NOTE: This satirical piece is rooted in facts. Having been to Australia on tour myself, I also heard the claims of bureaucratic abuse from many of the farmers who attended my talks. While Monckton’s essay has some biting satirical humor in it, laugh at it, but know that the issues he writes about are all too real. – Anthony
Guest essay by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
Captain’s Log, Stardate 2013.67: Antipodean climate extremists are going to have a field day with this one. In Australia (where else?) a pedigree Hereford bull has been named “Lord Monckton”. And the Prime Directive forbids me to intervene.
Peter Manuel, who farms many thousands of acres in the Lofty Ranges, became so exasperated with the Natural Resources Management Board of South Australia for interfering with farming that he arranged for Lord Monckton (the real one, that is) to visit the state and give a series of talks to farmers.

Peter is chief executive of Farmers’ and Landowners’ Group Australia (FLAG), which campaigns to defend farmers against the ridiculous environmental over-regulation that is destroying their livelihoods.
Earlier this year, I spent ten days with Peter and his family on their beautiful, impeccably-maintained spread high in the hills above Adelaide. The only way for us jackaroos to cover all the rolling acres and herd the cattle and sheep (in Australia, the word “sheep” is spelt “IPCC”) was on off-road motor-bikes, keeping a sharp eye out for snakes as we thundered across the rock-strewn terrain at speeds that would have been illegal on the roads.
After I had ridden (or slidden) fearlessly after my kind host down a shifting, rock-strewn 60-degree brae that no visitor had dared to attempt before, Peter announced that this year’s best pedigree bull on the farm would be named Lord Monckton, and would make an early appearance at the Adelaide Show.
Australia has more poisonous critters than any other continent – including the spooky, spiky officials of the ever-expanding Natural Resources Management Borg, who now outnumber police officers by a handsome margin in the country districts, where former precinct houses and cop-shops have been Assimilated and are now nests of Borg, dedicated to the eradication of farming throughout South Australia in the name of Saving The Planet against non-existent “global warming”.
Farming is Australia’s biggest business. Or, rather, it was. The number of farms in this vast, desert continent is down by 100,000, and, remarkably, the state of Victoria has already become the first in the Federation to become a net importer of food – in Australia, of all places, where a vast continent the size of Europe feeds a tiny population the size of greater London. Peter Manuel is determined that South Australia shall not be the next net importer of food.
The pretext for the Borg’s cruel attacks on farmers is Agenda 21, the U.N.’s sinister plan for global domination via environmental over-regulation.
The Borg, a universally-hated bureaucracy, are actively putting the U.N.’s nihilistic, anti-irrigation, anti-pesticide, anti-farming, anti-business, anti-environment, anti-population, anti-human, anti-capitalist, anti-Western, anti-everything Agenda 21 program into ruthless effect.
During my visit to the Lofty Ranges, Peter introduced me to a local farmer with a shocking story. For weeks bureaucrats with binoculars had hidden behind a shed and spied on his farm. Then, one night at 11 pm, They pounced.
Three of Them drove at the farmer in a pickup truck with a massive roo-bar on the front. He ended up hanging from the bar, with an agonizingly bruised leg. He had to be taken to hospital with bruising, lacerations and post-traumatic stress, and remains in pain to this day.
The Borg got to the police before he did, for he was still crook. They alleged he had driven at Them and not the other way about. Wisely, They did not pursue that allegation, but it was enough to ensure that the police disregarded his allegation against Them.
Instead, They took him to court for unlawfully extracting water from a nearby creek. In his absence – his injuries had rendered him unfit to attend – the rube judge in the local criminal court, on no evidence and taking no account of his condition, savagely fined him $18,000 for allegedly having used water from the creek near his property to irrigate his crop of lucerne on the day of the bureaucrats’ raid.
Fortunately, the farmer neither paid the fine nor did the 320 hours’ community service the hanging judge handed down on learning that he had not paid. Though the judge had inflicted what – even if a real offense had been committed, which it had not – was a flagrantly disproportionate fine, not everyone in the civil service is heartless. The judge’s order was simply ignored. The farmer went unpunished.
