Guest essay by Eric Worrall
The Telegraph, a major UK Newspaper, has investigated a scandalous waste of British taxpayer’s money on expensive renewables projects which deliver very little return for the money invested.
Hundreds of millions of British aid ‘wasted’ on overseas climate change projects
Robert Mendick, chief reporter
12 MARCH 2017 • 10:00PM
Serious questions are raised today over hundreds of millions of pounds of British taxpayers’ money being ‘wasted’ on climate change projects such as an Ethiopian wind farm and Kenyan solar power plant.
A Telegraph investigation shows little benefit so far from a £2 billion foreign aid programme to tackle climate change that was established eight years ago.
One scheme, costing £260m of UK taxpayers’ money, has produced only enough renewable electricity to power the equivalent of just 100 British households – about the size of a typical street.
Projects including solar parks in Kenya and Mali, a rubbish-burning power plant in the Maldives and wind farmer project in Ethiopia are all earmarked for funding from the scheme.
The Telegraph investigation raises major concerns over the use of international aid money to fund complex renewable energy schemes in some of the world’s poorest countries.
It will also reignite the row over the Government’s commitment, championed by David Cameron, to ring fence the £12 billion annual foreign aid budget, which is fixed at 0.7 per cent of national income.
Critics have accused the Government of “scandalously wasting” taxpayers’ money on the schemes.
…
The Government defended the funds’ performance.
A spokesman said: “The Climate Investment Fund is helping provide the world’s poorest people with stronger defences to extreme weather which can cause life-threatening crises such as floods, droughts and famine.
…
Britain passed a law committing 0.7% of British GDP to foreign aid in 2015, but the scheme has been misconceived from the start. Instead of having to justify expenditure, British bureaucrats are now required by law to find ways to spend enormous sums of money. The inevitable outcome of this government idiocy has been a tremendous perverse incentive for inefficiency and corruption.
Since British conservatives are much greener than US counterparts, a significant slice of this budget is directed to green energy schemes in the third world, a string of white elephant projects across Africa, dumped in locations which neither need or want them.
It is good at least some of the British Press are finally taking notice of this scandalous waste of money.
Britain has huge domestic problems which could really use some of that wasted money.
The single payer British government healthcare system is so bad in places, Médecins du Monde, which normally offers free medical services in third world war zones and the like has opened clinics in Britain, to treat people who are not receiving proper care from government health outlets.
Waste and poor treatment of British war veterans is an ongoing scandal.
Pensioners and poor people shiver away in policy created fuel poverty, starving themselves to save enough money to pay exorbitant green energy inflated heating bills.
British Government debt is out of control.
Yet despite all this disastrous waste and suffering, the British government still find extra borrowed cash to splurge on worthless renewable schemes in other countries.
The sooner this sorry chapter of British government waste is brought to a close, the better.
Africa’s Aid Mess
Renowned author Paul Theroux discusses why the philanthropy of Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Bono, and Jeffrey Sachs largely fails. Here’s what works.
The desire of distant outsiders to fix Africa may be heartfelt, but it is also age-old and even quaint. Curiously repetitive in nature, renewed and revised every decade or so, it is an impulse Charles Dickens described, in a wickedly accurate phrase, as “telescopic philanthropy.” That is, a focus from afar to uplift the continent: New York squinting compassionately at Nairobi.
http://www.barrons.com/articles/SB50001424053111903747504579185800700741812
Few things have harmed Africa more than ‘foreign aid’.
Slavery?
Slavery was of course horrible for the poor men and women who were kidnapped and sold. But if you know how things really played out there on the ground, there are a lot more similarities to the foreign aid boondoggles than many like to admit.
First off, it was very rare for westerners to charge in and actually kidnap people – what would happen is that they would make deals with the local slave dealers, who were connected with the local tribal rulers, who would capture and turn over all the people they didn’t like (war enemies, political enemies, whatever) and get some nice goods and payments in exchange.
