On The Recent Unisys Sea Surface Temperature Anomaly Maps and Cooling of Northern Hemisphere Ocean Surfaces

Guest Post by Bob Tisdale

UPDATE 2: As of Monday November 3, 2014, Unisys is no longer updating their sea surface temperature anomaly maps. See the update at the end of the post.

# # #

UPDATE: A week-old news report from Unisys clarifies a few points. See the update at the end of the post. Thanks, Michele.

# # #

The recent cooling of the sea surfaces in the Northern Hemisphere has caused a lot of comments and questions around the blogosphere…especially when someone displays a sea surface temperature anomaly map from Unisys, Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1 (Looks Ominous)

As you’ll recall, back in June of this year, Unisys had to change sea surface temperature products when NOAA discontinued the dataset they had been using. See Figure 2, which is a screen cap of the Wayback Machine archived edition of the Unisys SSTa webpage for June 25th, while Unisys were updating their product.

Figure 2 Wayback Machine for Unisys

Figure 2

As shown, Unisys advises they were planning to change to the NOAA/NCEP RTG-SST analysis. See the NOAA/NCEP Real-Time, Global, Sea Surface Temperature (RTG-SST) Analysis webpage. It’s probably safe to assume Unisys wound up using the RTG-SST product, when they began displaying the updated maps in July 2014.

If you were to click on the Global SST anomaly map in the left-hand menu on that NOAA webpage, Figure 3 would be displayed. It’s the same day, and it should be the same data, with assumedly the same referenced base years. (I can’t find what base years they’re using, and I can’t see Unisys going to all the trouble to create new daily climatologies for sea surface temperature anomaly maps.)

Figure 3 RTG-SSTa global_anomaly_oper0

Figure 3 (That looks ominous, too.)

Obviously, the color-coding of the temperature anomaly scales for the Unisys and NOAA presentations is different. NOAA’s color scale is readable. Unisys’s is not in the map above. Though it’s impossible to tell from the color bar below the Unisys map, they have historically used “cool” blue and green colors for positive anomalies, even above +1.0 deg C. See the older map here. The “warmer” yellows don’t appear until the anomalies are about +2.5 deg C. Thus, the tendency for the Unisys maps to look “cooler”.

But there is another significant difference between the two maps. Note the graduations in the latitudes of the NOAA map. They’re linear…equally spaced. Not so for the Unisys map. Unisys appears to use a Mercator projection, which expands the latitudes as they progress from the equator to the poles. That exaggerates the “cool” anomalies at the mid-to-high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, making the cooling look even more significant than it truly has been.

We discussed the reasons for the elevated sea surface temperatures in the post On The Recent Record-High Global Sea Surface Temperatures – The Wheres and Whys. And as shown in Figure 4, the “blob” in the North Pacific had a major impact on the sea surface temperatures of the Northern Hemisphere. But the sea surface temperature anomalies in the Northern Hemisphere peaked in August and September, and now they’re coming back down.

Figure 4

Figure 4

If you were to look at the Unisys animation, Figure 5, you’d think we were heading into a new ice age.

Figure 5

Figure 5

But, if you look at the animations of seasonal sea surface temperature anomaly maps with more subdued color scaling, like the one from NOAA here and the one from CMC Environment Canada here, you’ll be able to catch something else. While the sea surfaces of the high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere have cooled—no doubt about that—there appears to have been a slight warming at mid latitudes. In other words, the warming of the mid-latitudes should offset some (but not all) of the cooling at higher latitudes.

One would think there will be a noticeable drop in the sea surface temperatures of the Northern Hemisphere in October. Unfortunately, with the NOAA NOMADS system off-line, I don’t have easy access to the weekly Reynolds OI.v2 SSTa data. So we’ll have to wait for a few more days, until NOAA provides their October updates for sea surface temperature data.

As soon as October 2014 sea surface temperature data appears for the NOAA ERSST.v3b or the Reynolds OI.v2 data, I’ll bring you up to date on how substantial (or insignificant) that decline in recent weeks has been in the Northern Hemisphere.

Enjoy your weekends.

# # #

UPDATE: On the thread of the cross post at WUWT, Blogger Michele (in her comment here) provided a link to an October 22, 2014 Unisys news update titled Unisys SST Anomaly Maps. Unisys writes:

Unisys Weather has been receiving reports of incorrect maps of the daily SST contours. The data used to make the maps are the official NOAA RTG-SST and anomaly grids, being pulled directly from the NOAA NWSTG.