Just as well: for he had committed no offense. True, he had extracted water from the creek that day, but he had used it to fill his cattle-troughs. I have seen his permit granting him the lawful right to extract water from the creek for his household and for his cattle.
The court is soon to be asked to set aside its judgment and expunge the victim’s record of this non-offense. It may yet also be asked to issue a summons against the Borg ex proprio motu for conspiracy to attempt to pervert the course of justice and conspiracy to perpetrate wilful misfeasance in a public office.
The farmer who wanted to water his cows is by no means the only victim of the Borg’s regime of terror here in South Australia. Another farmer told me They had used satellite photos to estimate the size of his reservoir.
The dam’s true capacity, when professionally surveyed on the ground, was found to be 6.1 million liters, but their Mickey Mouse method, using satellites monitored by zitty teenagers eating too many Krispy Kreme donuts and doing/drinking too much coke/Coke, had incorrectly overestimated it at 10.2 million liters – a shocking error. The satellites can assess the area of a reservoir but not its depth. The Borg’s rule of thumb is calculated to exaggerate the depth of just about every reservoir.
All reservoirs above a threshold capacity are cripplingly and expensively regulated, allegedly to conserve water. As a result of this incident, farmers all over South Australia with reservoirs that the Borg say are just over the threshold for regulation are now demanding surveys to check Their math. But farmers have to pay for the surveys themselves.
In any event, there is no need for regulation at all. Farmers’ reservoirs represent less than 1% of the land area; and, aside from evaporation, they do not cause a net loss of water flow through the creeks and rivers. For Lord Monckton and his fellow cattle do not so much drink the water as rent it.
While I was in South Australia, at the height of the blazing summer drought, the Borg decided to let out a third of the water in the Mount Bold Reservoir, the only major public dam in South Australia and the main water supply for Adelaide, which is now desperately short of water. You couldn’t make this up.
Of course, They were not billed for the water They used to top up the ocean. Their excuse for this monstrous waste? “To maintain environmental flow”. Yet in the summer months the natural “environmental flow” is vanishingly different from zero. They should have left well alone.
Another farmer who cleared silt from a river on his land to assist the river flow was fined a staggeringly disproportionate $35,000 by the vicious judges, who are in the Board’s pocket and act as though they were in Their pay.
Yet another farmer was told a costly water-meter had to be fitted to his borehole, so he could be charged for using his own water, even though water used for his household and his cattle is by law exempt from any charges. No one had been to read the meter ever since its installation several years previously.
Another farmer who had annoyed the Borg by refusing to comply with an unlawful attempt to enforce upon him a regulation that did not apply to him, was told: “We can fine you for shifting a rock.”
Bullying notices along the roadsides here tell passers-by that they must not touch or disturb soil or vegetation at all. Presumably people are expected to hover a few inches above the ground. But most of the population are not Catholic, so they cannot do that. So going for a walk in the countryside is now illegal in much of South Australia.
The Borg are ordering farmers all across South Australia to plant thorny weeds all along the road verges: and Their reason is that “some clusters of acacia paradoxa will protect the river banks from kangaroo intrusion.” The kangaroos, an indigenous species, were here long before the Borg. But now, in the name of saving the natural environment, the natural environment and its iconic symbols, They are out to destroy the kangaroos.

Planting acacia paradoxa is a bad idea. Only bureaucratic panty-waists who have never ridden a farm bike would have thought it up. Spiny acacia is also known as the kerosene bush. As its name implies, it catches fire explosively. The bushes planted on the Borg’s orders will help bush fires to spread. One farmer put it to me bluntly: “That’s what the Agenda 21 maniacs want. They want to burn us out and drive us off our land forever.”
He is right. I have spoken to a sheep-farmer whom the Borg menaced with massive fines because, They said, he had more stock on his land than the arbitrarily low permitted maximum. They had double-counted his lambs, math not being a strong point with the hive mind. In any event, that farmer had plenty of feed for his stock, which were in magnificent condition.
