Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
Well, the leaders of the carbophobes in British Columbia are already declaring victory for their carbon-based energy tax as a way to reduce CO2 emissions. They highlight as a main indication of success the reduction in per-capita gasoline use, and my research shows that their numbers are right. Here’s a quote from one of the main tax cheerleaders, the head of a group of no-doubt well-meaning and dedicated rent-seekers called “Sustainable Prosperity”, on the subject (emphasis mine):
Since 2008, per capita gasoline use in BC has declined by 7.3% more than in the rest of Canada (Table 4) – a substantial difference. Gasoline use in BC was already declining faster than in the rest of Canada from 2000-2007 (see Figure 4).
Well, that’s pretty amazing, not only has “gasoline use in BC” leveled off, it’s been declining. You expect the clouds to part and celestial trumpets to ring out for those kinds of results.
… And for those folks like myself who are reluctant to believe in miracles, for those unabashed cynics who wonder how BC is making such deep cuts in gasoline use, consider Figure 1.
Figure 1. Changes in the number of one-day return trips to the US from British Columbia, by automobile (blue) and by other means of transportation (red). BC’s carbon-based energy tax went into effect on July 1, 2008. DATA SOURCE: Statistics Canada
The energy tax promoters have almost dislocated their shoulders patting themselves on the back for this momentous drop in gasoline use, as in the quotation above … and meanwhile, fuel suppliers in Alberta are laughing all the way to the bank from sales to BC customers, and lines at US gas stations in border towns are backed up with cars bearing BC license plates …
So what does Figure 1 show? Noble Canadian consumers are buying ever-increasing amounts of gasoline in the US of A, because there’s no carbon tax in Washington State. Patriotism at its finest. And you see how trips by bus and foot and train dropped when the automobile trips increased? So many folks are going from Canada to the US in automobiles that they’re taking their friends with them, plus folks who used to take the bus (or walk) across the border are now taking cars in order to bring back gas. It’s worth it to drive now, because you can bring back a tank full of gasoline with no energy tax.
And how much effect is this entirely predictable human behavior having on the miraculous reduction in BC gas usage? Well, therein lies a tale.
To start with, not only are more BC folks filling their tanks in the US of A, the Evil Carbon Empire, but even without that, BC motor gasoline use is right back up to where it was before the tax …
Figure 2. Changes in total BC gasoline sales for highway use (motor gasoline). Blue line shows the trend from 1993-2007, extended out to 2014. Red line shows the actual data.
So the first oddity is that it turns out that BC gasoline use is rising and has been since 1993, the first year in the record … and that means that per-capita gasoline use is only falling because of increased population. There’s been no decrease in total gasoline use, quite the opposite, it’s been increasing steadily. And since the current climate paradigm is that temperature is a function of total CO2 emissions, not per-capita CO2 emissions, that means that the theorized CO2 warming from BC gasoline emissions is still going up. Dang … guess that estimate of three thousands of a degree of cooling from their actions might have been optimistic …
Emissions from BC motor gasoline have been rising steadily since as far back as Statistics Canada has numbers, 1993, right up to 2007 … which brings me to the second oddity. This is that the tax hasn’t impacted total BC motor gasoline sales in the slightest—they’re right back up the pre-tax trend line. To be sure, during that time the population went up more than the fuel sales … but that’s immaterial regarding total emissions, and if you believe the IPCC, total emissions are all that counts.
But wait … it’s worse. Those are the official Statistics Canada figures. That doesn’t include the gas bought in the US. How much gas is being bought? Here’s one estimate:
Leaving aside trips in excess of two nights for now, we estimate that, in 2012, same-day crossings and overnight U.S. trips of two days or less together amounted to spending by B.C. residents of $1.0 billion to $1.6 billion. This estimate is based on the assumption that almost all (95 per cent) same-day and overnight vehicle crossings involve the purchase of gas, and that the average gasoline purchase was CN$70 last year.