The slave trade was a way for the Westerners to give tribal rulers money and goods while getting those leaders to do their dirty work for them, and from the tribal leaders POV it was an easy way for them to make some money while getting rid of anyone who they saw as a problem for them.
Africa really hasn’t changed all that much. Neither have we.
Geronimo
Slavery was never imposed on Africa.
JW
Africans?
https://www.google.at/search?client=ms-android-samsung&q=andre+heller+afrika+artists&spell=1&sa=X&ved=0?
https://www.google.at/search?client=ms-android-samsung&biw=360&bih=264&ei=ukzGWLaYDMaosAH_0YLQAw&q=south+africa+kohl+gem%C3%BCse+aids&oq=south+africa+kohl+gem%C3%BCse+aids&gs_l=mobile-gws-serp.?
https://www.google.at/search?client=ms-android-samsung&ei=fk7GWNy9D8etsAGwnaSYDQ&q=Africans+pulverizing+Albinos+&oq=Africans+pulverizing+Albinos+&gs_l=mobile-gws-serp.
https://www.google.at/search?client=ms-android-samsung&ei=uk7GWLrhLsSPsAHK75Fo&q=Africans+raping+lesbian+for+correction+&oq=Africans+raping+lesbian+for+correction+&gs_l=mobile-gws-serp.?
https://www.google.at/search?client=ms-android-samsung&ei=GFDGWLvNOcewsQHe7pygBw&q=African+voodoo+for+selling+their+people+abroad&oq=African+voodoo+for+selling+their+people+abroad&gs_l=mobile-gws-serp?
Africans raping for progress?
JWurts on March 12, 2017 at 8:52 pm
Geronimo
Slavery was never imposed on Africa.
JW
_____________________________________
Because Africa thrives on slavery.
My first remembrance on the 1950ties is ‘blind children of Biafra’.
Here’s the progress since:
http://dailypost.ng/2017/03/12/xenophobia-south-africans-attack-nigerians-dabiri-erewa/
https://www.google.at/search?q=Ruanda+Genozid+raping+capital&oq=Ruanda+Genozid+raping+capital&aqs=chrome.
Tired of Africa:
https://youtu.be/KyosPwwTl7s
https://youtu.be/FTQbiNvZqaY
I’ve got the silver. In my hairs, 30 years ago.
https://youtu.be/3a_x6gPDsLQ
Ain’t no big surprise!
https://youtu.be/r4WjMP8fRpA
Johann, threadbombing is not a good thing. please stop.
Better than the Toto version:
“Originally by rock band Toto, “Africa” is given a twist with acapella group Straight No Chaser. The song is off their CD, Holiday Spirits.”
wws: Yes.
Excellent detailed history: “The Slave Trade: The Story of the Atlantic Slave Trade: 1440 – 1870” by Hugh Thomas
https://www.amazon.com/slave-trade-story-atlantic-1440/dp/0684835657/
The European slave traders were only intermediaries. Most leftist propaganda about the issue conveniently elides the fact of African participation.
Geronimo:
Exported?
Africa did not invent slavery. The word “slave” comes from Slav as so many Roman slaves were Slavic. The vast majority of slaves have been white.
Slavery has been embraced by Islam since its inception in 611 AD and it is the spread of Islam in Africa and the many tribes ripe for raiding that has made Africa a huge slave fruit basket. Get rid of Islam and the major force behind ongoing slavery disappears.
“Few things have harmed Africa more than ‘foreign aid’.”
and the reply
“Slavery?”
There thousands and thousands of slaves, right now, in Africa. Real ones, not economic slaves like Cambodia and Vietnam, I am talking about people owned and enslaved and forced to work their whole lives for another. The whole of the central Sahara is a slave zone. In 1990 (sorry for old stat) there were only 1500 Blacks in Mauritania who were not slaves. Consult UN stats.