We have found an issue with the color scale of the mapping, and this has caused some users to misinterpret the maps. The color scale being used by WXP is wrapping, causing the same color to appear at very low and very high ends of the color table. The color table is also stretched beyond the actual values in the SST anomaly plot. We are working to correct the color table and color bar issue.

A comparison of the Unisys generated map with the NOAA RTG-SST anomaly maps indicate the contours are in line with NOAA’s maps.

# # #

UPDATE 2: Harold Ambler of TalkingAboutTheWeather explains why Unisys is no longer updating their sea surface temperature anomaly maps in his post UNISYS pulls down map showing dramatic ocean cooling. Thanks, Harold.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

106 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
beng
November 1, 2014 11:17 am

This one is easier on the eye, but not sure of its data source. I’ll try to embed:

If that doesn’t work: http://vortex.plymouth.edu/mapwall/ssta.png

Keith Minto
Reply to  Bob Tisdale
November 1, 2014 7:43 pm

Bob,I can only see pink from zero to plus one and light blue from zero to minus one.
This one has white for + and – 0.2° http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/cdas-sflux_ssta7diff_global_1.png ,seeing white for no change in an anomaly graphic is a good visual base to visualise warmer or cooler changes.

November 1, 2014 11:37 am

On “recon”,
If you want to know what is going on, you set out sensors and send boots on the ground to implant said sensors. Together with making sure you have the whole area needed covered. Therefore if the U.N. , and or the U.S. Govt. (EPA) (NWS), ect. want to know they should be about world wide data search full time and the money should be no problem. Yet seems the direction is toward grants, toward wind farm tax credits, toward closing coal mines, toward solar tax credits and other matters.
It seems the common sense thing to do. Find out the truth via sensors every where all the time.
Odd they have had what 30 to 40 years to get it in gear and done and na’da so far.

phlogiston
November 1, 2014 12:02 pm

I dont know where Bob finds the “Unisys” mapwith the bizzare repeating color palette. The Unisys map linked here at WUWT is quite different:
http://weather.unisys.com/surface/sst_anom_new.gif
The difference is in the base period not the color palette.

Bill Marsh
Editor
Reply to  phlogiston
November 1, 2014 12:45 pm
milodonharlani
November 1, 2014 12:21 pm

If NH oceans be cooling, can more Arctic sea ice be far behind?
With apologies to P. B. Shelley’s “Ode to the West Wind” & thanks to Willis’ quotation of “The Cloud”.

milodonharlani
Reply to  milodonharlani
November 1, 2014 12:23 pm

Growing Arctic sea ice should take the wind out of the sails of CACA.

Reply to  milodonharlani
November 1, 2014 2:41 pm

Why? It didn’t this year. In fact, low ice is being blamed on 2014-15 winter weather in advance despite record growth.

November 1, 2014 12:44 pm

The NOAA/NCEP RTG-SST is based on satellites, ships intakes and buoys, as is the Reynolds OI.v2.
From Bob.
I like the product you sent for sea surface temperatures.

Chuck L
November 1, 2014 12:49 pm

Looks like the “The Day After Tomorrow.” Anyone have Dennis Quaid’s phone number?

November 1, 2014 1:07 pm

Thanks, Bob. A clear voice of reason!

herkimer
November 1, 2014 1:28 pm

If we go to the UNISYS web page and enter ARCHIVES and then SST PLOTS and then go down the INDEX OF ARCHIVES /SST and to the very bottom you will find SST ANOM LOOP.GIF to October 27/2014. One can clearly see an animation of how the large heat ‘”blob” in the North Pacific that used to exist earlier in the NORTH PACIFIC seems to have cooled down or change to a cooler depressions now. The previous post by STEVE OREGON earlier about CLIFF MAAS analysis seems correct . There has been and still is a lot of turbulence, upwelling and major storms in this area plus periodically colder winds coming south from the Arctic as well to cool the Pacific North. On the surface , I see nothing wrong with UNISYS sst plots and agree with Bill ILLIS ‘S comments made ealier as well. The NOAA/NESDIS 50 KM GLOBAL ANALYSIS SST ANOAMLIES plot for October 30 shows part of this cool down as well.