At seventy litres per trip, and with a post-tax increase of about 4 million automobiles going to the US and returning to BC , that adds up to around 70 million gallons of fuel bought in the USA. So that’s one estimate. Now, compare this with the total drop in the BC sales of fuel …
As with total retail spending, per capita sales at B.C. gas stations have gone from exceeding the national average to being well below it within a couple of years. While the carbon tax and Translink-related fuel levies may have prompted some B.C. vehicle owners to drive less, the steep increase in cross-border trips and shopping leads us to conclude that a good portion of the reduction in gasoline sales in the lower mainland especially reflects rising cross-border gas purchases rather than meaningful underlying changes in consumer behaviour. Per capita gas sales in B.C. are now $90 below the Canadian level. As recently as 2009 they were $95 above the Canada-wide average.
How much difference does this make to the BC figures? Well, a change in the BC purchases of gasoline of $185 per capita comes to 180 million gallons. The US purchases account for a good chunk of that. Plus, of course, we have to include millions of gallons bought in Alberta for use in BC, although I can’t find figures on that. As a commenter on my previous thread said,
Add me to the list. I buy enough fuel at the Alberta border with BC to get me to my BC destination. Then if I am near the US border like at Grand Forks, I slip across the border like everyone else and fill up for the return trip. The US Danville station there is just a few hundred metres across the border.
So let me take as a rough estimate a hundred million gallons of gas transported into BC from the US and Alberta. Given that, here’s the net result:
Figure 3. Highway gasoline sales in BC, plus purchases made in the USA.
As you can see, the net effect of the BC energy tax on highway gasoline sales has been a fairly significant rise in CO2 emissions … heck of a plan they’ve got there. Note also that as far as I know they don’t account for the “leakage” of gasoline over the border when making their overblown claims about CO2 reduction … surprising, I know.
So for those claiming that BC is a shining example that we should all follow? Sorry, but the claim has always been that we need to reduce total emissions, and regarding the CO2 emissions of motor gasoline in British Columbia, they’re increasing, not going down. Never get to three-thousands of a degree of cooling that way, no sirree.
w.
NOTE: This is one of a four-part series on the BC carbon-based energy tax. The parts are:
British Columbia, British Utopia
Fuel on the Highway in British Pre-Columbia
Why Revenue Neutral Isn’t, and Other Costs of the BC Tax
My USA should charge about $0.50/gallon for military expense of imported oil, and the fed highway tax should increase to match inflation, to fix crumbling infrastructure, hasn’t increased in 20 years: “Since 1993, the U.S. federal gasoline tax has been 18.4¢/gal (4.86¢/L).”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_taxes_in_the_United_States
Sorry to contradict Willis’ excellent analysis, but the BC carbon tax is 100% effective. The only purpose of a tax is for the government to steal your money.
Looks like the market works, I just wonder what it makes with the canadian revenue figures.
Last year when Crispy Clark came round looking for votes here in SE BC my wife ask her “why have a carbon tax when hurts the economy and unfairly taxes rural BC for going to work. Clark answered “It’s simple, this money goes to general revenue and we can’t do without it.” Kindof a catch 22 because a lot of that money is now going to the states.Oops!
It seems everyone has forgotten that provincial income tax rates were reduced when the carbon tax was imposed. For almost everybody, and the government too, the trade of one for the other is close to a wash.
Thanks, Willis.
“heck of a plan they’ve got there”. Any planning against the market’s natural forces requires real communist forcing to implant. And these plans always hurt the people, starting with the poorest.
Odd Man Out says:
July 14, 2013 at 2:46 pm
It seems everyone has forgotten that provincial income tax rates were reduced when the carbon tax was imposed. For almost everybody, and the government too, the trade of one for the other is close to a wash.
————————————————————–
The glaring exception to “almost everybody” is those who pay little or no income tax, i.e. the poor. They can’t, however, avoid paying the extras that are tacked on to the cost of almost everything because of a CO2 tax.
Also, as posters have noted, the locals are now spending their money over the border (and not just on fuel) which adversely affects local business and – shock, horror – local tax revenue. I bet the provincial government would ban cross-border shopping if they could.
This sort of increase in tax would work in New Zealand. Not as if we can drive to Australia to get cheaper fuel!
Shows Green Canadians are as thick as Greens elsewhere though.
Odd Man Out says:
July 14, 2013 at 2:46 pm
To start with, the tax is not a wash, because it attracts Federal GST, and so you have to pay taxes on the taxes, and you never get that back.
It’s also not a wash, because the people doing the spending are not the people getting the refunds.