Colonialism is the usual whipping boy for discussion of Africa however there are plenty of self-imposed problems. In case there is doubt as my standing to comment, I have lived in Africa longer than the majority of Africans currently alive and worked in African 20 countries. If slavery is something you feel strongly about, go to Africa and try to end it. You can buy a young Black woman slave at the slave market in Khartoum for $10. Over-supply drives down the price.
The biggest problem preventing development (progress) in Africa is ‘the land problem’ which means people are in a great portion of the places, unable to own it, improve it, sell it, develop it, or retain it. It is a major cause of deforestation. No one’s tree is everyone’s tree. Anyone’s land is no one’s land.
Development projects like the crazy solar PV in the middle of nowhere sound great and are troughs into which at least some local snouts can delve. Crazy development employs a lot of people. But it is not ‘development’ in the regular sense. That is why I am concerned that giving a bunch of rank amateurs $100 billion to ‘offset the effects of climate change’ when the interpretation of ‘effects’ is anything you want. Read the Copenhagen Agreement. You think the Brits are wasting money, that is with the pros running it. Wait until you see the show that will be directed by the climate cult amateurs.
Monty Python Goes Developing.
Just imagine it.
Nope, think harder.
It’s gonna be worse than that.
The price is a little higher in Iraq, 2 sheep. .. American women have no idea. In India, a lot of the beggars are women who have been thrown out.
Well it was Africans who enslaved other Africans.
Doesn’t justify it; but that’s what happened.
G
“Renowned author Paul Theroux…”
Also read his “Dark Star Safari” for more of the same. I read it after traveling to East Africa and seeing the negative side of the foreign aid culture first hand.
“investigation shows little benefit so far from a £2 billion foreign aid programme,…”
How many coal power plants can you build and operate it for £2billion?
Paul Theroux’ follow-up: The Last Train to Zona Verde: Overland from Cape Town to Angola (2013)
Even darker than Dark Star.
At a Stanford U sponsored business seminar, held at their Fallen Leaf Lodge in the Sierra, an economist Professor, told the attendees, that you can bankrupt the entire economies of the Developed world, (not just the Western World) and you would still not be able to solve the problems that beset Africa.
He of course laid out some of the reasons for that; and no it was so long ago (circa 1975) that I don’t remember those details.
But as to the UK Government wastage on Renewables, and “climate change”, there’s an equally vast wastage by UK and others on ” Putting the energy of the sun in a virtually free clean green infinite sourced box or bottle.
Last weekend, I watched a BBC T&V science show all about thermo- fusion energy projects around the globe some of which the UK is funding. (US too, I’m sure).
We’ve been told we can get ALL of the energy the entire world needs, from the top 1/16th of an inch of the water in San Francisco Bay; which could in fact be Sierra Snow melt runoff.
I didn’t catch the whole show, but enough to leave my hair all standing on end.
One system being funded by somebody, seemed to use some sort of mechanical piston pumps arranged radially about a “chamber”; presumable the box to contain the sun.
I won’t spend too much time here diverting from the other issues; BUT !!
Suppose you have any such whack-a-mole machine, because that’s what they are, and you scrunched your “fuel” pellet, and got out more energy (as heat) than you put in, in some whack form.
Well the idea is for the nuclear fusion to take over from the match and continue to maintain the fusion reaction.
So after you blatch your fuel capsule, just what exactly comes next in this cheap process to put the sun in a bottle.
I conclude that WAM machines are toys for exploring high density high temperature plasmas; but not a cheap source of energy; or even any energy cheap or not.
So if we presume as a given that a magnetic field of some sort, can be used to indefinitely hold some plasma of some materials at a Temperature and pressure; maybe tens to hundreds of millions of kelvin, How do you continuously take out the garbage, and input new fuel, without disturbing the continuous stable reaction.
And how do you get from the thermo-nuclear fusion heated t-to-h MK temperatures, to say 1,2.3 KK bottled sauce to run some super steam turbine.
