The bull and the Borg

NOTE: This satirical piece is rooted in facts. Having been to Australia on tour myself, I also heard the claims of bureaucratic abuse from many of the farmers who attended my talks. While Monckton’s essay has some biting satirical humor in it, laugh at it, but know that the issues he writes about are all too real. – Anthony

Guest essay by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

Captain’s Log, Stardate 2013.67: Antipodean climate extremists are going to have a field day with this one. In Australia (where else?) a pedigree Hereford bull has been named “Lord Monckton”. And the Prime Directive forbids me to intervene.

Peter Manuel, who farms many thousands of acres in the Lofty Ranges, became so exasperated with the Natural Resources Management Board of South Australia for interfering with farming that he arranged for Lord Monckton (the real one, that is) to visit the state and give a series of talks to farmers.

clip_image002
Lord Monckton’s semen is now available at premium prices

Peter is chief executive of Farmers’ and Landowners’ Group Australia (FLAG), which campaigns to defend farmers against the ridiculous environmental over-regulation that is destroying their livelihoods.

Earlier this year, I spent ten days with Peter and his family on their beautiful, impeccably-maintained spread high in the hills above Adelaide. The only way for us jackaroos to cover all the rolling acres and herd the cattle and sheep (in Australia, the word “sheep” is spelt “IPCC”) was on off-road motor-bikes, keeping a sharp eye out for snakes as we thundered across the rock-strewn terrain at speeds that would have been illegal on the roads.

After I had ridden (or slidden) fearlessly after my kind host down a shifting, rock-strewn 60-degree brae that no visitor had dared to attempt before, Peter announced that this year’s best pedigree bull on the farm would be named Lord Monckton, and would make an early appearance at the Adelaide Show.

Australia has more poisonous critters than any other continent – including the spooky, spiky officials of the ever-expanding Natural Resources Management Borg, who now outnumber police officers by a handsome margin in the country districts, where former precinct houses and cop-shops have been Assimilated and are now nests of Borg, dedicated to the eradication of farming throughout South Australia in the name of Saving The Planet against non-existent “global warming”.

Farming is Australia’s biggest business. Or, rather, it was. The number of farms in this vast, desert continent is down by 100,000, and, remarkably, the state of Victoria has already become the first in the Federation to become a net importer of food – in Australia, of all places, where a vast continent the size of Europe feeds a tiny population the size of greater London. Peter Manuel is determined that South Australia shall not be the next net importer of food.

The pretext for the Borg’s cruel attacks on farmers is Agenda 21, the U.N.’s sinister plan for global domination via environmental over-regulation.

The Borg, a universally-hated bureaucracy, are actively putting the U.N.’s nihilistic, anti-irrigation, anti-pesticide, anti-farming, anti-business, anti-environment, anti-population, anti-human, anti-capitalist, anti-Western, anti-everything Agenda 21 program into ruthless effect.

During my visit to the Lofty Ranges, Peter introduced me to a local farmer with a shocking story. For weeks bureaucrats with binoculars had hidden behind a shed and spied on his farm. Then, one night at 11 pm, They pounced.

Three of Them drove at the farmer in a pickup truck with a massive roo-bar on the front. He ended up hanging from the bar, with an agonizingly bruised leg. He had to be taken to hospital with bruising, lacerations and post-traumatic stress, and remains in pain to this day.

The Borg got to the police before he did, for he was still crook. They alleged he had driven at Them and not the other way about. Wisely, They did not pursue that allegation, but it was enough to ensure that the police disregarded his allegation against Them.

Instead, They took him to court for unlawfully extracting water from a nearby creek. In his absence – his injuries had rendered him unfit to attend – the rube judge in the local criminal court, on no evidence and taking no account of his condition, savagely fined him $18,000 for allegedly having used water from the creek near his property to irrigate his crop of lucerne on the day of the bureaucrats’ raid.

Fortunately, the farmer neither paid the fine nor did the 320 hours’ community service the hanging judge handed down on learning that he had not paid. Though the judge had inflicted what – even if a real offense had been committed, which it had not – was a flagrantly disproportionate fine, not everyone in the civil service is heartless. The judge’s order was simply ignored. The farmer went unpunished.