The Borg wrote ordering the farmer to reduce his stockholding. He complained to a senior administrator (Locutus of Borg, perhaps). Eventually They climbed down – but without any apology. Instead, an official, furious at having been caught out in yet another error, told the farmer They would now arrange a forced sale of his farm.
Many other tales, such as the story of the prawn-farmer and the bogus koala claw-marks, will have to wait for another time. But the Borg felt the lash of the Viscount’s tongue. Towards the end of my visit to South Australia, they began turning up at my speaker meetings and muttering angrily to Themselves at the back.
No doubt Ban Ki-Moon, secretary-general of the useless United Nations, is delighted that his willing agents at the Natural Resources Management Borg are making the corrupt U.N. and its environmentally destructive Agenda 21 program even more hated than it already is.
Time to arrange a forced sale of the U.N.’s lavish New York HQ and send its pampered officials to do some real work on Australian farms. I have said it before and I’ll say it again. Let us convert the U.N. building to fancy apartments for the rich and famous. I shall take the penthouse.
Meanwhile, may the Natural Resources Management Borg and all their works wither and perish in the drought Their mad policies have needlessly created, and may Lord Monckton and his vigorous progeny thrive not merely ad multos annos but usque in saeculum. Make it so!
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“Lewis P Buckingham says:
September 6, 2013 at 2:10 am”
It’s an election year and, as with any politician, Abbott will say whatever needs to be said to win. I can think of plenty of infrastructure that $7bn of the $10bn clean energy fund can be better spent on stuff that is actually needed. Such as a second airport for Sydney ($3bn). I do not view high-speed inter-city rail is viable in Australia. The most efficient way to transport people, given the population density, in Aus is by air. That’s why we use air. We can invest in hospitals, schools etc etc. Communications such as roads. I have yet to see a box of mangos transported from where they grow to where people live an eat over a fibre-optic cable.
Regarding climate change, there is still no evidence to support the hypothesis that emissions of CO2 from human activities are *DRIVING* climate to change in a bad way. There is no evidence. None. Nada. Zip.
If there is a crisis of climate through change, then those who claim so need to start behaving like there is a crisis.
“climateace says:
September 5, 2013 at 11:24 pm
I am happy to go with the BOM stuff any day of the week.”
At your peril. Go to the BoM website and download their data. See any significant trend? Last time I looked there was none. By the way, how many thermometers do you think the BoM uses to calculate a national average? 112. That’s one thermometer for every ~68,500 square kilometres. The BoM have also vetted weather data from NIWA in New Zealand and have been found to have manipulated the data in favour of a warming trend. And still the hoax continues, perpetuated by “scientists”.
CSIRO is the same organisation who in 1935, then called CSRO (I think), worked with the Qld govn’t and sugar cane growers to introduce the cane toad to fight a beetle problem. CSRO approved the introduction because the CSRO itself wanted to introduce the European toad in other parts of the country. How did that work out for Aus?
Until the BoM and the CSIRO can demonstrate the ~3% of 400ppm/v CO2 is driving climate change in a catastrophic way then I will continue to take their view on climate change (All based on computer modelling) as pure hypothesis, conjecture. And so should everyone else IMO.
