For Immediate Release – September 10, 2013
On Friday, September 6th, the American Tradition Institute (ATI), a non-profit public policy organization, along with counsel from the Free Market Environmental Law Clinic (FMELC), filed a lawsuit seeking to compel the University of Arizona (U of A) to produce public records relating to what the London Telegraph’s Christopher Booker called “the worst scientific scandal of our generation”. These records are emails relating to the notorious global warming “Hockey Stick”, and the group that made it famous, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). IPCC is presently in the news for its latest in a running series of proclamations of looming climate catastrophe, and a now ritual proclamation of even greater certainty that economic activity is to blame.
“The public are increasingly aware that they have funded the effort to impose an all-pain, no-gain energy-scarcity agenda on them, from activists in federal bureaucracies and the green pressure groups they love, down to activists ensconced in state universities,’” says Chris Horner, ATI Senior Fellow, FMELC attorney and author of The Liberal War On Transparency, who managed the initial request and productions. “As such, we continue to seek copies of records the public paid for, to help bring about the oft-promised, yet rarely voluntary governmental transparency. Too often public institutions require that we engage in protracted battles under open records laws to allow the public a glimpse at the enormous apparatus they are underwriting,” he added.
ATI sought these records in December 2011.[1] After the University acknowledged resistance from the professors involved — both of whom, ATI points out to the court, were improperly allowed to decide what emails were responsive to the request, and which ones they would allow the University to produce — U of A ultimately produced several hundred responsive emails.
Included in U of A’s production was a first-ever, 213-page roadmap of several hundred emails the academics insisted could not be released about either the “Hockey Stick” or IPCC. Unfortunately the indexes were also deliberately and uncharacteristically scarce on details, though they do lay out correspondence between the Hockey Stick and IPCC authors (they also identify, e.g., emails about Professor and IPCC coordinating lead author Jonathan Overpeck’s work at the University for the environmentalist pressure group Union of Concerned Scientists, and emails to or from Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia, home to ClimateGate).
ATI filed suit under Arizona’s Public Records Law after the University declined ATI’s request to provide sufficient detail in these indexes about withheld records, or produce the responsive records. The Goldwater Institute is serving as ATI’s local counsel.
ATI’s complaint explains how these emails, produced and held on taxpayer time and assets, involve two academics with:
…a history of using University (public) resources — including to send and receive the emails at issue in this case — for work-related participation in related organizations including the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”), which was the subject of many of the most controversial emails produced, sent, received and/or held on publicly funded computer assets in the “Climategate” leaks.
Through these leaks, and releases under various freedom of information laws, the public learned of troubling practices by a network of publicly funded academics involving, inter alia, questionable use of statistics, organized efforts to subvert transparency laws in the United States and United Kingdom, campaigns to keep dissenting work from publication, recruiting journalists to target opponents and retaliation against scientists and editors involved in publishing dissenting work.
As part of ATI’s transparency project, it has been requesting and obtaining information held by publicly funded agencies and universities related to the important public policy issue of alleged catastrophic man-made global warming, and related policy demands.
ATI is also involved in litigation seeking related records from the University of Virginia, and has had numerous requests satisfied by, and has other requests pending at, various agencies and universities. The Supreme Court of Virginia recently heard argument from ATI explaining why that court should consider the UVA request.
American Tradition Institute (ATI) is a 501 (c) (3) public policy research and public interest litigation foundation advocating restoration of science and free-market principles on environmental issues, including air and water quality and regulation, responsible land use, natural resource management, energy development, property rights, and principles of stewardship. The organization, through its transparency initiative, obtains public information under open records and freedom of information laws, relating to environmental and energy policy and how policymakers use public resources.
-30-
[1] U of A acknowledges that “The University of Arizona is governed by Arizona public records law. The purpose of the law is to allow the general public, whose tax dollars support the University, to scrutinize the way we do business. Upon request, inspection of or copies of most records must be provided except for two categories which are not open to the public.”http://hoy.r.mailjet.com/redirect/x616hjzo3j67tj1q02wg30/www.hr.arizona.edu/03_hire/AZPSOrientation/main.php?sel=hi, p. 5 (these two categories are student records and personnel records, which are not involved in ATI’s request).