Just as well: for he had committed no offense. True, he had extracted water from the creek that day, but he had used it to fill his cattle-troughs. I have seen his permit granting him the lawful right to extract water from the creek for his household and for his cattle.

The court is soon to be asked to set aside its judgment and expunge the victim’s record of this non-offense. It may yet also be asked to issue a summons against the Borg ex proprio motu for conspiracy to attempt to pervert the course of justice and conspiracy to perpetrate wilful misfeasance in a public office.

The farmer who wanted to water his cows is by no means the only victim of the Borg’s regime of terror here in South Australia. Another farmer told me They had used satellite photos to estimate the size of his reservoir.

The dam’s true capacity, when professionally surveyed on the ground, was found to be 6.1 million liters, but their Mickey Mouse method, using satellites monitored by zitty teenagers eating too many Krispy Kreme donuts and doing/drinking too much coke/Coke, had incorrectly overestimated it at 10.2 million liters – a shocking error. The satellites can assess the area of a reservoir but not its depth. The Borg’s rule of thumb is calculated to exaggerate the depth of just about every reservoir.

All reservoirs above a threshold capacity are cripplingly and expensively regulated, allegedly to conserve water. As a result of this incident, farmers all over South Australia with reservoirs that the Borg say are just over the threshold for regulation are now demanding surveys to check Their math. But farmers have to pay for the surveys themselves.

In any event, there is no need for regulation at all. Farmers’ reservoirs represent less than 1% of the land area; and, aside from evaporation, they do not cause a net loss of water flow through the creeks and rivers. For Lord Monckton and his fellow cattle do not so much drink the water as rent it.

While I was in South Australia, at the height of the blazing summer drought, the Borg decided to let out a third of the water in the Mount Bold Reservoir, the only major public dam in South Australia and the main water supply for Adelaide, which is now desperately short of water. You couldn’t make this up.

Of course, They were not billed for the water They used to top up the ocean. Their excuse for this monstrous waste? “To maintain environmental flow”. Yet in the summer months the natural “environmental flow” is vanishingly different from zero. They should have left well alone.

Another farmer who cleared silt from a river on his land to assist the river flow was fined a staggeringly disproportionate $35,000 by the vicious judges, who are in the Board’s pocket and act as though they were in Their pay.

Yet another farmer was told a costly water-meter had to be fitted to his borehole, so he could be charged for using his own water, even though water used for his household and his cattle is by law exempt from any charges. No one had been to read the meter ever since its installation several years previously.

Another farmer who had annoyed the Borg by refusing to comply with an unlawful attempt to enforce upon him a regulation that did not apply to him, was told: “We can fine you for shifting a rock.”

Bullying notices along the roadsides here tell passers-by that they must not touch or disturb soil or vegetation at all. Presumably people are expected to hover a few inches above the ground. But most of the population are not Catholic, so they cannot do that. So going for a walk in the countryside is now illegal in much of South Australia.

The Borg are ordering farmers all across South Australia to plant thorny weeds all along the road verges: and Their reason is that “some clusters of acacia paradoxa will protect the river banks from kangaroo intrusion.” The kangaroos, an indigenous species, were here long before the Borg. But now, in the name of saving the natural environment, the natural environment and its iconic symbols, They are out to destroy the kangaroos.

Acacia paradoxa (Hedge Wattle)
Acacia paradoxa (Hedge Wattle) (Photo credit: Arthur Chapman)

Planting acacia paradoxa is a bad idea. Only bureaucratic panty-waists who have never ridden a farm bike would have thought it up. Spiny acacia is also known as the kerosene bush. As its name implies, it catches fire explosively. The bushes planted on the Borg’s orders will help bush fires to spread. One farmer put it to me bluntly: “That’s what the Agenda 21 maniacs want. They want to burn us out and drive us off our land forever.”

He is right. I have spoken to a sheep-farmer whom the Borg menaced with massive fines because, They said, he had more stock on his land than the arbitrarily low permitted maximum. They had double-counted his lambs, math not being a strong point with the hive mind. In any event, that farmer had plenty of feed for his stock, which were in magnificent condition.

The Borg wrote ordering the farmer to reduce his stockholding. He complained to a senior administrator (Locutus of Borg, perhaps). Eventually They climbed down – but without any apology. Instead, an official, furious at having been caught out in yet another error, told the farmer They would now arrange a forced sale of his farm.