climateace says: @ur momisugly September 5, 2013 at 8:04 pm
….The Borgs and farmers used to work together on this sort of stuff…..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And therein lies the problem. USED TO. The USDA, FDA… in the USA also used to work with farmers now they work FOR the multi-nationals. He!! the multi-nationals head the d@ur momisuglymn departments now! The Amazing Revolving Door
I suggest you read:
HACCP’S Disconnect From Public Health Concerns HACCP is international. The Corporations do the inspections, government just looks at the paperwork and has shut down testing labs. Cutting 80 Percent of Pathogen Testing for Produce, USDA Begins Shutdown of MDP
The new law pushing HACCP/traceability on farmers in USA (again international and driven by WTO) Trojan Horse Law: The Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009
The method used to scare the public: After HACCP went into effect in 1996 for food processing factories the Food Borne Disease rate doubled. Instead of being “Today, America has the safest food in the world.” as stated Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman in 1997, every outbreak of illness made headlines bringing ‘unsafe food’ into public awareness. The USDA instead of cracking down hid the problem. SHIELDING THE GIANT: USDA’s “Don’t Look, Don’t Know” Policy for Beef Inspection
Stanley Painter, Chairman of the National Food Inspection Unions, stated in his testimony at the congressional hearing on the Hallmark Dower Cows:
The USDA did an ‘investigation’ and “Their observations also concluded that the chairman’s allegations were unsubstantiated.” [pg 73] Senate Hearings
[Last two links removed by US government]
more on this fiasco in my comment link
This is all part of a long range plan not random occurrences. History, HACCP and the Food Safety Con Job
climateace says: @ur momisugly September 5, 2013 at 11:24 pm
I am happy to go with the BOM stuff any day of the week….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then I suggest you go and see what some independent auditors found.
After WUWT volunteers looked at the USA weather stations and found all sorts of problems. People in Australia took a look at their information. Australian temperature records shoddy, inaccurate, unreliable. New Zealand independents did the same BREAKING NEWS: NIWA reveals NZ original climate data missing so it seems The Goat ate the Data. NZ lawsuit
climateace says:
September 6, 2013 at 3:26 am
On your first point this is a US site so its OK to be a bit partisan.
1]So carbon sequestration is an intangible, so what?
Farmers in Goulburn are using conservation and permaculture to retain soil fertility and build up humus in otherwise poor soils devastated by erosion and ferals. Anyone, including politicians, who support this type of activity are to be applauded.
It sure beats buying carbon credits from Nigeria.
2} That’s just tough, its good practice to retain humus and organic materials in the soil.
I foresee that the plan will be dropped as it becomes evident it does nothing for climate.
2] Bob Hawke wanted to plant a billion trees, if its good enough for him, its good enough for me.
But then we don’t want to be partisan.do we?
“KenB says:
September 5, 2013 at 8:12 pm”
No, I don’t think you did. I have seen this “handle” before, definitely here at WUWT. May have been some years ago, maybe 2010? 2013, “climateace” pops up again. Pure speculation, but the “handle” and posts seem similar to me.
“Lewis P Buckingham says:
September 6, 2013 at 6:44 am”
How did Aborigines survive the ~60,000 years before “modern” humans arrived from Europe? Climateace moans about water quality from the Murray-Darling basin, what “climateace” forgets is that there are now 50,000 farms draining from that basin that were not there as late as 1950.
Climateace, you sure are a mine of misinformation, but then when I see you confidence in the Modern bought and sold political C.S.I.R.O competing for Climate Commission largess, you should speak to some of the scientists who once worked there when it was an honest scientific organisation rather than the organisation that issued a broadsheet backing up Flannerys claim that we had seen the last of the rain, and moving forward we had nothing to hope for but drought, meanwhile our climate did exactly as is has done many times before, produced the heavy flooding rain that traditionally comes after a drought breaks, and it did just as it has in the past and no doubt will do so in the future, and you conveniently gloss over the Queensland floods and extended wet seasons. all just alarmist propaganda that hopefully will be properly challenged by scientists who no longer have to toe the line of government taxing desires, and conflating harmless carbon dioxide with evil black carbon (Oh how many times did dear Julia use that term to raise a belief that C02 was black carbon particles, the sooty stuff that some other countries emit, but we scrubbed out of our emissions for some thirty years or more) I don’t even know why I am bothering to challenge your beliefs as there are plenty of facts on this site, and credible scientists to advance your knowledge if you are as you claim.