What the hell is the Carnot efficiency of such a heat exchanger system ??
I’ve NEVER seen a theoretical paper on exactly how a practical thermo-nuclear fusion reactor works from start to finish, with ANY sort of fuel from H2, D2, or DT or whatever.
In a regular fission nuclear reactor, what is the conversion efficiency from fission caused energy; heat and KE of particles, to final grid electric energy ?? What is the ratio of the total energy “released” in the box, and the grid energy out. ??
But back to the renewables.
If we need to use already available fossilized energy to light the match under renewable energy “sources”, then we are eventually doomed to perpetual cold.
Renewables have to light their own damn matches, or they will never be viable.
G
Sound. I think.
Sounds like a typical green scandal. Virtue signalling does not care much about cost-effectiveness.
Wow! 0.007% of GDP (US equivalent $124B)! That’s a stunning amount of money to put on auto-pilot to be given away by politicians/bureaucrats, especially to “Big Men” in Africa. The UK has a bad case of the Ben & Jerry’s disease.
Good thing you don’t have any bad banks, national debt, national defense needs or needy citizens in your own country.
/sarc!
The post said 0.7% not 0.007%
Javert Chip
UK GDP is ~USD2.8 trillion and 0.7% of that number is actually around USD20 billion, I think, assuming these numbers are correct. Still a collosal waste of money when it could be spent much better in other ways. Even assuming it was “ring fenced” for foreign aid, there are much better things that could be done with this money. Follwing some of the suggestions of Bjorn Lomborg’s Copenhagen consensus would be a good place to start!
Yep! 2.6 million pounds sterling per household sounds like a sweet deal (for some, maybe! Mugabe, anyone?)
Money spent on green vanity projects is not expected to be spent wisely or efficiently. It is merely expected to be spent, the expenditure considered a success in and of itself.
The spending is channeled through politically connected channels. So yes, the expenditure is considered a success in and of itself, since it is a redistribution of taxpayer money to privileged insiders. It is a form of payback among friends, using other people’s money.
Foreign “aid” is a slush fund to buy cooperation of local dictators. Whether it is called “green” or not changes little. That is why all the “green” money is basically just redirected foreign aid that was already there.
Oh, they joy that must be felt when spending someone else’s money to boost your own image!
People need to know where their taxes are being spent and vote accordingly. I’m guessing you could not account for all the money taxed and levied on CO2. Much like the UN….. a bottomless pit with no accountability.
What can you possibly mean by, “scandalous waste of money“?
Those projects most likely made several people very rich! Was that a waste of money?!!?
No, … wait. . . . :-p
+10
There will probably never be a final accounting , but the opportunity cost of CO2/Green fantasies to the people of the UK must be vast. They probably could have done something useful with the billions that have been frittered away for no tangible benefit.
Finally some of this is getting on the news. I believe we can thank Trump, Farage, Wilders and many people that have woken up and are STANDING up against the farce that has been the focus of the MSM in the past decades. We should thank people like Anthony, Curry, Soon, Crockford, Moncton etc etc etc
( too many to name sorry if your name wasn’t there) for having the courage to stand up in the face of terrible attacks on you for your beliefs and the truth.
It is a breath of fresh air thankfully and it is spring to boot ! And please everyone do not stop now, keep up the great work because it isn’t over yet. The insanity has to be stopped and we need to focus again on the well being of our own elderly, veterans and our children.
Absolutely true.
Citizens smart enough to take themselves out of the EU will be smart enough to figure this one out.
I see this is being reported by the Telegraph newspaper. As an yank, I have no idea the quality of that paper – is their reporting generally high quality or of the Globe & Daily Mail variety?
Hi Javert – The Daily Telegraph is a well-respected ‘serious’ newspaper in the UK, of a similar standing to the Times. Politically, it is the polar opposite of the left-wing Guardian. The Telegraph has a strong editorial team of reporters and columnists and has broken several major scandals over the years.