Steve Oregon
Reply to  herkimer
November 1, 2014 3:14 pm

Cliff Mass’ work is a nice addition to Bob Tisdale’s above. Together their work appears to be very informative.
Bob, what do you think of the Mass info?
http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2014/10/halloween-tragedy-blob-is-meeting.html
For some time Cliff Mass. a lukewarmer, has provided some honest, outstanding and useful analysis.
From Gordon Fulks PhD
“Cliff Mass is a distinguished professor of meteorology at the University of Washington and a Fellow of the American Meteorological Society. He is thoroughly alarmist but smart enough to avoid the worst of the stupidity. We keep challenging him on accountability, and he keeps finding an excuse for avoiding it. Most of the excuses have to do with our allegedly insulting him. He has a very BIG ego and a very thin skin. ANY criticism is an insult!
Cliff is worth pursuing, because he seems to have an independent streak that, for instance, kept him from signing the “Consensus of 50 Professors” document ten years ago that predicted relentless PNW warming +1.0 F/decade. That is not a document that they wave around today because PNW temperatures have actually trended downward (about -1.0 F/decade). That has to be a considerable embarrassment.
For being precisely wrong about PNW temperature, the consensus has taken in about a BILLION dollars, and still uses the +1.0 F/decade prediction. Why not? They were certainly correct about the money that their prediction would generate. 🙂
Since Cliff is more of a meteorologist than a climate fanatic scientist, he apparently does not depend on Federal grants tied to the hysteria. At least that is what he told me. Hence, he is sometimes willing to buck the UW climate tribe. He did so magnificently last year regarding their ‘Ocean Acidification’ hysteria.”
Gordon
http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/search?q=acidification
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2014/09/science_roundup_sept_27.html#incart_related_stories
“Cliff Mass
I have analyzed the two papers in depth. Check my blog:
http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2014/09/why-is-northwest-us-warming-natural.html
The Johnstone/Mantua paper is quite strong, while the Abatzoglou/Mote/Rupp paper has major problems.
The bottom line is that anthropogenic warming has been weak compared to natural variability over the past 100 years, but this will change later in this century as the global warming signal is enhanced..cliff mass, prof. atmospheric sciences, University of Washington”
http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2014/10/wimpy-el-nino.html
http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2014/09/epa-takes-on-oysteracidification.html

phlogiston
November 1, 2014 2:06 pm

I just read Bill Illis’ exposee of NCDC/NOAA seasonality fiddling. This is huge.

November 1, 2014 2:07 pm

Bob,
Here is my AVHRR movie of the last 50 days in North Atlantic SST. It doesn’t show any notable cooling.

herkimer
November 1, 2014 2:13 pm

The cool down that has happened and is still happening in the NORTH PACIFIC has also been happening and is still happening in the NORTH ATLANTIC .The latest Nullschool plots of surface winds in both areas illustrates the atmospheric turbulence that is still happening in both areas and why cool winters are likely for parts of Europe and North America with jet stream blocking and colder air coming further south.

Paul
November 1, 2014 2:24 pm

This UNISYS chart is very confusing. It clearly shows a drop of 2 degrees C or more from the long term average around the British Isles and beyond. If this is false it is climate fraud and heads should roll. Is this a trick by the warmists to lead the deniers up the garden path. You would think that the Gulf Stream has completely shut down and a mini ice age or something bigger is imminent.

November 1, 2014 2:35 pm

http://weather.unisys.com/news/?p=391
Posted on 2014/10/22 at 3:28 PM UTC
Unisys Weather has been receiving reports of incorrect maps of the daily SST contours. The data used to make the maps are the official NOAA RTG-SST and anomaly grids, being pulled directly from the NOAA NWSTG.
We have found an issue with the color scale of the mapping, and this has caused some users to misinterpret the maps. The color scale being used by WXP is wrapping, causing the same color to appear at very low and very high ends of the color table. The color table is also stretched beyond the actual values in the SST anomaly plot. We are working to correct the color table and color bar issue.
A comparison of the Unisys generated map with the NOAA RTG-SST anomaly maps indicate the contours are in line with NOAA’s maps.

