NOAA forecasts major December cold blast for nearly all the USA

Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. Alerts me to this map from the NOAA Climate Prediction Center and says:

Cannot recall last time I have seen such a cold anomaly forecast across almost entire USA.

Neither can I, have a look:

UPDATE: This map from Dr. Ryan Maue of WeatherBell shows that over 75% of the USA will be below freezing for overnight lows on December 8th:

conus-recordcold-dec2016

Dr. Maue writes:

CONUS average low temp of 17°F for Dec 8th according to ECMWF 12z is exceptionally cold — there will surely be record lows.

 

conus-814temp-new

Source: http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/predictions/814day/index.php

The only state not showing a cold anomaly is Hawaii, the southernmost parts of Florida and Texas are also spared.

The 6-10 day outlook shows the western half of the USA and Alaska in a deep cold anomaly:

conus-610temp-new

Source: http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/predictions/610day/index.php

Maybe it has something to do with the “cold blob” I pointed out yesterday?

The precipitation forecast shows the northernmost part of the USA as having above normal precipitation, which translates to heavier snow in the northern plains and northern Rockies, along with heavier snow in the Great Lakes and Northeast:

conus-610prcp-new

conus-814prcp-new

Source: http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/predictions/814day/index.php

NOAA CPC description of these charts:

The 8-14 day Outlook gives the confidence that a forecaster has, given as a probability, that the observed temperature, averaged over upcoming days 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 will be in the range of one of three possible categories below (B), normal (N), or above (A). For any calendar 7-day period, these categories can be defined by separating the 30 years of the climatology period, 1981-2010 (30 years), into the coldest 10 years, the middle 10 years, and the warmest 10 years. Because each of these categories occurs 1/3 of the time (10 times) during 1981-2010, for any particular calendar 7-day period, the probability of any category being selected at random from the 1981-2010 set of 30 observations is one in three (1/3), or 33.33%. This is also called the climatological probability. The sum of the climatological probabilities of the three categories is 100%.

Graphical Information

The colored shading on the map indicates the degree of confidence the forecaster has in the category indicated, where “B” and blue colors indicate “below-normal” and “A” and orange-red colors indicate “above normal”. The darker the shading, the greater is the level of confidence. The numbers labeling the contours separating different shades gives the probability that the indicated category (A, B, or N) will occur.

The probabilities of all three categories are implied on the map, and sum to 100%. The forecast probabilities given on the map generally fall far short of complete confidence (100%) in any single category. When the probability of the above (A) or below (B) category is greater than 33.33% by some amount, the probability of the opposite category declines by that amount, while the probability of the middle category remains at 33.33%. In the event that the N category is greater than 33.33%, the probabilities of both the “A” and “B” categories is each reduced by 1/2 the amount that the “N” category exceeds 33.33%. When the probability of “A”, or “B” reaches 63.33% or higher, the odds of the opposite category reach a minimum allowed value of 3.33%, while the odds of the middle category are allowed to drop below 33.33%.

The dashed contours on the map give the average of the temperature over the set of 30 observations for the calendar 7-day period during 1981-2010, in degrees Farenheit.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

296 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Resourceguy
December 1, 2016 10:31 am

I do hope team Trump has prepared an official response to bitter cold temps that reads something like this “It’s winter! get over it!”

Latitude
Reply to  Resourceguy
December 1, 2016 4:43 pm

+1 LOL

James at 48
December 1, 2016 10:34 am

Although the type years mentioned were 1983 and 2000, I have to wonder if we are going to see a repeat of things like late Falls / early Winters of 1990/91, 1998/99, or ….. Winter of 2006/07?
http://s.giannini.ucop.edu/uploads/giannini_public/fb/96/fb9644ef-3403-4324-b754-a3254b4cb174/v10n4_2.pdf

Resourceguy
December 1, 2016 10:36 am

I see great locations in northern ND and MT for relocation of EPA and NOAA headquarter(s). It’s the internet age so they can communicate and videoconference just fine from there.

Reply to  Resourceguy
December 1, 2016 11:12 am

You forgot. I want the UN to relocate there as well. With only renewable energy and no cars. Let them bicycle or walk in. And who will need coats, hats, and gloves ? Not with global warming ! And only locally sourced food. It would save them a ton on those really expensive French restaurants in NYC. You know the ones where 99.99% couldn’t sit down in. Let them be a shining example of leading the world. Since they will be so self sufficient, a budget cut would be in order. A big budget cut should be in order anyway, the science is settled. What more is there to prove ?

Alan Robertson
Reply to  rishrac
December 1, 2016 1:34 pm

Ok, but maybe work “sustainable” into the press release.

Kevin Kilty
December 1, 2016 11:06 am

First week on November in 2014 we had a 4-sigma cold outbreak in southern Wyoming. It injured many trees. I could use to not see that again.

Lil Fella from OZ
December 1, 2016 11:48 am

You ought to live in South Australia we are being governed by ideology not reality. I have my solar and batteries. Alternatively, a portable gen set is a must have. Please can we borrow Mr.Trump?

jorgekafkazar
Reply to  Lil Fella from OZ
December 1, 2016 1:13 pm

Maybe you should contact ACME torch and pitchfork company at Janice’s number, above.

