I don’t know where to start. I really don’t “text mining” oy ~ctm
Public Release: 3-Aug-2017
A new method of surveying published research, which has highlighted current issues faced by the marine environment, hopes to place scientific knowledge at the heart of policy agendas
Frontiers
Covering two-thirds of our planet, the ocean was once thought to be too big to be threatened by human activity. Scientific evidence now shows that our use and abuse of this environment is having a detrimental effect on marine habitats across the globe.
New research, published in the open-access journal Frontiers in Marine Science details current threats to our coasts and oceans, and potential solutions to these problems, as detailed by the focus of research undertaken by marine scientists over the past ten years.
“The amount of marine research being published is growing rapidly,” says Murray Rudd, an Associate Professor of Environmental Sciences, who carried out this research at the Emory University, Atlanta, USA. “There are a number of topics, such as the effects of climate change, marine plastic and debris, conservation, and increasingly, the human and social dimensions of ocean use and management, that are now the focus of major and emerging research efforts.”
Professor Rudd sifted through the tens of thousands of relevant scientific studies from the past decade using a method called ‘text mining’, which has only just become possible with recent advances in computing power and software. This method involved large-scale scans of written text, to assess how different words and phrases are used.
“I looked at the summaries of over fifty-thousand ocean and coastal science research articles and assessed how language relating to ocean challenges and their solutions varied over time. That allowed me to identify trends, emerging ‘hot topics’ in ocean research, and to see what types of solutions were most often proposed for specific challenges,” explains Professor Rudd.
As well as revealing the problems faced by our coasts and oceans, the survey highlighted how some of the solutions put forward to resolve these issues differed in focus. For example, Integrated Coastal Zone Management, a strategy that aims to ensure all the interests of those involved in the development, management and use of the coast are taken into consideration, was frequently mentioned in conjunction with sea-level rise, but few other issues. In addition, marine protected areas, once thought to be a tool for fisheries management, are now also seen as a way to help buffer ecological systems from predicted climate change effects, such as changes in ocean chemistry and temperature. The survey also found that the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010 generated a surge in focused research relating to this catastrophic event.
Professor Rudd hopes his research will demonstrate that the method of ‘text mining’ scientific publications will enable governments and international institutions to methodically track and identify important and emerging ocean sustainability issues, and the organizations and scientists who work on them.
“Oceans and coasts are crucially important for human society, especially for the 2.4 billion people that live within 100 km of the coast,” he explains. “We have seen some issues that are very important to the public – marine plastic pollution is a good example – rapidly receiving increased research effort. We don’t fully understand however, how emerging issues of concern catch the public’s attention and get onto government’s policy agenda, nor how scientists can and should communicate their research findings so that new knowledge about ocean and coastal sustainability is put to good use. Future research on the dynamics of information exchange between scientists, the public, and decision-makers in government and business is a natural next step for some of the specific research topics that were flagged in my exploratory study.”
Professor Rudd concludes by advising we combine all our global scientific knowledge for the good of our marine environment. “To sustain the oceans, and the benefits they provide us, we need to be able to use all the information from scientific research to help decision-makers weigh-up options about how we use the ocean and where / when we need to protect it. The ocean is dynamic and complex, often with long time lags before we can reverse the consequences of human activities, so building our scientific understanding is essential, if future generations are to inherit healthy oceans.”
###
Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Dang,
Now nobody minded the technics of text mining ( basically just applying math to texts) when the
texts in question were proxy studies, and Wegman showed the social network of Mann et al.
And no one complained when I used a tool of text mining ( search for high entropy words0 to bust Gleick
And no one complained when Anthony used the tool of text mining I recommended to him to study whether
Gleick was the author of the forged memo.
There are many tools in the textual analytics tool chest. A lot more than when I started looking at it back in
the early 80s.
The author is doing basic preliminary Topic modelling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p9MSJy761Y
here are the questions he wants to answer
” Specifically, my research questions in this text-oriented exploratory research included: Are there differences in the frequency with which keywords or phrases relating to instruments or strategies (i.e., potential solutions) co-occur with those relating to different types of ocean challenges?; Does the frequency at which text associated with particular ocean challenges and possible solutions vary temporally across all articles?; and Does the frequency at which particular text associated with particular ocean challenges and possible solutions vary between relatively highly- and lower-cited articles? The latter two questions are motivated by the idea that cutting edge ideas and methods that define and drive epistemic communities might be productive areas for further detailed assessment such as expert interviews or bibliometric research. ”
long ago we went at this by building concordances. I built one for Climategate 3 mails.
Essentially you are tring to take a huge corpus and make it more manageable, and look
for gross trends and changes. Places to dive in deep.
For example, if you searched the climategate mails you would find one occurance of the phrase
“squeaky clean” That was in the mail where Jones discussed making sure a particular paper got
a friendly reviewer.
if you search for the word megaphone, you would find one mail. It was about the creation of realclimate.org
These high entropy words ( Shannon entropy) Are clue that something interesting and important is going on.
basically something novel.
Here is the main genius
Its machine learning boys and girls, get used to it.
At one job I use this to analyze notes from field reps who visit customers.
Thanks for the summary.
Intel agencies use these techniques frequently from what I understand. And do so in ways far more focused and particular than this schlock faux study.
Search engines, network analysis, etc. all are basically spying tools.
That the climate obssessed use it to “help” prove their apocalyptic claptrap is not surprising.
That must be a cut-and-paste story. In many years reading this site I have never seen you post so much rubbish in a single post!
A friend of mine wrote a program that used text mining to automate stock picks. He conducted a hypothetical test and found, had he actually turned the program on and used real money (all things that are possible to automate with online stock purchase websites), he could have made a 200% return in less than a month. So data mining has its uses, but as a scientific vehicle…?
I live 100 meters from the ocean on Sagami Bay in Japan.
The most tragic environmental problem in this area has been the Japanese government’s approval of fisherman using ultra-fine sieve nets (2mm x 2mm) to catch baby sardines, which are used to make a local delicacy called “Shirasu” (sun-dried baby sardines sprinkled over rice, baked in bread, sprinkled on pizza, placed in omletes and salads, etc., ).
Obviously, the sardine population has crashed 90% since this totally INSANE fishing practice went into effect, as have ALL fish populations that feed on sardines, or are inadvertently caught in the ultra-fine sieve nets)
I often call the Japanese EPA and Fishery Department to complain about this deplorable fishing practice, and the feckless government hacks have the audacity to blame CLIMATE CHANGE (温暖化) for the sardine and other fish species population collapse..
Various: Fishery, Tourist, Hotel, Restaurant and Supermarket lobbies have strong sway over government hacks and spend a lot of money keeping this insane ultra-fine sieve net practice in place so they can continue harvesting and selling shirasu.
This is an example of CAGW nefariously being used as an exuse to coverup the true underlying cause of deplorable and real environmental problems.
Thank you Samurai. This is a huge problem around the world.
Here in the US, government blames “climate change” for neglected infrastructure failures.
In the Philippines “climate change” was blamed for deaths and destruction due to unenforced building codes when a Typhoon struck.
This social madness is quite lucrative.
search internet where data contains ‘climate’ and ‘serious’ and ‘man-made’ and ‘worse’ THEN publishAs(“confirmation of problem”);
Overwhelm the system with b.s..