Steve in Seattle
Reply to  Bob Tisdale
November 2, 2014 12:18 am

You ( now ) have to be careful which link you click on, when at the UNISYS SST page, They do make it clear that you can view the old, with the bizarre color wrapping scale, OR SST_New link to take you to the display that has been based upon the new, clear, non wrapping scale. And, by the way, includes a grey/white around 0 rendition.

phlogiston
Reply to  Michele
November 2, 2014 12:41 am

This is about changed base period, not color palette, please read the post by Bill Illis:
Bill Illis on November 1, 2014 at 8:08 am
A lot of people here are trying to cover this up. A chorus of “move along nothing to see”.

Reply to  phlogiston
November 2, 2014 5:52 am

+1

Editor
November 1, 2014 2:42 pm

For years we (coillectively) have complained that such maps are skewed by the use of warm and hot colors to over-emphasize small positive changes in (sea) surface temperatures — now we have complaints that Unisys uses too bold colors for small changes in cooling! Egads!

Mick
November 1, 2014 3:19 pm

I personally like this :
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/ocean.html
‘Global SST Anomaly 7-day Change’ chart I find it very useful to see SST ‘tendencies’
scroll down to see Nino temperature graphs.
Mick

Bill Illis
Reply to  Mick
November 1, 2014 4:34 pm

Go to the Forecast Models link and it is really the best outline of the weather model forecasts there is on the Web.
For example, the GFS forecast temp anomalies for North America going out 16 days.
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2014110118/gfs_T2ma_namer.html
Lots of other models, and options are available. It is operated by Levi Cowan, a grad student at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Richard G
Reply to  Bill Illis
November 2, 2014 12:58 am

Yes Bill, you can see the negative temperature anomalies pulsing from eastern Asia out over the North Pacific.

Richard G
Reply to  Mick
November 2, 2014 12:51 am

Thanks for the link Mick. It’s an interesting website on the tropics. Looks like it’s run by a Met.

wayne
November 1, 2014 7:05 pm

I wouldn’t stomp on Unisys quite so easily, personally I like their color schema but it took a while to get used to it and it needs to expand and limit the span from say -12 to +12 °C as I think is what Unisys said it is correcting. As for the actual data used I would more look at NCDC/NOAA for the warming distortions, they have been caught in lies constantly and there’s a good saying “once a liar, always a liar”.
Taking the more correct viewing of the Unisys plot and keeping in mind:
blue around the edges of magenta areas — colder when moving internally,
green around the edges of yellow areas — warmer when moving internally,
makes that schema very detailed and easy to read unlike NCDC’s plots and color scale made strictly to instill fear.

stuartlarge
November 1, 2014 8:03 pm

Sorry off topic, but this should be a WUWT article http://bravenewclimate.com/2014/08/22/catch-22-of-energy-storage

Global cooling
Reply to  stuartlarge
November 1, 2014 10:39 pm

No. EROEI confuses. Use just money without subsidies and tax breaks.

Keith Minto
November 1, 2014 9:22 pm

Look at the anomaly legend in the Unisys loop at fig. 5, it is all over the place.

Bill Illis
November 2, 2014 7:17 am

Just a note to those using the Climate Explorer for NCDC SSTs. They appear to be substantially different than the official NCDC ERSST v3b numbers. (Maybe the climate explorer is using an old database that hasn’t been updated for the newest and greatest adjustments or something else is wrong).
http://s30.postimg.org/5ic1wa0mp/NCDC_Annual_ERSST_v3b_Clim_Exp.png
http://s29.postimg.org/oiu5oz293/NCDC_Monthly_ERSST_v3b_Clim_Exp.png

November 2, 2014 8:02 am

The link above was to the low resolution RTG. The high resolution RTG (1/12th degree) is at http://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/sst/rtg_high_res One advantage of using that is that you can get regional blow ups of the temperature and anomaly. You would also see that the base period for the sst climatology is 1961-1990.
The base period will be updated to 1981-2010 in the next operational upgrade to the RTG-High Res. The colors shown will then be less angry. The color bar is based on keeping approximately equal areas of ocean in each anomaly band — for the new climatology period.
@Ernest Bush:
It is a good idea to remember that NOAA produces several SST analyses. The one used for deciding warmest month sorts of things comes from NCDC. The RTG comes from NWS. Among other things, the NWS product is aimed at best analysis for weather purposes today. The NCDC is aimed at climate analysis. That difference in goal (and what’s available) leads to differences in detail. The NESDIS analyses have yet another goal (and are satellite-only, as required by their goal).
Tisdale:
The RTG does adjust for satellite biases — http://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/sst/rtg_high_res/description.shtml
Speaking for myself only, of course.