Janice Moore
Reply to  jorgekafkazar
December 1, 2016 2:54 pm

Gave the Lil’ Fella a catalog! Thanks, Jorge! (I’ll give you 3% of my 10)
Here’s the selfie Lil’ Fella sent me just now. Sure hope he finds page 65 where the Acme gen sets are!comment image

emsnews
December 1, 2016 11:50 am

This is going to be a very cold winter for those of us who live in the ‘Ice Age Glacier’ zone and bitter even in the deep, deep south. LA won’t be cold and since all the rulers who are lecturing us every day have second homes in California and the Caribbean, they will scream they are roasting to death.

Jbird
December 1, 2016 11:53 am

Break out the sun block and swim wear North Americans. This must be the fake news Chancellor Merkel is trying to ban.

Donald Hanson
December 1, 2016 12:01 pm

Need to over lay the jet stream on these. This is going to be brutal.

Frederik
December 1, 2016 12:06 pm

i think in europe we also will be in for some cold…. the coldest end of november since 1998…..

wws
December 1, 2016 12:12 pm

Well, cold weather like this is proof that Global Warming is absolutely true, dontcha know.
Because Global Warming is tricky that way!

Resourceguy
December 1, 2016 12:19 pm

Bring in the automated John Holdren science distortion specialist bot to win the day.

TomRude
December 1, 2016 12:33 pm

Meanwhile CBC is warning us…
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/antarctic-ice-shelf-breaking-apart-from-inside-out-1.3874217
Nicole Mortillaro signed this piece of alarmist fear mongering.

Pine Island Glacier, at the outer edge of West Antarctica, is the fastest melting glacier in the region. In 2015, a 583 square kilometer piece of it broke off. Now researchers are beginning to understand how this is happening. The researchers discovered that the calving, or breakup, of the Pine Island Glacier began in 2013 after a rift formed at its base about 32 kilometers inland. The rift began to move upward over the following two years until it finally broke through the surface, causing the breakup.

In November 1956, the USS Glacier reported that west of Scott Island a 31,000 km2 piece (335 km x 97 km) broke away from Antarctica…
Are CBC writers paid activists?

MRW
Reply to  TomRude
December 1, 2016 3:31 pm

“CBC writers” can’t read a map. They have no clue that the continent of Antarctica is 1 2/3 times the size of the US. Their journalists are now as badly educated as ours are. (Never used to be.) They don’t know that Antarctica is a continent, solid rock under those two miles of ice (at the peak and the South Pole). So the nitwits don’t and can’t understand that the 583 sq km piece is 2X the size of Catalina Island off the southern coast of CA. Or 1/10th the size of Prince Edward Island.

John Harmsworth
Reply to  MRW
December 3, 2016 3:17 pm

This winter has been very mild so far, as was all of last winter in Western Canada. We are probably due to get back to more like average. In the context of climate, the winters here (Saskatchewan) were pretty brutal in the 60’s, a couple of tough ones in the 90’s and 2012 and 13 were nasty. Summer temps over 100F in the 60’s, 80’s and early 2000’s. Likewise alternating wet, dry and just average. Whadryagonnado?

ren
December 1, 2016 12:46 pm
Reply to  ren
December 2, 2016 2:02 pm

I don’t know how to interpret this, but it’s fun to watch. What is the timeframe and what are the meanings of the colors and differential lines?

ren
Reply to  aaron
December 2, 2016 3:04 pm

Polar vortex turns right. True that a ridiculously?

ren
Reply to  ren
December 2, 2016 3:58 pm
Eugene WR Gallun
December 1, 2016 12:49 pm

Occasionally I get ideas that don’t fit in –WUWT and Jonova are the only two places i post anything.
I had an idea for a political cartoon labeled — Obama’s Foreign Policy.. The cartoon is of Obama standing with his hands in the air wearing a T-shirt that says — Hands Up, Don’t Shoot.
Eugene WR Gallun

Latitude
Reply to  Eugene WR Gallun
December 1, 2016 1:27 pm

LOL!

Alan Robertson
Reply to  jorgekafkazar
December 1, 2016 1:36 pm

Great minds…

Eugene WR Gallun
Reply to  jorgekafkazar
December 1, 2016 2:58 pm

Well, I will settle for second place in the funny race. — Eugene WR Gallun

ren
December 1, 2016 12:52 pm
n.n
December 1, 2016 12:56 pm

Chaos in a semi-stable environment. It’s all normal. Bundle up.

DocScience
December 1, 2016 1:37 pm

Take that mosquitoes!!!!!!!!! Cold winters have finally forced Asian tigers from my area. Incredibly pesky daytime full sun biters.

Resourceguy
December 1, 2016 1:40 pm

Warning: Weather Approaching

Steve Fraser
Reply to  Resourceguy
December 1, 2016 1:55 pm

Smokey Bear better bundle up. Looks to be -20C in Jackson, WY on Monday, thereabouts.

December 1, 2016 1:45 pm

What happen their ?

