Breaking deep-sea waves reveal a potential mechanism for global ocean mixing

From the “Trenberth’s hidden heat” department and the University of Washington comes this story about waves nobody ever sees in the sea that may mix water and transport heat.
screenshot_wave_graph[1]
The deep-sea waves are 800 feet tall, as high as a skyscraper. Image: Tom Peacock, MIT | Wide Eye Productions

Waves breaking over sandy beaches are captured in countless tourist photos. But enormous waves breaking deep in the ocean are seldom seen, although they play a crucial role in long-term climate cycles.

A University of Washington study for the first time recorded such a wave breaking in a key bottleneck for circulation in the world’s largest ocean. The study was published online this month in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

The deep ocean is thought of as dark, cold and still. While this is mostly true, huge waves form between layers of water of different density. These skyscraper-tall waves transport heat, energy, carbon and nutrients around the globe. Where and how they break is important for the planet’s climate.

“Climate models are really sensitive not only to how much turbulence there is in the deep ocean, but to where it is,” said lead author Matthew Alford, an oceanographer in the UW Applied Physics Laboratory. He led the expedition to the Samoan Passage, a narrow channel in the South Pacific Ocean that funnels water flowing from Antarctica.

“The primary importance of understanding deep-ocean turbulence is to get the climate models right on long timescales,” Alford said.

Dense water in Antarctica sinks to the deep Pacific, where it eventually surges through a 25-mile gap in the submarine landscape northeast of Samoa.

“Basically the entire South Pacific flow is blocked by this huge submarine ridge,” Alford said. “The amount of water that’s trying to get northward through this gap is just tremendous – 6 million cubic meters of water per second, or about 35 Amazon Rivers.”

In the 1990s, a major expedition measured these currents through the Samoan Passage. The scientists inferred that a lot of mixing must also happen there, but couldn’t measure it.

In the summer of 2012 the UW team embarked on a seven-week cruise to track the 800-foot-high waves that form atop the flow, 3 miles below the ocean’s surface. Their measurements show these giant waves do break, producing mixing 1,000 to 10,000 times that of the surrounding slow-moving water.

“Oceanographers used to talk about the so-called ‘dark mixing’ problem, where they knew that there should be a certain amount of turbulence in the deep ocean, and yet every time they made a measurement they observed a tenth of that,” Alford said. “We found there’s loads and loads of turbulence in the Samoan Passage, and detailed measurements show it’s due to breaking waves.”

It turns out layers of water flowing over two consecutive ridges form a lee wave, like those in air that passes over mountains. These waves become unstable and turbulent, and break. Thus the deepest water, the densest in the world, mixes with upper layers and disappears.

This mixing helps explain why dense, cold water doesn’t permanently pool at the bottom of the ocean and instead rises as part of a global conveyor-belt circulation pattern.

The Samoan Passage is important because it mixes so much water, but similar processes happen in other places, Alford said. Better knowledge of deep-ocean mixing could help simulate global currents and place instruments to track any changes.

On a lighter note: Could an intrepid surfer ride these killer deep-sea waves?

“It would be really boring,” admitted Alford, who is a surfer. “The waves can take an hour to break, and I think most surfers are not going to wait that long for one wave.”

In fact, even making the measurements was painstaking work. Instruments took 1.5 hours to lower to the seafloor, and the ship traveled at only a half knot, slower than a person walking, during the 30-hour casts. New technology let the scientists measure turbulence directly and make measurements from instruments lowered more than 3 miles off the side of the ship.

The researchers left instruments recording long-term measurements. The team will do another 40-day cruise in January to collect those instruments and map currents flowing through various gaps in the intricate channel.

Co-authors of the paper are James Girton, Gunnar Voet and John Mickett at the UW Applied Physics Lab; Glenn Carter at the University of Hawaii; and Jody Klymak at the University of Victoria. The research was funded by the National Science Foundation.

###

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

85 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dp
September 11, 2013 9:16 pm

jayhd – perhaps they’re going to blame rogue waves on this hidden phenomenon and then blame people for an increase in unwitnessed rogue waves.