Many other tales, such as the story of the prawn-farmer and the bogus koala claw-marks, will have to wait for another time. But the Borg felt the lash of the Viscount’s tongue. Towards the end of my visit to South Australia, they began turning up at my speaker meetings and muttering angrily to Themselves at the back.

No doubt Ban Ki-Moon, secretary-general of the useless United Nations, is delighted that his willing agents at the Natural Resources Management Borg are making the corrupt U.N. and its environmentally destructive Agenda 21 program even more hated than it already is.

Time to arrange a forced sale of the U.N.’s lavish New York HQ and send its pampered officials to do some real work on Australian farms. I have said it before and I’ll say it again. Let us convert the U.N. building to fancy apartments for the rich and famous. I shall take the penthouse.

Meanwhile, may the Natural Resources Management Borg and all their works wither and perish in the drought Their mad policies have needlessly created, and may Lord Monckton and his vigorous progeny thrive not merely ad multos annos but usque in saeculum. Make it so!

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

112 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ed Zuiderwijk
September 4, 2013 11:48 am

Time to divert some AK47s to the farmers down under?

Rob Crawford
September 4, 2013 11:55 am

“rather than the ‘Borg’, much of farmers difficulties can be tied directly back to multinationals”
Who lavishly fund the conferences the enviros attend, and heap great rewards on those who do their bidding.

Rob Crawford
September 4, 2013 12:04 pm

“Just to clarify for those who may be in any doubt, all of the stories I tell here about the sinister operations of the Natural Resources Management Borg are true.”
Oh, it’s eminently believable. There was a story here in the US of a woman who was hosting a “farm to field” dinner for business clients, to have “health inspectors” sweep in and demand receipts for produce from her own land. They declared some of the food to be “unfit for consumption”, then when she asked if she could use it to slop her hogs, they poured bleach over it.
And there’s a bill in Congress now that would require every farm that sells $5,000 or more in produce to submit their goods to the FDA for certification. A back-of-the-envelope calculation tells me that’s the production of about an acre of apple trees.

Gail Combs
September 4, 2013 12:30 pm

Beta Blocker says:
September 4, 2013 at 8:57 am
Is there an increase in corporate farming going on in Australia driven by environmental protection requirements which only large corporations have the resources to implement?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If it is like the USA it is not the resources it is the Political Clout to make sure the little guy gets clobbered and the big corporations get a free pass.
A humorous account of how bureaucratic favoritism works in the USA:

John Munsell & A Trip To The Woodshed With The USDA
One day, a long, long time ago, Big John noticed something amiss. Contaminated meat was coming in the back door of his very small plant. “That’s not right,” he thought and called the authorities.
They arrived ready to right a wrong; after all, that was what they are paid to do, an earnest and dedicated group of men and women charged with safeguarding much of America’s food supply.
An inspector, armed with many official looking pieces of paper, looked Big John in the eye and said, “Assume the position!”
John was frisked. The authorities stopped just short of a full body cavity search. It was a very thorough exam.
“Wait,” protested Big John. “The meat came in with bad stuff already on it. I didn’t put it there. Go after the people who sent it to me!”
“Obviously you don’t understand the way we do things around here,” chuckled the inspector who was amused by Big John’s apparent naivety. “We found the bad stuff in your possession; therefore you have to be the bad guy.”
John was frisked again. This time, the authorities included a full body cavity search. It was VERY thorough exam.
“Wait,” protested Big John again. “All this bad stuff came from (deleted), a very large company that might be shipping lots more of that bad stuff to thousands of people. I can prove the bad stuff came from them. PLEASE go after them!”
“No, No, we can’t go after (deleted),” said the now impatient inspectors. “Don’t even say that name. We found the bad stuff here so you must suffer the consequences! We have to protect the public!”….

However John, though he lost the business is not the type to lay down and take it. He started a new whistle blowing career: F.A.R.E. – Foundation for Accountability in Regulatory Enforcement
HACCP’S Disconnect From Public Health Concerns

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Captured by Meatpacking Industry
This summer, Munsell put his operation up for sale, foretelling the end of a business that his father — who, at the age of 84, still serves breakfast to the crew — founded in 1946. But Munsell has no regrets. What haunts him is not his decision to go public, he says, but the fact that he almost decided to stay quiet, just to protect his own livelihood. “You know what it comes down to?” says the third-generation meatpacker, his steady composure beginning to crack. “My grandkids. The USDA could care less about the health of my grandkids.”