Reply to  Robert Grumbine
November 2, 2014 9:18 am

Thank you Mr. Grumbine!
The base years used for climatology are likely driving our confusion between Unisys and US Gov products. I had been seeking the info on the base years–especially for the NOAA RTG-SST product, and your point out to the 1961-1990 period is much appreciated.
If anyone can determine the base years for the Unisys product, we’ll all be able to calibrate our minds and properly compare the products.
Hifast, as always, is Curious.

Reply to  hifast
November 2, 2014 10:49 am

My guess on the source of difference is some kind of straight up mistake, rather than different climatologies. The thing is, sea surface temperature changes slowly, and the climatology even slower. With differences of over 4 C in the plotted anomalies showing up in only a few weeks … that’s pretty drastic. As climatology for the seasonal cycle, that’s an awfully rapid change on hemispheric basis.
Looking to change in climatologies, if it were this, it would say the Unisys climatology was showing a 2 or 4 degrees per decade change in temperature relative to the RTG’s 1961 start (depending on whether it started at 1981 or 1971). Maybe a few local areas, near the ice pack or upwelling zones, could pull that off. But on hemispheric basis, that’s just unreasonable.
I’m sure that differing climatologies contribute to differences between the many different SST sites. Not just the base period, but also exactly what sources were used to make the climatology. The JMA uses the JMA analysis in making their climatology. The CMC uses the CMC analysis. And so on. Even if we all use the same time period, there will be differences in detail.

ren
November 2, 2014 8:24 am

This will not be a warm winter in the northern hemisphere.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat_a_f/gif_files/gfs_toz_nh_f00.gif

Joseph Bastardi
November 2, 2014 9:32 am

I am likely biased, because I know him to be one of the brightest lights I have seen come onto the scene and he works with us, but Ryan Maues SST, available here
http://models.weatherbell.com/sst/globe_cdas1_anom.png
blows away everything else out there, in my opinion.
BTW what you see on that map has a striking resemblance to the blend of the SST’s in 1976 and 1977 el nino events, which are in our analog package, and the subject of an outstanding paper Joe D Aleo shared with me on those winters SST’s be Dickson and Nemias, 2 huge lights from the past that still shine bright today to many of us

Reply to  Joseph Bastardi
November 2, 2014 5:57 pm

Can’t see anything Joe unless you sign up to weatherbell

November 3, 2014 6:39 am

Hi everyone…
My name is Brian and I’m the deputy director of Unisys Weather. I want to thank everyone who brought this to our attention. I generated the blog entry at http://weather.unisys.com/news/?p=391 after we started receiving email messages about issues with the SST anomaly maps. After further analysis, today I’ve asked the web team to remove the SST anomaly images indefinitely.
At first, we believed the issue to be purely a mapping issue with the color table and max/min of the look up table as generated by WXP. Comparing some of the larger areas of the SST anomaly with the NOAA RTG-SST anomaly (I tried to compare with the NESDIS SST anomaly but their site was down for a week) it looked as of our product was in general agreement (difficult to make an objective comparison when one is comparing GIF/PNG images visually).
Due to the recent switch by NWS to remove the legacy SST from the NOAAPort feed, we switched to using the RTG-SST. Further investigation indicated that the SST anomaly charts are being generated using a 30 year dataset that has not been updated in a very long time.
I can see from the loops and further analysis that something is causing a large bloom of cooler than normal temps in the NH on our maps even in areas where the NOAA analysis shows an increase (specifically looking off the coast of Newfoundland).
I’m going to ask the products and web team to look into this, so we can generate a quality SST anomaly product that is in line with the official analysis from NOAA and other sources. Thank you all for your patience and understanding. My contact info is below.
-Brian Hughes
Unisys Weather Deputy Director/Weather Program Manager
brian dot hughes at unisys dot com
[Thank you for the reply. Email address spelled out. .mod]

November 3, 2014 9:00 am

Thanks mod!

November 3, 2014 2:32 pm

Thank you for joining the discussion Brian. Your input is exactly what we needed.