The Daily Telegraph is the highest circulation of the “broadsheet” ie serious, newspapers. It is right of centre (but not extreme like the Daily Mail), so reasonably moderate, mainstream Conservative. Good quality, but I would say historically very weak on science and environment reporting. Generally not alarmist. They investigated and broke the MP expenses scandal in recent years, proper investigative reporting.
The Telegraph daily circulation is about 3 times that of the Guardian (472K vs 157K) and slightly higher than the Times. By comparison the Daily Mail is about 1.5M and the Sun tabloid about 1.7M
For a time the Telegraph had the ability to accept readers comments online, and a vigorous ‘green’ puff section.
They dumped the green puff section because the money went out of green advertising.
They dumped the comments section because it was starting to look like a UKIP festival.
Its now dangling on the edge of bankruptcy but still has a few good articles.
This may be one of them.
John – I think your description needs the words ‘used to be…’ appended in front of it.
The Telegraph has sacked most of its journalists, is losing money, is in thrall to its owners the Barclay brothers and biased towards their interests and like the Mail employs interns to rip stuff off the net.
It is less credible than ever.
Griff,
As a London ‘Daily Telegraph’ reader of many years, I agree.
Twerps. I have agreed with you twice in a week; one of us is smoking something interesting?
But interesting.
The Telegraph has a reasonably good Sports Section – but, as you say, much of the “news section” is straight rip-offs from the internet. Although they do acknowledge their sources; ‘from a paper in the February ‘Antiquarian Times’ by Smith, Chung and MacAteer’ or whatever. Pretty much cut and paste in some cases, I think.
Incidentally, ‘Private Eye’ (the ‘satirical fortnightly’) has a good column on the UK Newspaper Industry, which has corroborated your comments over the last few years.
Auto
Knowing Ethiopia as I do, most of that money will be siphoned off by corrupt officials and politicians. BTW, solar projects in Kenya were supposed to provide power to 10,000 homes, it’s one of Griff’s favourite examples of how well renewables are doing in Africa.
….maybe Griff’s vested interest has been exposed in the form of “dividends” from Kenya. It all boils down to “follow the money”.
@ur momisugly griff this is the latest:http://www.popsci.com/arctic-ice-melt-natural-climate-change
So maybe griff is half way right . Or is that wrong, It sure looks like the CYA is starting every where.
“Corruption is a Western Concept”
Jacob Zuma, President of South Africa.
http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/Politics/Zuma-wanted-charges-dropped-because-corruption-is-a-Western-thing-20141012
I think Zuma is correct.
In the west we have lots of “legal” ways to syphon off money involving businesses and non-profit organisations. That makes money for the lawyers and accountants as well.
Think of the money the government “gave” to, for instance, Solyndra. Many government cronies “earned” large sums until the money ran out. Consider also the way that non-profits or foundations work in the US. Some just seem to be money laundering operations for the already rich.
Given the current state of affairs, you gotta look at the bright side: it’s ONLY hundreds of millions. Our ex-president (Obama) gave away almost $1B to climate schemes in his last few weeks in office. The US Congress didn’t authorize it, he just gave it away.
The Obama administration was also sending hundreds of millions of dollars to other nations to help them out with climate change. Obama sent something like $50 million to Asian nations just before he left Office. Sure is easy to spend other people’s money, isn’t it, Barack.
Trump is going to stop this overseas CAGW gravy train. Now it looks like British citizens are becoming aware of the waste their government is engaged in. Don’t know if this knowledge will stop the British gravy train or not. Trump’s not in charge over there.
Will the last capable professional engineer, if there is one, in the HOC, the HOL or Whitehall please turn off the lights before leaving! That is, assuming they would know how to do this!
No need,they will go out on their own once there is no more power from the “green” energy sector.
They won’t go out because the government has their own gas fired backup plant under Whitehall to provide power for Parliament and government offices.
