New computer model says human emissions can 'render Earth ice free'

burning_earth

From the “department of global roasting” and the UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS, where great ideas like this one are formed at Halloween parties, (yes really, see PR) comes this claim:

UAF model used to estimate Antarctic ice sheet melting

To see how burning up the Earth’s available fossil fuels might affect the Antarctic ice sheet, scientists turned to a computer program developed at the University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute. The ice would disappear, they found, and that conclusion is making headlines across the world.

UAF’s Parallel Ice Sheet Model “was the perfect tool to find out whether human emissions are sufficient to render Earth ice free — and unfortunately it turns out that they are,” said Anders Levermann, a researcher at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. Levermann is an author of a paper recently published in the journal Science Advances.

He and the paper’s other authors figured out that burning all available fossil fuels would release about 10,000 gigatons of carbon into the atmosphere, which could possibly raise the average temperature of the planet by 20 degrees Fahrenheit. One gigaton is one billion tons. More carbon dioxide in the atmosphere raises temperatures because the greenhouse gas traps infrared radiation from sunlight striking the Earth.

The computer program shows that the increased temperatures would melt the Antarctic ice sheet, which is bigger than the United States, has an average thickness of 6,200 feet and contains more than 50 percent of the world’s fresh water. More than half the melting could occur during the first 1,000 years, although the entire study spans 10,000 years. PISM also shows that the melting would push sea levels up by more than 160 feet. Coastlines would retreat, forcing people in places like New York City, London and Paris to move inland.

“The future evolution of the global sea level is mainly determined by the melting of the big ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica,” Levermann said. “If we want to properly protect our cities, we need to know how these ice sheets evolve. Models like PISM are the only chance we have to understand future sea-level rise.”

Andy Aschwanden, a UAF glaciologist who helped develop PISM, said he uses the computer program to study how climate change could affect Greenland’s ice sheet. He said that more than 50 studies have used PISM, including a soon-to-be-published paper that investigates the future of Alaska’s Juneau Icefield.

“Models are testbeds for all sorts of questions, and PISM is what we call a numerical model.” said Aschwanden. “We take our best understanding of the physical processes of the real world, in this case ice sheets, and frame that in the language of mathematics. Then we teach the computer how to come up with solutions to ‘what if’ questions about the processes that this model represents. We did a lot of work under the hood to make this model work.”

Ed Bueler, a UAF associate professor of mathematics, and GI computer programmer Constantine Khroulev, did much of that work. They built the engine of this model from new mathematical equations. Bueler said PISM is designed to solve what-if scenarios for different-sized ice sheets and glaciers over a time period that extends 100,000 years into the future and the past. It considers such factors as ice thickness and temperature, the weight of the ice and how fast the ice flows as gravity slowly pulls it downhill “like pouring honey onto a pancake.”

“The equations are a way to say precisely how the parts of an ice sheet work and how each of these pieces is connected to all the others,” said Bueler. “Once you have the equations, you can make predictions.”

Most programs that handle such a wide range of scenarios over a large time span rely on mathematics so complex that it may take computers years or decades just to answer one problem. Bueler said PISM is complex enough to be accurate but efficient enough to deliver answers in a timely manner to scientists.

PISM also uses the GI’s high-performance computers to get more accurate answers to the wide variety of scenarios. These computers can outperform an average personal computer in processing calculations.

The PISM team posts the computer program and its updates on the Internet so that scientists can use it freely and provide feedback on the program. Levermann learned about the program after one of his graduate students found it on the Internet and showed it to him in 2008.

“Half a year later, I was flying to Fairbanks to discuss the model with Ed,” said Levermann. “That was my first Halloween party in the U.S. In the two following weeks, my two then-Ph.D.-students, Ricarda Winkelmann and Maria Martin, visited Ed, and he explained the model. That started a wonderful long-term collaboration.”

Winkelmann went on to be the lead author on the recent paper published in Science Advances.

###

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

133 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
September 25, 2015 9:35 am

By extending the model out to 10,000 years, they are now playing in the procession of the poles game. All sorts of things could change as the poles move around. However, I believe that as the procission progresses, the Northern hemosphere will become less hospitable (hotter summers, colder winters), and the South Pole will get even colder in the summer, never approching -12°C. The ice down there is there for good!

Richard deSousa
September 25, 2015 9:54 am

Rubbish! The only way all the ice on Antarctica and Greenland would melt, as well as all the oceans boil away, is during the end stage of our sun’s life. http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~infocom/The%20Website/end.html

thechuckr
September 25, 2015 9:55 am

Perhaps Obi Wan Kenobi describes Potsdam Institute best:
https://youtu.be/0znNiN0lYAQ

September 25, 2015 9:56 am

i use a computer program to play chess. like Capt James T. Kirk, i fixed the program so i will win. is that wrong?