John wasn’t the only one who saw a problem. The Government Accountability Project has a good paper on the subject Shielding the Giant: USDA’s “Don’t Look, Don’t Know” Policy

Hoser
September 4, 2013 12:57 pm

Bureaucratic Orwellian Resource Godfathers
Blatant Oppression Restrictive Government
Boundless Opportunists Rapacious Geophiles

Gail Combs
September 4, 2013 1:31 pm

Rob Crawford says: September 4, 2013 at 12:04 pm
…Oh, it’s eminently believable…. there’s a bill in Congress now that would require every farm that sells $5,000 or more in produce to submit their goods to the FDA for certification. A back-of-the-envelope calculation tells me that’s the production of about an acre of apple trees.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As Doreen so nicely put it LET THEM EAT GRASS!
I am afraid that is probably the best method of dealing with the problem. Sit on the land but do not use it for producing food.
Perhaps US farmers should consider either biofuel or carbon offsets instead of food.

An assessment of forest landowner interest in selling forest carbon credits in the Lake States, USA
Abstract
The nation’s family forest lands can be an important contributor to carbon sequestration efforts. Yet very little is known about how family forest landowners view programs that enable them to sell carbon credits generated from the growth of their forest and the compensation that would be required to encourage a meaningful level of participation. To address this information gap, we conducted a study to identify and quantify family forest landowner interest ….Specifically, carbon credit payment amount, contract length, gender, value placed on other non-market forest amenities, need for additional income, attitude towards climate change, absentee status, land tenure and total acres owned were found to be significant determinants. Our findings indicate that carbon sequestration management may align with the ownership goals of many family forest owners in the Lake States.

Is there any other information out there? I look to California.

…How do offsets work and where do urban forests fit in?
If an entity is emitting more than their allowed amounts of GHG, they have the option to buy a certain amount of offset credits issued through approved sources. In California’s case, these projects are approved under The Climate Action Reserve. Urban forest projects all over the country can apply under the Climate Action Reserve’s Urban Forest Project Protocol to receive offset credits that they can then sell to firms in California that are emitting more than their allowed amounts of GHGs…..
https://www.americanforests.org/blog/a-carbon-market-primer/

How ever the link in the article goes no where. As another article at the same website says…
June 27th, 2013 Urban Forests & Carbon Markets “Cashing-in” on urban forestry projects by selling credits for carbon stored in growing trees has been elusive. Several urban forest organizations have developed voluntary carbon market projects, while the City of Santa Monica’s 1,000 tree planting project is the only one in the compliance-based market….
Why am I not surprised that there is no way a family farmer can get into the Carbon offset market?

September 4, 2013 1:57 pm

Svalgaard and Mosher: 5th column.

Andyj
September 4, 2013 1:59 pm

In 1938 the worlds richest man said “Own nothing, control everything”. Corporations & Gov’ts use this to “own” the people and what is theirs.
No wonder Australia is seen burning away on the satellite photos taken at night. Did they invite the Borg before encircling them with red hot death?

Pathway
September 4, 2013 2:04 pm

Man the pitch forks. Full steam ahead.

Just Steve
September 4, 2013 2:20 pm

This article perfectly illustrates the maxim that without personal property rights, all other rights are academic.

Auto
September 4, 2013 3:00 pm

Rob Crawford says:
September 4, 2013 at 12:04 pm
“Just to clarify for those who may be in any doubt, all of the stories I tell here about the sinister operations of the Natural Resources Management Borg are true.”
Oh, it’s eminently believable. There was a story here in the US of a woman who was hosting a “farm to field” dinner for business clients, to have “health inspectors” sweep in and demand receipts for produce from her own land. They declared some of the food to be “unfit for consumption”, then when she asked if she could use it to slop her hogs, they poured bleach over it.
And there’s a bill in Congress now that would require every farm that sells $5,000 or more in produce to submit their goods to the FDA for certification. A back-of-the-envelope calculation tells me that’s the production of about an acre of apple trees.
==========
I suggest several farms – each with about 0,8 acre.
AUTO

Antonia
September 4, 2013 3:31 pm

Paul Maeder , In my copy it was called, “The Scouring of the Shire”, – a much better verb. You need plenty of elbow grease to scour.