To turn out the lights, all the last person needs to do is to wait for the battery to run down. Renewable needs storage.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2812034
Presumably “schemes” like this are where Obama’s $500 million will be going.
More fake news from Eric.
The way to judge an energy project is by the cost of each project and how much power is produced. This can then be compared to say a coal or gas plant.
Finding this info in a newspaper article would be a first. If you conclude anything from this article you guilty of confirmation bias.
Retired Kit P March 12, 2017 at 7:59 pm
“The way to judge an energy project is by the cost of each project and how much power is produced.”
“One scheme, costing £260m of UK taxpayers’ money, has produced only enough renewable electricity to power the equivalent of just 100 British households – about the size of a typical street.”
Are you saying that the author of the article one “Robert Mendick, chief reporter” lied?
Do you have any proof that he did not do his research and report accurately?
If you are going to be making such statements offer counter evidence. Name the facility the author is referring to and provide the customer list as well as power consumption records. And before you say “I don’t have to”- yes you do. You after all are the one calling it fake “news”
michael
Sorry Mike, just quoted the same thing 🙂
Well, perhaps one of you can tell me the details of the 260m pound project from that article. Exactly what are they building, what is the schedule? Where are they up to on that schedule. Details??
How can I know from reading that if it really is not going to produce the expected power for the total cost, or if it’s a case like with the NBN in Australia, where people were making silly claims about how long it was going to take at the current rate of building, as if the project was expected to be constructed at peak speed right from the start?
Mike
Power production is measured in units of kwh or mwh, not households.
The value of the power is based on the cost of generating or buying power at that location.
The merits of a project are often measured in payback period. For example, whenever I have checked PV for a house I live in a get a a 40 year payback period. So for me it would not be a good investment.
Since the article had none of the basic elements of an economic analysis, Yes Robert Mendick is a big fat liar.
For those who do not see that, you are stupid. That is a fact not an opinion.
+1 Eric should have a “views are not nesarcarily those of the blog” disclaimer. Most it is just rebadged clickbait.
McClod can now count to 2 !!
Well done, McClod.
Progress.. tiny steps. !!
Looks stuck on one to me.
If you bother to read the linked article it provides some names and numbers. For example, the following on the £638 million SREP system:
Eric, you have offended Kit by criticizing the food to fuel program. Therefore, from this day forward everything you say is cr@p and it is Kit’s job to make sure that everyone knows this.
Again, I am amazed at the parsimony of British households. That would power 23 average American homes for a year. Non-electric homes, mind you (gas furnace, gas hot water heater, gas dryer).
As for 276 MWh powering only 23 American homes with non-electric heat, dryer and water heaters, etc: That’s 1,000 KWH per month or about 1,370 watts average power consumption. This sounds to me like rather power-hungry or downright wasteful homes as far as ones with fossil fuel heat, hot water and dryers go. I remember in the days before my state had supplier choice and my local electric utility used to have a surcharge for residential customers consuming more than 750 KWH per month during air conditioning season, and that was before non-incandescent residential lighting became easily available at reasonable cost and when refrigerators consumed more energy than modern ones do.
Kit is ranting about straw men. Tune him out.
When they’re too busy to check sources and follow links, they’re not worth the time to read or listen.
Food grains getting raised, harvested, fermented, distilled by carbon fuels, forced down people’s tanks as expensive negative additions to their fuel that are destructive towards their engines, causes increased total emissions…
What’s not to like?
Here’s hoping this Administration eliminates unnecessary government requirements on fuels!
@Donald L. Klipstein
Our lowest usage over the past 12 months is 693 KWhr and the highest is 1,955 KWhr. Family of 4, quintessentially average.
“It will also reignite the row over the Government’s commitment, championed by David Cameron, to ring fence the £12 billion annual foreign aid budget, which is fixed at 0.7 per cent of national income.”
More like it should be ring-barked.