On the same webpage, U of A informs new employees, under “Arizona Public Service Orientation”, “Within your first 30 days of employment, read the information in this orientation. At the conclusion, print the checklist, verifying that you have completed the section, and deliver it to your department representative for placement in your departmental file.”http://hoy.r.mailjet.com/redirect/8sqxhk5kpwbmc9lqwoftlo/www.hr.arizona.edu/03_hire/AZPSOrientation/main.php?sel=hi, p. 4.
“sea change”?
Hopefully this will be one of the last straws on the hockey-stick’s back!
Mr. FOIA – time to act (again).
New addition for Obama’s 9/10 “address to the American people” since he won’t be getting his own brand-new war now that he wore out Bush’s hand-me-downs and needs something else to push up poll numbers:
Since global warming has now been conclusively demonstrated to be as great a threat to American prosperity and security as chemical weapons, he shall sign an Executive Order to secure and classify select records and research related to global warming, removing them from the view of the general public in the name of National Security.
ATI, be prepared for the entire release authorized by Homeland Security to be two sheets so heavily redacted you’d swear they were black paper with a few bleached-on white marks.
Reblogged this on The GOLDEN RULE and commented:
AN EXTRACT: “American Tradition Institute (ATI) is a 501 (c) (3) public policy research and public interest litigation foundation advocating restoration of science and free-market principles on environmental issues, including air and water quality and regulation, responsible land use, natural resource management, energy development, property rights, and principles of stewardship. The organization, through its transparency initiative, obtains public information under open records and freedom of information laws, relating to environmental and energy policy and how policymakers use public resources.”
I believe that it is extremely important to have access to the requested information as it underpins the global civilization control agenda about which WUWT and many other blogs, criticize as being basically fraudulent.
Secrecy is not acceptable and should not be a part of a process that is publicly funded and of far-reaching, extreme consequences.
One may well ask why opposition to release of information exists unless the particular information reveals proof of fraudulent behaviour? Whatever the reason, it is clearly a cover-up.
So what happen to climategate 3 email dump? Was it a hoax or was it real?
Go Home says:
September 9, 2013 at 11:02 pm
So what happen to climategate 3 email dump? Was it a hoax or was it real?
its real
So why was it stomped on and by who?
Wait, is this the same University of Arizona that had a Stevenson screen in the middle of a parking lot?
Go Home said on September 9, 2013 at 11:02 pm:
Details/background: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/13/climategate-3-0-has-occurred-the-password-has-been-released/
Password that unlocks the big zip file went to select small group, UEA sent out legal notice advising against general release of password, against releasing emails with personal details, etc.
So somewhere in the background the stockpile is being sorted, personal details redacted, the archive is being prepped for general release.
As a somewhat-secretive volunteer effort, expect it to take awhile before you and me see it.
Although since the NSA likely also has the password, after the public FBI prosecution for wire fraud etc begins against certain (C)AGW “scientists”, they might also demand there to be no public release of such sensitive evidence. So it might take awhile longer.
Its worth remember that if the situation was as urgent , extreme and as settled , as claimed . Far from the massive use of smoke and mirrors they be throwing this information peoples faces .
If anything give the lie to ‘settled science ‘ its the manner of refusing to share it.
My worry is that ATI has failed in every single attempt to get info from previous AGW scammers like Cuccinelli
Cucinelli attempted same (He is not an AGW Scammer)
Presumably there will be sufficient evidence gained to prosecute some warmists on behalf of the impoverished energy consumers.
So basically ATI is trying to distract attention from current issues by bringing up a fifteen year old non-scandal. Well, I suppose they have to to what their backers tell them to do, however pointless.
Thomas says: September 10, 2013 at 1:05 am
…
Well then, UoA should just stump up these “pointless” records and everybody will be happy and the “fifteen year old non-scandal” will then go away. Or are they hiding the depth of the corruption of science in their watch? Methinks the latter is true. Do us a favour, “Thomas”, and let your buddies know that there is nothing to be afraid of because they’re acting mighty scared about it.