December 1, 2016 1:45 pm

Looks like my bet on Global Warming, as evidenced by my move from California to Maine back in the 90’s, is not working out. The real estate guy promised that it would be just like California in 20 years – can I sue? /sarc off

Mike the Morlock
Reply to  Taylor Pohlman
December 1, 2016 4:00 pm

Taylor Pohlman December 1, 2016 at 1:45 pm
Taylor I am from Conn moved to AZ. in 1985. then to OR, back to AZ.
I was raised with the motto of never hitting a man when he was down – kick him why bend over.
Joking aside, Maine is a wonderful state, I spent many summers there in my youth.
I think if you stayed, there the state has been good to, and for you.
michael

John Harmsworth
Reply to  Taylor Pohlman
December 3, 2016 3:21 pm

Maybe he meant full of goofy Democrats. Got you on a technicality!

Bruce Cobb
December 1, 2016 2:07 pm

According to weather “experts” in the ski industry “It is really hard for the industry to plan in advance like they used to”, and “winter has become increasingly unpredictable in recent decades due to climate change”.
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/23122015/climate-change-global-warming-imperils-winter-ski-industry-frets-el-nino
So it is good that NOAA is on the case, setting their minds at ease….

Latitude
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
December 1, 2016 4:48 pm

….that’s their excuse for crappy weather forecasts

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
December 1, 2016 7:20 pm

Good post Bruce. Similar posts pop up every little while but in 65 years of skiing, this is a wash, rinse repeat that has been going on for my entire life. The jet stream wanders a bit and the snow may come or it may go. One resort is inaccessible due to snow, and another has grass on the lower slopes. Just another infinite “Do Loop”.

4TimesAYear
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
December 1, 2016 10:39 pm

Winter recreational areas got a head start last year – and an extended period of snow in the spring. Not doing quite so well this year, but things are starting to snowball now 😁

fredsconsulting
Reply to  4TimesAYear
December 2, 2016 3:58 am

Other seasonal work will probably spike as well. For instance this service maybe big this winter 😂😂😂Http://RoofSnowRemovalct.com

4TimesAYear
Reply to  fredsconsulting
December 3, 2016 10:41 pm

If that’s yours, I hope business will be booming. 😃

December 1, 2016 2:27 pm

I trust the new administration will focus on actual forecasting – short-term and seasonal, so that businesses and individuals can do real planning with confidence. Spending enormous sums on the climate 100 years from now while not measuring and developing reliable near-term models is such a waste, and doesn’t serve our needs. Here’s hoping that shift will occur.
Do you think Joe Bastardi would make a good head of NOAA?

BallBounces
December 1, 2016 2:34 pm

Canuckics are a minority in North America. We find these maps hurtful and exclusionary. They erase us as a people. Worse, they hurt our feelings. When Democratic Party uproar over this reaches the right intensity, we shall descend upon the US northern border and claim climate asylum. Imagine, climate refugees — a Democratic dream come true.

Janice Moore
Reply to  BallBounces
December 1, 2016 3:01 pm

BallBounces — All Canadian stuff is TOP SECRET. “C” is for (ssshhh — look left…. look right…..) “classified.” Mm, hm. 😉
At least your borders are there. Poor ol’ New Zealand, often gets left out completely!
“John A: I think the ‘Argonne National Laboratory’ wins this this week’s prize for ‘Lousy Unhelpful Scientific Diagram’. New Zealand was clearly inconvenient and so got wiped off the globe, which is criminal considering how beautiful that country is.
(https://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/05/22/atlantic-conveyor-belt-current-still-going-strong/#comment-666137 )

MarkW
Reply to  Janice Moore
December 2, 2016 8:20 am

When as many Canadians vote for US president as Mexicans, then the press will start caring.

Reply to  BallBounces
December 1, 2016 3:20 pm

hahahaha. A fellow Canuck agrees!
https://minimalistlifestyle.wordpress.com/

John Harmsworth
Reply to  BallBounces
December 3, 2016 3:31 pm

This Canuck couldn’t care less about weather maps. I’ve been out in 100F + heat and -80C (with wind chill) temps. Dress up or strip down to suit and get to it! We used to play road hockey all day at -25 and we had tons of fun! Just don’t stand still or touch steel!

December 1, 2016 3:16 pm

Having harangued a bit on an analysis of the hot and cold blob as a modifier of usual expectations from ENSO alone, I’m sticking my neck out here to say that NOAA has the forecast for precipitation for the southern half of of the US wrong. There will be much higher precipitation than normal there. This will end the drought in Calif. Indeed the polisci worriers will be blaming it on dirty weather or some such. Remember you heard it here first. And maybe I can get someone else a PhD for taking up this opportunity to do science.

TRM
December 1, 2016 6:01 pm

http://www.findlocalweather.com/weather_maps/temperature_north_america.html
All these maps that don’t show Canada and the Arctic weather really fall flat IMHO. It is always nice to see the whole picture. Watch it progress day by day.
In the Canadian & USA prairies temps next week will have daily HIGHS in the -15 C to -20 C range. Ski pants and face cover if you are going out as skin will freeze if there is any wind.

Verified by MonsterInsights