Have you even read the 100 year official history of the BoM, and the chapters on the competition for the C.S.I.R.O. to politically capture supremacy over certain functions, or the problems of using computers and climate modelling to seemingly predict weather, when they were not then and still not now fit for purpose due to the variability and chaotic nature of weather, and the pressure to put aside traditional meteorology for faith in computers – a good read might open your eyes, and of course source documents and papers can be found via the extensive references given throughout the 100 years of the BoM, and if you look at the graphics printed on the inside of the covers you will see representation of the actual rainfall (blue being among the wettest one third of historical observation and red areas amongst the driest one third of historical observation starting from 1910, its pretty easy to track the yearly changes, droughts floods etc, and you might also see how in a large continent like Australia even in the wettest years there will be parts of the continent that are coloured red and in the drought years their are blue areas of heavy rain. White areas are amongst the middle one third of historical observations. With such variable rainfall patterns it is easy to dwell on one dry event somewhere in Australia, or a flooding event elsewhere and totally misrepresent the worst in my short lifetime memory as something worrying or scary, but the data collected meticulously by the science does not unless it is molested like our past high LIG thermometer temperatures.
I think you need to listen and learn more before spouting current climate propaganda, as others will call you out on the science and data as they rightly should – Are you here to learn and understand or to mock. A good test would be your belief in the existence of some consensus, as used to be claimed in regard to Climate science. Its missing at the moment just like the accelerated warmth that didn’t arrive for some 15 years or more and has been now recognised as “a hiatus in warming” causing some concern as it ever so slowly trends down – yep keep your fingers crossed!! and those mates suitably updated.
Cam Banks. RE CSIRO Research
Cam Banks on his northern NSW grazing property foresees massive potential to bury carbon.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2013/carbon-farmers-await-a-carrot-20130905-2t862.html#ixzz2e98gOZyJ
Looks as if an Aussie farmer thinks its worth ten bucks to sequester a ton of carbon.
I don’t think the climate will change because of it, but the microclimate of the soil will benefit, and the money stays in Australia.
Sorry for not responding quickly and also that there are far too many points raised above for me to address so I will just focus on a few. I post as climateace from time to time on WUWT. From memory the last time I posted was when the bushfires were doing considerable damage during our hottest summer on record. As far as I can recall I have been pretty consistent in my views – but who knows? Things change.
RL Buckingham: I did not say that CSIRO is not intensely interested in promoting soil sequestration of carbon. What I was saying was that there are far too many uncertainties about how much gets sequestrated under what circumstances to either build a market around it or to get any firm idea about what you are buying for tax dollars. It is, therefore, poor public policy at this stage. I believe that soil carbon sequestration has an excellent future.
In relation to a billion trees that was well before carbon sequestration was a significant public policy issue. I don’t think they were ever all planted and I am willing to bet that drought killed off lots of the ones that were planted. Whether the plantings ‘worked’ to minimize salinization and/or stave off our extinction event, I don’t know.
The CSIRO of today is vastly different from the CSIRO of 1935.
Despite the attempts of doubt merchants to pick away at the edges, I believe that BOM and CSIRO are credible science organisations. Like every other organisation they get things here and there from time to time. But they fix things up and then get them right eventually. I have no time at all for paranoid conspiracy theories. OTOH, nitpickers are useful because from time to time they improve the eventual outcome at the margines.
My main point above stands: farmers need Borgs.
“climateace says:
September 7, 2013 at 1:33 am
The CSIRO of today is vastly different from the CSIRO of 1935.
Despite the attempts of doubt merchants to pick away at the edges, I believe that BOM and CSIRO are credible science organisations.”
The CSIRO today is the same as it was when it was called the CSIR in 1935. Just like NASA is the same today as it was in the 1960’s. The difference you infer in the CSIRO, and quite obvious in NASA, is politically based science programs, the major one being climate change.
If you believe what the BoM and CSIRO tell you, my suggestion is that you get a second opinion.
“climateace says:
September 7, 2013 at 1:33 am
My main point above stands: farmers need Borgs.”
Given the shattering result of the Federal election, we now can leave in the past the ALP/Green/Independent minority ALP lead Govn’t, with it’s internal, kindergarten like bickering, I’d say you farmers will have fewer “Borgs” on tap. Time to stop selling land/farms to China. The Chinese won’t care where the water comes from, they will simply buy the water supply or move. Mark my words.