Gail Combs
September 4, 2013 3:47 pm

Just Steve says: September 4, 2013 at 2:20 pm
This article perfectly illustrates the maxim that without personal property rights, all other rights are academic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That is in a nutshell what Agenda 21 is all about.
If you can not OWN property you ARE property.
The Ag Corporations came up with Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) or Livestock Confinement Operations. Now the corporations/elite have come up with Concentrated Human Work Operations with the euphemistic name of Transit Villages used to hide the fact that they are nothing more than an updated version of medieval feudal estates. We, the ‘Free-Range Serfs’ are about to have our wings clipped. No Energy = No Transportation = Confinement.
There is a darn good reason Livestock Confinement Operations de-beak poultry, de-horn cattle, dock the tails of pigs and shoot the animals full of antibiotics or feed them antibiotic laced feed. Overcrowding causes illness, stress and fights.
I wish like heck I was a deranged Conspiracy-nut but the news all over the internet says otherwise.
Tips for Selling the ‘Urban’ Experience to Suburbanites: Many of us involved in the creation or advocacy of “sustainable” cities, neighborhoods and metro regions know what we’re mostly for….

HUD.GOV U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Secretary Shaun Donovan
The mission of the Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities is to create strong, sustainable communities by connecting housing to jobs, fostering local innovation, and helping to build a clean energy economy…
The objective of the Sustainable Communities Initiative is to stimulate more integrated and sophisticated regional planning to guide state, metropolitan, and local investments in land use, transportation and housing, as well as to challenge localities to undertake zoning and land use reforms. This Initiative has four main tasks.
http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/sustainable_housing_communities

National Multi Housing Council

Apartments are the core of any sustainability strategy. They are more resource- and energy-efficient than other types of residential development because their concentrated infrastructure conserves materials and community services. As part of an infill or mixed-use development, apartments create communities where people live, work, and play with less dependence on cars. This reduces the consumption of fossil fuels and their carbon emissions.
Through the NMHC Sustainability Committee, the Council is advancing industry best practices; working with lawmakers to adopt voluntary and incentive-based energy policy; and developing and promoting standards to help firms market their sustainability quotient…. http://www.nmhc.org/Content/LandingPage.cfm?NavID=249

…The U.S. is on the cusp of fundamental change in our housing dynamics as changing demographics and housing preferences drive more people away from the typical suburban house. According to Professor Arthur C. Nelson, Presidential Professor and Director of Metropolitan Research at the University of Utah’s College of Architecture and Planning, to meet emerging housing demands, between now and 2020, half of all new homes built will have to be rental units…. http://www.nmhc.org/Content/LandingPage.cfm?NavID=2

Sustainability in Action
Wall Street Journal: California Declares War on Suburbia: Planners want to herd millions into densely packed urban Corriders. It won’t save the planted but it will make traffic even worse.

Metropolitan area governments are adopting plans that would require most new housing to be built at 20 or more to the acre, which is at least five times the traditional quarter acre per house. State and regional planners also seek to radically restructure urban areas, forcing much of the new hyperdensity development into narrowly confined corridors.

California’s Private Property War
The ‘micro-unit’ mini-apartment building is coming to New York
San Francisco considers allowing nation’s tiniest micro-apartments 220 square feet (That is less than a 15X15 ft motel room)

Ed, 'Mr' Jones
September 4, 2013 4:26 pm

Jdallen says:
September 4, 2013 at 12:21 am
“Hmmm. Judging from this article, Australia is still a net food exporter, by a large margin, and that rather than the ‘Borg’, much of farmers difficulties can be tied directly back to multinationals who are off-shoring labor to increase margins.”
I’ll skip the entirely appropriate Ad Homs and point out that this is what happens when one is regulated into non-competitive (read ‘artificially less capable’) status.. You demonstrate that emotionalism is your compass, and Logic a quaint, dimly understood abstract concept.
“Multinationals” are vastly more competent at producing things, Bureaucrats vastly more competent at destroying things.