It’s not a wash because even if the right people get the money, they don’t get money back in proportion to what they spent.
It’s not a wash because millions and millions of people are going across the border, buying untaxed energy, and then receiving refunds on what they haven’t spent.
It’s not a wash because (as I pointed out elsewhere), when I was 17 I was living on my own and working at a job … and if I’d done that in BC, I’d have been paying energy tax and not getting a damn cent back. So despite paying the tax like everyone else, you can’t get money back until you’re 19 … go figure.
It’s not a wash because of the expenses of the government in administering and overseeing the taxes are paid out of your pocket.
It’s not a wash because the suckers in BC will be paying pensions for the pluted bloatocrats for decades … and the energy tax doesn’t even cover their present costs, much less their future costs.
So no, it’s nowhere near “close to a wash”, that’s close to hogwash … I’m writing a post on this topic, and I hope it’s my last, I want to get back to real science.
w.
Thank you Willis!
Thanks for your time and effort Willis. Appreciated!
All Canadians know that when you visit BC it means “bring cash”.
I drove Calgary to Spokane and back this week. Filled in Alberta, traversed BC. On the way back, filled Idaho, traversed BC. AB CAD$1.2 / litre. BC CAD$1.38 / litre. Idaho USD$3.65 / US gal (about CAD$1.02 / litre). Why did I not buy in BC?
Here’s another factor: Look at your exchange rate vs trip graph—- the first blip of increase was indeed part of a shopping frenzy brought on by the 1:1 exchange rate. Problem was, there were two hour waits at the boarder, so that increase was unsustainable (and, might I add, left lots of vehicles idle, cranking out extra CO2).
The busiest crossing by far is the Peace Arch on I-5. It was expanded from three lanes to ten, making it practical for far greater traffic flow when the CAD bounced back to parity. That helped the blade of your graph to grow and grow.
Combine that with the fact that it is not just gas which is cheaper:
“Peacock compared prices on 19 commonly found household items such as crackers, batteries and cereal, and found double-digit price differentials on 16 of them. The highest price disparity was on diary and eggs, with average milk prices nearly 42-per-cent lower in the U.S., butter retailing for 17-per-cent less and eggs nearly 38-per-cent less. The biggest difference, however, was on cheese, where American prices were nearly 60 per cent below those of Canadian retailers.”
http://www.vancouversun.com/life/Cross+border+shoppers+cost+economy+billions+each+year+study/8485049/story.html
SURREY (NEWS1130) – Some major improvements to the Peace Arch border are near completion. Soon heading into the States will now be more efficient and provide better safety.
This weekend the US Border Patrol began their transition into a new high tech security building. While the move will be gradual, the Service Port for Blaine aims to tear down the old building within the week.
So what can you expect now that the buildings are switched. Mike Milne with the Port says by the time construction is done in the fall there will be up to ten lanes southbound that could be open at any given time. Currently there are only three lanes to get you into the states.
Milne also says “With the security enhancements wait times should be shorter and that the new configuration will also allow the vast majority of travellers to be able to process through more effectively and efficiently and hopefully it will lead to less waiting and more travelling.”
One of the more impressive security features includes having every lane equipped for Nexus use.
http://m.news1130.com/2010/08/02/new-security-features-should-mean-shorter-waits-at-peace-arch/
When an industry leaves BC or decides not to locate in BC because of the carbon tax
scam is that “Revenue Neutral” ? The BC Liberals new from the beginning that if no
other competing Provinces or States but in a carbon tax the result was damaging to
BC . What is now revealing after five years is they are hooked on the cash and the
appropriate people have been bought .
Doug mentions Nexus…
For those who don’t know, a Nexus Pass essentially provides pre-screening for border crossing, in most cases completely eliminating the need to even stop at the border.
http://getnexus.com/
They are still claiming it: “B.C. carbon tax cut fuel use, didn’t hurt economy”
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2013/07/23/bc-carbon-sustainable-prosperity-premiers.html
Typical reader comment: It may not have hurt the economy, but it does hurt individuals.
“WaPo’s Incomplete Coverage of British Columbia’s Carbon Tax”
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/07/wapos_incomplete_coverage_of_british_columbias_carbon_tax.html
Thanks, Toto. That’s an interesting report. I note that they didn’t address all the money flowing over the border …
w.