Cuccinelli is the Attorney General of Virginia. As such, he has done his best to enforce the law, including prosecuting fraudulent activity at the University of Virginia (UVA) by Michael Mann, now at Penn State, who was at UVA using public money to further the aims of the CAGW crowd. UVA has balked at releasing emails and other documents concerning the case, but that is certainly not Cuccinelli’s fault. He has surely made a major effort to move a recalcitrant bureaucracy (conspiracy?) at UVA. If he is elected Governor, he may have more consistent success. Unfortunately, he is opposed by Terry McAuliffe, the fraudulent and lightweight former Clinton fundraiser, who has much more money than Cuccinelli and the backing of the Washington DC Democrat party elite from Obama on down; a tough battle that I hope Cuccinelli wins.
Streetcred, there are many legitimate reasons people might not want all their mail made public. Article and grant reviews are for example anonymous for good reason. Try asking ATI for all of their messages and see how far you get. This “scandal” will not go away as long as there are people profiting from insinuations and others stupid enough to believe them. All ATI is doing is wasting taxpayer money on a frivolous lawsuit after they already lost one.
Wouldn’t it be easier for ATI to go directly to NSA? It seems they snoop on and archive just about everything.
The root cause of global warming / climate change has been determined to be anthropogenic economic activity. The ‘cure’ is the curtailment of the use of energy, particularly the energy derived from fossil fuel. Success will be defined as the condition when humans have nothing to show for their efforts.
From Thomas on September 10, 2013 at 1:05 am:
Distract attention from global warming going away despite rising atmospheric CO₂ levels, and rising CH₄ levels too, so we don’t notice that statistically it hasn’t existed for 15-20 years?
Distract attention from confirmation of what has long been suspected, the extent of Arctic sea ice remaining at the end of the melt season has more to do with chance and the phases of natural cycles like the AMO then it does with global warming? And that which was attributed to global warming can be handily accounted for by black carbon (soot) pollution?
Distract attention from abundant natural gas rendering energy from wind and solar even more worthless for practicality and economical reasons than before?
You sure of that?
You neglected to specify the Big Oil funding from Exxon/Mobil/Shell/BP etc. Oh wait, they support Greenpeace, WWF, and they have Green Energy divisions that benefit from CAGW hype. My mistake.
From Thomas on September 10, 2013 at 2:00 am:
As originally listed here:
https://twitter.com/MichaelEMann/status/373133788005400576
https://twitter.com/DrMarkBurnley/status/373134873118375936
https://twitter.com/MichaelEMann/status/373136007211655169
https://twitter.com/stevebloom55/status/373146903363334144
Michael E. Mann @MichaelEMann
Being stalked by #HeartlandInstitute/#Koch-funded climate change denier #AnthonyWatts & his mob: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/08/28/requesting-some-assistance/#more-92604 … #CarnivalBarkers
10:23 AM – 29 Aug 13
Mark Burnley @DrMarkBurnley
@MichaelEMann has he never heard of travel grants? But registration fees for sci meetings are getting ridiculous imho!
10:27 AM – 29 Aug 13
Michael E. Mann @MichaelEMann
.@DrMarkBurnley Can’t #AnthonyWatts just go back to #Heartland/#Koch for another 88K? http://www.desmogblog.com/anthony-watts
10:32 AM – 29 Aug 13
Steve Bloom @stevebloom55
@MichaelEMann Completing the analogy: AW is indeed a carnival barker, but he’s also the dog-headed boy.
11:15 AM – 29 Aug 13
Watts reply here.
I agree Thomas. As long as Mann keeps profiting from insinuations like these and others are stupid enough to believe him, this “scandal” ain’t going away.
“Try asking ATI for all of their messages and see how far you get.”
Given they are a privately funded organisation that is entirely appropriate. Taxpayers however have a right to see what their tax payments are being spent on.
cg3 was very very dull.
I’m not sure why they’re requesting this. The science is settled. 😀 (kidding)
I doubt they’ll get anything, but I’m glad they’re trying. Things like this sure do shine the light on how “open and transparent” the scientific process is when it comes to AGW.
The laws on FOI, you can be sure of this, will be changed soon. The ideologues running governments around the world don’t support transparency. One had better get all they can now because this will be the end of it. Unless a lot of people (voters) see the light before voting itself is remodeled.