Just Steve
September 4, 2013 5:11 pm

There is nothing more anti free market than a large corporation. See: lobbyists. And that isn’t a liberal position, rather a libertarian one.

September 4, 2013 6:33 pm

The statists are everywhere:

You are here
Gold miners near Chicken cry foul over ‘heavy-handed’ EPA raids

When agents with the Alaska Environmental Crimes Task Force surged out of the wilderness around the remote community of Chicken wearing body armor and jackets emblazoned with POLICE in big, bold letters, local placer miners didn’t quit know what to think.
Did it really take eight armed men and a squad-size display of paramilitary force to check for dirty water? Some of the miners, who run small businesses, say they felt intimidated.
Others wonder if the actions of the agents put everyone at risk. When your family business involves collecting gold far from nowhere, unusual behavior can be taken as a sign someone might be trying to stage a robbery. How is a remote placer miner to know the people in the jackets saying POLICE really are police?
Miners suggest it might have been better all around if officials had just shown up at the door — as they used to do — and said they wanted to check the water. . .

More here:
http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/20130903/gold-miners-near-chicken-cry-foul-over-heavy-handed-epa-raids
Thanks to Drudge for this latest example of EPA thuggery. Time to elect conservatives who will put the kibosh on these eco-Borgocracies! And join Mark Levin in the program outlined in his new book, The Liberty Amendments. It may be our last chance to stop the bureaucratic monster leviathan the 20th century has bequeathed us.
/Mr Lynn
PS What happened to the handy Preview option? Seems to have disappeared.

Jason Calley
September 4, 2013 8:08 pm

There is an easy way for Australians to understand why the greenies and regulators do what they do. If you are an Australian, stop using the phrase “OUR government.” The proper phrase is “THE government” or even more accurately, “the Australian Occupational Government.”
If the government does not put YOUR welfare foremost, then they are not YOUR government.

KenB
September 4, 2013 8:14 pm

Patrick says:
September 4, 2013 at 6:12 am
Maybe. However, none of them are in a position of influence unlike Karoly and Flannery et al.
Patrick, Karoly and Flannery are the puppets of power, the Borgmasters choice to sprout bulls**t and propaganda, the non experts granted “expert” status to sell lies, misinformation and of course handsomely rewarded with Australian taxpayers money, and the worst example of what is wrong in Australia today.
We have too many borg departments with too many would be, could be urban borgs comfortably feeding at the taxpayers trough and working on new ways to exploit their fellow citizens, country people are regarded by them as rubes and rednecks, to invoke American terms and the subject of much laughter, story telling in their comfortable air conditioned city headquarters as to how they fixed up/fitted the good honest farmers that were once valued for the productivity and work ethic in building the backbone of a once strong economy buoyed by the export of farm products throughout the world.
Borgs love to destroy and mock tradition, honesty and the Australian traditional values, including a fair go for all. They have an urban deathlock on education and what was naively once described as public service to our country.

