land based wind turbines, but controllable and thus far more valuable. China is also building 20 floating nuclear reactors, ala the Russian innovation (The Russians own and operate their floating nuclear reactors, which they tow to a harbor and hook up. When refueling required, they simply tow another one in and tow the other back totheir facility for refueling). Floating reactors power coastal cities. China is also building lots of nuclear power plants (35 under construction, as I recall, with hundreds more scheduled for the future. China is also rushing to develop molten salt nuclear reactors and has banned wind power as “a disruptor” of the power grid.