So the Gang Green even knows the 100B a year won’t fix anything reinforcing the idea that it is really part of the scheme to destroy destroy western civilization. The UN, Ngos, and the EU parliament are all working to destroy the rest of it.
Note, in the short time since BREXIT, the UK economy is now the fastest growing economy among major countries. The US Is next and it will blow by Britain’s in growth because it doesn’t have the crippling EU and UK devastation, although Hillary would have maybe finished BO ‘s demolition work. Trump will save the rest of us, too.
You’d think Australia would have learned something from the South Australian experience? Apparently not.
http://www.smh.com.au/business/energy/government-cba-in-landmark-230m-solar-deal-20170313-guwo0f.html
I guess that means that the tram service will start around 11am and stop around 3pm during summer if the sun happens to be out in Kerang, less in winter if at all:
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/climatology/cloud/images/cld15/cld15jun.png
“The total cloud amount is measured visually by estimating the fraction (in eighths or oktas) of the dome of the sky covered by clouds. A completely clear sky is recorded as zero okta, while a totally overcast sky is recorded as 8 oktas” (BOM climate data online: cloud).
🙂 im in the 8 zone..;-/
sorta off topic but not by much
adeladie advertiser online on Musks power offer?
seems our INfamour Ross Garnuat the rabid co2 accountancy and fearmonger
has a large stake is some idiot battery system here in aus
at $600 a kwh? to run?
“The Climate Investment Fund is helping provide the world’s poorest people with stronger defences to extreme weather which can cause life-threatening crises such as floods, droughts and famine”.
=================================
There is absolutely no evidence that building “large-scale wind and solar farms in poorer countries” or anywhere else has any effect on the frequency or severity of extreme weather events or prevents floods, droughts and famine.
If I had read those remarks say thirty years ago as a time traveller I would have wondered if a weird apotropaic magic form of religion had taken hold.
Come to think about it, I think it has.
Nonrenewable in Africa ???
How the hell is the consumer going to pay to keep the light (1) on ? If the European household has to budget to pay the electric bill ? Ah, the British taxpayer will provide !
Actually – the UK clinics mentioned are for treating the “asylum seekers” and “undocumented migrants.” In other words, the non-citizen parasites that the NHS is not supposed to be treating. Redirecting those billions to that purpose would not help the British taxpayer one whit – it would most likely just bring in more trouble.
Considering hotels in the Maldives cost $1000/night, and you can bet the local gov’t is taking a big cut of that, you would think they would have the money to build their own rubbish burning power plant if they really wanted or needed one, which they obviously don’t.
yeah thought struck me too re that
they got huge OS mega motels investors using massive water and producing huge waste
but they didnt factor that into the approvals and make them pay?
they even managed to dredge to build i gather?
no outcry on that either?
obviously not so worried re them sinking are they
One place off the radar is Timor Leste.
The average income is $1 a day.
The local hospital has shortages of drugs, as have local area medical centres.
‘Medical facilities in Timor-Leste are limited and evacuation, at significant expense, is often the only option in cases of serious illness or accident (including diving accidents). The cost of medical evacuation can reach into the tens of thousands of dollars depending on the circumstances. Generally all emergency cases are treated at Dili National Hospital, which only has limited facilities available. Dental facilities are extremely limited. A limited supply of basic medicines is available.
There is no hyperbaric (decompression) chamber in Timor-Leste. Travellers who plan to dive should ensure that they have a current medical clearance to do so and that their insurance covers such activities.
In the past, local authorities have advised that fish sold on the roadside has been contaminated with formaldehyde. Heed any local warnings on avoiding contaminated fish.’
http://smartraveller.gov.au/Countries/asia/south-east/Pages/timor_leste.aspx
This place is ripe for gas fired electricity generation.
The British may want to help these unfortunates.
A good local fishing industry and Technical College education to teach them off shore mining skills would be very useful.
They need Green initiatives like a hole in the head.
As one close to me used say ‘A little help is better than a deal of pity’.