climateace
September 4, 2013 10:44 pm

Good to see that an Aussie farmer has got the right name for Lord Moncton. After all, what do bulls do?
Here are a few things that Monckton either forgot to tell you or got completely wrong.
Agriculture at the farm gate represents around 3% of Australia’s GDP. It is many decades since Australia was evenly remotely ‘riding on the sheep’s back’. Most of Australia is desert, semi-desert and fairly erratically-watered rangelands. After Antartica, we are the driest continent in the world. Our soils are amongst the oldest in the world, and are also amongst the most fragile. Most of our soils are nutrient-poor, and so poorly structured that they fall to pieces under very little agricultural strain and are then gone with the wind. One of Australia’s great gifts to other countries has been the development of exceptionally good skills at farming ultra-dry farmlands with minimal soil loss.
Much of South Australia’s water comes from interstate from the Murray Darling Basin. South Australians generally, and South Australian farmers in particular, reckon that their country cousins upstream must have been pilfering water by various means because not a hell of a lot of it gets to South Australia any more, and what there is of it is getting saltier and saltier. And what with increased population in the Basin, by the time it gets to South Australia it has been through more cows and more people than ever before. Fortunately for the South Australians there are some water quality borgs upriver who maintain water regulations, inspections, quality standards, and fines. Bad borgs – right?
Still, maybe they need some more alert and active borgs to stop all that upstream water thieving, hey? Whoops. Forgot. Moncton’s farmers good. Borgs bad.
Here are some good reasons why most Australian farmers are worried about what agriculture has done and/or is doing to the environment:
(1) irrigation salinity and dryland salinity
(2) over-allocation of freshwater
(3) erosion
(4) soil acidity
(5) siltation of rivers
(6) massive national introduced weeds problem
(7) tens of millions of feral animals.
The discerning reader will get it that in each and every case the environmental problem costs farmers lost production and increased costs. In many cases the environmental problem has got so bad that it has driven farmers off their land altogether.
Fortunately, the smarter farmers, which is the overwhelming majority of us (just a few beefies, but hey), get it, and have been working through peak farming bodies and through great innovations like Landcare, with both left and right governments (aka borgs in Monckton’s ridiculous article) for some decades, to address these systemic issues properly. Excellent progress has been made in some areas – particularly in relation to irrigation salinity, for example. Some areas are a work in progress. Some areas have hardly begun.
There is a reasonable view that in some areas government cut backs (which means less borgs) have damaged the interests of farmers. There used to be hundreds of farm extension officers who worked directly with farmers to, for example, carry out soil erosion conservation works using part-farmer and part-government funding. These borgs have largely gone, more’s the pity. I have had a farmer tell me that recent cutbacks in anti-fruit fly activities by the government had resulted in large scale fruit fly infestations in one of Australia’s premier fruit irrigation areas. For government ‘activity’ read borgs, regulations, inspections and fines. Bad, right? In Monckton’s lunatic view, ever borg is bad borg and every farmer is a good farmer.
Do we sometimes get over-officious officials? Hell, yes. Do we sometimes get irresponsible famers? Hell, yes.
OTOH, we already have enough exotic feral animals in Australia without foreign smartarses like Monckton hooning around, muddying the waters, generally demonstrating their ignorance, and confusing the issues.

September 4, 2013 11:51 pm

This is a great post by Lord Monckton. Those who doubt the veracity of the stories of Borg repression in Victoria and South Australia (home of the Australian Greens Party) can rest assured that there are similar and worse to come out of NSW and Queensland, and Tasmania too. Fingers are crossed in the rural community for the forthcoming election in the hope that an incoming Liberal government will sweep away the Green-madness that has threatened the Primary production sector.

September 4, 2013 11:58 pm

Conservatives make no sense Mr. Lynn and I’ll provide you a prime example: abortion… If it weren’t so disgusting, it would be amusing how these people want government “off our backs” when it comes to business and financial regulation, yet insist on climbing into bed with us to enforce their version of morality.
The GOP care most about staying in power, protecting their wealth and that of their shareholders/ rich contributors.
Not wages for the working poor. Raise the minimum wage to keep pace with inflation and much of the economic reason for abortion will disappear. When Republican big businessmen pony up and pay fair wages so working parents can survive, there will be much more incentive to keep the baby. Don’t tell us about the sanctity of life and then abandon the baby and mother and leave them to fend for themselves.

Brian H
September 5, 2013 12:01 am

Steve B says:
September 4, 2013 at 12:31 am
Looks like we need to send in the Daleks. Borg V Daleks sounds good to me.

“Assumilate” vs. “Exterminate”! Should be an entertaining contest.

James Bull
September 5, 2013 12:02 am

Another great read from his Lordship.
A few years ago an aunt of mine sent us a postcard she found on holiday in Scotland, it was a picture of a gate to a field in which the farmer kept his bull it said “Free entry BULL will charge”.
It sounds like the Borg are finding Lord Monckton can charge as well!
James Bull

Brian H
September 5, 2013 12:07 am

mods, typo: Assimilate not Assumilate
I even previewed! (Using the CA Assistant Greasemonkey script).

climateace
September 5, 2013 12:24 am

BTW, I am not sure how it works in the US but in the Australian outback, to ‘bullsh*t’ means to sort of not tell the truth, stretch the truth, exaggerate, to carry on like a pork chop, that sort of thing. You get the general picture The farmer who named a bull after Lord Monckton was either having a lend of the bull or a lend of Lord Monckton. Take your pick.