C.K.Moore
September 11, 2013 9:24 pm

Mike Bromley the Kurd says September 11, 2013 at 3:55 pm:
“Waves don’t transport very much more than kinetic energy. Individual particles of ‘stuff’ (I’ll point to the “CARBON”) basically rotate in place as the energy passes by. The ‘stuff’, Mr. Alford, will not be transported. Best get your understanding of fluid dynamics under control before you carry on with this line of ‘reasoning’. “Turbulence” on the other hand, is from currents interacting with obstructions, and yes, these currents transport ‘stuff’. The turbulence will certainly mix stuff.”
Thanks for reminding us about this “little detail”. People tend to identify with the surfur scooting along on the downward slope of the wave surface and forgetting about the shark idling below. 🙂

higley7
September 11, 2013 10:02 pm

In the long run, it’s the currents that move the nutrients and heat, not the waves. The waves are ancillary. Tempest in a teapot. Trenberth is searching for that elusive substitute for the water cycle, that he does not want to admit exists. It must be difficult to look in the mirror and deny that your nose exists.

higley7
September 11, 2013 10:03 pm

““The primary importance of understanding deep-ocean turbulence is to get the climate models right on long timescales,” Alford said.”
How about getting the short time scales in hand first? Just asking.

Janice Moore
September 11, 2013 11:33 pm

So, Word Press policy got to my 911 remembrance post (at 0239, today). Gonna protect those (bleeeep) -lim sensibilities if it kills us. Sigh. I understand, though I disagree. There are some pretty warped minds out there. People who would attack Word Press or A-th-y in the name of defending (bleep) -lam. Their noble cause. No hard feelings, A-th-y. Just sad. Well, take heart, J.A., you can still denigrate Jesus. ‘Cause he’s not anyone to respect.

lurker, passing through laughing
September 12, 2013 5:33 am

This could be an important mechanism to help explain ocean dynamics. The obsession over climate apparent in the news release is rather sad.
This mechanism on its own is worth studying. As to its role,(s), I think it is going to help us understand El/La Nino(a) better as well as how oceans stay well nourished for supporting life. The amount of energy moved? I think that Trenberth should still check his assumptions, for a change.

1sky1
September 12, 2013 3:59 pm

The hype regarding these deep internal waves (which transport mechanical energy but not mass, which simply orbits in place) is remarkable. When breaking, at velocities greatly slower than surface waves, they do add to the turbulent tidal-stream mixing of bottom water with the overlying deep layer. But that constitutes a small contribution to thermohaline circulation, which itself accounts for orders-of-magnitude smaller heat transport than provided by ordinary surface-layer currents. Despite the theoretical importance, the possible effect upon surface climate is entirely negligible.

Mike Bromley the Kurd
September 13, 2013 5:26 pm

C.K.Moore says:
September 11, 2013 at 9:24 pm
Funny little detail, In’it. House of cards stuff.

September 22, 2013 12:31 pm

RoHa says:
September 11, 2013 at 6:29 pm
Cowabunga! Deep sea surfing!

Very……slow……..surfing. The ship had to travel at about ½mph to track the wave. Pack a lunch.

September 22, 2013 9:46 pm

This is getting close to what I like to call “the rubber duckie” theory for climate – that “ocean sloshing” (as in the bathtub when you reach for your rubber duckie), in addition to “ocean currents” and “ocean turbulence” as normally discussed (words which tend to inadvertantly limit the thinking, I suspect), may be an important mechanism for heat transfer to/from the ocean. Potential drivers of “sloshing” might be Chandler wobbles of the Earth’s axis, Length Of Day (LOD) changes that can be related to astronomical parameters (sun/earth/moon especially, as has been discussed by Paul Vaughan and many others before him, but perhaps also effects during eclipses of other phenomena), “jerks” from earthquakes/tsunamis, some electrical effects, etc (to throw out some ideas I’ve come across). See comments above, as examples :
– Greg Goodman (September 11, 2013 at 2:10 am,2:25 am) – “… However, longer cycles like the 4.43y passage of the lunar perigree precession across the equator may be able to create tidal patterns in this slow moving interface …”
– Ian Wilson (September 11, 2013 at 5:04 am) – “… the extent of world-wide cool deep water mixing that is caused by lunar tides (links to awesome article by Ninderthana 111112 El Ninos and Extreme Proxigean Spring Tides) …” (also of great interest – Ian Wilson article years ago suggesting that El Nino may [fluctuate within, be influenced by] the Pacifc Decadal Oscillation (PDO)
Also very interesting (to me at least) :
– tim in vermont (September 11, 2013 at 6:01 am) – “… waves in the thermocline [of Lake Champlain] up and down by something like 30 ft over a matter of hours. …”
– Bill Illis (September 11, 2013 at 6:07 am) – “… Antarctic Deep Ocean Water is actually flowing into the north Pacific …”