There is a big enough story here without sexing it up with misleading assertions about Médecins du Monde, who only encourage illegal migrants to remain in the U.K.
Quite right! Mr Worrall chooses to omit that vital information – that their work is dedicated to helping asylum seekers and the “undocumented”.
You won’t hear about this scandalous waste of money on the BBC.
We’ve created a new African tribe – the Wa-Benzi. Those who drive Mercedes Benz.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/02/27/exxon-stands-up-to-the-green-bullies/comment-page-1/#comment-2154602
On Energy:
I have worked in the energy industry for much of my career.
When challenged on the global warming question by green fanatics, I explain that that fossil fuels keep their families from freezing and starving to death.
Cheap abundant reliable energy is the lifeblood of society – it IS that simple.
Furthermore, I suggest that recognition of this reality is an ethical and a professional obligation.
The following numbers are from the 2015 BP Statistical Review of World Energy, for the year 2014:
http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2015/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2015-primary-energy-section.pdf
Global Primary Energy Consumption by Fuel is
86% Fossil Fuel (Oil, Coal and Natural Gas),
4% Nuclear,
7% Hydro,
and 2% Renewables.
That 2% for Renewables is vastly exaggerated, and would be less than 1% if intermittent wind and solar power were not forced into the electrical grid ahead of cheaper and more reliable conventional power.
This is not news – we have known this energy reality for decades. As we published in 2002.
“The ultimate agenda of pro-Kyoto advocates is to eliminate fossil fuels, but this would result in a catastrophic shortfall in global energy supply – the wasteful, inefficient energy solutions proposed by Kyoto advocates simply cannot replace fossil fuels.”
On Grid-Connected Wind and Solar Power:
Wind Power is what warmists typically embrace – trillions of dollars have been squandered on worthless grid-connected wind power schemes that require life-of-project subsidies and drive up energy costs.
Some background on grid-connected wind power schemes:
The Capacity Factor of wind power is typically a bit over 20%, but that is NOT the relevant factor.
The real truth is told by the Substitution Capacity, which is dropping to as low as 4% in Germany – that is the amount of conventional generation that can be permanently retired when wind power is installed into the grid.
The E.ON Netz Wind Report 2005 is an informative document:
http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/wp-content/uploads/eonwindreport2005.pdf
(apparently no longer available from E.ON Netz website).
Figure 6 says Wind Power is too intermittent (and needs almost 100% spinning backup);
and
Figure 7 says it just gets worse and worse the more Wind Power you add to the grid (see Substitution Capacity dropping from 8% to 4%).
The same story applies to grid-connected Solar Power (both in the absence of a “Super-Battery”).
This was obvious to us decades ago.
Trillions of dollars have been squandered globally on green energy that is not green and produces little useful energy.
On Global Warming Alarmism:
We also write in the same 2002 article, prior to recognition that the current ~20 year “Pause” (actually a Plateau) was already underway:
“Climate science does not support the theory of catastrophic human-made global warming – the alleged warming crisis does not exist.”
I (we) now think global cooling will commence after the current El Nino runs its course, prior to 2020 and possibly as soon as 2017. Bundle up!
Regards to all, Allan
Rock and a hard place Allan.
Your brain and reading comprehension?
I have been hearing since 2008 predictions that global cooling was going to start soon. This seems to keep on getting postponed, like peak oil and snow becoming a thing of the past and the Arctic Ocean becoming ice-free.
I wrote in 2002 that global cooling would start by 2020-2030.
Still about right – maybe cooling starts sooner…
Allen. Regarding the spinning backup I am curious as to the amount of fuel, if any, is saved when the windmills are supplying some of the electrical load. Do you have any numbers?
James,
Full life-cycle, I think wind power is net-negative on energy.
It is certainly net negative on dollars, since it requires life-of-project subsidies.
Money often, but not always, is a good proxy for energy.
Best, Allan