Reply to  scott frasier (@frasierscott1)
September 25, 2015 2:00 pm

Only if the computer objects.
(If it does object, please unplug it before we have a VIKKI, Sky Net or The Matrix!)

Caligula Jones
September 25, 2015 10:24 am

“New computer model says human emissions can ‘render Earth ice free’”
I have an old computer model that says I am a Level 10 Wizard…

Reply to  Caligula Jones
September 25, 2015 2:03 pm

Maybe you can conjure up Doc Brown from the future or past and have him make a couple of ice cubes for us?

JimS
September 25, 2015 12:42 pm

Well great. It seems that man has the power to end this 3-million year Ice Age. Wow! I had no idea how powerful we were.

Lady Gaiagaia
Reply to  JimS
September 25, 2015 12:49 pm

Ten times that powerful, since Antarctica has been iced over for the past 34 million years.

JimS
Reply to  Lady Gaiagaia
September 25, 2015 4:35 pm

And when Antarctica was being iced over, that was around the same time that South America split from Antarctica, thus surrounding it with water. The power of plate movements and the resulting effects seems to be overlooked by today’s crop of climate scientists. All they can see is CO2.

Hugs
Reply to  Lady Gaiagaia
September 26, 2015 4:39 am

See Zhang15 and their graph on temperature / carbon dioxide.
http://d29qn7q9z0j1p6.cloudfront.net/content/roypta/371/2001/20130096/F5.large.jpg?width=800&height=600&carousel=1
According to that, CO2 is now as high as it has been during the last 20-25 Ma. But the great descent in temps started about 15 Ma ago and accelerated 4 Ma ago, while CO2 dropped from 800 to 400 ppm 25-30 Ma ago. Try to find this data in Wikipedia 🙂
Shortly put. Temperatures in geological scale don’t follow CO2 concentrations. As said, “the correlations between CO2 and T are neither strong nor stable.” (Zhao&Feng15)
It doesn’t mean CO2 does not have any effect – I believe is has a complex effect. I don’t say CO2 couldn’t postpone glaciation. I find it improbable that human CO2 remained long enough to melt all continental ice. No, the word is ‘implausible’. Prove me wrong, don’t use models 🙂

September 25, 2015 2:10 pm

Anybody know what the going price is for a couple of acres on top of Mount Everest? I think I want to get in on the ground floor.

JimS
Reply to  Gunga Din
September 25, 2015 4:37 pm

I would look more towards beach property on western Antarctica.

Hugs
Reply to  JimS
September 26, 2015 4:53 am

If I could buy some Antarctica, I’d do it. It would be funny. Children could say grandpa bought a seaside estate and thought it’d be valuable some day. And then they could show a picture from a snowfield telling the property is 700 m down under ice. For humanity, melting Greenland and Antarctica provided more options than leaving it under ice, but in any case, it would take thousands of years.Think about what was 12 ka ago, 6 ka ago or will be 2 ka from now? We can’t know if humans exist, or what they think is important then.
Human in year 4000 probably won’t give a damn if the planet is say, 4C warmer than now. Looking out of the window, it is +15C there and +8C would be very very optimal. The question of most importance to humans has always been ‘where’s my next lunch’.

Hugs
Reply to  JimS
September 26, 2015 4:56 am

Oops, I meant 8C more would be optimal. +8 degrees is where I place my favourite climate scientist.

Bruce Cobb
September 26, 2015 1:44 pm

Models say the darndest things.

richard verney
September 28, 2015 3:46 am

If the increase in CO2 since the 1950s has because of DWLWIR caused the warming seen since the 1950s, where is the data regarding its impact on IR telescopes, which have been in operation since the 1950s.
Surely this backradiation is to an IR telescope the equivalent to light pollution in the visible light range to an optical telescope. If there has been an increase in DWLWIR over the years, surely this will have had some impact (may be very small depending upon the precise wavelengths being monitored) upon the efficiency of IR telescopes and may require some adjustment to lessen the impact.
Is anyone aware of such data?

James at 48
September 28, 2015 10:06 am

Regarding sea ice … It’s been fascinating to see how the various remote sensing and data crunching operations around the world have been handling the “necklace” of sea ice up north of Alaska between 140 and 160 W. All over the map (pun intended). Not a great vote of confidence.